The Australia First Party supports the rally, to be held at Parliament House Canberra on May 11, against free trade in beef-against import of Mad Cow Disease infected meat products into Australia!
Many groups and people are building this protest. Supporters include: the Australian Beef Association, a Hunter/ New England Abattoir, "the Support Aussie Farmers Say No To Imported Beef" Facebook site ( creator: Donna Morrison ), Vida Thomson, a Canberra Activist, Gabby Hughes a Wagga Wagga activist, various farmers and graziers from country Victoria, NSW and Queensland, the Australia First Party, the Australian Long Distance Owners ` and Drivers` Association and many independent people.
Messrs Brad Bellinger and John Carter from the Australian Beef Association, will be speaking at the protest, along with J.R Mc Donald from a Hunter/ New England Abattoir. There may be other speakers.
May 11 is Budget Day and a substancial media presence is expected.
This is a rally that will not be hijacked by the usual Liberal/ National Party game-players who offer a few platitudes to the crowd. It is an independent demonstration of people concerned at the free trade policies that are supported by the major parties.
Assemble: 11th May at 9am Meet at Magna Carta Place in the Parliamentary Triangle.
FREE TRADE CAN KILL YOU! SAY NO TO IMPORTED BEEF!
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
MAD COW MEAT: You Could Be Eating It, If You Don't Protest! We Refuse To Poison Ourselves!
Don't be fooled by a government promise that it will investigate whether BSE affected meat could ever turn up in Australia. BSE is better known as Mad Cow Disease. And it kills people.
It's probably already here. And it can beat the quarantine tests that are going to be done now-and in the future.
There's only one way to be sure: don't allow beef and beef products to come into Australia from any country that has had an outbreak of Mad Cow Disease!
CLASS WAR ON THE CATTLE STATIONS: WHAT THEY SAID A FEW WEEKS AGO: FREE TRADE CUCKOO POLITICS GRIPS VERY RICH CATTLEMEN!
The biggest producers of beef in Australia want free trade so they can keep their export market. That means they don't mind if foreign beef enters our market. If foreigners can do that, then they won't keep our beef out of their countries. Crazy stuff. The Cattle Council said last week:
"The old Bse policy was not consistent with international rules. Under the previous rule banning sale of beef from countries that have had a case of BSE, if Australia were to be affected by an unlikely single case of BSE the results would be devastating for the sector and the economy. All beef could be removed from all domestic shelves at enormous expense, crippling the industry, and foreign markets could reciprocate by locking us out without scientific justification. Cattle Council found this arrangement totally unacceptable. These export markets were at serious risk if we did not change our BSE policy and we ever got a trade disruptive disease. Our markets could have shut us out and we would have no retaliation."
Why allow imported beef anyway ? The amount allowed in will grow over time. It will destroy smaller Aussie producers. But that won't worry the biggest cattlemen because they produce for export. Simple! Free trade can kill you and it will destroy thousands of Aussie graziers and farmers on the way. It will undermine regional cities and towns and destroy thousands of jobs! If regional Australia falls apart and people die from contaminated beef -that's a high price for free trade!
FREE TRADE CAN KILL YOU! SAY NO TO IMPORTED BEEF!
Join the Facebook site: SUPPORT AUSSIE FARMERS SAY NO TO IMPORTED BEEF!!! ( 20,500 members and growing )
It's probably already here. And it can beat the quarantine tests that are going to be done now-and in the future.
There's only one way to be sure: don't allow beef and beef products to come into Australia from any country that has had an outbreak of Mad Cow Disease!
CLASS WAR ON THE CATTLE STATIONS: WHAT THEY SAID A FEW WEEKS AGO: FREE TRADE CUCKOO POLITICS GRIPS VERY RICH CATTLEMEN!
The biggest producers of beef in Australia want free trade so they can keep their export market. That means they don't mind if foreign beef enters our market. If foreigners can do that, then they won't keep our beef out of their countries. Crazy stuff. The Cattle Council said last week:
"The old Bse policy was not consistent with international rules. Under the previous rule banning sale of beef from countries that have had a case of BSE, if Australia were to be affected by an unlikely single case of BSE the results would be devastating for the sector and the economy. All beef could be removed from all domestic shelves at enormous expense, crippling the industry, and foreign markets could reciprocate by locking us out without scientific justification. Cattle Council found this arrangement totally unacceptable. These export markets were at serious risk if we did not change our BSE policy and we ever got a trade disruptive disease. Our markets could have shut us out and we would have no retaliation."
Why allow imported beef anyway ? The amount allowed in will grow over time. It will destroy smaller Aussie producers. But that won't worry the biggest cattlemen because they produce for export. Simple! Free trade can kill you and it will destroy thousands of Aussie graziers and farmers on the way. It will undermine regional cities and towns and destroy thousands of jobs! If regional Australia falls apart and people die from contaminated beef -that's a high price for free trade!
FREE TRADE CAN KILL YOU! SAY NO TO IMPORTED BEEF!
Join the Facebook site: SUPPORT AUSSIE FARMERS SAY NO TO IMPORTED BEEF!!! ( 20,500 members and growing )
A Dose Of Reality!
Ray Goodlass's response ( Daily Advertiser 29.3.10 ), to the concerns raised by Rhonda Palmer ( Daily Advertiser 24.3.10 ) can only be described as extreme leftist cuckoo politics!
Firstly, Mr. Goodlass has continually encouraged the public to view the Green's website and policies; but it appears when people do just that and fail to agree with the stated policies, they are stridently attacked by Mr. Goodlass-and immediately labelled "right wing radicals" etc. So much for the new Greens` candidate Mr. Fletcher's assertion that the Labor Party are un-democratic in their views/policies!
Secondly, he failed to correlate the link between the Greens` approval of second trimester abortions ( murder ) and pro-euthanasia ( bumping off the infirm ) as a policy for social justice? Rather, it's a vaudiville attempt at playing God himself.
Thirdly, we note the dangers to public safety in the Greens` policy to do away with sniffer dogs, ( which provide an invaluable and necessary service regarding detecting explosives carried by would be terrorists and drugs set to poison our youth ). The sniffer dogs perform a cruical service at our ports and airports helping control the importation of drugs into the country and so on. Mr. Goodlass's concerns that the sniffer dogs are threatening when let loose in clubs and bars is absurd; next he will be asserting guide dogs are threatening when coming towards you in the street. What is of concern and threatening is if the Greens` policies were to be let loose to threaten Australia!
Fourthly, we wonder how Mr. Goodlass's recent allies on the open border for refugees policy ( Dr. Short, OAM Richter and others ) feel about the Greens` recent attempts to have prayer removed from Parliament and replaced with "reflection time" ? Who needs "right wing" media telling so-called untruths about the Greens to discredit them, when they are doing a sterling job of that themselves!?
Finally, in Mr. Goodlass's response we note a one line after thought to his epic response, as if it had almost slipped his mind that the Greens espouse humane treatment of animals. Well, don't we all.
We see nothing on environmental issues in Mr. Goodlass's statements, only a scathing attack on a concerned contributor, Ms. Palmer, who dared to view the Green's website and policies as encouraged by Mr. Goodlass himself!
Firstly, Mr. Goodlass has continually encouraged the public to view the Green's website and policies; but it appears when people do just that and fail to agree with the stated policies, they are stridently attacked by Mr. Goodlass-and immediately labelled "right wing radicals" etc. So much for the new Greens` candidate Mr. Fletcher's assertion that the Labor Party are un-democratic in their views/policies!
Secondly, he failed to correlate the link between the Greens` approval of second trimester abortions ( murder ) and pro-euthanasia ( bumping off the infirm ) as a policy for social justice? Rather, it's a vaudiville attempt at playing God himself.
Thirdly, we note the dangers to public safety in the Greens` policy to do away with sniffer dogs, ( which provide an invaluable and necessary service regarding detecting explosives carried by would be terrorists and drugs set to poison our youth ). The sniffer dogs perform a cruical service at our ports and airports helping control the importation of drugs into the country and so on. Mr. Goodlass's concerns that the sniffer dogs are threatening when let loose in clubs and bars is absurd; next he will be asserting guide dogs are threatening when coming towards you in the street. What is of concern and threatening is if the Greens` policies were to be let loose to threaten Australia!
Fourthly, we wonder how Mr. Goodlass's recent allies on the open border for refugees policy ( Dr. Short, OAM Richter and others ) feel about the Greens` recent attempts to have prayer removed from Parliament and replaced with "reflection time" ? Who needs "right wing" media telling so-called untruths about the Greens to discredit them, when they are doing a sterling job of that themselves!?
Finally, in Mr. Goodlass's response we note a one line after thought to his epic response, as if it had almost slipped his mind that the Greens espouse humane treatment of animals. Well, don't we all.
We see nothing on environmental issues in Mr. Goodlass's statements, only a scathing attack on a concerned contributor, Ms. Palmer, who dared to view the Green's website and policies as encouraged by Mr. Goodlass himself!
Thursday, March 25, 2010
One Nation Vote In South Australia Cuts In Half : Another Proof Of The Failure Of Mainstreaming.
The South Australian election has, in some ways sadly of course, validated the stand taken by Australia First Party against any idea of "mainstreaming" the patriotic movement.
Our friends in the One Nation party saw their State-wide upper house vote cut in half from the last poll in 2006. In 2006, the One Nation party polled 7,559 votes ( 0.8 % ). This time around it was 3,759 votes ( 0.51 % ). At one half of one per cent, the result could only be considered poor.
It is true that there are policy and political differences between Australia First and One Nation; however, at the level of presentation, One Nation set itself on the road of "mainstreaming" many years ago. Australia First has said a lot about that in the past and we make comment on parts of the mainstreaming formula:
Mainstreaming means reaching for the very people still enthralled by Establishment ideas and values-and parties. What mainstreamers usually don't get is that political change, real change, is not a product of mass electioneering with competing party "imageries" put before the public. Change cannot occur while the great mass of Australians is prepared to support the regime itself, the system itself. Grumblings about this or that government, or party boss, or erroneous state policy, do not mean a rejection of the liberal globalist society and its politics. Clearly, some 70 % of Australians most certainly support the regime because they refuse to change it and of the rest, there are varying degrees and qualities of radicalisation and ideological persuasion. The liberal globalist regime has weaknesses, but it rests on still-secure economic, social and legal ( and yes, we must also say, physical force ) props. No mainstreamer ( and yes, at this time, no nationalist! ), is going to change this at least not now.
The mainstreamer is overwhelmed by cosmetic appearance. Any person, any action, any symbol, any issue etc, who/which can be held ( by media and our political opposition ) to be non mainstream, sends him into a frenzy of denial and repudiation. Hence mainstreamers will abandon friends, maintain public facades that they may or may not believe in, confuse their associates who can no longer decide what they do actually believe, create fluffy programmes and adopt non threatening ( sic ) imagery. Our problem with this, is that it is not a clever game ( sic ) to get big support, big votes and acceptance, but a process that finally leads to the transformation of the mainstream would-be-nationalist into his exact opposite. He becomes a version of what he says he is supposedly fighting, just a nice-guy in a party with feel-good policy.
We say that mainstreaming is a recipe for political death! We have principles and we intend to convert people to them.
We know that right now the mainstream follows what is wrong with Australia. We say that we stand for Real Australia, those who have in one way or another stepped outside of the mainstream to stand up for themselves, their communities and livelihoods, with new associations and new parties. We aim to become the voice of Real Australia. Real Australia may also be divided about which way to go and who to follow, but at least-thinks for itself.
In our view, One Nation may find itself wiped out after the next Federal poll-and we do not mean that in terms of votes received. In the last Federal poll, One Nation's average was 1.82 %. Even though the climate is very favourable to a nationalist type message, it is likely that One Nation will continue its course, saying what it thinks "reasonable" people want to hear about problems for which the solution is hard and unbending.
Of course, there are nationalists inside One Nation who wish to take the path of an activist politics. Good luck to them, but we cannot escape our own logic; there is no future for them inside a mainstreamer group because there may not be time to reform it.
The mainstreaming path was repudiated by Australia First in 2007 after a small cabal of persons tried to take over the original Australia First Party ( inc ) and "mainstream" it, causing the old party real damage. However, the nationalists reconstituted the party and moved forwards. We welcome all genuine nationalists who would serve Real Australia-into the ranks of Australia First!
Our friends in the One Nation party saw their State-wide upper house vote cut in half from the last poll in 2006. In 2006, the One Nation party polled 7,559 votes ( 0.8 % ). This time around it was 3,759 votes ( 0.51 % ). At one half of one per cent, the result could only be considered poor.
It is true that there are policy and political differences between Australia First and One Nation; however, at the level of presentation, One Nation set itself on the road of "mainstreaming" many years ago. Australia First has said a lot about that in the past and we make comment on parts of the mainstreaming formula:
Mainstreaming means reaching for the very people still enthralled by Establishment ideas and values-and parties. What mainstreamers usually don't get is that political change, real change, is not a product of mass electioneering with competing party "imageries" put before the public. Change cannot occur while the great mass of Australians is prepared to support the regime itself, the system itself. Grumblings about this or that government, or party boss, or erroneous state policy, do not mean a rejection of the liberal globalist society and its politics. Clearly, some 70 % of Australians most certainly support the regime because they refuse to change it and of the rest, there are varying degrees and qualities of radicalisation and ideological persuasion. The liberal globalist regime has weaknesses, but it rests on still-secure economic, social and legal ( and yes, we must also say, physical force ) props. No mainstreamer ( and yes, at this time, no nationalist! ), is going to change this at least not now.
The mainstreamer is overwhelmed by cosmetic appearance. Any person, any action, any symbol, any issue etc, who/which can be held ( by media and our political opposition ) to be non mainstream, sends him into a frenzy of denial and repudiation. Hence mainstreamers will abandon friends, maintain public facades that they may or may not believe in, confuse their associates who can no longer decide what they do actually believe, create fluffy programmes and adopt non threatening ( sic ) imagery. Our problem with this, is that it is not a clever game ( sic ) to get big support, big votes and acceptance, but a process that finally leads to the transformation of the mainstream would-be-nationalist into his exact opposite. He becomes a version of what he says he is supposedly fighting, just a nice-guy in a party with feel-good policy.
We say that mainstreaming is a recipe for political death! We have principles and we intend to convert people to them.
We know that right now the mainstream follows what is wrong with Australia. We say that we stand for Real Australia, those who have in one way or another stepped outside of the mainstream to stand up for themselves, their communities and livelihoods, with new associations and new parties. We aim to become the voice of Real Australia. Real Australia may also be divided about which way to go and who to follow, but at least-thinks for itself.
In our view, One Nation may find itself wiped out after the next Federal poll-and we do not mean that in terms of votes received. In the last Federal poll, One Nation's average was 1.82 %. Even though the climate is very favourable to a nationalist type message, it is likely that One Nation will continue its course, saying what it thinks "reasonable" people want to hear about problems for which the solution is hard and unbending.
Of course, there are nationalists inside One Nation who wish to take the path of an activist politics. Good luck to them, but we cannot escape our own logic; there is no future for them inside a mainstreamer group because there may not be time to reform it.
The mainstreaming path was repudiated by Australia First in 2007 after a small cabal of persons tried to take over the original Australia First Party ( inc ) and "mainstream" it, causing the old party real damage. However, the nationalists reconstituted the party and moved forwards. We welcome all genuine nationalists who would serve Real Australia-into the ranks of Australia First!
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Monday, March 22, 2010
Rural Australia Needs A Thousand Ned Kelly's: Dr. J Saleam / K Sharp
Ned Kelly embodied the spirit of the downtrodden and those oppressed at the hands of the Establishment.
Today we can draw parellels, between the past and the present. Can we not realise the ongoing signifigance of the Kelly Spirit in the patriotic struggle and defence of our nation and identity?
We see today the globalists` indifference at the plight of the ordinary Australian. Did not the patriots of the past speak of the oppression at the hands of the elite?
The rural issues of the past echo in the rural struggles of today. There is the matter of survival of Australian farmers and indeed the Australian identity which our farming class so well expresses.
As the patriots of the past struggled for survival, we today struggle for our future. We fight the 2 faces of the same elite ( Lib/Lab ) and their lackeys the Greens, all with their globalist friends and their collusion that would turn Australia into one big quarry for the world ( the fate predicted for us by the World Bank ).
We note our farmers, timber mills, abattoirs, manufacturing industries and our identity are all earmarked for extinction. What was theatened in the past may certainly occur in our future.
The globalists attempt to sanitise our minds with an indoctrination by media that tells us that their deceptions are good policies. Ned Kelly's last stand was a defeat that our great union leaders and other fighters of the day turned into many victories for social justice. Today, our rural communities face their own "last stand" - but this time around, it is either win or lose. Nothing follows in the event of defeat.
Animated globalist rats have us sandwiched between the two faces of the same government-system. Indeed we see and feel the pain of our great land just as did our patriotic brothers of the past. We see clearly the perpetually moving anti Australian agendas of the day. We intend to win and fight. We recall the lines about Ned Kelly.
No man single-handed,
Can hope to break the bars.
It's a thousand like Ned Kelly,
Who'll hoist the Flag of Stars.
Today we can draw parellels, between the past and the present. Can we not realise the ongoing signifigance of the Kelly Spirit in the patriotic struggle and defence of our nation and identity?
We see today the globalists` indifference at the plight of the ordinary Australian. Did not the patriots of the past speak of the oppression at the hands of the elite?
The rural issues of the past echo in the rural struggles of today. There is the matter of survival of Australian farmers and indeed the Australian identity which our farming class so well expresses.
As the patriots of the past struggled for survival, we today struggle for our future. We fight the 2 faces of the same elite ( Lib/Lab ) and their lackeys the Greens, all with their globalist friends and their collusion that would turn Australia into one big quarry for the world ( the fate predicted for us by the World Bank ).
We note our farmers, timber mills, abattoirs, manufacturing industries and our identity are all earmarked for extinction. What was theatened in the past may certainly occur in our future.
The globalists attempt to sanitise our minds with an indoctrination by media that tells us that their deceptions are good policies. Ned Kelly's last stand was a defeat that our great union leaders and other fighters of the day turned into many victories for social justice. Today, our rural communities face their own "last stand" - but this time around, it is either win or lose. Nothing follows in the event of defeat.
Animated globalist rats have us sandwiched between the two faces of the same government-system. Indeed we see and feel the pain of our great land just as did our patriotic brothers of the past. We see clearly the perpetually moving anti Australian agendas of the day. We intend to win and fight. We recall the lines about Ned Kelly.
No man single-handed,
Can hope to break the bars.
It's a thousand like Ned Kelly,
Who'll hoist the Flag of Stars.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Australian Resources And Industries Are The Property Of The Australian People: Special Editorial.
What we are seing in Australia regarding takeover of our resources and industries, defies democracy and all reason. We cannot continue to tolerate it!
In fact, both major parties have no problem prostituting whatever may be left of Australia's resources and industries to their globalist parasitic pimp masters! We need to remind them that Australia actually belongs to the Australian people, that they are merely caretakers of our great land. But what care have they taken?
These traitors have lined their pockets and that of their cronies; meanwhile we see a different reality materialising for the Australian people!
Is it not offensive that an unacceptable situation faces Australians in our hospitals and with health care, that Third World standards are the order of the day? The traitors have no qualms about that. In all their arrogance are we somehow supposed to be grateful for this disaster that should be proclaimed a state of emergency?
Farmers and Australian workers are being brought to their knees by convenient free trade, contract labour and mining agendas.
The education stimulus rort and insulation fiasco defy belief. The astronomical electricity price hikes about to befall us are warnings.
We may end up with in excess of the already 100,000 homeless Australians ( something well beyond our already conservative statistics ).
We could say that due to the price of electricity alone, we will find ourselves dancing in the dark. Yet, ironically KRudd has kept us in the dark regarding many issues of national importance, whilst hatching plans and hidden agendas.
The list of atrocities against the people is endless and billions of dollars have been wasted!
Let's not forget the "asylum seeker" scandal. Just take note one of the hundreds of boat arrivals under the KRudd regime-and the terrorist style arrival that it was. We refer to the SIEV36 exploding boat case. Of course, the Minister for Immigration helped facilitate and rewarded their terrorism in Australian waters by wecoming the terrorists and murderers into our great land with visas.
So much for law and order and any policy on terrorism or border control! If we were to be democratic about the SIEV36 issue, we should just open the gates and pull down the walls for everyone incarcerated in our nation's jails-and set them free as well. Maybe even reward them with a Gold Mastercard to boot!
At the recent coronial inquest on the SIEV36, Coroner Greg Cavanagh found the boat explosion to have been a deliberate act by the Afghans at issue.
Council assisting the Coroner, Mr. Walsh QC, said "the asylum seekers did not tell the truth" at the inquest into the deaths/murder of five people on board the SIEV36. They were in fact all involved in a conspiracy to blow up the boat. This was obviously a deliberate act of terrorism which endangered Australian Defence Force Personnel, who were put at risk in an attempt to help these criminals!
What does the KRudd government do in the face of this blatant act of terrorism? Why, grant the murderers a permanent protection visa. What fine Australians these folk will make! Before they have even set foot on our sacred soil, they have already murdered five of their own countrymen-and who knows how many others back in Afghanistan?
This is madness! Minister Evans and Kommandant KRudd announced they had no option but to grant them a permanent visa under the Immigration laws and refugee treaty. We say this is all a lie. They were not lawfully bound to issue these terrorists with permanent visas at all.
Our old friend, Ian Rintoul from Refugee Action Coalition says they should be allowed to stay even after the coronial inquiry found them to be liars and guilty of intentionally blowing up the boat. This says a lot for the credibility of Rintoul and refugee advocates in general. They would be better imprisoned along with the criminals they advocate for. Had any other ordinary Australian citizen been involved in such crimes, or "advocated" for such criminals, he would in fact be in jail.
This whole refugee/asylum seeker business is out of control and the state KRudd and his globalist mates have reduced Australia into a state of anarchy. This is not democracy!
In fact, both major parties have no problem prostituting whatever may be left of Australia's resources and industries to their globalist parasitic pimp masters! We need to remind them that Australia actually belongs to the Australian people, that they are merely caretakers of our great land. But what care have they taken?
These traitors have lined their pockets and that of their cronies; meanwhile we see a different reality materialising for the Australian people!
Is it not offensive that an unacceptable situation faces Australians in our hospitals and with health care, that Third World standards are the order of the day? The traitors have no qualms about that. In all their arrogance are we somehow supposed to be grateful for this disaster that should be proclaimed a state of emergency?
Farmers and Australian workers are being brought to their knees by convenient free trade, contract labour and mining agendas.
The education stimulus rort and insulation fiasco defy belief. The astronomical electricity price hikes about to befall us are warnings.
We may end up with in excess of the already 100,000 homeless Australians ( something well beyond our already conservative statistics ).
We could say that due to the price of electricity alone, we will find ourselves dancing in the dark. Yet, ironically KRudd has kept us in the dark regarding many issues of national importance, whilst hatching plans and hidden agendas.
The list of atrocities against the people is endless and billions of dollars have been wasted!
Let's not forget the "asylum seeker" scandal. Just take note one of the hundreds of boat arrivals under the KRudd regime-and the terrorist style arrival that it was. We refer to the SIEV36 exploding boat case. Of course, the Minister for Immigration helped facilitate and rewarded their terrorism in Australian waters by wecoming the terrorists and murderers into our great land with visas.
So much for law and order and any policy on terrorism or border control! If we were to be democratic about the SIEV36 issue, we should just open the gates and pull down the walls for everyone incarcerated in our nation's jails-and set them free as well. Maybe even reward them with a Gold Mastercard to boot!
At the recent coronial inquest on the SIEV36, Coroner Greg Cavanagh found the boat explosion to have been a deliberate act by the Afghans at issue.
Council assisting the Coroner, Mr. Walsh QC, said "the asylum seekers did not tell the truth" at the inquest into the deaths/murder of five people on board the SIEV36. They were in fact all involved in a conspiracy to blow up the boat. This was obviously a deliberate act of terrorism which endangered Australian Defence Force Personnel, who were put at risk in an attempt to help these criminals!
What does the KRudd government do in the face of this blatant act of terrorism? Why, grant the murderers a permanent protection visa. What fine Australians these folk will make! Before they have even set foot on our sacred soil, they have already murdered five of their own countrymen-and who knows how many others back in Afghanistan?
This is madness! Minister Evans and Kommandant KRudd announced they had no option but to grant them a permanent visa under the Immigration laws and refugee treaty. We say this is all a lie. They were not lawfully bound to issue these terrorists with permanent visas at all.
Our old friend, Ian Rintoul from Refugee Action Coalition says they should be allowed to stay even after the coronial inquiry found them to be liars and guilty of intentionally blowing up the boat. This says a lot for the credibility of Rintoul and refugee advocates in general. They would be better imprisoned along with the criminals they advocate for. Had any other ordinary Australian citizen been involved in such crimes, or "advocated" for such criminals, he would in fact be in jail.
This whole refugee/asylum seeker business is out of control and the state KRudd and his globalist mates have reduced Australia into a state of anarchy. This is not democracy!
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
The Evil That Lurks Within David Fletcher Revealed!
RIVERINA GREENS CANDIDATE WILL BE PUTTY FOR NATIONALISTS.
A recent exchange of words took place between David Fletcher of the Greens ( and candidate in the next Federal poll ) and Mr. Craig Hesketh of One Nation, who has been a patriotic candidate in this region in the past. Fletcher has recently put himself forward as an opponent of Australia First, accusing us of distributing "hate" leaflets which targeted African refugees ( we deny any knowledge of them ), which oh-so conveniently turned up in his letterbox.
Fletcher supports the refugee invasion. In his statement here, he shows his loathing of any nationalist position. Mr. Hesketh holds the pro Australian position. In any election, the mad "open up the borders" rants of Mr. Fletcher would make him putty for nationalists.
New Greens ( C. Hesketh )
The Greens have launched their new candidate for the upcoming 2010 election: Mr. Fletcher. This is the David Fletcher from Forrest Hill who attacked me personally in the Daily Advertiser for asking for calm on the immigration debate that was happening between members of Australia First and supporters of immigration.
I must say after reading his emotional tirade and derogatory opinion of nationalist Australians who want to retain their culture and countries character, we are in for some fun times.
It is a sad fact that our local media likes to give people of this political persuasion and ideology a lot of attention. It seems that the more fuss is made about what the Greens are doing or what their opinions are on all matters then the sitting member Kay Hull. It is obvious that diverse left political views are also supported by editorial staff at the Daily Advertiser. This can be confirmed by reading their pro Labor party view in most editorials.
As leader of One Nation in the Riverina, I am never asked my opinion on an event or policy. Even at election time I do more chasing than answering questions on our position. I must say that I am luckier than most members of One Nation who do not even get their letters published. Don't ever believe the media will publish an accurate impartial view on any subject. They like Labor, their cronies and allies the Greens and Liberal have many vested interests to protect.
Dear One Nation Riverina: ( D. Fletcher ).
Firstly, I live in Forest Hill, not "Forrest Hill".
Secondly, perhaps Greens get a voice in the media because they are a party that is fast growing; or maybe because there are five ( soon to be seven )
Greens Senators in Federal Parliment, four ( six by March 2011 ) in the NSW Upper House and over 70 ( the sky is the limit ) in local government areas across the state. How many elected officials does One Nation ( or any other so-called nationalist group ) have?
Furthermore, perhaps One Nation should devote more time to convincing the electorate that Pauline Hanson and her politics of personal profit and racial hatred have left the party. Here's a free tip: running around claiming conspiracy does not help your cause; it makes you look like fringe lunatics ( proper spelling and grammar also helps ).
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Australians can smell a political rat, and One Nation has odour de rodent emanating from every orifice.
Regards
David Fletcher
Forest Hill.
Well it seems that Mr. Fletcher is not only smug, he is condesending. A simple mistake to put an extra 'r' in Forest Hill. Yes the Greens have bluffed voters, especially the young and naive, conning them to believe that they have something to offer in Politics. If you get past the environmental propaganda you have some very strange ideas. I am looking forward to the fight Mr. Fletcher. ( C. Hesketh ).
A recent exchange of words took place between David Fletcher of the Greens ( and candidate in the next Federal poll ) and Mr. Craig Hesketh of One Nation, who has been a patriotic candidate in this region in the past. Fletcher has recently put himself forward as an opponent of Australia First, accusing us of distributing "hate" leaflets which targeted African refugees ( we deny any knowledge of them ), which oh-so conveniently turned up in his letterbox.
Fletcher supports the refugee invasion. In his statement here, he shows his loathing of any nationalist position. Mr. Hesketh holds the pro Australian position. In any election, the mad "open up the borders" rants of Mr. Fletcher would make him putty for nationalists.
New Greens ( C. Hesketh )
The Greens have launched their new candidate for the upcoming 2010 election: Mr. Fletcher. This is the David Fletcher from Forrest Hill who attacked me personally in the Daily Advertiser for asking for calm on the immigration debate that was happening between members of Australia First and supporters of immigration.
I must say after reading his emotional tirade and derogatory opinion of nationalist Australians who want to retain their culture and countries character, we are in for some fun times.
It is a sad fact that our local media likes to give people of this political persuasion and ideology a lot of attention. It seems that the more fuss is made about what the Greens are doing or what their opinions are on all matters then the sitting member Kay Hull. It is obvious that diverse left political views are also supported by editorial staff at the Daily Advertiser. This can be confirmed by reading their pro Labor party view in most editorials.
As leader of One Nation in the Riverina, I am never asked my opinion on an event or policy. Even at election time I do more chasing than answering questions on our position. I must say that I am luckier than most members of One Nation who do not even get their letters published. Don't ever believe the media will publish an accurate impartial view on any subject. They like Labor, their cronies and allies the Greens and Liberal have many vested interests to protect.
Dear One Nation Riverina: ( D. Fletcher ).
Firstly, I live in Forest Hill, not "Forrest Hill".
Secondly, perhaps Greens get a voice in the media because they are a party that is fast growing; or maybe because there are five ( soon to be seven )
Greens Senators in Federal Parliment, four ( six by March 2011 ) in the NSW Upper House and over 70 ( the sky is the limit ) in local government areas across the state. How many elected officials does One Nation ( or any other so-called nationalist group ) have?
Furthermore, perhaps One Nation should devote more time to convincing the electorate that Pauline Hanson and her politics of personal profit and racial hatred have left the party. Here's a free tip: running around claiming conspiracy does not help your cause; it makes you look like fringe lunatics ( proper spelling and grammar also helps ).
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Australians can smell a political rat, and One Nation has odour de rodent emanating from every orifice.
Regards
David Fletcher
Forest Hill.
Well it seems that Mr. Fletcher is not only smug, he is condesending. A simple mistake to put an extra 'r' in Forest Hill. Yes the Greens have bluffed voters, especially the young and naive, conning them to believe that they have something to offer in Politics. If you get past the environmental propaganda you have some very strange ideas. I am looking forward to the fight Mr. Fletcher. ( C. Hesketh ).
The Ombudsman For Everything !
Australia First ran foul of Wagga Wagga busybody, Erwin Richter. Now, it seems it is the community that has tired of him.
We note an unsavoury common denominator regarding Mr. Richter's contributions to-and recent publicity in -the Daily Advertiser. Mr. Richter appears to want to remove the splinter from his brother's eye, before taking the log out his own. And people have seen this contradiction!
Not long ago, Mr. Richter was yelling around and nominated himself as "fuel watchdog" for the Riverina; of course, such a role is redundant.
He has brought nothing but dissension into the group which manages the Tarcutta Truckies Memorial. His meddling is something he should be ashamed of, as our truckers are Australian heroes. The site is a sacred site of Australian labour! Without our truckies, Australia would grind to a halt and so many have paid the ultimate price for their service to Australia. Mr. Richter's futher involvement and his position as Secretary of the Memorial, are now seen as liabilities by most of the Memorial Committee and truckies who know him. We think his position as Memorial Secretary should be terminated.
Mr. Richter, recently announced to Wagga that it is right to accept all and sundry into our community and boasted of his contribution to the process. He did not ask the community its wishes regarding refugees swamping the area. He rammed the agenda down our collective throat.
We should make mention that Mr. Richter has shown no interest on issues facing farmers or Australian workers; he just bangs on about refugees! His OAM should be rescinded, but in the currently politically correct climate, he will survive that demand.
Finally, the city's affair with this theatre of the absurd moved into its final phase. Mr. Richter wanted to monitor the goings-on of Council and scrutinise their every move. The Councillors are elected by the community, not puppets of the watchdog for everything and grand master puppeteer, Erwin Ritcher. If the community are not satisfied with the decisions of Council, they will have the democratic opportunity to vote them out at the next election. This last performance has publicly shown the man to be a first class second class fool. Even the local media saw through this.
In the meantime we remind Mr. Richter there is a God, but it's not you our readers or our editor-let alone, Mr. Richter. He is starting to resemble the personality of a Hitler type character, dictating to the community. Some citizens say that someone should start a watchdog group to monitor the actions of Mr. Richter and his cronies.
We note an unsavoury common denominator regarding Mr. Richter's contributions to-and recent publicity in -the Daily Advertiser. Mr. Richter appears to want to remove the splinter from his brother's eye, before taking the log out his own. And people have seen this contradiction!
Not long ago, Mr. Richter was yelling around and nominated himself as "fuel watchdog" for the Riverina; of course, such a role is redundant.
He has brought nothing but dissension into the group which manages the Tarcutta Truckies Memorial. His meddling is something he should be ashamed of, as our truckers are Australian heroes. The site is a sacred site of Australian labour! Without our truckies, Australia would grind to a halt and so many have paid the ultimate price for their service to Australia. Mr. Richter's futher involvement and his position as Secretary of the Memorial, are now seen as liabilities by most of the Memorial Committee and truckies who know him. We think his position as Memorial Secretary should be terminated.
Mr. Richter, recently announced to Wagga that it is right to accept all and sundry into our community and boasted of his contribution to the process. He did not ask the community its wishes regarding refugees swamping the area. He rammed the agenda down our collective throat.
We should make mention that Mr. Richter has shown no interest on issues facing farmers or Australian workers; he just bangs on about refugees! His OAM should be rescinded, but in the currently politically correct climate, he will survive that demand.
Finally, the city's affair with this theatre of the absurd moved into its final phase. Mr. Richter wanted to monitor the goings-on of Council and scrutinise their every move. The Councillors are elected by the community, not puppets of the watchdog for everything and grand master puppeteer, Erwin Ritcher. If the community are not satisfied with the decisions of Council, they will have the democratic opportunity to vote them out at the next election. This last performance has publicly shown the man to be a first class second class fool. Even the local media saw through this.
In the meantime we remind Mr. Richter there is a God, but it's not you our readers or our editor-let alone, Mr. Richter. He is starting to resemble the personality of a Hitler type character, dictating to the community. Some citizens say that someone should start a watchdog group to monitor the actions of Mr. Richter and his cronies.
Monday, March 8, 2010
Contaminated Beef: Time For Action.
The notion that contaminated overseas beef products could have entered Australia would have riled previous generations of Australian politicians. Not now. Free trade allows everything.
A people's movement is building against this madness.
The key to winning this fight is people's action. Despite the interest Aussie farmers and workers of all types have a vibrant local beef industry, there are movers and shakers behind the National Farmers` Federation and similar federations-who are for free trade. These folks arn't allies of the people.
So as individuals or in small groups: get letters going in to all papers, including trades and other papers; ring radio talk-back and go to town on the facts; put together local pickets of your Federal MP's offices particularly if he's a National and likes to pretend he has the rural interests at heart; call on the Meatworkers Union to strike ( and on this one they may have the companies in support ); call on TWU and the Maritime Union to "black" the imported products ( this will pit some organizers and the rank and file squarely against those who toe the ALP line on Free Trade ); The Australian Long Distance Owners And Drivers Association may also blacklist imported products; similar political groups are keen allies in any fight with the big parties; and don't forget the old supermarket protest-load your trolleys with imported products and leave it at the checkouts.
In other words, what people do is the important thing and one can do in tandem with just a few friends.
Australia First Party will support any local action taken by anyone-and do so in a co-operative manner. For any comments on any of the above-we're happy to oblige , to contact us e-mail ausfirst@alphalink.com.au
A people's movement is building against this madness.
The key to winning this fight is people's action. Despite the interest Aussie farmers and workers of all types have a vibrant local beef industry, there are movers and shakers behind the National Farmers` Federation and similar federations-who are for free trade. These folks arn't allies of the people.
So as individuals or in small groups: get letters going in to all papers, including trades and other papers; ring radio talk-back and go to town on the facts; put together local pickets of your Federal MP's offices particularly if he's a National and likes to pretend he has the rural interests at heart; call on the Meatworkers Union to strike ( and on this one they may have the companies in support ); call on TWU and the Maritime Union to "black" the imported products ( this will pit some organizers and the rank and file squarely against those who toe the ALP line on Free Trade ); The Australian Long Distance Owners And Drivers Association may also blacklist imported products; similar political groups are keen allies in any fight with the big parties; and don't forget the old supermarket protest-load your trolleys with imported products and leave it at the checkouts.
In other words, what people do is the important thing and one can do in tandem with just a few friends.
Australia First Party will support any local action taken by anyone-and do so in a co-operative manner. For any comments on any of the above-we're happy to oblige , to contact us e-mail ausfirst@alphalink.com.au
THE HEADSPINNING SPIN!
MONEY FOR WASTE POLICY : WHAT ABOUT MONEY FOR HEALTH REFORM?
We note KRudd and his spin doctors all but spun out, with a sudden urgency for a plan to implement "health reform".
Well, maybe with a 2014 type urgency! Are we so gullible as to embrace KRudds sudden and long awaited concern for the needs of Australians? Australians are understandably quite sceptical of KRudds grandiose announcements by now. What about the broken promises of the Kevin 07 Manifesto? All we see is a health system in the final stage of decomposition.
KRudd can't dig the mineral resources of Australia out the ground quick enough and ship them over to China and to hell with future consequences! Everything in the name of "free trade"! We note the denials of the KRudd government regarding the building construction going on at Christmas Island Detention Centre ( come on KRudd it's a bit hard not to notice earthmoving equipment ). KRudd anticipates Christmas Island will need to accommodate 5,000 "asylum seekers" within the next 4 years, as 1,000 have arrived here already. And what parasites they all are.
KRudds calculations could be considered conservative. Predictions for this year were only 200 arrivals but that has already been surpassed by 800! This is a fine example of KRudds roll over and die attempt to deal with organised criminals, the "people smugglers" he once described "as the scum of the earth". By the time we get to the end of the year, the budget for running this operation will have blown out to $300 million dollars. That's money that could have helped Australia's health reform.
When we analyse the reality here, we see Australia's homeless and jobless continuing to be ignored. We note that thousands of Australian Defence Force Personnel have gone to Afghanistan to make that country safer, but thousands of Afghani young males have come to Australia seeking "asylum". What message is that sending to our Defence Forces heading in the other direction? Why doesn't KRudd just use the $300 million dollars and put them all on a P&O cruise ship back from whence they came!?
Mr. Rintoul from the Refugee Action Coalition should be the first detained for the crime of assisting mass invasion of Australia. These refugees / asylum seekers are no more than parasites on the misery of struggling Australian people and are willing participants in organised crime. As far as KRudd's spin doctors are concerned, the old wives tale will ring true: "what doesn't come out in the wash will come out in the spin dry!" Happy campaigning, KRudd.
We note KRudd and his spin doctors all but spun out, with a sudden urgency for a plan to implement "health reform".
Well, maybe with a 2014 type urgency! Are we so gullible as to embrace KRudds sudden and long awaited concern for the needs of Australians? Australians are understandably quite sceptical of KRudds grandiose announcements by now. What about the broken promises of the Kevin 07 Manifesto? All we see is a health system in the final stage of decomposition.
KRudd can't dig the mineral resources of Australia out the ground quick enough and ship them over to China and to hell with future consequences! Everything in the name of "free trade"! We note the denials of the KRudd government regarding the building construction going on at Christmas Island Detention Centre ( come on KRudd it's a bit hard not to notice earthmoving equipment ). KRudd anticipates Christmas Island will need to accommodate 5,000 "asylum seekers" within the next 4 years, as 1,000 have arrived here already. And what parasites they all are.
KRudds calculations could be considered conservative. Predictions for this year were only 200 arrivals but that has already been surpassed by 800! This is a fine example of KRudds roll over and die attempt to deal with organised criminals, the "people smugglers" he once described "as the scum of the earth". By the time we get to the end of the year, the budget for running this operation will have blown out to $300 million dollars. That's money that could have helped Australia's health reform.
When we analyse the reality here, we see Australia's homeless and jobless continuing to be ignored. We note that thousands of Australian Defence Force Personnel have gone to Afghanistan to make that country safer, but thousands of Afghani young males have come to Australia seeking "asylum". What message is that sending to our Defence Forces heading in the other direction? Why doesn't KRudd just use the $300 million dollars and put them all on a P&O cruise ship back from whence they came!?
Mr. Rintoul from the Refugee Action Coalition should be the first detained for the crime of assisting mass invasion of Australia. These refugees / asylum seekers are no more than parasites on the misery of struggling Australian people and are willing participants in organised crime. As far as KRudd's spin doctors are concerned, the old wives tale will ring true: "what doesn't come out in the wash will come out in the spin dry!" Happy campaigning, KRudd.
HOMELESSNESS
We publish a piece contributed by a lady in the Riverina ( edited for length ). It is for the rights of the ordinary people- that Australia First will fight.
When we scratch away the facts behind what we call homelessness, we can see an institution and an unsavoury reflection of our contemporary society.
It is wrong to blame people for their circumstances. Some look down their nose of their privilege won by serving the elite; they have their position of power and control. It is not sufficent to wear blinkers and perceive homelessness with a childlike out-of-sight-out-of-mind and do-nothing convenience.
What we see is a certain group of Australians on the scrap heap of society. Out of this fact we have seen an industry emerge that ironically keeps some people in a living. Yes, it's ironic that the emptiness of others, fulfils yet another group. We see the so-called social housing providers, DOH and the like, providing anything but a safety net. Rather they provide yet more social injustice; they play the slumlord overseeing the institution that their housing ghettos have become.
The bureaucrats facilitating this so-called housing for the disadvantaged relish the power and control with sick pleasure. They play with the lives of the downtrodden, and receive a delicious salary to do so. We see the run down boarding houses / unscrupulous private landlords in our communities, fleecing the otherwise-homeless of their meagre pensions.
We see DOCS providing so called care and protection for our youth in dire circumstances. In reality, they further the abuse and neglect. They just warehouse youth until they come of age and they are no longer required to be seen to be providing any care and protection.
Some youth have accepted it is in fact safer on the streets, where they form their own street communities and family, and maybe finally find some empathy and understanding. That would be an indictment of the system itself.
What of the homeless? We see complete lack of empowerment ever increasing in our society. So much for a mans 's home is his castle-if you don't have a castle! This is part of the breakdown of our real social fabric and our identity as Australians.
Years ago programs were run that were actually successful, with low cost homes and loans available to circumvent perpetual homelessness. There was even pride in our social housing communities. Of course all these things are long gone. These were the days when an Australian culture was dominant and these issues and people mattered. What matters now is not the human cost, but the capitalist machine and the globalist agenda.
This agenda further erodes our culture. We step over our brother in the street, rather than consider the institution of homelessness and what goes with it. Do we consider the government agendas that make this reality? Do we wonder how it is possible to re-settle and find housing and services for refugees and invaders, as we deny our own?
If the Australian governments of today can plan for stupid wars, why cannot they plan to bring Australians out of poverty?
When we scratch away the facts behind what we call homelessness, we can see an institution and an unsavoury reflection of our contemporary society.
It is wrong to blame people for their circumstances. Some look down their nose of their privilege won by serving the elite; they have their position of power and control. It is not sufficent to wear blinkers and perceive homelessness with a childlike out-of-sight-out-of-mind and do-nothing convenience.
What we see is a certain group of Australians on the scrap heap of society. Out of this fact we have seen an industry emerge that ironically keeps some people in a living. Yes, it's ironic that the emptiness of others, fulfils yet another group. We see the so-called social housing providers, DOH and the like, providing anything but a safety net. Rather they provide yet more social injustice; they play the slumlord overseeing the institution that their housing ghettos have become.
The bureaucrats facilitating this so-called housing for the disadvantaged relish the power and control with sick pleasure. They play with the lives of the downtrodden, and receive a delicious salary to do so. We see the run down boarding houses / unscrupulous private landlords in our communities, fleecing the otherwise-homeless of their meagre pensions.
We see DOCS providing so called care and protection for our youth in dire circumstances. In reality, they further the abuse and neglect. They just warehouse youth until they come of age and they are no longer required to be seen to be providing any care and protection.
Some youth have accepted it is in fact safer on the streets, where they form their own street communities and family, and maybe finally find some empathy and understanding. That would be an indictment of the system itself.
What of the homeless? We see complete lack of empowerment ever increasing in our society. So much for a mans 's home is his castle-if you don't have a castle! This is part of the breakdown of our real social fabric and our identity as Australians.
Years ago programs were run that were actually successful, with low cost homes and loans available to circumvent perpetual homelessness. There was even pride in our social housing communities. Of course all these things are long gone. These were the days when an Australian culture was dominant and these issues and people mattered. What matters now is not the human cost, but the capitalist machine and the globalist agenda.
This agenda further erodes our culture. We step over our brother in the street, rather than consider the institution of homelessness and what goes with it. Do we consider the government agendas that make this reality? Do we wonder how it is possible to re-settle and find housing and services for refugees and invaders, as we deny our own?
If the Australian governments of today can plan for stupid wars, why cannot they plan to bring Australians out of poverty?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
