Interview with President Assad of Syria – why the crisis?

              
November 23, 2015   

Certain political groups like the Australian Party For Freedom, Liberal Party ‘conservatives’ and other creatures linked back to Q Society and Australian Liberty Alliance, see Australia First Party telling the truth on the Middle East, and they don’t like it.
They don’t want Australian governments exposed for supporting terrorism in Syria against the government of the secular president, Bashir al Assad.
They even call us “Islamo terrorists” to muddy the waters – given that we think the secular Arab leaders were ‘the best’ for their peoples!

When Liberal puppet groups within Australia start bundling the foreign interests of Israel, China, etc with foreign cults like Islam, they will start putting Australia’s national interests first.

Australia First’s Position on the Syrian Civil War

For Australian nationalists, our position is clear: if Assad wins the war (with Russian help) the flow of refugees will be reversed, ISIS will be crushed and terrorism defeated; Christianity will be saved in Syria because the Ba’ath party which rules Syria is secular and not Islamic (yes, Assad is a Muslim). The Australian politicians must be brought to justice for supporting the terrorist war in Syria!

Below is the transcript of President Assad’s interview with the French Magazine Valeurs Actuelles, so that readers may understand the position of the Syrian President and the cognitively dissonant nature of the propaganda coming from the West regarding both ISIS and Assad.
We offer this amazing interview with President Assad as he talks over the Syrian crisis.

President Bashar al-Assad with his wife first lady Asma al-Assad

Interview with Bashar Al-Assad of Syria with Valeurs Actuelles:

Question 1:  I want to have your comment on this: when our President Mr. Hollande, said that President Assad couldn’t be the solution because he was part of the problem. Does this represent a general view for you, and how you see this? What’s your reaction?

President Assad:
First, the first part of my reaction is: was Hollande assigned by the Syrian population to speak on their behalf? That is the first question. Would you as a French citizen accept a similar comment from any other politician in this world, to say that President Hollande shouldn’t be the French President? Isn’t it a humiliation to the French people? We look at it the same way. It’s a humiliation to the Syrian people when he says such a thing. Doesn’t it mean that he doesn’t recognize them?
Second, for France as a country that’s always proud of its traditions and the principles of the French Revolution and maybe democracy and human rights, the first principle of that democracy is that peoples have the right to decide who leads them.
So, it’s a shame on him, for somebody who represents the French population, to do and say something which is against the principles of the French republic and the French people. It’s a shame on him to try to humiliate a population with a civilized, long, deep history for thousands of years like the Syrian people. So, that’s my reaction, and I think it will not affect the facts in Syria, because the facts will not be affected by certain statements.

Question 2: If you had a message, one message, for Mr. Hollande and Mr. Fabius, especially after what happened yesterday in Paris? Is it “please cut your relations urgently with Qatar and Saudi Arabia?”

President Assad:
My message to Hollande and Fabius.. be serious when you talk about fighting terrorists
First of all, this message has many aspects. The first part of this message is a question: are they independent to send them a message they can implement? Actually, the French policy these days is not independent of the American one. This is first. So, sending a message will lead nowhere.
In spite of that, if I have a hope that there will be some political change in France, the first one is go back to the real, independent, friendly politics of France toward the Middle East and toward Syria. Second, be away from the American, how to say, methodology, of double standards. So, if you want to support the Syrian people – allegedly – regarding democracy and freedom, it’s better to support the Saudi people first.
If you have a problem about democracy with the Syrian state, how could you have good relations and friendship with the worst states in the world, the most underdeveloped states in the world which are the Saudi and Qatari states? So, this contradiction doesn’t give credibility.
Third, it’s natural for any official to work for the sake and interest of his people. The question that I ask in any message is: did the French policy during the past five years bring any good to the French people? What is the benefit?
I’m sure the answer is no, and the proof of that answer is what I said a few years ago, that messing with the fault line in Syria is messing with an earthquake that will reverberate in the rest of the world, first of all in Europe because we are the backyard of Europe, geographically and geopolitically, so that time they said “are you threatening?”
I didn’t, and Charlie Hebdo happened at the beginning of this year, and I said after that incident that this is only the tip of the iceberg, and what happened yesterday is another proof.
So, they need to change their policy toward the interests of their people, and this is where we’re going to have the same interests with the French population, mainly fighting terrorism. So, the final message is: be serious when you talk about fighting terrorists. That’s my message.

Question 3: French experts say that terrorists are certainly being trained in the Middle East, and we have a lack of information. What would be necessary to have that kind of cooperation between Paris and Damascus?

President Assad:
You need first of all seriousness. If the French government is not serious about fighting terrorism, we wouldn’t waste our time cooperating with a country, or a government, let’s say, with an institution that is supporting terrorism.
First of all, you need to change your policy, to have one standard regarding this and not multiple standards, and to have that country be part of an alliance with countries that only fight terrorism, not countries that support terrorism and are fighting terrorism. This is a contradiction.
So, these are the first basics of having any cooperation. We would like to have this kind of cooperation, not only with France, but with any country, but this cooperation needs an atmosphere. It needs certain criteria, and needs certain conditions.

Question 4: And in the future, if the government changes, would it be possible?

President Assad:
In politics you don’t have friendship and emotions, you have interests. That’s my role as a politician, and that’s their role as politicians in your country. It’s not whether they like Assad or don’t like him, it’s not whether I like Hollande or not. It’s not about that. My job is about what is best for the Syrians, and what is best for the French, that’s our job. So, in the future we don’t have a problem.
The problem is the policies, not the emotions.

Question 5: You just met President Putin. I mean, I don’t want to ask you what he said to you, but I want to ask you; when somebody said that Putin is the last guy who defends the West, would you say that? That Putin is the last head of state who defends the Christian-Western civilization?

President Assad:
So he defends Western Europe?

Question 6: Exactly…

President Assad:
When you talk about terrorism, it’s one arena; it’s not the Syrian, Libyan, Yemeni and French arenas. It’s one arena. So, the incentive behind the Russian coalition that they announced a few months ago before they sent their military to Syria, is that if we don’t fight terrorism in Syria, or maybe in other parts of the world, it will be hitting everywhere including Russia, so that’s correct.
When you fight terrorism in Syria, you’re defending Russia and defending Europe and defending other continents. That’s correct. This has been our view for decades now, since we have been fighting against the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood in the 1970s and 1990s.
We had that impression, we always asked for an international coalition for fighting terrorism because terrorism doesn’t recognize political borders, doesn’t care about procedures.
No matter what procedure you took in France after Charlie Hebdo, what happened yesterday proves that theory. So, that’s correct and that’s very precise; whoever fights terrorism, not only Putin, whoever fights terrorism somewhere, will protect the rest of the world.

Question 7: There is a conference in Vienna about Syria, and also tomorrow in Ankara with the G20, and at several times different presidents have said “the solution is Bashar Assad has to leave Syria.” Are you ready, personally, to leave power if it could be the best solution to protect Syria?

President Assad:
This is a two-part question.
The first part, is there anything I have to do in response to any foreign request? My answer is no. I will not do it, no matter what that request is; small, big, important, not important, because they have nothing to do with the Syrian decision. The only thing they did so far is to support terrorists in different ways, by [providing an] umbrella and by direct support. They could only create problems; they are not part of the solution. Those countries, whoever supports terrorists, are not part of the solution in Syria. So, whatever they say, we don’t respond because we don’t care about them, to be frank.
Second, for me, as a Syrian, I have to respond to any Syrian will. Of course, when I talk about Syrian will, there must be a kind of consensus, the majority of the Syrians, and the only way to know what the Syrians want is through the ballot box. This is second.
Third, for any president, to come and go, in any state that respects itself, respects its civilization and respects its people, is through a political process that reflects the constitution. The constitution will bring the president and the constitution will make him leave, through the parliament, through elections, through referendum, and so on. This is the only way for the president to come and go.

Question 8: What are all these talks about that the only solution not only for Syria; Iraq and Lebanon: partition? We hear much, you know, this is what you talk about, secular and sectarian. But there is a lot of talk everywhere, you know that better than us, about Syria with the coast, and Iraq too, and Lebanon. What is you feeling about that?

President Assad:
The impression that they try to give in the Western media is that the problem in this region is a civil war between different components, religions, and ethnicities that don’t want to live with each other. So, why don’t they divide their country? This is where they can stay.
Actually, the problem is not like this, because now, under the government’s control in Syria, you can see that all these components live with each other a normal life, a natural life.
So, if you want to make division, you have to create clear lines between the components, whether between sects, or between ethnicities. In that case, if you’re going to have that situation, if the region reaches that situation, I will tell you that the situation is going to be small states fighting with each other, never-ending wars for maybe centuries. Any situation like this means constant wars. For the rest of the world it means more sources of exporting instability and terrorism around the world. That’s the situation. So, this is a very dangerous way of thinking.
We don’t have the incubator now, the social incubator for such partition. Actually, if you ask any Syrian now, whether they are with the government or against the government, they will tell you that we are supporting the unity of Syria.

Question 9: You spoke about the constitution. In several months, you will have elections inside Syria. Are you ready to have international observers for these elections?

President Assad:
Yes, but we said international observation doesn’t mean UN organizations that have no credibility, to be frank, because they are under the control of the Americans and the West in general.
So, when you talk about international observation or participation or cooperation, it means certain countries around the world that were not biased during the crisis, that didn’t support the terrorists, didn’t try to politicize their position toward what’s happening in Syria. Those are the countries that can participate in such coordination or observation, but we don’t have a problem with the principle.

Question 10: We talked about Qatar and Saudi Arabia, but we didn’t talk about Turkey, and they let go in Europe hundreds of thousands of refugees, and it seems that they let go in Syria jihadists. So, what is the role of Turkey?

President Assad:
The most dangerous role, in the whole situation, because Turkey offered all kinds of support to those terrorists, and all the spectrums of the terrorists.
Some countries support al-Nusra Front, which is Al Qaeda, some other countries support ISIS, while Turkey supports both, and other groups at the same time. They support them with, how to say, human resources, they recruit. They support them with money, logistics, armaments, surveillance, information, and even the maneuvers of their military through their borders during the fights in Syria.

Even the money that’s being collected from the rest of the world passes through Turkey, and the oil that ISIS sells is through Turkey, so Turkey is playing the worst part of our crisis.
Second, that’s related directly to Erdogan himself and Davutoglu, because they both reflect the real ideology that they carry in their hearts, which is the Muslim Brotherhood ideology.

Question 11: You think he is Muslim Brotherhood?

President Assad:
Not necessarily to be organized, but the mentality, a hundred percent. He cares a lot about politicized Islam which is the opportunistic part of Islam which is not Islam actually. That’s how we look at it, because you shouldn’t politicize religion.
So, it’s related directly to him, to his will to see the Muslim Brotherhood governing in the rest of the Arab world so that he can control them as a sultan, but actually more as an imam, not a sultan. That is what Turkey is playing.

Question 12: You know we are in a situation right now, yesterday night and before, Charlie Hebdo, and before and before. You said that, but I want your confirmation; you think that France cannot fight terrorism if it stays with its links with Qatar and Saudi Arabia?

President Assad:
Yes. In addition, you cannot fight if you don’t have relations with the power that’s fighting ISIS or terrorism on the ground. You cannot fight terrorism while you follow or pursue the wrong politics that, at the end, in the end result, support terrorism directly or indirectly. If you don’t have all these things, no, you cannot, and we don’t think that they can, so far.
Journalists: Thank you very much, Mr. President, for this interview.
President Assad:
Thank you for coming.

Wagga Wagga’s Syrian Refugees – Behind The Tall Tales

The Wagga Wagga area is to receive hundreds of ‘refugees’ from the Syrian
civil war. These ‘refugees’ are to be imposed upon the city - as they are
imposed elsewhere across the country - with a dash of lying
manipulation-propaganda. The propaganda tells us so much.

The people of Wagga Wagga are told that these people are either Christians
who are victims of the savagery of ISIS and its Islamist pals, or Muslims who
are Sunnis and who are the favourite targets of the (supposedly) bloodstained
dictator, President Assad who adheres to the Alawite sect of Islam. We are
told that this war is all about the attempt of democratic Syrians to topple a
dictator, but a war now complicated by the advent of the ISIS death cult. Our
Australian governments, ever moral, opposed the dictator and now oppose the
Islamist killers and are offering the Syrians a safe haven. They also say
that things are so bad many of these people – especially the Christians –
could never return home. So, our United Nations obligation (sic) kicks in and
we spring in to help.

All this is a crock of the proverbial. We believe none of it and say it is lies.

In truth, our politicians are the ones bathed in blood. As part of the
Western alliance, it is our leaders who have aided and abetted Islamist
terrorists to overturn President Assad. But like all clever game plans, it
has caused blowback. President Putin of Russia has dropped the bucket on ‘our
side’ in recent months, showing how US weapons conveniently end up in the
hands of Islamists  while ISIS sells oil to US allies (like Turkey and
Israel) at bargain prices. Now of course, the Islamists attack Europe and the
‘West’ is obliged to follow the Russian lead to kill off its Frankenstein
monster.

Okay then, but what should be done for the refugees? If the Australian
politicians were serious about giving displaced people a chance, they would
send food and medical aid and soldiers to the camps in Jordan and elsewhere
and keep these people where they are until the war ends. That could be done.
Encouraging some to leave, or persuading people to leave, is no solution.

Make no mistake. The civil war will end in 2016 when President Assad, with
Russian help and the now begrudging help of Western powers which, after the
Paris outrage, can do nothing else – wins the war. When Assad wins the war,
and ISIS and its brother Islamists are crushed, there will be a political
solution in Syria and all refugees could return home. The truth is that
Assad, though a Muslim, has run a secular government not a religious one and
his army is heavily Christian. He would probably even win a free election
when the war is over.

With peace in Syria, could the refugees just go home? They could, but we
think that the Australian government will want to hold these Syrian refugees
as permanent captives, trophies to their false and sickening false morality.

What will happen to the Syrian refugees in Wagga Wagga? They will all get
public housing and massive handouts and start up monies, resources denied to
our youth and elderly – and even to the Aborigines. Then they will be shunted
off into lower-paid jobs. In these jobs, they will serve the new masters of
the Riverina economy which will rapidly become - the Chinese. What a mixed
up, muddle all this is!

The nationalists reject the idea that the ‘refugees’ have any place in Wagga
Wagga. Yet, do these people even really want to be here? Should the people of
our city lobby them to return home when the war ends? But should we not raise
our voices loud that enough is enough. This is our city as Australia is our
country.

No refugees! Protect refugees back in the camps in the Middle East! Demand
that the Australian government supports the Russian initiative to defeat
terrorism in Syria!

AUSTRALIA FIRST PARTY YOUTUBE

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCE8ICBR7nn5iWXofj9aVN5A

Two Party Prefered Corruption; But Where Is ICAC ?

Warnervale China Theme Park: New Allegations Demand ICAC Inquiry

February 16, 2015

[by Dr. Jim Saleam and Lorraine Sharp].

Australia First Party has received an item of anonymous correspondence which makes new allegations against the China Theme Park being secretly planned for Warnervale on the NSW Central Coast.
The party has published in the past to expose this Theme Park as a construction of the Chinese state and its local collaborators.
Read: http://australiafirstparty.net/wyongs-mayor-eaton-v-australia-first-the-truth-about-the-funny-front-men-of-the-china-theme-park/
The new material is disturbing. We publish it as follows:

“Name: iknowthestory
Email: 789abcd987@gmail.com

Time: February 5, 2015 at 5:38 pm

IP Address: 203.45.233.88 (from Cronulla using Telstra BigPond, but proxy could be anywhere)

Comment: DR JIM SALEAM

http://australiafirstparty.net/wyongs-mayor-eaton-v-australia-first-the-truth-about-the-funny-front-men-of-the-china-theme-park/

Something is wrong in your above article. The DOB of the YA Zhang Zhong, the CEO of the Chinese Theme Park, should be 26/09/1953 rather than 26/09/1963. Just wondering where did you get that information?

Yes, the directors of the Chinese Theme Park were born overseas, though they may be Australian citizens but that is not the point. A large number of Australian citizens were born overseas.

One thing you don’t know is that Ya Zhang Zhong got his Australian permanent residency in 1993 through sham marriage. He made two instalments to that woman. If you can be authorized to check his financial history you can find a trace of such record.

Zhong has certain connection to Chinese government. His brother, currently retired, was a department head of China Liao Ning province. Zhong and his company don’t have any money. The motive of the project is money laundry and help some corrupted Chinese officials migrate to Australia.”

 Bruce Zhong

The questions that arise from this email are:
1. What is the true birth date of the Park CEO Mr. Zhong?  And if it is ten years earlier than the official ASIC documents, then why was it wrongly recorded?  What would he be concealing?
2. How did Mr. Zhong get Australian residency? Was it through a marriage and was this a sham marriage?
3. Where does the money that Mr. Zhong pledges towards the Theme Park actually come from?
4. Are there any Chinese officials connected with Mr. Zhong or his brother who have applied to migrate to Australia?
5. What security tests are in force by Australian authorities to check the sources of Mr. Zhong’s money? If money laundering is involved, for whom is this offence being organized?

In June 2013, Wyong Mayor Doug Eaton‘s initiated a Wyong Shire 9-day ratepayer-funded visit to Shanghai and beyond, where economic investment opportunities for a $500 million Chinese Cultural Village Theme Park at Warnervale.

Amanda Li (Australian China Theme Park Pty Ltd), Alice Cawte (Australian Consul-General Shanghai), Mayor Doug Eaton, Mrs Ruby Eaton, Bruce Zhong (ACTP), Cr Greg Best at the Shanghai conference.

There are similar-fact historical parallels that run all over the Warnervale project. These parallels involve outrageous Chinese economic-political activity in Australia.
We recall that in the (still unresolved) Fitzgibbon Affair, a Chinese businesswoman (Helen Liu) and an investor (Humphrey or Harry Xu) had each contracted false marriages to enter Australia; gained access to senior Australian politicians and businessmen.
The latter reappeared in Wagga Wagga in 2012-13 as Humphrey Xu and was the high powered mover in the Trade Centre Affair.
The Wagga and Central Coast matters involve crawling city councils and financial and other irregularities in the companies involved. Although the hand of the Chinese state was all over the Wagga Wagga Centre, as it is in the Warnervale project, there is also a question over the players which suggests that corruption may also be a feature.
The linkage between the Theme Park and the Barangaroo Casino puts the matter of money laundering right on the agenda – and corrupt Chinese officials have secreted billions into Australia, locking it up in property, likely washing this money through James Packer’s gambling empire.


We said previously:
“We have received great support from the beginning from the Foreign Affairs Office of the Shanghai Municipal People’s Government and Office of Overseas Chinese Affairs of the Shanghai Municipal People’s Government,  Bruce Zhong noted. “They twice sent a delegation to visit Wyong and the land”. In fact the Chinese Tourism Bureau will be setting up an office at the China Theme Park.”
Of course. Yet we suspect there is far more than the state involved.
Whatever we may feel about the Chinese state, President Xi has moved against the intertwined networks of bureaucrats and crooks who have shifted capital offshore to places like Australia. We just cannot say what is what and who is who. This trend presents the curiosity that Australian politicians and business elites take the money both of the Chinese state and its corrupt officials. What happens when the Chinese state demands back its money?
There must be an open inquiry into the Warnervale China Theme Park to determine whether the funds are dirty and to weigh what involvement Australians in the Wyong Council and business community have in this matter.
We are well aware that Mayor Eaton has been linked to Liberal Party corruption through his extensive connections although no formal investigation has been held. It is time to do so. He has persistently touted the virtues of the Theme Park and dropped the clangour that Chinese gamblers would visit the Park from Barangaroo Casino. Rumours persist that his Chinese spouse is linked to the China Theme Park. The whole matter runs round in circles.
Mike Baird, Premier of New South Wales, has cried aloud that he wants to run a clean government despite having a myriad of his parliamentarians and party officials hailed up before the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) admitting a host of sins.
Baird once worked for the giant mercantile bank HSBC, (the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation) and the biggest money-laundering bank on Earth, so reasonably he would know what corruption is.

Mike Baird has close ties with the Chinese Communist Party

Is there any commitment anywhere to fighting the corruption bred by the billions of dollars flowing out of China? The ordinary people demand that there be action!
For our part we believe that some earnest person has contacted us to blow the whistle. We ask; is the information true?
Australia First Party calls upon the people of Wyong Shire to resist the China Theme Park proposal until it is dead. Let a united front of concerned Australians do the job.

Gatekeepers Of The Matrix

CONTRIBUTED:

Attorney General and Minister For Justice, The Hon. Brad Hazzard MP.

I request an immediate review of a decision made by your staff (J & C) at Juniperina Juvenile Justice Centre in regard to my daughter A.

On  XX.X.XX while visiting my daughter A at Juniperina I provided staff at Juniperina with a book that I requested to be passed on to my daughter A. to read. With A's rehabilitation in mind, part of the care born of a Mother's appreciation of the "psychology"of her own child, I believe this book to be an invaluable part of A's rehabilitation. (Over the past two years the programmes run by Juvenile Justice have been a complete failure in respect of my daughter A, e.g., where are the "Rehabilitation" RESULTS ??)

The referred book was "assessed"(?) by Juniperina staff as "too radical"(?) (albeit staff had not even read the book) and staff at Juniperina refused to pass it on to my daughter.

Must I congratulate government re their "all-round, Multi-Disciplined Staffers" who are also Speed-Reading Experts, Masters in Propaganda Classifications, and Master "Book Reviewers" ??

The book, "Red Cocaine", by Dr Joseph Douglass is a historical account of how Drugs were flooded into the West, and by whom, AND the purposes, during the Cold War period. Dr Douglass was a national security affairs consultant with 25 years experience in defence policy, technology and intelligence. Douglass has worked in the US government where he was deputy director, Tactical Technology Office, Advance Research Projects Agency, with several Washington-area defence contractors. Dr Douglass has served on various defence science board studies and as a consultant/advisor to various government agencies and non-profit industries.

The book does not call anyone to arms nor "radicalise" anyone.

The arbitrary "judgement" by the Juniperina resident Little-Hitler Cretin, that this book is "too radical", is quite a reflection upon government standards in their selection of staff for such institutions.

Knowing my own daughter's intellect, i.e., A, I believe this book will provoke serious thought, and be a step towards a greater understanding of the multifaceted drug trade and her unfortunate place, as a drug user, in the drug "industry". It may well assist in discouraging A from continuing within the Hell of the world of drugs. A has a certain "psychology", such that I believe this book will impact on her in a positive way.

I have spoken with her regarding the programmes run at Juniperina - Profile and "harm minimisation", counselling etc and she has stated "it's all rubbish", and that it had no effect on or benefit to her at all; in fact quite the opposite. A being a girl with intelligence has made the observation that many others have made, "harm minimisation" (using drugs safely) is failed policy. You cannot minimise the harm of drugs such as Ice; that is simply the reality. I will also note two of A's older sisters (who have not been subject to the damaging influences of these policies) are not drug users, nor have they ever been involved in crimes such as has A. In fact those girls are well adjusted, productive members of society, being socially responsibile and community minded.

It is well accepted principle that, to continue to do the same thing over and over again and to expect a different result, is the definition of insanity. That is what is being done within your "system". The "outcomes", being negative, then either the "system" and its perpetrators are insane, OR the NEGATIVE "Outcomes" ARE INTENDED. Can there be any other answer, Minister ??

About 18 months ago I enquired at XXXXX Juvenile Justice Office about the programmes run by Juvenile Justice and was less than satisfied with the answers given by the Manager Mr M. W. I asked Mr W about the "Profile' programme and he stated "it's just the programme we run". He had no statistics regarding sucess or failure, and had little understanding of what it even was.

I wrote a letter to the then Attorney General Greg Smith regarding "drug programmes" run at Juvenille Justice, and the reply I received from his underling quoted the wrong programmes. They had no clue as to what was going on at ground level in the centres.

I have since corresponded with your office and received much the same response. This is unacceptable.

I was referred to the Juvenile Justice website, which is flawed, and claims of "working closely with Parents", is certainly not my experience. My experience is that Parents are being excluded, and that Child Justice presumes to have all authority and decision-making powers regarding my child, the "outcomes" of which "nurture"(?) the on-going destruction of my child. These realities are a deliberate contravention to the obligations Australia has to the UNROC Convention to which Australia is a signatory. The practical evidence points to the sinister prospect that indeed, the Juvenile Justice system is consistently "setting our youth up to fail". The alternative "prospect", i.e., that the people who are "running the show" from their Ivory Towers are a collective of imbeciles out of touch with reality, is cynically laughable. They may appear to be imbeciles, but that is only a professional "front" since imbeciles are not reliably "issue-consistent". Rather than the policies that are developed from deep within the bowels of academia and protected by the political apparatus hitherto, it is time for government to either solve these problems or get out tof the way and to restore to the decent Parents, their natural rights and authority over their own children and let them solve this problem which has been spawned from the demonic cloisters of "New-Ageism" and Political-Correctness.

I had previously forwarded to your office some sound advice and suggestions on how to address some of the problems facing youth and society, only to have these suggestions demeaned and dismissed out of hand.

Many are the conversations I have had with people working within the Juvenile Justice system and the Police force on the subject issues; they have resigned themselves to the fact that, as matters stand, Juvenile Justice and it's current policies are a complete failure. Regular comment from these people when discussing Juvenile Justice is, "you're speaking to the converted - I agree"! When government doggedly persists in the perpetuation of a disaster which they perpetrated in the first place, it is obviously MEANT to be a disaster !!

Many other people within "the system" who do not comment, or who fail to see, are self-interested types who seek only to protect their bloated salary, lurks and perks and guaranteed superannuation - True gatekeepers of the Matrix !

So much for free speech, so much for religious or cultural rights, so much for any rights for Parents. So much for Juveniule "Justice"(?) working with Parents !

To conclude, I insist that the book I have provided for my daughter A. to read, be immediately passed on to her as an important part of her rehabilitation.

Of course, if "The State" does not desire the Rehabilitation of A. and many others in her predicament, then that raises serious questions about deliberate, planned, State-orchestrated genocide of one or more generations of our youth. I will be happy to engage on that matter, should it be necessary.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_principles

The Nuremberg priciples apply. It is no defence to say "I was only following orders", when One knows those orders (policies and proceedures) are wrong. A duty of care applies regarding employees of Juvenile Justice and government to Detainees of Juniperina. Hiding behind State powers provides no immunity.

　

 

http://portalconservador.com/livros/Joseph-Douglass-Red-Cocaine-The-Drugging-of-America-and-the-West.pdf

Nous ne sommes pas Charlie (We are not Charlie)

by Dr. Jim Saleam
The terror attacks in France, especially the attack upon the magazine staff of Charlie-Hedbo (Charlie Weekly), brought out on Sunday a demonstration of four million people upon the streets of Paris.

The slogan of the protestors was ‘Je Suis Charlie” (I Am Charlie).

It was said by the official organizers of the rally that Charlie Hebdo represented liberty and freedom of speech and diversity and tolerance and multiculturalism and the best of democratic civilization.  They said that the Islamists struck at this definition of liberty.
The demonstration was led by the prime ministers and presidents and monarchs of several countries. Yet, all of the Western leaders are people who have supported immigration, Muslim immigration at that, open borders and have actually suppressed the democratic freedoms of Europeans to speak against the process of demographic invasion and challenge. Some of these leaders welcome the very idea that Europeans may become minorities within the European countries within a half-century.
Are they mad?

But are we, the Australian nationalists, brothers and friends of the nationalists of the European countries, really – Charlie?
No, we are not Charlie.
Many of the European nationalists took up the French patriotic counter slogan: ‘Nous Ne Sommes Pas Charlie’ (No We Are Not Charlie).
I note that Jean-Marie Le Pen, founder of the French National Front, said that too after Francois Hollande the President of France, banned his party from participation in the commemoration rally.

That was fine by Le Pen, because as he said, Charlie-Hedbo represented the liberal values that had brought terrorism to France in the first place. He sympathized with the families of the slain, but that was that.
Let me put it in an Australian context.
Some Islamist fanatics go to the Gay And Lesbian Mardi Gras and set off a bomb and people die. Our sympathy goes to the families of the dead and we would demand the death penalty for the bombers. But we are not the Gay And Lesbian Mardi Gras.
Some Islamist fanatics go to the headquarters of a gay and lesbian adoption agency and machine gun the staff. Our sympathy goes to the families of the dead and we would demand the death penalty for the gunmen. But we do not favour gay and lesbian adoption.
Some Islamist fanatics go to the offices of the Australian Zionist Federation and behead a couple of old ladies. Our sympathy goes to the families of the dead and we would demand the death penalty for the murderers. But we do not suddenly embrace Zionism as Australia’s Middle East foreign policy option.
So would we be a group of Aussie Charlies?   Clearly not.
We are not liberals. We do not favour open immigration and open borders.
In this debate, we do not take up the line of the Charlies that there is a nice Islam and a terrorist Islam. There is only an irritant within the body-politic that is alien and which does not fit. It fits neither with liberalism, nor with the true traditional Australianism.

It is called Islam.

So, we are not Charlies and cannot bloc with Charlies and must run our own race.

Australia and Australians first !   Years ago, France did have a policy of paying immigrants to go home.

Given that the radicalization of Muslim youth in Australia continues to deepen and that the chasm between Australia and Muslim migrants is absolute and the attitudes intransigent, we should consider such a policy.
The next outrage in Australia is only a matter of time. The Lindt Café affair in Sydney last month was just a taste of things to come.

France’s National Front marches alone to defend ‘liberty’

Read More:   http://news.yahoo.com/frances-national-front-marches-alone-defend-liberty-201059795.html
“Beaucaire (France) (AFP) – France’s (patriotic) National Front (FN) held a demonstration of its own against terrorism on Sunday, after being excluded from a massive unity rally in Paris.
Party leader Marine Le Pen led a demonstration in the FN-controlled southern town of Beaucaire after denouncing what she called the “exclusion” of her party from Paris march, which drew more than a million people in solidarity with the 17 victims of terror attacks this week.
Though debate had raged among French political leaders over whether the generally ostracised FN should be allowed to participate alongside other parties in the Paris demonstration against terrorism, Le Pen claimed she and her supporters had been shunned even though President Francois Hollande had invited “all citizens” to participate.
Leading a thousand FN marchers in Beaucaire, Le Pen thanked the crowd “for being here and reminding us of the values of liberty,” saluting them from beneath a banner reading “I Am Charlie — Homage to the victims of terrorism.”
The slogan contrasted with the flat rejection Saturday by her father and FN founder, Jean-Marie Le Pen, to associate with the “#JeSuisCharlie” (IAmCharlie) slogan which expresses unqualified solidarity the satirical Charlie Hebdo newspaper targeted by Islamist attackers who killed 12 people Wednesday.
“Sorry, but I’m not Charlie,” the elder Le Pen told the Beaucaire crowd in a video message, echoing his long-standing hostility towards the paper that frequently singled him out for merciless satire.
During a press conference later Sunday, Le Pen senior deployed his notorious use of mocking humour to disparage the national march and politicians leading it, by referring to them as “charlots” — the French nickname for Charlie Chaplin that also means “clown.”
“All these people are marching with the placard ‘I Am Charlie,’ when they’re actually ‘charlots’ responsible for the decadence of France,” Le Pen said, adding that French and European leaders “bear the responsibility for what happened” in the attacks by failing to address rising immigration and halting integration of foreigners.
He said he felt compassion for his “fellow citizens” killed in the attack, but railed against the “anarcho-Trotskyist spirit” of Charlie Hebdo which he derided as corrosive to “political morality”.

The Curfew !

THE PRIVATE “FANTASY KINGDOM” 

OF MAYOR TRINA THOMPSON,  DARYL MAGUIRE (LOCAL STATE LIBERAL MP),

AND THEIR CRONIES.

 

AND THE FAKE CURFEW OF 15 YEARS.

 

 

THE  END  IS  NEAR !!!

 

The FAKE 15-YEAR CURFEW engineered and maintained by the SELF-APPOINTED “MONARCHY” of “THE KINGDOM” of Adelong-Tumut, is about to come to an end, as TRUTH AND FACTS will soon reveal the LIES and IMPROPRIETIES that have PROPPED UP this  SCANDALOUS MYTH.

 

 

BRAZEN MIS-USE  (BY THIS FANTASY “KINGDOM”) OF GOVERNMENT FUNDS TOO !!!

The on-going misuse of Government Funds,  BY  “THE KINGDOM” of Adelong Tumut,  will soon be brought out into the sunlight for all to see.    Council’s “LARGESSE”  to their Local “CRONIES’  CLUB”  (the  ADELMUT  “ARISTOCRATS” ??)   may not continue much longer once “The Cat Is Out Of The Bag”.

 

 

LOCAL  POST  OFFICE  -  OPENS  &  READS  THE PRIVATE  MAIL  OF  LOCAL  RESIDENTS !!!     SPYING  ON  RESIDENTS ???

Well,  why  NOT ??!!   After all,  the Local  “CRONIES’  CLUB”  think that they own and control  everything else  there.    So,  no  need  to be shy about  stickey-beaking into other persons’  Private  Correspondence,  RIGHT ??!!    Hey !!!   Fellers !!!   Why go only  half  way  -   have you thought about  getting  the  ADELMUT  STASI  to  put  surveillance  bugs in the homes,  vehicles,  offices  and phones of  persons on your “Target  List” ???    How  about  Compulsory  Weekly  “CONFESSIONS” of  Local  Residents to the ADELMUT  STASI ???     Perhaps  you can take a leaf  out of Abbott’s  book   -   introduce your own style of “ANT-TERROR LAWS” to justify everything  you want,  and  label  local  “DISSIDENTS”(??)  as  “TERRORISTS”  whenever they criticise  YOUR  CORRUPTION !!!    Like  I  said,   let’s not  do  things  by  halves,  fellers !!!

 

 

THIS “MONARCHY” SOON TO BE “OVERTHROWN” BY ITS OWN CORRUPTION.

Corruption has a habit of eventually catching up with its “Devotees”,  EVEN THOUGH THE “POWERS THAT BE” IN MACQUARIE STREET  MANACLE  ICAC  TO   IN-ACTION WHEN IT COMES TO INVESTIGATING CORRUPT NEW SOUTH WALES SHIRE COUNCILS !!!   

 

Mr Maguire,  as Parliamentary Secretary to the NSW State Premier, Mr Baird,  thinks he’s poised for re-election in the up-coming State Elections,  and that he will “SAIL INTO A ‘MINISTRY’ “.    Don’t be too sure of yourself,  Daryl !!!    On the heels of the CORRUPTLY SCHEMED  “CHINESE TRADE CENTRE” AT WAGGA WAGGA   (YOUR  “BABY” FOR 10 YEARS,  Remember ??),   the 100-PLUS UN-ANSWERED QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT “PROJECT”,  AND ITS “MYSTERIOUS” CANCELLATION,  your future “Prospects” don’t look too good now that the “Little Games”  of the  “ADELMUT  KINGDOM” are about to emerge.

 

 

SO, WHERE WILL ALL OF YOU “SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE”  RUN  TO  (WITH YOUR “UN-EXPLAINED” WEALTH) ???

 

Of course there is always room in Communist China for more LACKEYS OF THAT ORGAN-HARVESTING STATE  WITH ITS 36 TORTURE & DEATH CAMPS.    And you’ll meet “Old Friends”  there too  -   BOB HAWKE,  ERIC ROOZENDAHL  and others .   You can join the “OLD CHUMS CLUB” !!!   Won’t that be nice ??!!   And then there are the TRIAD “JUNKETS”  whom your Buddy,  Mr Baird,  seems happy to introduce to Australia to assist the impoverished Mr Packer.   Perhaps, some kind of “Liaison Officer”  position,  hmmmm ??

 

 

We’ll try our best  to not keep you all  (THE “ROYAL FAMILY” OF ADELONG-TUMUT) in suspense for too long.    It  may  be  disappointing  for you  to  learn  that  “one  (or  more)  of  your  own”  has  “ratted  on you”.    And,  hasn’t  it  been  such  a  “COSY”  game ??!!

 

 

 

TA-TA FOR NOW.