Australia First Party candidate for Palerang Council, John McGrath, has won a solid 6.1% - 430 votes - in the by-election held yesterday ( these figures are not yet final ).
Once again, we have shown that there is a definate community and electoral clientele for our party. In the 2008 NSW local government poll, Australia First won 4% in the Sutherland Shire and some 5.67% in Blacktown City. In Sutherland Shire by-election in October last year we crossed over the 4% line again. In June 2010, in the Hawkesbury City by-election, we won 9.4%
If a full Council election had been held in Palerang yesterday, John McGrath may have picked up the last position; indeed, some of our polling booth workers conversed with the current Mayor, who himself picked up the last seat in Palerang in 2008-with just over 3% of the vote !
Mr. McGrath has signalled his willingness to contest Palerang in 2012, along side of Australia First Party candidates set to contest ( and win ! )-in a swathe of councils across the State.
Farmers, Truckies, Young Workers Targets Of The Campaign:
The Australia First Party campaign followed the political line of the party. It set out to target specific social sectors which we call Real Australia, or those parts of our community who have, in one way or another, stepped outside of the globalising norms of the present anti Australian economic and political system either to vote for something new or wage their economic struggles: some farmers challenged by the Murray Darling Basin Authority water legislation and who have opted to resist outside of the usual sell-out farmers organisations and the National Party; truck owner-drivers who are pushed to the wall by bureaucracy at the service of the big companies, citizens who have rejected the big parties and the Greens on immigration and young workers under the gun of contract labour and who see no party willing to say no. In ways specific to local conditions, these groups were 'targets' of the McGrath campaign.
Importantly too, Australia First publicly campaigned for People's Referendum or Citizens Initiated Referendum where it is the people who may propose directly local rules and 'laws'. This resonated in chaotic Palerang.
There is another aspect of the Real Australia strategy. Because the party targets Real Australia for support, Australia First leaves the 'mainstream' people behind at this stage: sadly, the majority of our fellow Australians accept their lot and relish its rewards and comforts; they may grumble at this or that, but are psychically bound to a 'comfort zone' of political normality and so consequently support the candidates and parties that actually undermine them too. This truth is the truth and is not changed by wishful thinking. These folks are not the agents of change at this point in time. Essentially, our strategy is the logical one: build where we can, with whom we must, at this crucial phase of party and community network construction. That same big-picture logic plays out at local level politics also.
John McGrath's thirty five years of political experience, served him well in doing what needed to be done at a local level and he was witness to how all these sobering strategic facts work themselves out.
Hard Work Yields Results:
John McGrath campaigned very hard in Palerang. John spoke at the three community meetings and was received well and his candidature and the party name were mentioned at length in the Bungendore Mirror, the Braidwood Times and community newsletters. The Queanbeyan Age ( which covers a part of the council area ) referred to him as "arguably the most controversial candidate". Indeed, the latter paper reported on a growing community angst across Palerang at the "plan" to explode the Shire's population by nearly 70% by 2036- and noted what our candidate was saying. Had we tapped a growing consciousness ? We think so.
The party mobilised some Australia First members in Canberra and in Palerang Shire to assist on polling day with how to vote cards. Most booths were covered. Ironically, in the only booth where we have no worker ( the isolated area of Nerriga ), we polled 20%. These same members earlier letterboxed streets and spoke with residents and gave the party 'name-recognition'. John campaigned personally in Captain's Flat, Burra and Bungendore, meeting local residents and soliciting votes.
A Statement Of Position:
Despite the candidates against John McGrath all running as 'independents', there were party allegiances in the poll. One candidate had Labor Party connections and another is active in the National Party, whilst yet another had some Green input to his support-base. What is equally clear is that a layer of voters in Palerang have also made a statement of position in voting for Australia First.
This statement is an ideological statement of Real Australia. It is a rock base of support that will be expanded, but only by the party being involved directly in community politics, if the party markets itself as a protest and defence organisation for issues that affect the lives of people.
Underground name recognition helps Australia First. As the polling booth workers attest, our party has a name that travels by pubs, clubs, workplaces, cafeterias, truck-stops, from brothers to sisters and mothers to fathers. The thousands of people across different States who have voted for Australia First in the last three years carry the name of the party to other Australians and the same process has now commenced in Palerang Shire.
Australia First Party thanks all who assisted in any way on this campaign and we look forward to further electoral successes in New South Wales.
Saturday, May 14, 2011
One Nation's Asian Sex Tour: Or The Takeover Of One Nation By Multi-Racialist 'Conservatives'
The One Nation party is to be revived in Queensland with a new leadership. The party wants to register for the next State election.
Since late last year, One Nation has been in the news. It has been reported for its opposition to the illegal refugee influx. Yet, it was noted by ourselves as early as last December that One Nation did not appear to absolutely oppose the just-as-toxic intake of the "legal" arrivals ! Something was amiss. Thereafter came the attempt by former leader Pauline Hanson to enter parliament in New South Wales, vaulting the name 'One Nation' into full public view. The party set out to remodel itself.
But what a sad and compromised thing it is. Whatever One Nation was ten or so years ago, the current group seems to be pushing a product little different from the Liberal National Party ( LNP ). Essentially, One Nation is now all about multiracialism and conservatism.
Australia First makes its allegations very clear. First: One Nation advocates the assimilation of all migrants and any future migrants drawn from anywhere on earth ( note: it excludes only Moslems ), into an English-speaking civic culture. It would multiracialize Australia finally and completely and thereby destroy the Australian identity. Second: One Nation is cuddling up to the LNP offering limp-wristed 'criticism' over some policies, while still promising preferences for patronage.
What is happening ? Are Queenslanders being deceived by the brand-name One Nation ? However, has its guts been ripped out and has it turned into its opposite ?
A REAL STOLEN GENERATION`.
Australia First noted the rot had well set in during the last Federal election campaign. A curious policy statement appeared on the party website. One Nation was advocating foreign adoptions from the Third World, with the placing of these children into Aussie families since this was the best way to arrive at "assimilation".
What ?? This didn't sound too much like our perception of the beliefs of One Nation members.
Last August, a representative of Australia First phoned the One Nation Senate candidate Ian Nelson, who expressed surprise that anyone would question such a policy Mr. Nelson pointed out that the State President, Jim Savage, had experience of the difficulties getting such Third World children into Australia-given his wife had had real problems obtaining visas for her nephew and niece from the Philippines.
Mr. Nelson was asked: "but isn't that going to make a real sort of stolen generation, one where children are stolen and brought into an alien culture ? "No, it is the best way to assimilate them", he said. "But maybe we Australians don't want to assimilate them, maybe they should stay in the Third World" ? Call ended.
In their policy statement, One Nation was advancing the proposition that the assimilation of another race into the Australian nation via the backdoor of some family-based 'cultural assimilation' of stolen children-was a credible policy goal. Why, why, would one want to preach that ? Is there something going on in One Nation ?
THE PLOT THICKENS. THE MOSLEM RED-HERRING AGAIN
Then the penny was dropped on us concerning Mr. Nelson. Penny ? Try cement slab. An article appeared in the Queensland Times. Every patriotic Queenslander should read this article.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/one-nations-surprising-new-face-20110225-1b7y9.html
The article explains that Mr. Nelson who intends to campaign for One Nation in the next year's poll will be joined on the hustings by his Thai wife and their teenage daughter. It said that this was a new development for One Nation which had first made its name by being critical of Asian migration. Did not Pauline Hanson say that "Australia is being swamped by Asians" ? In the article, Mr. Nelson made it very clear that his fury on immigration was only directed at the Moslem bogy man.
The article said-and we quote directly: Despite witnessing his wife's difficult adjustment to a new culture and country, Nelson has no sympathy at all for the most recent targets of multiculturism's critics.
For him, the woman he affectionately calls "little one" is not like the other new Australians, particularly Muslims, at the heart of the current national debate.
"It's the ones that don't [ assimilate ] and live in their little enclaves that's unacceptable in this country," he said.
Now let's get this garbage right. Moslems don't assimilate. Well, tick. And as the rest of the article makes very clear, Mr. Nelson equates Moslem migration with rapes, ghettos and crime. Well, tick. However, if you assimilate other Third Worlders, particularly by marrying them and having kids with them, that is okay ? Yes ? This is an odd policy, a sort of bedroom-driven plan for social engineering. It's a wonder the Human Rights Commission didn't think it up-and offer special baby bonuses to facilitate the outcome.
Do we ignore the other negatives of immigration ? Do we ignore the sustainability question: that is, whether Australia should take any migrants at all ? Do we ignore the reality of Chinese immigration where massive swathes of the big cities are subject to takeover by horde-like agents of a foreign state, a group whose members are far more insidious than an Arab or Moslem rape gang ?
It seems Mr. Nelson has ignored all that. He might also have ignored, if he ever understood it, that the alien does not assimilate: we Australians assimilate to the alien. Moslems are just a small part of the massive demographic change now swamping our country. Why concentrate on just Moslems ?
Australia First has this radical idea that, to a certain small extent, the powers-that-be don't mind too much if a few points are scored against the Moslems. After all, Aussie soldiers are ( sadly ) doing a job for the oil companies and other alien interests by being in Moslem lands and whipping up a little amount of anti-Islamism here has a purpose in keeping support up for these useless wars. And, vaguely out there somewhere, Islamist nutter networks still might pull off a terrorist outrage in Australia. People have to be alert to that too. Of course, this anti-Islamism must never go too far and branch out in a general criticism of immigration, multiculturalism-and more sharply, never, ever, condemn multi racialism. It must stay within strict limits and so the major parties can manipulate the public.
So, very conveniently for establishment needs, along comes some group which wants to raise up the spectre of unassimilated Moslems. One Nation wants to scream at them, rant at them, get votes from people who realise they certainly don't fit; then One Nation can parade itself as an independent party standing up for us ordinary folks who are peeved with immigration.
Yet all the while we have the anti Moslem crusade in operation, One Nation's leading male members use their penises to assimilate nice Asian brides. Is Sigmund Freud having a joke on us ? Are they overcompensating for their personal conduct ? Did any other One Nation members do the Asian sex tour ? Are they the internal base of support for this new leadership ?
Are we missing something here ? Is it the case that there is some game being played aimed right at the heart of those Queenslanders who wish to take the nationalist road ?
CONSERVATISM
Of late, as One Nation makes noises about re-registering as a party, it has been chattering about doing preference deals with the Liberal National Party, even saying publicly that its preferences elected a LibNat in the recent Federal Senate poll and that the LibNats should reciprocate in the future, that they should make an end to the 'preference One Nation last' policy. They are saying that their preferences in the electorate of Ashgrove might even elect the next Queensland Premier. The offer is: throw us a bone and we'll be there for you. Who knows, maybe they will ? But the drift is that One Nation is now calling itself a "conservative party", much to the internal criticism of many sincere One Nation members who think this puts them on the same continuum as the LibNats. In a sort of way-it does. It's the slippery slope to nowhere.
In this delusional politics, the One Nation leadership steers the party rhetoric about traditional family values; a little flag waving is engaged in;, and a civic identity politics is pushed ( ie. it defends the idea of a national identity based only upon symbols, promotes that aliens become English-speaking and everyone gives loyalty to the constitution and our 'allies' ). As a conservative party, One Nation members will be told that they are bringing conservative voters out of the establishment parties towards a new hard patriotism. In truth, it is the establishment LNP which is quite happy to harness disaffected patriotic Queenslanders to One Nation and its forlorn quest to enter the mainstream as the leading conservative voice. That is an old con. Smart. Slick. Effective.
RUDYARD KIPLING'S ROAD TO MANDALAY V RODGERED COUPLINGS WAY TO GO THAIGIRLINTHEHAY
There was a great poem by Rudyard Kipling called the Road To Mandalay, a nineteenth century muse that suggested some sort of true-love unions occur between Europeans and Orientals in the mists of cultural abstraction up the Irrawaddy River-or something like that. Possibly, that has happened occasionally just as much as the true members of those races might have scorned it. However, we have doubts that unions founded upon alcohol in Manila or Bangkok bars, sex-tour romps where rancid old Aussies indulge their fantasies, mail-order shopping for a good housekeeper and compliant bed-partner and so on-make for much along the lines of Kipling's muse. The public displays of these Rodgered Couplings that their little ones are just marvellously assimilated, don't wash with us.
We have said that Freudian sex psychology is a factor here. We should say that the whole affair is politically corrupting. Not simply psychic overcompensation is involved when we witness anti Moslem screaming in place of a sober critical sentiment about immigration. Policy could become perverted-and not just about the matter of overseas adoptions. A different model of Australianity is put up there. Intermarraige as assimilation becomes a goal of the 'patriot'. In the latest policy turn of One Nation, we can see that defence of Australia's European identity is just not what the party is about.
EITHER IT'S ONE BIG MELTING POT OR IT'S THE AUSTRALIA FIRST POSITION
The position of Australia First is one that sorts out the muddle of One Nation. One Nation, going back a very long way and right to the start in fact-was always equivocal on what it meant about immigration from the Third World. Did it want to end it ? And reverse it ? Or assimilate what was already here ? Did it seek to preserve Australia's European heritage or not ? Certainly at least, at the very least, Mrs. Hanson said that Australia was running the risk of being "swamped" by Asians. Sadly, she gave no answer.
The mix-up has become one big messy melting-pot muddle. Now One Nation will rant against Moslems ( and refugees too ), but stay criminally silent about the very future of the nation.
We say that nationality does have a biological component. None of that involves, or ever could, any hatreds of other peoples or odd thoughts about how 'superior' or 'better' we white Aussies may be in respect of other peoples. However, it certainly includes our right to exist as a people sovereign over our continent. It is also very clear to us that our very survival is challenged by mass immigration and alien takeover and that we will have to defend ourselves, our heritage, our identity ! As a matter of necessity, one big melting pot is not for us. It is odd to Australia First that not only is the melting pot the official state view, but it is now the position taken by some so-called patriots. We say: no !
It is time for One Nation members to take back their party if they can. Yet, when they do, if they do, they will need to look at how this muddle was arrived at. One Nation members might even think better and consider it is time to join Australia First.
Since late last year, One Nation has been in the news. It has been reported for its opposition to the illegal refugee influx. Yet, it was noted by ourselves as early as last December that One Nation did not appear to absolutely oppose the just-as-toxic intake of the "legal" arrivals ! Something was amiss. Thereafter came the attempt by former leader Pauline Hanson to enter parliament in New South Wales, vaulting the name 'One Nation' into full public view. The party set out to remodel itself.
But what a sad and compromised thing it is. Whatever One Nation was ten or so years ago, the current group seems to be pushing a product little different from the Liberal National Party ( LNP ). Essentially, One Nation is now all about multiracialism and conservatism.
Australia First makes its allegations very clear. First: One Nation advocates the assimilation of all migrants and any future migrants drawn from anywhere on earth ( note: it excludes only Moslems ), into an English-speaking civic culture. It would multiracialize Australia finally and completely and thereby destroy the Australian identity. Second: One Nation is cuddling up to the LNP offering limp-wristed 'criticism' over some policies, while still promising preferences for patronage.
What is happening ? Are Queenslanders being deceived by the brand-name One Nation ? However, has its guts been ripped out and has it turned into its opposite ?
A REAL STOLEN GENERATION`.
Australia First noted the rot had well set in during the last Federal election campaign. A curious policy statement appeared on the party website. One Nation was advocating foreign adoptions from the Third World, with the placing of these children into Aussie families since this was the best way to arrive at "assimilation".
What ?? This didn't sound too much like our perception of the beliefs of One Nation members.
Last August, a representative of Australia First phoned the One Nation Senate candidate Ian Nelson, who expressed surprise that anyone would question such a policy Mr. Nelson pointed out that the State President, Jim Savage, had experience of the difficulties getting such Third World children into Australia-given his wife had had real problems obtaining visas for her nephew and niece from the Philippines.
Mr. Nelson was asked: "but isn't that going to make a real sort of stolen generation, one where children are stolen and brought into an alien culture ? "No, it is the best way to assimilate them", he said. "But maybe we Australians don't want to assimilate them, maybe they should stay in the Third World" ? Call ended.
In their policy statement, One Nation was advancing the proposition that the assimilation of another race into the Australian nation via the backdoor of some family-based 'cultural assimilation' of stolen children-was a credible policy goal. Why, why, would one want to preach that ? Is there something going on in One Nation ?
THE PLOT THICKENS. THE MOSLEM RED-HERRING AGAIN
Then the penny was dropped on us concerning Mr. Nelson. Penny ? Try cement slab. An article appeared in the Queensland Times. Every patriotic Queenslander should read this article.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/one-nations-surprising-new-face-20110225-1b7y9.html
The article explains that Mr. Nelson who intends to campaign for One Nation in the next year's poll will be joined on the hustings by his Thai wife and their teenage daughter. It said that this was a new development for One Nation which had first made its name by being critical of Asian migration. Did not Pauline Hanson say that "Australia is being swamped by Asians" ? In the article, Mr. Nelson made it very clear that his fury on immigration was only directed at the Moslem bogy man.
The article said-and we quote directly: Despite witnessing his wife's difficult adjustment to a new culture and country, Nelson has no sympathy at all for the most recent targets of multiculturism's critics.
For him, the woman he affectionately calls "little one" is not like the other new Australians, particularly Muslims, at the heart of the current national debate.
"It's the ones that don't [ assimilate ] and live in their little enclaves that's unacceptable in this country," he said.
Now let's get this garbage right. Moslems don't assimilate. Well, tick. And as the rest of the article makes very clear, Mr. Nelson equates Moslem migration with rapes, ghettos and crime. Well, tick. However, if you assimilate other Third Worlders, particularly by marrying them and having kids with them, that is okay ? Yes ? This is an odd policy, a sort of bedroom-driven plan for social engineering. It's a wonder the Human Rights Commission didn't think it up-and offer special baby bonuses to facilitate the outcome.
Do we ignore the other negatives of immigration ? Do we ignore the sustainability question: that is, whether Australia should take any migrants at all ? Do we ignore the reality of Chinese immigration where massive swathes of the big cities are subject to takeover by horde-like agents of a foreign state, a group whose members are far more insidious than an Arab or Moslem rape gang ?
It seems Mr. Nelson has ignored all that. He might also have ignored, if he ever understood it, that the alien does not assimilate: we Australians assimilate to the alien. Moslems are just a small part of the massive demographic change now swamping our country. Why concentrate on just Moslems ?
Australia First has this radical idea that, to a certain small extent, the powers-that-be don't mind too much if a few points are scored against the Moslems. After all, Aussie soldiers are ( sadly ) doing a job for the oil companies and other alien interests by being in Moslem lands and whipping up a little amount of anti-Islamism here has a purpose in keeping support up for these useless wars. And, vaguely out there somewhere, Islamist nutter networks still might pull off a terrorist outrage in Australia. People have to be alert to that too. Of course, this anti-Islamism must never go too far and branch out in a general criticism of immigration, multiculturalism-and more sharply, never, ever, condemn multi racialism. It must stay within strict limits and so the major parties can manipulate the public.
So, very conveniently for establishment needs, along comes some group which wants to raise up the spectre of unassimilated Moslems. One Nation wants to scream at them, rant at them, get votes from people who realise they certainly don't fit; then One Nation can parade itself as an independent party standing up for us ordinary folks who are peeved with immigration.
Yet all the while we have the anti Moslem crusade in operation, One Nation's leading male members use their penises to assimilate nice Asian brides. Is Sigmund Freud having a joke on us ? Are they overcompensating for their personal conduct ? Did any other One Nation members do the Asian sex tour ? Are they the internal base of support for this new leadership ?
Are we missing something here ? Is it the case that there is some game being played aimed right at the heart of those Queenslanders who wish to take the nationalist road ?
CONSERVATISM
Of late, as One Nation makes noises about re-registering as a party, it has been chattering about doing preference deals with the Liberal National Party, even saying publicly that its preferences elected a LibNat in the recent Federal Senate poll and that the LibNats should reciprocate in the future, that they should make an end to the 'preference One Nation last' policy. They are saying that their preferences in the electorate of Ashgrove might even elect the next Queensland Premier. The offer is: throw us a bone and we'll be there for you. Who knows, maybe they will ? But the drift is that One Nation is now calling itself a "conservative party", much to the internal criticism of many sincere One Nation members who think this puts them on the same continuum as the LibNats. In a sort of way-it does. It's the slippery slope to nowhere.
In this delusional politics, the One Nation leadership steers the party rhetoric about traditional family values; a little flag waving is engaged in;, and a civic identity politics is pushed ( ie. it defends the idea of a national identity based only upon symbols, promotes that aliens become English-speaking and everyone gives loyalty to the constitution and our 'allies' ). As a conservative party, One Nation members will be told that they are bringing conservative voters out of the establishment parties towards a new hard patriotism. In truth, it is the establishment LNP which is quite happy to harness disaffected patriotic Queenslanders to One Nation and its forlorn quest to enter the mainstream as the leading conservative voice. That is an old con. Smart. Slick. Effective.
RUDYARD KIPLING'S ROAD TO MANDALAY V RODGERED COUPLINGS WAY TO GO THAIGIRLINTHEHAY
There was a great poem by Rudyard Kipling called the Road To Mandalay, a nineteenth century muse that suggested some sort of true-love unions occur between Europeans and Orientals in the mists of cultural abstraction up the Irrawaddy River-or something like that. Possibly, that has happened occasionally just as much as the true members of those races might have scorned it. However, we have doubts that unions founded upon alcohol in Manila or Bangkok bars, sex-tour romps where rancid old Aussies indulge their fantasies, mail-order shopping for a good housekeeper and compliant bed-partner and so on-make for much along the lines of Kipling's muse. The public displays of these Rodgered Couplings that their little ones are just marvellously assimilated, don't wash with us.
We have said that Freudian sex psychology is a factor here. We should say that the whole affair is politically corrupting. Not simply psychic overcompensation is involved when we witness anti Moslem screaming in place of a sober critical sentiment about immigration. Policy could become perverted-and not just about the matter of overseas adoptions. A different model of Australianity is put up there. Intermarraige as assimilation becomes a goal of the 'patriot'. In the latest policy turn of One Nation, we can see that defence of Australia's European identity is just not what the party is about.
EITHER IT'S ONE BIG MELTING POT OR IT'S THE AUSTRALIA FIRST POSITION
The position of Australia First is one that sorts out the muddle of One Nation. One Nation, going back a very long way and right to the start in fact-was always equivocal on what it meant about immigration from the Third World. Did it want to end it ? And reverse it ? Or assimilate what was already here ? Did it seek to preserve Australia's European heritage or not ? Certainly at least, at the very least, Mrs. Hanson said that Australia was running the risk of being "swamped" by Asians. Sadly, she gave no answer.
The mix-up has become one big messy melting-pot muddle. Now One Nation will rant against Moslems ( and refugees too ), but stay criminally silent about the very future of the nation.
We say that nationality does have a biological component. None of that involves, or ever could, any hatreds of other peoples or odd thoughts about how 'superior' or 'better' we white Aussies may be in respect of other peoples. However, it certainly includes our right to exist as a people sovereign over our continent. It is also very clear to us that our very survival is challenged by mass immigration and alien takeover and that we will have to defend ourselves, our heritage, our identity ! As a matter of necessity, one big melting pot is not for us. It is odd to Australia First that not only is the melting pot the official state view, but it is now the position taken by some so-called patriots. We say: no !
It is time for One Nation members to take back their party if they can. Yet, when they do, if they do, they will need to look at how this muddle was arrived at. One Nation members might even think better and consider it is time to join Australia First.
Monday, May 9, 2011
A Liveable Pension For Fairdinkum Australians & The 3000 Club !
Aussie Senior Citizens are now experiencing the effects of the collapsing Globalist economic system, which has been imposed upon Australians over recent decades by Liberal and Labor politicians dutifully implementing the Big Business agenda.
Seniors who have worked productively over a life time; have contributed to society with family and community activity; put some money aside; have paid taxation of 1/3 plus of income; were duped into superannuation schemes, are now seeing their savings evaporate as this Globalist ideology crashes.
The wholesale sell out of our Australian manufacturing and productive capacity to foreign interests, and the deregulation of our financial sector, to create a subservient cog in the Global economic order as a "trinket" type raw materials supplier, and an immigrant dumping ground-is the root cause of the crisis likely to now descend upon Australians. ( Members of the 3000 Club excepted ).
Compulsory supperannuation monies, instead of being allocated for Australian owned productive development, have been used to stoke the Stock Exchanges, and for other usage in speculative exploitation. It was, all inherently prone to collapse as per the contradictions of capitalism.
A rude awakening is now descending on increasing numbers of Seniors as they are forced to undertake the "Centerlink Run"-coming to grips with a pension system programmed to comply with the IMF/Internationalist/Globalist agenda to minimise Social Security payments.
THE CENTERLINK RUN:
STEP 1: You front to the local office, and can experience first hand the Liberal/Labor/Green politicians` immigration/guest workers/refugee rackets, but you fall into the queue for you still believe you count for something as a productive citizen, and your years of paying taxation had a purpose.
You have your turn for the bureaucrat-and the near 100 question application form to see if the paltry $230 a week is to come your way. A number is allotted to you for the "system". ( No members of the 3000 Club sighted ).
STEP 2: You bare your soul in the multitude of questions-any thought of the Aussie tradition that your affairs are your business soon dissipates. Who are you-prove it; How much cash have you under the bed; Have you been o/s and how much money did you take; Did you give any money away; What are your bank accounts; Any rooms rented out; Who has your super fund and how much is it-prove it; What property do you own/got a beach shack/what's it worth; How much for your house and contents; What jewellery have you got; Can you cash in any life assurance.
It starts to dawn on you that this might all be about ensuring you get as little pension entitlement as possible.
But you are enticed that you might qualify for a health card for medical benefits, and reduced rates and government charges. How good is that !
When finished, you look at your arm to see if by chance a tattoo of the allotted system number has appeared, as you are starting to think that as an Aussie you no longer rate for much.
STEP 3 : You front before the bureaucrat, forms ( and cap ) in hand to be scrutinised. You are reminded again about the Pension Bonus of $30k, available to you if you will slave on in full time work for another five years. ( 3000 Club Members get that in 10 weeks ).
Your getting a bit edgy, aware that all your personal information is now going onto Big Brother's database and available virtually to any Government department, and who knows who else.
You are informed that on your details, that after 45 years of work and paying taxes, your in for a part pension-$125 a week, as is your spouse-yes, a pension of $250 a week between you for the good life. And, you must also report in each month on any extra income you may generate so your pension would be reduced. ( Still no 3000 Club Members sighted ).
The penny finally drops that in the Australia of today AUSSIE SENIORS COUNT FOR NOTHING !
WHAT CAN BE DONE.
As a group of citizens, the reality is that Seniors are past"use by date" to the Liberal/Labor politicians who have inflicted the Globalist agenda upon Australia.
Protesting Pensioners can "bare their bras" for the systems` media, or petition these same politicians, but it is pointless. Genuine Seniors may find this difficult to accept, but it is this very same political ilk down the decades who have restricted, and devalued pension entitlements to the current poverty line level, and who continue to parrot that a liveable pension cannot be afforded. ( But not for the 3000 Club Members ).
Petitioning Globalist politicians that have overseen our productive enterprises and natural wealth taken by foreigners; connived for near zero tax for multinational corporations, and other schemes of tax avoidance; squandered untold $billions on alien immigration and anti Australian multiculturalism, AND, stealing the 7% taxation surcharge ( passed by referendum in 1947 ) to fund all Aussies a pension, is a total waste of Seniors time.
The facts are that "Regime Change"-a change of attitude, psycology,economic and cultural direction through the complete and utter rejection of the present traitor political caste and their Big Business masters, is essential to now attain social justice for Aussie Seniors.
The Australia First Core Policy of Citizens Initiated Referendum ( CIR ) and Parliamentary Recall can ensure this change-CIR remakes the political landscape-no ifs-no buts, for the citizen is again in charge of our society and values, not vested interest politicians.
The Australia First Party programme is for ALL AUSSIE SENIORS at retirement age to have a LIVEABLE PENSION, related to the average wage, and secured on supply of appropriate identity to the relevant government administration. Nothing else is needed !
Australia First will take back our productive and natural wealth; we want Aussie control, direction, and ownership of our Australian economy, free of all Globalist dictates, and with equitable payment of taxation to provide pension funding. And, no Globalist political parrots like the 3000 Club Members.
IF YOU DON'T FIGHT, YOU LOSE.
THE 3000 CLUB:
Members on this easy street ride include Malcolm Fraser, Bob Hawke, Meg Lees, Jeff Kennett, John Howard, Gareth Evans, Tim Fisher, Joan Kirner, John Cain, Alexander Downer, Steve Bracks, Paul Keating, Nick Greiner, etc, etc, all feeding off the taxpayer with their $3000 a week pensions. You won't see this lot on the Centerlink run !
Seniors who have worked productively over a life time; have contributed to society with family and community activity; put some money aside; have paid taxation of 1/3 plus of income; were duped into superannuation schemes, are now seeing their savings evaporate as this Globalist ideology crashes.
The wholesale sell out of our Australian manufacturing and productive capacity to foreign interests, and the deregulation of our financial sector, to create a subservient cog in the Global economic order as a "trinket" type raw materials supplier, and an immigrant dumping ground-is the root cause of the crisis likely to now descend upon Australians. ( Members of the 3000 Club excepted ).
Compulsory supperannuation monies, instead of being allocated for Australian owned productive development, have been used to stoke the Stock Exchanges, and for other usage in speculative exploitation. It was, all inherently prone to collapse as per the contradictions of capitalism.
A rude awakening is now descending on increasing numbers of Seniors as they are forced to undertake the "Centerlink Run"-coming to grips with a pension system programmed to comply with the IMF/Internationalist/Globalist agenda to minimise Social Security payments.
THE CENTERLINK RUN:
STEP 1: You front to the local office, and can experience first hand the Liberal/Labor/Green politicians` immigration/guest workers/refugee rackets, but you fall into the queue for you still believe you count for something as a productive citizen, and your years of paying taxation had a purpose.
You have your turn for the bureaucrat-and the near 100 question application form to see if the paltry $230 a week is to come your way. A number is allotted to you for the "system". ( No members of the 3000 Club sighted ).
STEP 2: You bare your soul in the multitude of questions-any thought of the Aussie tradition that your affairs are your business soon dissipates. Who are you-prove it; How much cash have you under the bed; Have you been o/s and how much money did you take; Did you give any money away; What are your bank accounts; Any rooms rented out; Who has your super fund and how much is it-prove it; What property do you own/got a beach shack/what's it worth; How much for your house and contents; What jewellery have you got; Can you cash in any life assurance.
It starts to dawn on you that this might all be about ensuring you get as little pension entitlement as possible.
But you are enticed that you might qualify for a health card for medical benefits, and reduced rates and government charges. How good is that !
When finished, you look at your arm to see if by chance a tattoo of the allotted system number has appeared, as you are starting to think that as an Aussie you no longer rate for much.
STEP 3 : You front before the bureaucrat, forms ( and cap ) in hand to be scrutinised. You are reminded again about the Pension Bonus of $30k, available to you if you will slave on in full time work for another five years. ( 3000 Club Members get that in 10 weeks ).
Your getting a bit edgy, aware that all your personal information is now going onto Big Brother's database and available virtually to any Government department, and who knows who else.
You are informed that on your details, that after 45 years of work and paying taxes, your in for a part pension-$125 a week, as is your spouse-yes, a pension of $250 a week between you for the good life. And, you must also report in each month on any extra income you may generate so your pension would be reduced. ( Still no 3000 Club Members sighted ).
The penny finally drops that in the Australia of today AUSSIE SENIORS COUNT FOR NOTHING !
WHAT CAN BE DONE.
As a group of citizens, the reality is that Seniors are past"use by date" to the Liberal/Labor politicians who have inflicted the Globalist agenda upon Australia.
Protesting Pensioners can "bare their bras" for the systems` media, or petition these same politicians, but it is pointless. Genuine Seniors may find this difficult to accept, but it is this very same political ilk down the decades who have restricted, and devalued pension entitlements to the current poverty line level, and who continue to parrot that a liveable pension cannot be afforded. ( But not for the 3000 Club Members ).
Petitioning Globalist politicians that have overseen our productive enterprises and natural wealth taken by foreigners; connived for near zero tax for multinational corporations, and other schemes of tax avoidance; squandered untold $billions on alien immigration and anti Australian multiculturalism, AND, stealing the 7% taxation surcharge ( passed by referendum in 1947 ) to fund all Aussies a pension, is a total waste of Seniors time.
The facts are that "Regime Change"-a change of attitude, psycology,economic and cultural direction through the complete and utter rejection of the present traitor political caste and their Big Business masters, is essential to now attain social justice for Aussie Seniors.
The Australia First Core Policy of Citizens Initiated Referendum ( CIR ) and Parliamentary Recall can ensure this change-CIR remakes the political landscape-no ifs-no buts, for the citizen is again in charge of our society and values, not vested interest politicians.
The Australia First Party programme is for ALL AUSSIE SENIORS at retirement age to have a LIVEABLE PENSION, related to the average wage, and secured on supply of appropriate identity to the relevant government administration. Nothing else is needed !
Australia First will take back our productive and natural wealth; we want Aussie control, direction, and ownership of our Australian economy, free of all Globalist dictates, and with equitable payment of taxation to provide pension funding. And, no Globalist political parrots like the 3000 Club Members.
IF YOU DON'T FIGHT, YOU LOSE.
THE 3000 CLUB:
Members on this easy street ride include Malcolm Fraser, Bob Hawke, Meg Lees, Jeff Kennett, John Howard, Gareth Evans, Tim Fisher, Joan Kirner, John Cain, Alexander Downer, Steve Bracks, Paul Keating, Nick Greiner, etc, etc, all feeding off the taxpayer with their $3000 a week pensions. You won't see this lot on the Centerlink run !
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Liberal/National Silence Deafening On Labour/Greens` Sell Off.
Daily Advertiser 4.5.11
Jock Munro
Rankin Springs
The proposed purchase by foreigners of AWB commodities by giant publicly unlisted Cargill and Sunrice by Spanish Ebro, is further evidence that the buyup of Australian assets continues apace.
However, Liberal Junee Senator Bill Heffernan who has led a song and dance previously on foreign takeovers is strangely silent.
Bill and his Liberal regional colleagues voted with the Liberal and Labor urban elites to abolish the wheat single desk and the consequences have been profound.
Wheat marketing and logistics are now spiralling out of control and rapidly passing into foreign hands.
Growers, including his neighbours from Junee, a strong wheat growing area, might have expected that Senator Heffernan may have taken the opportunity to stand up and be counted on this latest round of overseas takeovers.
So far his silence has been deafening.
End.....
Australia First Party is the only party that puts Australia and Australians first !
Jock Munro
Rankin Springs
The proposed purchase by foreigners of AWB commodities by giant publicly unlisted Cargill and Sunrice by Spanish Ebro, is further evidence that the buyup of Australian assets continues apace.
However, Liberal Junee Senator Bill Heffernan who has led a song and dance previously on foreign takeovers is strangely silent.
Bill and his Liberal regional colleagues voted with the Liberal and Labor urban elites to abolish the wheat single desk and the consequences have been profound.
Wheat marketing and logistics are now spiralling out of control and rapidly passing into foreign hands.
Growers, including his neighbours from Junee, a strong wheat growing area, might have expected that Senator Heffernan may have taken the opportunity to stand up and be counted on this latest round of overseas takeovers.
So far his silence has been deafening.
End.....
Australia First Party is the only party that puts Australia and Australians first !
Palerang Shire By Election Campaign
Australia First Party has entered Mr. John McGrath in the Palerang Shire Council by-election to be held on May 14. Palerang is centered on the New South Wales rural towns of Bungendore and Braidwood.
Mr. McGrath has been a Palerang resident for four decades and has mainly been involved in farming. He has also been a committed nationalist activist with a long history in various organisations. He has been a member of Australia First Party since it was re-established as a new corporate entity in September 2007.
The campaign in Palerang Shire has moved well with firm local contacts being made by the party. Articles mentioning the party have appeared in local newspapers and other publications. John McGrath, has been scheduled to speak at community meetings with other candidates, in Bungendore, Braidwood and Wamboin.
This election is the first time that anyone has raised the Murray Darling water conspiracy as an electoral matter. It is John's intention to assist in deepening the community resistance to the schemes of the Murray Darling Basin Authority which will surely destroy Australian agriculture-in favour of foreign and local mining magnates who have mining claims all over the Riverina and other affected areas. Nothing very 'green' there ! Rather, environmental concerns with water usage and being used as a smoke screen by the multinationals and other exploiters.
We publish the Palerang Australia First programme as it appears on John's recently printed how-to-vote card.
(i) For Citizens` initiated referendum at council level; I want to see people be able to propose Council policy and by-laws directly so as to maintain democratic control over their representatives.
(ii) Against the NSW Department of Planning scheme to expand the population of Palerang by 69% by 2036. I am sure this will be immigration -driven. Immigration is no friend to the lifestyle, the environment or our heritage and surely a policy whose time has passed.
(iii) Against the water takeover plans of the Murray Darling Basin Authority. The water plans threaten to destroy Australian farming and regional communities. The UN Treaty RAMSAR upon which this is based is acceded to by the major parties, Greens and others. I stand opposed and will work with all to win against the government.
(iv) To make Palerang more friendly towards road transport. I note that farmers depend on the trucking industry and while I believe in the extention of rail wherever possible, Council must try to protect this vital industry.
(v) For greater autonomy for local Councils over the NSW Department of Planning. I want to see domestic planning decisions made for the benefit of people.
( Electoral comment responsibility: J. Saleam 725 Princes Highway, Tempe 2044 )
Mr. McGrath has been a Palerang resident for four decades and has mainly been involved in farming. He has also been a committed nationalist activist with a long history in various organisations. He has been a member of Australia First Party since it was re-established as a new corporate entity in September 2007.
The campaign in Palerang Shire has moved well with firm local contacts being made by the party. Articles mentioning the party have appeared in local newspapers and other publications. John McGrath, has been scheduled to speak at community meetings with other candidates, in Bungendore, Braidwood and Wamboin.
This election is the first time that anyone has raised the Murray Darling water conspiracy as an electoral matter. It is John's intention to assist in deepening the community resistance to the schemes of the Murray Darling Basin Authority which will surely destroy Australian agriculture-in favour of foreign and local mining magnates who have mining claims all over the Riverina and other affected areas. Nothing very 'green' there ! Rather, environmental concerns with water usage and being used as a smoke screen by the multinationals and other exploiters.
We publish the Palerang Australia First programme as it appears on John's recently printed how-to-vote card.
(i) For Citizens` initiated referendum at council level; I want to see people be able to propose Council policy and by-laws directly so as to maintain democratic control over their representatives.
(ii) Against the NSW Department of Planning scheme to expand the population of Palerang by 69% by 2036. I am sure this will be immigration -driven. Immigration is no friend to the lifestyle, the environment or our heritage and surely a policy whose time has passed.
(iii) Against the water takeover plans of the Murray Darling Basin Authority. The water plans threaten to destroy Australian farming and regional communities. The UN Treaty RAMSAR upon which this is based is acceded to by the major parties, Greens and others. I stand opposed and will work with all to win against the government.
(iv) To make Palerang more friendly towards road transport. I note that farmers depend on the trucking industry and while I believe in the extention of rail wherever possible, Council must try to protect this vital industry.
(v) For greater autonomy for local Councils over the NSW Department of Planning. I want to see domestic planning decisions made for the benefit of people.
( Electoral comment responsibility: J. Saleam 725 Princes Highway, Tempe 2044 )
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
