NEW SYDNEY - MELBOURNE FAST TRAIN - BYPASSES WAGGA WAGGA

NEW SYDNEY - MELBOURNE RAIL LINE. FOR WHOM AND FOR WHAT??
Jim Saleam and Lorraine Sharp

The proposal to build eight new cities along a very fast rail service between Sydney and Melbourne raises two questions. For who are these cities intended? What purposes would they serve?

Question one. These cities are chiefly for people who are not in Australia yet. Most of the 'new Australians' who would populate them are mainly currently in Asia, especially China.

Question two. The cities are to provide some new localized commerce and industry, but many of the new Australians (sic) would commute daily to the satellite cities of Sydney or Melbourne or to the new CBD centres being built around the suburban railway stations of our two greatest cities. The new cities are part of the system of 'global growth corridors'.

The new cities and their capital city linked structures are part of the global economy and do not serve Australian interests and Australia would exercise little real sovereignty there thanks to Free Trade Agreements and the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

So what of the Australian towns long the old railway line?

Recently Wagga Wagga City Council and Albury City Council expressed their dismay that the new wondrous technology and urband development would not bless them.

Sad councillors all! But that is the very point of it. It is called re-colonization and they don't see it!

The old Australian towns between Sydney and Melbourne will degenerate into ghettos and labour centres. What?? The White and Aboriginal populations would be left to rot, to declining services, rough and rougher justice, drugs, and utter marginalization. The refugees (sic) and cheap labour rural workers would work the nearby rural economy that is also linked to globo land, as farms as we know them disappear and turn into plantations and coal seam gas and other mining scars the land. People pushed out of the new Sydney-Melbourne globalist order could migrate there to live out their lives - and die!

What a vision!

Those who dreamed up the new cities project we call members of the traitor class of power and money. Perhaps our readers can see why?

http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/australia-could-soon-get-its-own-dormitory-towns-thanks-to-fast-rail/news-story/17674fcabf605308faea9d9164a23ded

REMOVE THE FOSSILS FROM WAGGA COUNCIL - Australia First Party (2016 Council Elections)

THE HOUSE OF FOSSILS
Henry Lawson, 1892


Behold! above the people all an old museum stands,
The ancient House of Fossils which is mighty in the lands, And there, as in the days gone by, when the ancient rulers lied, Invulnerable ignorance and cheek are petrified;
And, though the God of property might grit his teeth and frown, I think it's time the people pulled the old museum down.
I think that we've been fooled enough by venerable lies - I think it's time that Workmen wiped the verdure from their eyes.

Why send our men to Parliament?
There's nothing to be won,
For all the good they do is by the FOSSILIZED undone;
We start the car of progress, and we see it coming back,
For lo! the old museum stands forever in the track.
We cannot pass the measures that the people talk about,
And there'll be no reform until we clear the Fossils out.
We battled for One-Man-One-Vote; the PEOPLE passed the Bill;
But listen how the Fossilized can thwart the People's will.

Now P(h)ilcher, first, denied in terms, sarcastically choice.
That Labour Members represent the working People's voice;
He went a little further, and he spiked their guns - to wit,
He did deny their right to say they represented it.
He drew his sword of argument from out it's rusty sheath,
And dared the champions who "threw the Assembly in his teeth".
And he denied - well, he denied the TRUTH to all intents
And purposes - I want to know what P(h)ilcher represents.

Then Combes must add his drivel to the everlasting flood;
He hoped that they would stop the Bill and "nip it in the bud",
(But aye the plant shall bud again and Time, the Grand old Thief
Shall nip the House of Fossils in the sear and yellow leaf);
A Fossil he, and so, of course he thinks that it is best
That any man should vote whate'er "he has an interest".
He gave a case in point; he said, in other days (lang syne)
He "went into the wilderness" and opened up a mine;

The place is populated now by thousands - "mostly fools" - (He even gave the number of the children in the schools,)
And if the bill was passed - well then - what then ? well - anyhow
He couldn't represent - or help to boss - the district now!
I really think the man who craves so much for place and pelf
Should go and dig another hole, and undertake himself.
Then Ironmonger Macintosh addressed the Fossilized!
He claimed the rights of property- they should have recognised.
He lives, like other rocks. as though the past has never been;
He really cannot say he has, since last election, seen
A single public meeting called on purpose to discuss
The question of One-Man-One-Vote. But was it ever thus;
For if the whole creation let the reign of wrong behind,
The Fossils wouldn't see, for the Petrified are blind.

And in his inconsistency he thinks it is too much
That he be asked to give a vote to parasites as such.
Alas, for human arguments, when these enlightened men
Deny the starving thief a vote, while wealthy thieves have ten.
If honest Labour can't outvote the spieler and the tout,
"Tis time the Lord got up in wrath and wiped the nations out.
Then Joseph rose to "caution" the community at large"
(I really think the God of Greed was left in Israel's charge).

He did not hesitate to say that if the Bill was passed
We'd turn and put a cruel tax on property at last.
He looked into the future, just as far as he could see,
And drew a painful picture of poor "helpless Property"
He mouthed about "Frugality" and says, as bold as brass.
That that which injures capital will damn the working-class.
He drivelled, and he cautioned, and- we do not say he lied-
He cautioned mankind just as much as P(h)ilcher had denied.

Then purblind Lawyer Piggott rose with something in his throat,
He said the Bill was never meant to give One-Man-One-Vote.
The gist of Piggott's argument was that the Bill was meant
To make a pauper equal to an "honourable" gent.
And then upon the Bill there tell another of the rocks
With thirty thousand acres of the People's land - 'twas Coin' He said, etcetera. But why repeat the senseless bosh agen;
(As Anthony remarked; "They all are 'honourable' men.")

And still above the people all the House of Fossils stands,
The greatest of phenomena in these enlightened lands;
And there as in the grand old days, when Roman Fossils lied,
Invulnerable ignorance and cheek are petrified.
And though it shelters property, and helps to prop the Crown,
I think it's time the toilers pulled the old museum down.
I think that we've been fooled enough by venerable lies.
I think it's time the people cleansed the verdure from their eyes.