For A Patriotic United Front.

The Following statement was approved by the management committee of the party on January 10 2011. It Is Now Published.

The Australia First Party recognises the dependent nature of the Australian state upon the forces of globalism. Australia is a client state, ruled by a traitor class which is intergrated into a transnational network of globalist elites and their economic and political structures. This class would govern Australia as a resources quarry cowed by thought-policing and a secret political police. Australia is further menaced by a new Chinese imperialism that competes with the American face of the New World Order for domination over Asia and the Pacific, with Australia a pawn in the game. The unfolding population / food crisis coupled with New World Order wars launches refugee hordes at Australia's borders, whilst the traitor class sponsors a mass immigration recolonization of Australia for the purposes of economic enmeshment with the 'global economy'. In the world crisis of the first quarter of the twenty-first century, Australia lacks status as an independent country. Indeed, Australia may disappear by century's end as a country-and suffer partition by other states.

To rescue our country and our people means removing Australia to a position outside of the chaos of globalism. That means the creation of an independent Australia. To win an independent Australia where political power can be exercised directly by the people, where wealth comes to all who labour and where arms and the initiation and the enforcement of the laws are in the hands of the people, a new force outside of the old parties and their worn-out ideologies and prejudices-has become necessary. This new nationalist movement must now fight and win the struggle for Australia's national independence.

It is ultimately necessary to unite all who can be united against the traitor class into a broad patriotic front to achieve Australian national independence. All those parties, groups and trade and community associations which contest the ideology, the politics, the economics and the cultural expressions of globalism, can find common ground against the foreign control and exploitation of Australia. Their uniting thread is the cause of Australian national independence.

The patriotic united front should not be a matter for tomorrow, but a matter of immediacy. United fronts operate in two ways: we predict the ultimate formation of a mass united front in times future, one that will win Australian national independence at a moment when parties and groups, economic and social and cultural associations all bond together in intense struggle. For today, we must build for that future in struggles on a daily basis around all manner of issues; we must wage community campaigns apposite to each Australian group and build unity on the ground. It is mandatory to seek this unity.

The Australia First Party is an incorporation registered as a Federal party. That does not mean that its function is only to contest elections. The party operates to the 'three tier method'. This means that the party contests elections, wages community campaigns of all sorts to build links with fellow Australians and to unite all Australians-and develops its ideas and principles into an Australianist ideology that also carries on a cultural defence of Australianity against globalisation. The three tiers operate as a unity.

In one sense, the party reaches out to groups of a patriotic nature which may operate to one or another of these three tiers as their individual method. The party seeks to build relationships with such parties and groups and to unite whenever necessary to defend common interests and win common victories. New patriotic groups form either as political, trade, or cultural groups. As Australia descends into chaos, that process is organic.

Australia First Party within the broad patriotic movement seeks to be a vanguard movement. This means that the party struggles to affirm the power of the ideals of Australian identity, independence and freedom, to carry those ideals everywhere, to defend them and preach them with zeal as a veritable Australianism and to inspire all others to tread the path towards the overweening fight for Australian national independence.

The party states clearly how it would prefer its dealings with other patriotic political organisations to be conducted and what relationships should be developed.

The Australia First Party recognises that different parties and groups exist for several reasons. These reasons can include: geographic circumstance, particular historical factors, previous organisational histories, the inter-relationships of people and sometimes-internecine struggles that are to be regretted, but which are human nature.

The Australia First Party declares that it will treat the other political organisations within a patriotic united front in this way:

1. Negotiate with any would-be candidate to avoid electerol competition.

2. Assist, when requested, other parties etc. in an electorate or council area where Australia First Party has no candidate.

3. Develop united activist campaigns on public issues or on other fronts, with any party or group-and do this in a consultative and cooperative spirit.

4. Exchange intelligence on disruptive elements, or state or other programs which undermine the integrity of the patriotic movement.

5. Avoid all unnecessary, unreasonable comment on other parties and groups; but point out fairly and reasonably, what any differences may be, whenever appropriate.

The party states clearly how it would prefer its dealings with other patriotic community organisations to be conducted and what relationships should be developed.

The Australia First Party recognises that different community associations arise for different reasons. Some defend the interests of the Australian productive classes-workers, farmers, small-business or other patriotic working people. Some advance the defence of Australian heritage and identity. Some explain new ideas that can inspire a very different Australia.

The Australia First Party declares that it will treat other organisations that represent the Australian community within a patriotic united front in this way:

1. Build links with each group and attempt to link together each group that all understand and appreciate the role of the party and each other.

2. Assist all in their struggles as requested.

3. Develop united activist campaigns on public issues with each group-and do this in a consultative and cooperative spirit.

4. Exchange intelligence on disruptive elements, or state or other programs which undermine the integrity of the patriotic movement.

5. Aviod all unnecessary, unreasonable comment on groups; but point out fairly and reasonably, what any differences may be, whenever appropriate.

The Australia First Party will always maintain its independence and iniciative in any united front arrangement and will act to secure its interests. However, it accepts that the times require a flexible and co-operative attitude.

Certainly, the goals of the Australia First Party are ( i ) to unite all nationalist and activist minded people into a single party and then seek further working arrangements with whatever political forces may thereafter exist for whatever reasons outside of the party's ambit and ( ii ) to deepen the unity of Australia's productive classes and their organisations against the traitor class and to create wider unity amongst all those resistance organisations which critique globalisation in ideas and culture.

Certainly, the party's aim is indeed to impose order where we detect diffuseness and to give focus where we note disarray.

Nonetheless, the party reasons that such general goals can not be reached by a self-proclamation of virtue. Rather, the party will fight such that its ideological position and political line progressively gain hegemony. It shall do so openly and honestly and by all fair means of discourse. No other organisation should feel anything else than a sense of relief that the position is made clear.

In the interim, and given that the fair contest of parties and other forces will continue, the Australia First Party has concluded that the only practical way whereby all may learn of each other and build the necessary bonds and links which allow for final unity, is to work confederally to construct a practical unity in struggle.

The united patriotic front is the requirement to which all should work.

Why Do We Really Need To Levy Australian Business And People For The Floods.

The floods are a national disaster, yet we persist in making short term decisions which have long term impacts on our economy, our food security and our lives. Why levy businesses and our people to pay for the neglect of infrastructure by governments, and poor decisions by planning authorities over many years? Why not levy the importers who will benefit from the decimation of our food growing areas in Queensland, NSW and Victoria?

The floods have exacerbated a problem that we created, not mother-nature. Our farmers have suffered years of drought, the threat of mining taking priority over their water supplies or contaminating them, and foreign companies and countries allowed to buy our land or breeding stock to export and compete with us, or to buy our water licenses then trade them as intangible commodities.

Free Trade Agreements and the high AUD$ mean that cheap, imported foods have been competing against our farmers for years by foreign owned companies manufacturing here, or local retailers importing their private labels in direct competition with Australian suppliers.

Foreign interests have been allowed to buy the channels of distribution for our exports leaving our farmers as price takers not price makers. Seventy five percent of our dairy industry is foreign owned, as are our brewing, beef exports and abattoirs, grain exports, sugar and most of our food manufacturing. Unless we own what we have we lose control.

Decisions have been made wrongly by successive governments on the basis that we export more food than we use here. No other developed country has exposed its food supply and farmers to the same extent. When we consider that we have an enviable clean, green, growing environment and some of the most skilled and productive farmers in the world this is an indictment on how poorly we have managed a strategic resource – our food supply.

We have opportunities to rebuild lost homes and infrastructure, and priority should be given to resourcing our people and our own local companies to supply and build these. But almost half our food growing areas are decimated for the short term. These are our farmers, our skills, our factories, and our jobs under threat.

The beneficiaries of our losses will be all those countries who will gain access to our food markets while our farmers rebuild. These countries will not leave once they gain greater access. China, New Zealand, USA, Peru, Chile, UK, EU, Thailand, India are all ready to capitalise on our losses. If they are to benefit, then they should pay for access to our markets, and their imports should be on an emergency basis only until such times as our farmers can supply us again. The levies should be on them not Australians.

These countries subsidise their farmers, so it about time Australia started to subsidise our farmers especially through this “natural disaster” rebuilding period. Consumers should be better informed and allowed to choose. Our labelling laws should make it mandatory to put country of origin on all foods, and be policed to ensure consumers know exactly where the food they are eating is grown.

Our gate keepers should be better resourced to ensure we have a viable farming sector and retain the skills and quality systems that our farmers meet. AQIS should at the very least triple its resources to assess the quality and condition of produce being imported so that we are not exposed to unwanted diseases or contaminants and chemicals not allowed here.

Bio security Australia should have independent Australian scientists to assess the quality of imported foods, and not have to rely on global companies with vested interests other than Australia’s to provide research.

ACCC should be serious about the unfair competition allowed to occur when foreign interests buy our key food industry sectors for both domestic and export use. Our farmers may own the farms but they do not own the profits.

Our farmers will never recover if we do not look after them now. It is not a level playing field. These are our people, our businesses, our communities and our farmers. The Australian people have shown their true worth in how they responded to the disasters which have befallen them. Now it is time for decision makers to give Priority to Australia.

PRIORITY AUSTRALIA IN 2011

Lynne Wilkinson

Ausbuy.

Will John Moi Go Home ?

That well known Wagga 'refugee advocate' John Moi has blessed us with his views on the independence referendum in Southern Sudan. Many of the African 'refugees' to Australia come from Southern Sudan Moi told the Daily Advertiser ( Wagga ) :


"Close to 9300 southerners living in Australia registered to vote. A number of us from Wagga will travel to Canberra to cast our votes. To many southerners, the plebiscite was the best thing that ever happened because this will now resolve internal contradictions; the country of Sudan was in for the last 50 years, 40 of which was spent in civil wars."


Now that Sudan will break into two states, the African south and the Arabised north, the safety of the South Sudan population can no longer be an issue. We wonder: who will return home? will the Australian government encourage these people to return home?


Mr. Moi continued:


"I would like to call on the government of Australia to support the new born country in its development".


Australia First could not agree more except we would add a rider to that: the Sudanese 'refugees' should return home! Aid should be contingent on South Sudan taking these people and assistance should be provided to get these people home.


Yet, it is our strong suspicion that having tasted the benefits of free housing, cash gifts, welfare of all sorts, few of these people would be interested in a return to South Sudan. And we suspect that Mr. Moi won't be leaving either.


For Australia First Party a return home is non-negotiable. The Future Australia will be generous, but the right of the Australian People to identity in our own land is ahead of everything.