Dr. Jim Saleam and Brendan Gidley
Mr. Basil Hille, South Australian Director of the One Nation party, has written an important article on refugees. If his comments become One Nation policy, then it would mean that One Nation had fundamentally compromised its principles.
We understand that the refugee influx, the breaking open of the borders is the ultimate irrationality which faces all who say they are Australian patriots. It is something which threatens our very right to exist as a people. And it is being foisted upon us by politicians, capitalists, media, church lunatics, leftists, in front of our eyes. Our people are being dispossessed in their own land.
So, some decent people tinker with the hard question-yes or no ? Some play clever with it. Some lose sight of what the task of any Australian patriot is: to secure the Australian Nation itself !
Mr. Hille has written:
"Meanwhile, we in One Nation if we are against the arrival of boat people we must have an alternative solution, and one way I or we propose is, stop illegal immigrants in the country of their departure, that is where they board the boats on their journey to Australia eg; Indonesia or where ever, this must be done in consultation with the appropriate government authorities of that country, with any that may slip past those authorities and arrive in Australian waters then placed on planes and sent to appropriate refugee locations and processed along with other refugees who have been waiting patiently for entry into Australia the legal and safe way, other wise they are queue jumpers and are taking a place away from those who waited patiently and earned the right to enter Australia."
The Australia First Party is not concerned with whether refugees ( sic ) are illegals, or if they are legally ( sic ) processed by ten thousand United Nations officials for entry to Australia.
Australia First does not care whether they paid to come by boat ( as 'queue-jumpers' ), or whether they patiently waited their 'turn'.
Australia First says: no, no, no !
Australia First would repudiate all treaties on refugees.
Australia First would turn all boats around as the Malaysians did to Vietnamese boats in 1976-9.
Australia First would declare these unarmed intruders to be unlawful combatants in a new type of warfare which will characterise the twenty-first century: the war for resources, land, water and life itself. Those who re-entered the national territory after being turned about, after being provisioned to return home, after receiving full warning-would be sunk.
Australia First recognises that, combined with the 'legal' immigration invasion, the refugee influx adds to our woe. Essentially, Australia is being drowned in a sea of alien cultures.
Can One Nation say what needs to be said ? The members of One Nation clamour to hear the truth shouted loud and clear ! But do some leaders fear the media will frighten the voters off by saying they are a party of blood and violence ? Truly any party that allows these refugees into Australia is creating an age of blood and violence ! Who said 'voters' are the answer here ? Isn't agitation and action that mobilises the Australian people-what is really needed ?
What is being proposed to One Nation members is Liberal Party deceit-politics. Isn't that what an Abbott might say ? It is not a nationalist solution. If such a policy line was ultimately imposed upon the One Nation party-then it would be time for members to vote with their feet.
And Australia First would welcome all who are prepared to fight !
We call on One Nation members: do not go down the compromise road !
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
The Dispossession Agenda.
Review Of Political Parties Needed
Max Goulter ( Daily Advertiser 8.12.10 ).
I ask readers to cast their minds back to 2007. Which political party was in power at the time ?
The 2007 Water Act has rightfully been attacked by irrigation farmers and dryland farmers alike. It was passed by the then Liberal/National Howard government.
Mike Taylor, the MDBA chairman, stated that "The act that set up this authority was based on the Ramsar Convention of 1971."
When the Howard government passed it they were handing the Murray/Darling producers over to a program that threatens their livelihoods, and the food security which we have always enjoyed.
How many people realise that already, Australia is a net importer of food ? There used to be close to 200,000 family farmers in Australia, now there are just 80,000.
At Echuca last week, Tony Abbott, Barnaby Joyce and Sharman Stone were confronted by Aaron Isherwood of the CEC who asked them if they had read the water act.
Sharman Stone admitted that they designed the act, but blamed the MDBA's interpretation for the problems. This whole saga smells of hypocrisy. The party which was responsible for drafting the act sends their reps to the meetings who pose like the "white knights" who are going to save our struggling farmers from the Labor Party and the MDBA.
As many have already said, the whole water act needs to be rejected and a new one written because as it stands, it doesn't matter how much consultation goes on, the necessary changes that need to be made to it will never happen.
Our rivers are flooding, and still they say that our irrigation farmers cannot have any more water. The Green/Labor coalition is just continuing this foolishness.
It has got to the point that voting in the Lib/Nat government to get rid of Green/Labor is like moving the deck chairs on the Titanic. We in the country need to take a good look at the track record of the people we have voted in over many years and assess the facts.
Max Goulter ( Daily Advertiser 8.12.10 ).
I ask readers to cast their minds back to 2007. Which political party was in power at the time ?
The 2007 Water Act has rightfully been attacked by irrigation farmers and dryland farmers alike. It was passed by the then Liberal/National Howard government.
Mike Taylor, the MDBA chairman, stated that "The act that set up this authority was based on the Ramsar Convention of 1971."
When the Howard government passed it they were handing the Murray/Darling producers over to a program that threatens their livelihoods, and the food security which we have always enjoyed.
How many people realise that already, Australia is a net importer of food ? There used to be close to 200,000 family farmers in Australia, now there are just 80,000.
At Echuca last week, Tony Abbott, Barnaby Joyce and Sharman Stone were confronted by Aaron Isherwood of the CEC who asked them if they had read the water act.
Sharman Stone admitted that they designed the act, but blamed the MDBA's interpretation for the problems. This whole saga smells of hypocrisy. The party which was responsible for drafting the act sends their reps to the meetings who pose like the "white knights" who are going to save our struggling farmers from the Labor Party and the MDBA.
As many have already said, the whole water act needs to be rejected and a new one written because as it stands, it doesn't matter how much consultation goes on, the necessary changes that need to be made to it will never happen.
Our rivers are flooding, and still they say that our irrigation farmers cannot have any more water. The Green/Labor coalition is just continuing this foolishness.
It has got to the point that voting in the Lib/Nat government to get rid of Green/Labor is like moving the deck chairs on the Titanic. We in the country need to take a good look at the track record of the people we have voted in over many years and assess the facts.
Friday, December 3, 2010
Australia First Supports A Boycott Of The Sineva Foundation !
Foundation Needs Support; Daily Advertiser ( 3.12.10 ).
Clearly there is no end in sight to what is seemingly an entrenched parasitic culture of refugees. Is it not enough that Mr. Newah-Jarfoi has disadvantaged other Australians by way of all the tax payer assistance he and other refugees have received from the Australian people, ahead of other needy and disadvantaged groups, he now wishes to sponge the resources of struggling businesses and the community of Wagga Wagga as well !
In an article in the Daily Advertiser ( 3.12.10 ) Mr. Newah-Jarfoi states he wishes to set up a "foundation" to provide education for children in Sierra Leone. There is no doubt this is a worthy cause and has merit, BUT, as Mr. Newah-Jarfoi stated "According to the United Nations, 5 % of Sierra Leone people are illiterate. This lack of education is having a terrible and prolonged effect on the country".
I would refer Mr. Newah-Jarfoi to official Australian government NAPLAN statistics that remote areas and areas of disadvantage in Australia have much worse statistics than 5 % illiteracy, it is more like 60 %. Is Mr. Newah-Jarfoi concerned with these disadvantaged people ?
We would suggest to the people of the Riverina rather than donate yet again to international causes and agencies, they would consider donating to local and or Australian disadvantaged peoples. In the case of literacy and education, they may consider donating to the Australian Literacy and Numeracy Foundation, who are trying to raise $150,000 to support a one year community program as part of the foundations campaign to reverse the situation, where four out of five children in remote Aboriginal communities are unable to read.
Donations can be made to http://www.wallofhands.com.au/. The Herald is a media partner of the Australian Literacy and Numeracy Foundation.
Further worthy causes within Australia, that are desperate for funding and donations are child protection organisations, mental health agencies, assistance for the over 100,000 Australian homeless and rising, including homeless youth and the elderly and many many more worthy and ignored Australian causes in dire need.
We would suggest to Mr. Newah-Jarfoi, that he approach one of these other "charities" such as Red Cross, World Vision and so on, that would happily assist his cause, before that of local need as we note with the Red Cross in Lockhart and the Lockhart flood victims.
Further, as Mr. Newah-Jarfoi would be well aware, the U.N and other "international" groups are providing humanitarian and other assistance to "his country". If he is as passionate about his cause ( as he states in Daily Advertiser ), maybe he should consider returning to Sierra Leone himself to assist the need he speaks of at the coal face ?
This situation is an example of the failure of multiculti and that in reality we are opposing groups joined only by a global economy, rather than any hallucination of a homogeneous nation.
Clearly there is no end in sight to what is seemingly an entrenched parasitic culture of refugees. Is it not enough that Mr. Newah-Jarfoi has disadvantaged other Australians by way of all the tax payer assistance he and other refugees have received from the Australian people, ahead of other needy and disadvantaged groups, he now wishes to sponge the resources of struggling businesses and the community of Wagga Wagga as well !
In an article in the Daily Advertiser ( 3.12.10 ) Mr. Newah-Jarfoi states he wishes to set up a "foundation" to provide education for children in Sierra Leone. There is no doubt this is a worthy cause and has merit, BUT, as Mr. Newah-Jarfoi stated "According to the United Nations, 5 % of Sierra Leone people are illiterate. This lack of education is having a terrible and prolonged effect on the country".
I would refer Mr. Newah-Jarfoi to official Australian government NAPLAN statistics that remote areas and areas of disadvantage in Australia have much worse statistics than 5 % illiteracy, it is more like 60 %. Is Mr. Newah-Jarfoi concerned with these disadvantaged people ?
We would suggest to the people of the Riverina rather than donate yet again to international causes and agencies, they would consider donating to local and or Australian disadvantaged peoples. In the case of literacy and education, they may consider donating to the Australian Literacy and Numeracy Foundation, who are trying to raise $150,000 to support a one year community program as part of the foundations campaign to reverse the situation, where four out of five children in remote Aboriginal communities are unable to read.
Donations can be made to http://www.wallofhands.com.au/. The Herald is a media partner of the Australian Literacy and Numeracy Foundation.
Further worthy causes within Australia, that are desperate for funding and donations are child protection organisations, mental health agencies, assistance for the over 100,000 Australian homeless and rising, including homeless youth and the elderly and many many more worthy and ignored Australian causes in dire need.
We would suggest to Mr. Newah-Jarfoi, that he approach one of these other "charities" such as Red Cross, World Vision and so on, that would happily assist his cause, before that of local need as we note with the Red Cross in Lockhart and the Lockhart flood victims.
Further, as Mr. Newah-Jarfoi would be well aware, the U.N and other "international" groups are providing humanitarian and other assistance to "his country". If he is as passionate about his cause ( as he states in Daily Advertiser ), maybe he should consider returning to Sierra Leone himself to assist the need he speaks of at the coal face ?
This situation is an example of the failure of multiculti and that in reality we are opposing groups joined only by a global economy, rather than any hallucination of a homogeneous nation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
