Monday, April 26, 2010

Getting It Right On The Islamic Migration Question: Don't Be Fooled!

Dr. Jim Saleam and Brendon Gidley.

The Australia First Party ( AFP ) has deep reservations about certain groups, some of which even parade as nationalist and patriotic organizations, when they move to the centre of their public outreach-the Islamic question.

It is hardly that there is no problem with Islamic immigration into Australia. There was and there is. If anything, consistent experience over the last 15 years has shown the utter incompatibility of Islamic "culture" ( let alone Islamist preaching ) with Australian culture and its legal and civil norms. From brutal rape, to asocial conduct, to criminal enterprise and to terrorism, the litany of abuse against the host society is obvious. We may also rightly deprecate the hidden, but practised, principles of Sharia Law on our soil. The multiculturalist industry and nice-guy Moslem spokesmen can say whatever they like, but the problem is there.

Of course it would be completely remiss of any Australian patriot not to point this out and to politically capitalize upon it. Indeed, given it shows the futility of the multicultural experiment, we have a powerful weapon to explain this case. Yet, serious questions for a party such as ours which seeks to re-Australianize Australia, remain-and must be addressed in order to provide strategy of tactics in the immigration struggle.

The questions for the nationalists are: is Islamic migration the main problem?; how can we politically advance with this issue?; might there not be other agendas operating with those who join in the chorus against Islamic migration?

Main Problem?

Definately, Islamic migration is not the main immigration danger facing Australia and the survival of the Australian People.

The figures belie any claim of Islamization of Australia. The pattern of Australian immigration sees the nations of Asia providing the main sources of migrants. The South Pacific and Africa are now new sources. Of course, Middle Easterners and other Moslems arrive here and they are a strong component in the refugee racket. However, they are minorities. The largest non European source is China and that will remain so.

Essentially, we can see Australia rendered polyglot. We can see Australia being generally Asianized. However, there is no real threat of Islamization.

So why do some wish to say that the opposite?

Is it because it is easy? People have heard about the problems with Islamic immigration and some groups opt for political traction? That is partly sensible, even if ( as we say )it is the line of least resistance.

The problem is, that the Australian state currently permits some criticism of Islam-because it remains engaged in false wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, because it endorses the "war on terror" which the American regime still fights and it requires some sort of public support for these stupid and politically criminal adventures that kill our soldiers. Cussing the Moslems can serve that point. Permitting people to blow off steam too at a public demon, is always a clever tactic in the state's ploy to maintain multiculturalism and mass immigration overall. It keeps people away from the main danger. Of course also, making noises about Islamism also brings one into contact with likeminded religious and other groups, so one has the delusion of participation in a broad movement against Islamization.

For Australia First Party, it is a line of approach that leads one into a sideline war, a blind alley. Since Australia is not being Islamized, can the people recruited to this fight, really generalise their awareness of one problem into criticism of another? We doubt it. Indeed, as we observe, some of the groups taking up the struggle against Islamic migration are not concerned with much else.

How Can This Issue Be Developed?

We do not wish our main blow to be directed at Islamic migration. Rather, we see the rise of Chinese imperialism over Asia and the Pacific Ocean states; we are more concerned at immigration that is in fact recolonization, that which enmeshes Australia in new imperial arrangements from which we cannot escape. Australia First Party appreciates the various patterns of contract labour recruitment and investment which ensure a generalized Asianization of Australia.

In building a resistance movement to these things, we call upon our history which was engaged with these types of issues from prior to Federation and well afterwards. For Australia First Party, the matter of Islamic migration is just another vindication of a general case.

Certainly, we will warn the Australian People of all aspects of this Islamic intrusion and how it highlights the failed doctrine of multiculturalism. Yet, we won't be fooled into going up this blind alley. We will keep it in perspective so we can expose those who are working con jobs on the Australian People.

The Dark Agendas Of Others.

In the period that followed John Howard's drift to war in 2001, anti Islamism was embraced publically by a number of groups. The Christian Democratic Party, the Australian Christian Nation Association, certain Christian-Zionist church groups and the "right wing" faction of the Liberal Party, all came out about it. They whipped up concerns at Islamic extremists being active in Australia and the need to follow the USA to war.

Most corruptly, these groups posited that Australia's true friends in the Middle East was Israel and that Australian Zionists (namely those Jews who put Israel first in their thinking ) were allie's in the inter - related struggles. In fact, Israel creates Moslem unrest and the Zionists would see our soldiers killed in their service.

The propaganda of these anti Islamic groups was very energetic.

Eventually, this propaganda penetrated into One Nation Party and it also spawned a Liberal Party connected pseudo nationalist group called the Protectionists. In the case of One Nation, a rabid anti Islamist recently aquired real power there-and he has also sung the praises of Tony Abbott for supposedly being tough on immigration; funny that, since this was Abbott who put Pauline Hanson in gaol! Of course, the One Nation boss sees the anti Islamic rhetoric of Abbott and the Liberal "stance" for social cohesion etc as hard political currency and not rhetorical rubbish cooked up for voters. He does not see the truth of what the Liberals represent-enmeshment with Asia, high immigration and refugees flowing in but in an "orderly" way. This boss also collaborates very closely with the high immigration Christian Democrats just like his friends in the so-called Protectionist group. They all unite on anti Islamism and their recruits fall prey to this con.

The new line of the anti Islamists advanced a civic patriotism in which loyalty to Australia was defined as language, flag and supporting certain political institutions. At no point did this ideology commit anyone to the European ethic basis of the Australian People, or to its survival. How could it be? This anti Islamism was one big fraud.

The bottom line of it was that it led groups into the orbit of the Liberal Party and it gave them a job that served that party. The Liberals under Howard were ( till the election of the KRudd government ) the highest immigration government in Australian history. Anti-Islam? So what?

Election Year Again.

In another election year, the Australia First Party wants the immigration and population questions to be placed squarely out there on the real political agenda. There's a lot of evidence that this is occurring naturally. Australians are talking and Australians are getting angry at the loss of identity and economic security that immigration implies. Our Party will play an electoral and a community role in making this awareness intensify. However, we will not allow the anti-Islamism to creep in as a diversion from the immigration question overall and from the matter of the real threats to Australia. It will be a hard struggle to resist the con merchants. It will be this struggle that will define the political savvy of Australia First.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

U.S GOV'T: We Failed To Protect Your Beef!

A USDA audit finds pesticides, heavy metals, and veterinary medicines in supermarket meat. Even Mexico sent some of it back!

Rodale News, Emmaus, PA - A new report from the U.S Department of Agriculture ( USDA ) found that many dangerous substances, including pesticides, veterinary medicines, dioxin and heavy metals like arsenic, are winding up in the nations beef supply because government agencies haven't worked together to set limits.

The report makes clear that co-ordination between the USDA, the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) is lacking, making it difficult to recall beef contaminated with these harmful substances.

"They're all pointing their fingers at one another," says Tony Corbo, spokesman for the nonprofit watchdog group Food and Water Watch.

THE DETAILS: The audit report, released by USDA's Food Safety and Inspection General, found that common contaminents that can make there way into beef are not currently restricted in meat, even though contamination could harm human health. For instance, FSIS says the following medicines, feed supplements, and other contaminents could harm human health when people eat tainted beef.

1. Flunixin-a veterinary drug that can cause kidney damage, stomach and colon ulcers, and blood in the stools of humans.

2. Penicillin, a drug that can cause life-threatening reactions in people who are allergic to it.

3. Ivermectin, an animal wormer that can cause neurological damage in humans.

4. Arsenic, a known carcinogen.

5. Copper, an essential element, but harmful if too much accumulates in our bodies.

WHAT IT MEANS: When we think of food safety, we generally think about e-coli, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes contamination making people sick, but this report sheds light on the problems of drug, pesticide and heavy metal residues that can also accumulate in our bodies and make us sick. According to the report authors, "while cooking meat properly can destroy these pathogens before they are consumed, no amount of cooking will destroy residues. In some cases, heat may actually break residues down into components that are more harmful to consumers".

That's why it's more important than ever to seek out meat from sources you trust, and ideally, from farms where you can visit and perform an on-site inspection yourself, asking farmers what the animals eat, and seeing what type of conditions they live in.

Coupled with the threat of BSE contamination causing vCJD in humans,a fatal condition,with this complete absence of traceability, this is all very re-assuring. Just think Australia is set to allow this poison into our country, when the corrupt IRA is complete and the Australian government is all for it, kow towing once again to their free trade pimp masters while happily sacraficing the Australian people and Australian industries on the alter of free trade.

So long as we allow our great country to be governed by the dictatorship of the World Trade Organisation and the United Nations, we can only expect our situation to deteriorate.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Mass Unemployment On The Agenda For The Western World!

What we see here is Western industries earmarked for extinction thanks to free trade!

China's Predatory Trade Practices. ( Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 6.4.10 )

On his Mon Valley stop today, Sen, Arlen Specter will accuse China of "international banditry" in its trade policies, blaming the export powerhouse for the erosion of manufacturing employment in the United States. The speech comes during a campaign in which his Democratic primary opponent Rep. Joe Sestak, has faulted the incumbent's record on economic issues, blasting him for his support of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Mr. Specter has voted for a variety of other free trade pacts, often opposed by U.S Labour groups but he has been a reliable ally of the steel industry and the

USW in his support of a succession of international Trade Organisation cases complaining about steel imports. The prepared text of the strongly worded speech targets China's management of its currency, demanding that Beijing move to a floating exchange rate. Numerous economists have observed that by undervaluing its currency, the yuan, China has seized an unfair advantage in the price of its goods over its trading partners. China has repeatedly denied the widespread charges that it manipulates its currency to promote its exports. Mr. Specter's speech calls for a "workers bill of rights" on trade. "America's continuing loss of manufacturing jobs threatens the welfare and pre-eminence of this nation."

Because of currency rates and as China's currency policy grows more intense no-one can compete with prices quoted from China. The products they bring over are cheaper than we can buy materials to make them.

Well if that's free trade today, will anyone have a job tomorrow ?

THE TRUTH ABOUT FREE TRADE..And Our Trading Partner "Friends".

When we analyse how our so-called "friends" in the globalist world of free trade do business, we note their business practices appear more like a script from the Mafia movie The Godfather.

LIFT BSE BEEF BAN OR WE'LL BLOCK DANGEROUS TOYOTAS, U.S THREATENS JAPAN!
(Fairfax Stock And Land 7.3.10 )

Former United States Department of Agriculture Secretary and now Senator Mike Johanns, a Republican from Nebraska, raised the parallel of safety of U.S beef going into Japan to that of the safety of Toyotas coming from Japan into the United States.

Yet the Japanese have shut out U.S beef from their country and the market remains mostly closed to this day, over 6 years later. Johanns said "maybe it's time for us to tell the Japanese to allow our beef in or we will treat Japanese produced Toyotas in the same way. Many say the Obama administration should aggressively persue the Japanese over the beef issue.

CANADA DEMANDS SOUTH KOREA ACCEPTS ITS BEEF.
( Reuters 23.3.10 )

Canada Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz stated "South Korea has until the end of this month to re-open its borders to Canadian beef" South Korea, formerly Canada's fourth biggest export market for beef, stopped all imports following the discovery of Mad Cow disease in the west of the country.

"We left the Koreans with no illusion that the FTA is on hold until we get this beef issue worked through and resolved to Canadian producers` benefit," Ritz reportedly said in a conference call, says Reuters.

"It makes it very difficult to move forward when they want to just hive off a very signiffigant part of our exports and hold it in abeyance while we move forward with all smiles and chuckles".

With friends like these folks, who needs enemies ? This is the reality of free trade and now Australia is in their sights as the next dumping ground for their diseased beef. This is not in Australias best interests and certainly not the act of a "friend". Would a friend ask you to do something that would harm you ? To force diseased and potentially deadly beef on us- is biological warfare! It is a testement to why Australia First states: "we need to urgently rip up these foul treaties and regain Australian independence". It's time to put Australia First, this is a matter of survival! We can not rely on, nor trust the globalist Lib/Lab parties to do what is right for Australia, they are intent on prostituting what is left of Australian industries to their globalist free trade pimp masters!

Sunday, April 4, 2010

A Disturbing Trend!

We note a disturbing trend: one which denies our vulnerable Australian citizens the basics of life, while we continue to throw our pearls before swine.

Recently in the Daily Advertiser there were some disturbing articles.

There was Chloe the homeless Down Syndrome girl, who was making a huge effort to the best of her ability to secure housing, while contributing to society employed at the local disability employment centre ( Kurrajong Warratah ). However, she was unable to obtain housing. Of course D.O.H Wagga can offer her nothing but a dump in the most problematic area around town. She has been unable to secure private rental accommodation either. Of course, the refugees around town seem to have no difficulty in gaining housing and of course under the re-settlement scheme they have no end of assistance which snaps up the best lodgings.

There was an article reporting abuse and assaults common place upon our elderly citizens in aged care facilities.

Then, we noted the article regarding the 101st "asylum seeker" boat arrival this year and learned of how the people on board rang via mobile phone from the boat once they were metres away from shore. They announced their arrival and asked if they could be picked up forthwith and taxied to immediate shelter, food and health care and protection on our land, a privilege more than 100,000 homeless Australians could only dream off. This situation is so out of control, that one can only question the Australian government: why do we put these parasites before our own needy and vulnerable citizens, is this a cruel kind of madness.

We may add, that we also see Australian farmers and workers being sold out in favour of foreign interests and the globalist agenda of the rich! It appears we urgently need to rip up these foul treaties ( U.N treaty on refugees and free trade agreements ). We must allow our own survival to force our hand before it's to late!