australian identity

Australian Farms, Crops, Drinking Water Under Threat From Coal Seam Gas Mining

2011-11-26T17:31:00.000-08:00

http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2011/s3375855.htm?site=rural&microsite=coalseam&section=latest&date=(none)

One wonders what exactly the Murray Darling Basin Plan is really all about "environmental" needs ? River health ? as cited by the MDBA. How can this be when toxic waste from Coal Seam Gas mining is being dumped into the very same river system in Southern Qld then flowing along with the toxic waste down to the Riverina and beyond ?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/specials/coal-seam-gas-by-the-numbers/

Where are the "Greens" in this rapidly unfolding environmental catastrophe ? Still focused on their three main issues ? Same sex marraige, Carbon tax and Refugees ? The Greens "commitment" to the environment or lack there of on this simmering catastrophy speaks for itself !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZe1AeH0Qz8&noredirect=1

View the above trailer from Gasland, the experience America has had from this Halliburton developed technology of "fracking". Interestingly aside from the enviromental destruction and human health implications, pundits suggest "we must consider the more CSG mining, the less dependant on oil from terrorists we shall be". Terrorists will hardly be a problem once we've poisoned our lands and ourselves with the CSG magic pudding.

What of our Artesian basin, our aquifiers and water contamination generally ?

Our Australian farms will be irrigating crops with a mix of very dangerous and highly toxic chemicals, if crops will grow at all in the salty toxic mix !

Quality drinking water will be reserved for those who can afford to pay multinational beverage companies.

It is difficult to see how CSG mining waste is going to improve the health of the Murray Darling Basin and its fragile ecosystem and at the rate CSG mining is expanding in Australia, the situation has become grave.

Perhaps these questions and more should be asked of the Murray Darling Basin Authority ?

What of the water privatization, foreign "investors" and the "water" futures market ?

So many questions and so few answers... beside the obvious GREED !

No Penalty Due To "Trauma" !!

2011-09-29T20:24:00.000-07:00

Daily Advertiser ( 30.9.11 )

Magistrate Peter Dare SC has dismissed charges against a woman who smashed up Wagga's Centerlink office with a cricket bat due to a "mental condition", which in his view stemmed from "one of the most tragic lives".

Constance Lamon Okot, 45, on Wednesday stood in Wagga Local Court accused of destroying 16 computer screens after walking into Centerlink brandishing a cricket bat when the doors opened on the morning of August 29.

But she walked out without penalty after the charges were dismissed under Section 32 of the Mental Health ( Forensic Provisions ) Act.

Mr. Dare said Okot was the victim of an "unspeakable tragedy" in her homeland of Sudan before she relocated to Australia as a "Refugee", was a victim of domestic violence and was "basically a single mother of five or six children".

"I'm satisfied the defendant was suffering from a mental condition that could be treated at a hospital," Mr. Dare said.

Okot was released into the care of a Doctor and ordered to comply with a treatment plan submitted to the court for at least six months.

...............

No doubt Ms Okot was subject to "unspeakable tragedy" in her homeland of Sudan, ( highlighting again the issues surrounding"trauma" ). Validating the Australia First position "more needs to be done in these people's homelands, ( trauma ground zero ).

Let us not forget our Australian brothers and sisters, suffering "unspeakable and traumatic circumstances" in Australian Department of Housing Estates, and many locations around Australia.

Are these "traumatised" Australians availed the same mercy and privilege ? No, they are not, nor is there any desire or political will to improve the very dangerous and traumatic circumstance many Australians live in. Rather the "government" have increased their adversarial attitude towards the disenfanchised people they are elected/employed to assist and consequently disempower these traumatised Australians even further.

The Million Dollar question remains "does anyone ever recover from trauma" ? As one example of this being people sexually and or physically abused in our communities, some who receive years of "treatment" rarely, if ever recover, therefore the 6 month whiz bang treatment plan such as awarded Ms. Okot seems redundant. Australia First would also ask, what happens the next time "traumatised" Ms. Okot "loses it" ?

After all arriving at Centerlink with a cricket bat with intent is a premeditated act, rather than a spur of the moment inability to control oneself emotionally.

Unlike Refugees all Australians receive is much talk and little or no action and their circumstance becomes more dire and "generationally" entrenched... Yet no-body notices and no-body cares !

Same old story: It's amazing what can be achieved when one is the politically favoured "group" of the day !!

'Go Back Where You Came From': SBS Propaganda: Is It Also A Hoax - And An Opportunity ? ( Bill Rezac )

2011-06-21T01:16:00.000-07:00

SBS screens this week a three part series 'Go Back Where You Came From', a documentary which shows a group of Australians being confronted ( sic ) with the living conditions of so-called 'refugees' in camps of Asia and Africa and with their difficult journeys ( sic ) to come to Australia.

The program is pure propaganda.

Originally, Australia First members Jim Saleam and Perry Jewel, were also approached to participate. As could reasonably be expected, the tentative invitations to these nationalists were not pursued. At all points, the true purpose of the producers was to choose persons who were likely to be 'remoulded' by a type of hands-on live-drama re-education.

So it was.

At no time does this program really explain that refugees ( sic ) are often people who have declined to take up arms against their alleged oppressors, that the conditions they may find themselves in are in one sense of their own making, what economic refugees may be as opposed to political dissenters, that many consider permanent flight of better value than a fighting return, that many have social practices repugnant to Australian society, that many of these people may also hate and be envious of those who possess wealth and territory-and that overpopulation and New World Order wars and other ethnic based strife are the chief underlying causes of many outpourings from the Third World.

We are witness then to an attempt to brainwash Australians to accept that they are guilty people if they lack compassion.

In fact, for most Australians other than the liberal minded, there is a feeling that this brainwash should be resisted but they don't know how.

The Case Of Raye Colbey:

The star of the show, Raye Colbey, is described as a lady from Inverbrackie in South Australia where the refugee detention centre has been founded. Mrs. Colbey goes on the SBS organised jaunt overseas and learns about her 'hate', learns of compassion and so forth.

Reports passed to Australia First in South Australia, suggest that Mrs. Colbey has family members involved in support campaigns for so-called refugees.

Mrs. Colbey has been a victim, if she really is a victim, of psychological manipulation. We note how quickly the usual media suspects have been to publish a public recant from her of her 'former', t=racist ( sic ) views.

Schools Will Get The SBS Doco But 'The Camp Of The Saints' Will Be There In Reply:

A report was given to Australia First in New South Wales that the program will be shown on DVD to high school students as part of a propaganda offensive to soften students` attitudes to the refugee invasion. This offers an opportunity for the new Eureka Youth League and Australia First Party to fight back.

Both organisations will surely seek to make mass awareness of the antidote: The Camp Of The Saints, the 1972 novel which explained the psycosis the dominant groups of our Western societies faced with a refugee invasion of European lands-a work composed before there were any mass refugee outpourings from the Third World. This revolutionary novel posited that overpopulation and poverty, war and envy, would propel masses towards the vision of a better life. It then pilloried the false-moralities that would justify to certain Westerners the very destruction of their own societies.

For the curious:

http://www.archive.org/details/CampOfTheSaints

This book should be studied by all Australians who need a counter-morality to the SBS type propaganda about to invade our screens.

Intensify The Struggle: 'Expel The Refugees'

Australians need to act against the army of churchmen, Greens, Trotskyites, lawyer-advocates and others who play morality games over the refugee invasion and who mobilise daily to beat down Australians.

The morality is on the side of the Australian people, who under the challenge of mass immigration and now refugee invasion, have opted to resist.

Our party will repudiate the United Nations Convention On Refugees ( 1951 ). Ultimately, we will expel the refugees ! But we make this very, very, dark promise: the traitors who have decided to give away our birthright will pay for the assisted return, if necessary of hundreds of thousands of persons to countries of origin-by the public seizure of their assets.

It has come to this.

Warn your friends and children against the latest SBS propaganda.

Pollies Blind To Voltairian Warnings.

2011-06-02T17:33:00.000-07:00

Counterpoint:
John Carter ( The Land 2.6.11 ).

Voltaire wrote, "Men will always be mad, and those who think they can cure them are the maddest of all".

Australia's supposed leaders are now demonstrating the accuracy of his observation. Their concept of man controlling the earth's climate in isolation from the sun underlines this case.

We multiply our exports of coal and iron ore to enable China to produce more steel and atmospheric pollution, double world air travel in six years, and promote increased transport emissions through free trade.

At the same time we announce we will show the world how to control climate by taxing one of the many gases emitted into the atmosphere. Perhaps we should implement a tax to cool down the sun.

Urban dwellers are moving on from "saving the Murray-Darling" to saving the planet.

Anybody swallowing the claim that the disadvantaged will be compensated by government doesn't read history. This is all about moving money from the masses to the already rich - as has been demonstrated with the European emissions trading scheme.

Any of the few landholders who are still members of a State farm organisation - and as a consequence of the National Farmers Federation ( NFF ) - must be very confused. NFF has added to its depressing list of farmer sell-outs with the daddy of them all: carbon sequestration by tree planting as a reward for supporting a carbon tax.

The architects of this gem obviously couldn't grow a zucchini in a La Nina year.

The concept of independent assessor chaps coming on to properties to measure the carbon sequestration takes us into a land of fantasy and unlimited corruption.

The record of tree planting initiatives in Australia is woeful, as many saddened superannuants caught in managed investment schemes would attest. Most of our land is subject to severe droughts which play havoc with any crop from wheat to trees.

Country to go under trees would have to be higher rainfall, food and fibre producing country. Food is apparently now seen as something one buys from the supermarket - nobody cares where it originates.

In just a few years we have seen dairying become dominated by an Italian company, our wheat board taken over by our Canadian competitors, our rice board bound for Spain, and our beef processing dominated by two US and Brazillian government-backed multinationals.

Our farmers will have their prices determined by foreigners, who will naturally put their shareholder interest first. Meanwhile the flood of natural gas, coal and wind "farms" will take more of our scarce farming land out of food production.

The urban background of almost all in leadership positions apparently makes them incapable of seeing what is happening. Add the NFF support for importation of beef from countries with BSE to their carbon sequestration and Voltaire's case is sewn up.

Palerang Election Campaign: John McGrath For Australia First Polls A Solid 6.1%

2011-05-14T22:41:00.001-07:00

Australia First Party candidate for Palerang Council, John McGrath, has won a solid 6.1% - 430 votes - in the by-election held yesterday ( these figures are not yet final ).

Once again, we have shown that there is a definate community and electoral clientele for our party. In the 2008 NSW local government poll, Australia First won 4% in the Sutherland Shire and some 5.67% in Blacktown City. In Sutherland Shire by-election in October last year we crossed over the 4% line again. In June 2010, in the Hawkesbury City by-election, we won 9.4%

If a full Council election had been held in Palerang yesterday, John McGrath may have picked up the last position; indeed, some of our polling booth workers conversed with the current Mayor, who himself picked up the last seat in Palerang in 2008-with just over 3% of the vote !

Mr. McGrath has signalled his willingness to contest Palerang in 2012, along side of Australia First Party candidates set to contest ( and win ! )-in a swathe of councils across the State.

Farmers, Truckies, Young Workers Targets Of The Campaign:

The Australia First Party campaign followed the political line of the party. It set out to target specific social sectors which we call Real Australia, or those parts of our community who have, in one way or another, stepped outside of the globalising norms of the present anti Australian economic and political system either to vote for something new or wage their economic struggles: some farmers challenged by the Murray Darling Basin Authority water legislation and who have opted to resist outside of the usual sell-out farmers organisations and the National Party; truck owner-drivers who are pushed to the wall by bureaucracy at the service of the big companies, citizens who have rejected the big parties and the Greens on immigration and young workers under the gun of contract labour and who see no party willing to say no. In ways specific to local conditions, these groups were 'targets' of the McGrath campaign.

Importantly too, Australia First publicly campaigned for People's Referendum or Citizens Initiated Referendum where it is the people who may propose directly local rules and 'laws'. This resonated in chaotic Palerang.

There is another aspect of the Real Australia strategy. Because the party targets Real Australia for support, Australia First leaves the 'mainstream' people behind at this stage: sadly, the majority of our fellow Australians accept their lot and relish its rewards and comforts; they may grumble at this or that, but are psychically bound to a 'comfort zone' of political normality and so consequently support the candidates and parties that actually undermine them too. This truth is the truth and is not changed by wishful thinking. These folks are not the agents of change at this point in time. Essentially, our strategy is the logical one: build where we can, with whom we must, at this crucial phase of party and community network construction. That same big-picture logic plays out at local level politics also.

John McGrath's thirty five years of political experience, served him well in doing what needed to be done at a local level and he was witness to how all these sobering strategic facts work themselves out.

Hard Work Yields Results:

John McGrath campaigned very hard in Palerang. John spoke at the three community meetings and was received well and his candidature and the party name were mentioned at length in the Bungendore Mirror, the Braidwood Times and community newsletters. The Queanbeyan Age ( which covers a part of the council area ) referred to him as "arguably the most controversial candidate". Indeed, the latter paper reported on a growing community angst across Palerang at the "plan" to explode the Shire's population by nearly 70% by 2036- and noted what our candidate was saying. Had we tapped a growing consciousness ? We think so.

The party mobilised some Australia First members in Canberra and in Palerang Shire to assist on polling day with how to vote cards. Most booths were covered. Ironically, in the only booth where we have no worker ( the isolated area of Nerriga ), we polled 20%. These same members earlier letterboxed streets and spoke with residents and gave the party 'name-recognition'. John campaigned personally in Captain's Flat, Burra and Bungendore, meeting local residents and soliciting votes.

A Statement Of Position:

Despite the candidates against John McGrath all running as 'independents', there were party allegiances in the poll. One candidate had Labor Party connections and another is active in the National Party, whilst yet another had some Green input to his support-base. What is equally clear is that a layer of voters in Palerang have also made a statement of position in voting for Australia First.

This statement is an ideological statement of Real Australia. It is a rock base of support that will be expanded, but only by the party being involved directly in community politics, if the party markets itself as a protest and defence organisation for issues that affect the lives of people.

Underground name recognition helps Australia First. As the polling booth workers attest, our party has a name that travels by pubs, clubs, workplaces, cafeterias, truck-stops, from brothers to sisters and mothers to fathers. The thousands of people across different States who have voted for Australia First in the last three years carry the name of the party to other Australians and the same process has now commenced in Palerang Shire.

Australia First Party thanks all who assisted in any way on this campaign and we look forward to further electoral successes in New South Wales.

One Nation's Asian Sex Tour: Or The Takeover Of One Nation By Multi-Racialist 'Conservatives'

2011-05-14T00:00:00.000-07:00

The One Nation party is to be revived in Queensland with a new leadership. The party wants to register for the next State election.

Since late last year, One Nation has been in the news. It has been reported for its opposition to the illegal refugee influx. Yet, it was noted by ourselves as early as last December that One Nation did not appear to absolutely oppose the just-as-toxic intake of the "legal" arrivals ! Something was amiss. Thereafter came the attempt by former leader Pauline Hanson to enter parliament in New South Wales, vaulting the name 'One Nation' into full public view. The party set out to remodel itself.

But what a sad and compromised thing it is. Whatever One Nation was ten or so years ago, the current group seems to be pushing a product little different from the Liberal National Party ( LNP ). Essentially, One Nation is now all about multiracialism and conservatism.

Australia First makes its allegations very clear. First: One Nation advocates the assimilation of all migrants and any future migrants drawn from anywhere on earth ( note: it excludes only Moslems ), into an English-speaking civic culture. It would multiracialize Australia finally and completely and thereby destroy the Australian identity. Second: One Nation is cuddling up to the LNP offering limp-wristed 'criticism' over some policies, while still promising preferences for patronage.

What is happening ? Are Queenslanders being deceived by the brand-name One Nation ? However, has its guts been ripped out and has it turned into its opposite ?

A REAL STOLEN GENERATION`.

Australia First noted the rot had well set in during the last Federal election campaign. A curious policy statement appeared on the party website. One Nation was advocating foreign adoptions from the Third World, with the placing of these children into Aussie families since this was the best way to arrive at "assimilation".

What ?? This didn't sound too much like our perception of the beliefs of One Nation members.

Last August, a representative of Australia First phoned the One Nation Senate candidate Ian Nelson, who expressed surprise that anyone would question such a policy Mr. Nelson pointed out that the State President, Jim Savage, had experience of the difficulties getting such Third World children into Australia-given his wife had had real problems obtaining visas for her nephew and niece from the Philippines.

Mr. Nelson was asked: "but isn't that going to make a real sort of stolen generation, one where children are stolen and brought into an alien culture ? "No, it is the best way to assimilate them", he said. "But maybe we Australians don't want to assimilate them, maybe they should stay in the Third World" ? Call ended.

In their policy statement, One Nation was advancing the proposition that the assimilation of another race into the Australian nation via the backdoor of some family-based 'cultural assimilation' of stolen children-was a credible policy goal. Why, why, would one want to preach that ? Is there something going on in One Nation ?

THE PLOT THICKENS. THE MOSLEM RED-HERRING AGAIN

Then the penny was dropped on us concerning Mr. Nelson. Penny ? Try cement slab. An article appeared in the Queensland Times. Every patriotic Queenslander should read this article.

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/one-nations-surprising-new-face-20110225-1b7y9.html

The article explains that Mr. Nelson who intends to campaign for One Nation in the next year's poll will be joined on the hustings by his Thai wife and their teenage daughter. It said that this was a new development for One Nation which had first made its name by being critical of Asian migration. Did not Pauline Hanson say that "Australia is being swamped by Asians" ? In the article, Mr. Nelson made it very clear that his fury on immigration was only directed at the Moslem bogy man.

The article said-and we quote directly: Despite witnessing his wife's difficult adjustment to a new culture and country, Nelson has no sympathy at all for the most recent targets of multiculturism's critics.

For him, the woman he affectionately calls "little one" is not like the other new Australians, particularly Muslims, at the heart of the current national debate.

"It's the ones that don't [ assimilate ] and live in their little enclaves that's unacceptable in this country," he said.

Now let's get this garbage right. Moslems don't assimilate. Well, tick. And as the rest of the article makes very clear, Mr. Nelson equates Moslem migration with rapes, ghettos and crime. Well, tick. However, if you assimilate other Third Worlders, particularly by marrying them and having kids with them, that is okay ? Yes ? This is an odd policy, a sort of bedroom-driven plan for social engineering. It's a wonder the Human Rights Commission didn't think it up-and offer special baby bonuses to facilitate the outcome.

Do we ignore the other negatives of immigration ? Do we ignore the sustainability question: that is, whether Australia should take any migrants at all ? Do we ignore the reality of Chinese immigration where massive swathes of the big cities are subject to takeover by horde-like agents of a foreign state, a group whose members are far more insidious than an Arab or Moslem rape gang ?

It seems Mr. Nelson has ignored all that. He might also have ignored, if he ever understood it, that the alien does not assimilate: we Australians assimilate to the alien. Moslems are just a small part of the massive demographic change now swamping our country. Why concentrate on just Moslems ?

Australia First has this radical idea that, to a certain small extent, the powers-that-be don't mind too much if a few points are scored against the Moslems. After all, Aussie soldiers are ( sadly ) doing a job for the oil companies and other alien interests by being in Moslem lands and whipping up a little amount of anti-Islamism here has a purpose in keeping support up for these useless wars. And, vaguely out there somewhere, Islamist nutter networks still might pull off a terrorist outrage in Australia. People have to be alert to that too. Of course, this anti-Islamism must never go too far and branch out in a general criticism of immigration, multiculturalism-and more sharply, never, ever, condemn multi racialism. It must stay within strict limits and so the major parties can manipulate the public.

So, very conveniently for establishment needs, along comes some group which wants to raise up the spectre of unassimilated Moslems. One Nation wants to scream at them, rant at them, get votes from people who realise they certainly don't fit; then One Nation can parade itself as an independent party standing up for us ordinary folks who are peeved with immigration.

Yet all the while we have the anti Moslem crusade in operation, One Nation's leading male members use their penises to assimilate nice Asian brides. Is Sigmund Freud having a joke on us ? Are they overcompensating for their personal conduct ? Did any other One Nation members do the Asian sex tour ? Are they the internal base of support for this new leadership ?

Are we missing something here ? Is it the case that there is some game being played aimed right at the heart of those Queenslanders who wish to take the nationalist road ?

CONSERVATISM

Of late, as One Nation makes noises about re-registering as a party, it has been chattering about doing preference deals with the Liberal National Party, even saying publicly that its preferences elected a LibNat in the recent Federal Senate poll and that the LibNats should reciprocate in the future, that they should make an end to the 'preference One Nation last' policy. They are saying that their preferences in the electorate of Ashgrove might even elect the next Queensland Premier. The offer is: throw us a bone and we'll be there for you. Who knows, maybe they will ? But the drift is that One Nation is now calling itself a "conservative party", much to the internal criticism of many sincere One Nation members who think this puts them on the same continuum as the LibNats. In a sort of way-it does. It's the slippery slope to nowhere.

In this delusional politics, the One Nation leadership steers the party rhetoric about traditional family values; a little flag waving is engaged in;, and a civic identity politics is pushed ( ie. it defends the idea of a national identity based only upon symbols, promotes that aliens become English-speaking and everyone gives loyalty to the constitution and our 'allies' ). As a conservative party, One Nation members will be told that they are bringing conservative voters out of the establishment parties towards a new hard patriotism. In truth, it is the establishment LNP which is quite happy to harness disaffected patriotic Queenslanders to One Nation and its forlorn quest to enter the mainstream as the leading conservative voice. That is an old con. Smart. Slick. Effective.

RUDYARD KIPLING'S ROAD TO MANDALAY V RODGERED COUPLINGS WAY TO GO THAIGIRLINTHEHAY

There was a great poem by Rudyard Kipling called the Road To Mandalay, a nineteenth century muse that suggested some sort of true-love unions occur between Europeans and Orientals in the mists of cultural abstraction up the Irrawaddy River-or something like that. Possibly, that has happened occasionally just as much as the true members of those races might have scorned it. However, we have doubts that unions founded upon alcohol in Manila or Bangkok bars, sex-tour romps where rancid old Aussies indulge their fantasies, mail-order shopping for a good housekeeper and compliant bed-partner and so on-make for much along the lines of Kipling's muse. The public displays of these Rodgered Couplings that their little ones are just marvellously assimilated, don't wash with us.

We have said that Freudian sex psychology is a factor here. We should say that the whole affair is politically corrupting. Not simply psychic overcompensation is involved when we witness anti Moslem screaming in place of a sober critical sentiment about immigration. Policy could become perverted-and not just about the matter of overseas adoptions. A different model of Australianity is put up there. Intermarraige as assimilation becomes a goal of the 'patriot'. In the latest policy turn of One Nation, we can see that defence of Australia's European identity is just not what the party is about.

EITHER IT'S ONE BIG MELTING POT OR IT'S THE AUSTRALIA FIRST POSITION

The position of Australia First is one that sorts out the muddle of One Nation. One Nation, going back a very long way and right to the start in fact-was always equivocal on what it meant about immigration from the Third World. Did it want to end it ? And reverse it ? Or assimilate what was already here ? Did it seek to preserve Australia's European heritage or not ? Certainly at least, at the very least, Mrs. Hanson said that Australia was running the risk of being "swamped" by Asians. Sadly, she gave no answer.

The mix-up has become one big messy melting-pot muddle. Now One Nation will rant against Moslems ( and refugees too ), but stay criminally silent about the very future of the nation.

We say that nationality does have a biological component. None of that involves, or ever could, any hatreds of other peoples or odd thoughts about how 'superior' or 'better' we white Aussies may be in respect of other peoples. However, it certainly includes our right to exist as a people sovereign over our continent. It is also very clear to us that our very survival is challenged by mass immigration and alien takeover and that we will have to defend ourselves, our heritage, our identity ! As a matter of necessity, one big melting pot is not for us. It is odd to Australia First that not only is the melting pot the official state view, but it is now the position taken by some so-called patriots. We say: no !

It is time for One Nation members to take back their party if they can. Yet, when they do, if they do, they will need to look at how this muddle was arrived at. One Nation members might even think better and consider it is time to join Australia First.

A Liveable Pension For Fairdinkum Australians & The 3000 Club !

2011-05-09T22:34:00.000-07:00

Aussie Senior Citizens are now experiencing the effects of the collapsing Globalist economic system, which has been imposed upon Australians over recent decades by Liberal and Labor politicians dutifully implementing the Big Business agenda.

Seniors who have worked productively over a life time; have contributed to society with family and community activity; put some money aside; have paid taxation of 1/3 plus of income; were duped into superannuation schemes, are now seeing their savings evaporate as this Globalist ideology crashes.

The wholesale sell out of our Australian manufacturing and productive capacity to foreign interests, and the deregulation of our financial sector, to create a subservient cog in the Global economic order as a "trinket" type raw materials supplier, and an immigrant dumping ground-is the root cause of the crisis likely to now descend upon Australians. ( Members of the 3000 Club excepted ).

Compulsory supperannuation monies, instead of being allocated for Australian owned productive development, have been used to stoke the Stock Exchanges, and for other usage in speculative exploitation. It was, all inherently prone to collapse as per the contradictions of capitalism.

A rude awakening is now descending on increasing numbers of Seniors as they are forced to undertake the "Centerlink Run"-coming to grips with a pension system programmed to comply with the IMF/Internationalist/Globalist agenda to minimise Social Security payments.

THE CENTERLINK RUN:

STEP 1: You front to the local office, and can experience first hand the Liberal/Labor/Green politicians` immigration/guest workers/refugee rackets, but you fall into the queue for you still believe you count for something as a productive citizen, and your years of paying taxation had a purpose.

You have your turn for the bureaucrat-and the near 100 question application form to see if the paltry $230 a week is to come your way. A number is allotted to you for the "system". ( No members of the 3000 Club sighted ).

STEP 2: You bare your soul in the multitude of questions-any thought of the Aussie tradition that your affairs are your business soon dissipates. Who are you-prove it; How much cash have you under the bed; Have you been o/s and how much money did you take; Did you give any money away; What are your bank accounts; Any rooms rented out; Who has your super fund and how much is it-prove it; What property do you own/got a beach shack/what's it worth; How much for your house and contents; What jewellery have you got; Can you cash in any life assurance.

It starts to dawn on you that this might all be about ensuring you get as little pension entitlement as possible.

But you are enticed that you might qualify for a health card for medical benefits, and reduced rates and government charges. How good is that !

When finished, you look at your arm to see if by chance a tattoo of the allotted system number has appeared, as you are starting to think that as an Aussie you no longer rate for much.

STEP 3 : You front before the bureaucrat, forms ( and cap ) in hand to be scrutinised. You are reminded again about the Pension Bonus of $30k, available to you if you will slave on in full time work for another five years. ( 3000 Club Members get that in 10 weeks ).

Your getting a bit edgy, aware that all your personal information is now going onto Big Brother's database and available virtually to any Government department, and who knows who else.

You are informed that on your details, that after 45 years of work and paying taxes, your in for a part pension-$125 a week, as is your spouse-yes, a pension of $250 a week between you for the good life. And, you must also report in each month on any extra income you may generate so your pension would be reduced. ( Still no 3000 Club Members sighted ).

The penny finally drops that in the Australia of today AUSSIE SENIORS COUNT FOR NOTHING !

WHAT CAN BE DONE.
As a group of citizens, the reality is that Seniors are past"use by date" to the Liberal/Labor politicians who have inflicted the Globalist agenda upon Australia.

Protesting Pensioners can "bare their bras" for the systems` media, or petition these same politicians, but it is pointless. Genuine Seniors may find this difficult to accept, but it is this very same political ilk down the decades who have restricted, and devalued pension entitlements to the current poverty line level, and who continue to parrot that a liveable pension cannot be afforded. ( But not for the 3000 Club Members ).

Petitioning Globalist politicians that have overseen our productive enterprises and natural wealth taken by foreigners; connived for near zero tax for multinational corporations, and other schemes of tax avoidance; squandered untold $billions on alien immigration and anti Australian multiculturalism, AND, stealing the 7% taxation surcharge ( passed by referendum in 1947 ) to fund all Aussies a pension, is a total waste of Seniors time.

The facts are that "Regime Change"-a change of attitude, psycology,economic and cultural direction through the complete and utter rejection of the present traitor political caste and their Big Business masters, is essential to now attain social justice for Aussie Seniors.

The Australia First Core Policy of Citizens Initiated Referendum ( CIR ) and Parliamentary Recall can ensure this change-CIR remakes the political landscape-no ifs-no buts, for the citizen is again in charge of our society and values, not vested interest politicians.

The Australia First Party programme is for ALL AUSSIE SENIORS at retirement age to have a LIVEABLE PENSION, related to the average wage, and secured on supply of appropriate identity to the relevant government administration. Nothing else is needed !

Australia First will take back our productive and natural wealth; we want Aussie control, direction, and ownership of our Australian economy, free of all Globalist dictates, and with equitable payment of taxation to provide pension funding. And, no Globalist political parrots like the 3000 Club Members.

IF YOU DON'T FIGHT, YOU LOSE.

THE 3000 CLUB:
Members on this easy street ride include Malcolm Fraser, Bob Hawke, Meg Lees, Jeff Kennett, John Howard, Gareth Evans, Tim Fisher, Joan Kirner, John Cain, Alexander Downer, Steve Bracks, Paul Keating, Nick Greiner, etc, etc, all feeding off the taxpayer with their $3000 a week pensions. You won't see this lot on the Centerlink run !

Liberal/National Silence Deafening On Labour/Greens` Sell Off.

2011-05-03T22:25:00.000-07:00

Daily Advertiser 4.5.11
Jock Munro
Rankin Springs

The proposed purchase by foreigners of AWB commodities by giant publicly unlisted Cargill and Sunrice by Spanish Ebro, is further evidence that the buyup of Australian assets continues apace.

However, Liberal Junee Senator Bill Heffernan who has led a song and dance previously on foreign takeovers is strangely silent.

Bill and his Liberal regional colleagues voted with the Liberal and Labor urban elites to abolish the wheat single desk and the consequences have been profound.

Wheat marketing and logistics are now spiralling out of control and rapidly passing into foreign hands.

Growers, including his neighbours from Junee, a strong wheat growing area, might have expected that Senator Heffernan may have taken the opportunity to stand up and be counted on this latest round of overseas takeovers.

So far his silence has been deafening.

End.....

Australia First Party is the only party that puts Australia and Australians first !

Palerang Shire By Election Campaign

2011-05-03T05:21:00.000-07:00

Australia First Party has entered Mr. John McGrath in the Palerang Shire Council by-election to be held on May 14. Palerang is centered on the New South Wales rural towns of Bungendore and Braidwood.

Mr. McGrath has been a Palerang resident for four decades and has mainly been involved in farming. He has also been a committed nationalist activist with a long history in various organisations. He has been a member of Australia First Party since it was re-established as a new corporate entity in September 2007.

The campaign in Palerang Shire has moved well with firm local contacts being made by the party. Articles mentioning the party have appeared in local newspapers and other publications. John McGrath, has been scheduled to speak at community meetings with other candidates, in Bungendore, Braidwood and Wamboin.

This election is the first time that anyone has raised the Murray Darling water conspiracy as an electoral matter. It is John's intention to assist in deepening the community resistance to the schemes of the Murray Darling Basin Authority which will surely destroy Australian agriculture-in favour of foreign and local mining magnates who have mining claims all over the Riverina and other affected areas. Nothing very 'green' there ! Rather, environmental concerns with water usage and being used as a smoke screen by the multinationals and other exploiters.

We publish the Palerang Australia First programme as it appears on John's recently printed how-to-vote card.

(i) For Citizens` initiated referendum at council level; I want to see people be able to propose Council policy and by-laws directly so as to maintain democratic control over their representatives.

(ii) Against the NSW Department of Planning scheme to expand the population of Palerang by 69% by 2036. I am sure this will be immigration -driven. Immigration is no friend to the lifestyle, the environment or our heritage and surely a policy whose time has passed.

(iii) Against the water takeover plans of the Murray Darling Basin Authority. The water plans threaten to destroy Australian farming and regional communities. The UN Treaty RAMSAR upon which this is based is acceded to by the major parties, Greens and others. I stand opposed and will work with all to win against the government.

(iv) To make Palerang more friendly towards road transport. I note that farmers depend on the trucking industry and while I believe in the extention of rail wherever possible, Council must try to protect this vital industry.

(v) For greater autonomy for local Councils over the NSW Department of Planning. I want to see domestic planning decisions made for the benefit of people.

( Electoral comment responsibility: J. Saleam 725 Princes Highway, Tempe 2044 )

Pauline Hanson In The Legislative Council ?: Thanks, But No Thanks!

2011-03-15T03:02:00.000-07:00

Australia First Suggests Vote For John Hatton ( Group C ) Or The Shooters` And Fishers Party ( Group P ) For The Legislative Council.

Australia First is supporting two candidates in this election, Tony Pettitt in Riverstone and Tony Robinson in Mulgoa.

In all other electorates, if voters give preferences, we recommend that the sitting member be placed last.

Some media attention has been focused on Pauline Hanson who has formed a group and has nominated for the Legislative Council.

Australia First does not counsel a vote for Mrs. Hanson.

Australia First would recommend a vote for either Group C, formed by one-time Legislative Assembly Member John Hatton, or a Group P, the Shooters` And Fishers` Party.

John Hatton has a proven public record against corruption and mismanagement in New South Wales. His great achievement will forever remain the reform of policing through a Royal Commission. The Shooters` And Fishers` Party will stand up for people's rights to enjoy their sports and their lives free of government over-regulation.

Australia First has grave doubts as to the motives of Mrs. Hanson and some of those on her ticket.

The pro Australian nationalist-minded and patriotic section of the people in this State should not expect anything from Pauline Hanson. Her attempt to speak for them is besmirched by her track record of mismanagement and betrayal of her former parties-One Nation and Pauline's United Australia Party.

After the election and her failure to be elected, we would expect further 'come backs' hosted by dubious forces.

If we are criticized for our position by any group or person, we can only reply that we stand for principle.

Whatever Pauline represented in 1996-7, or even appeared to represent then, cannot be compared to the present person. Thanks ! But no thanks !

Carbon Tax A Pledge Of Suicide.

2011-02-26T18:30:00.000-08:00

Terry McCrann.
Weekend Australian ( 26.2.11 ).

Julia Gillard is embarked on introducing two new taxes.

The first is the big lie that last week was turned into a big tax: her Julia carbon tax, the tax you have when you promise not to have that tax. The second is the reworked resources tax.

One is designed to force us to cut our emissions of carbon dioxide. To stress, emissions of the life-enhancing gas, not the so-called carbon pollution of bits of grit subconcious image that Gillard and Co deliberately promote.

The other is based on the assumption that China, in particular, but also India will continue to increase exponentially their emissions of that very same carbon dioxide.

Needless to say, except it does apparently need saying repeatedly, the increase in their emissions will dwarf any reduction we achieve. Rendering any reduction by us utterly pointless.

Indeed, China for all its claimed commitment to aggressive world leadership in alternative energy, plans to get most of its electricity from coal-fired power. Not just today, but tomorow and, indeed, the day after tomorrow. Over the next ten years, it plans to install net new capacity of coal-fired power equal to 10 times our entire power generation sector.

To stress, that's net additional generation. Its existing coal-fired power sector is already 14 times our entire power sector. To the extent it does close down any - really - grit-emitting old dirty coal-fired generation, that means even more replacement plants. All fired increasingly by coal from ... you fill in the blank.

Our real "assistance" to increased Chinese CO2 emissions, though, won't be centered on shipping energy coals from Newcastle. But in pouring hundreds of millions of tonnes of iron ore and coking coal every year into Chinese, and increasingly, Indian mills. And not to forget our old customers in Japan and South Korea.

Gillard's proposed resources tax doesn't just assume huge increases in these exports but is designed to encourage their maximum expansion. Along with - dare I say it, carbon based - natural gas.

Does the Prime Minister have the slightest self-awareness of a certain hypocrisy, but even more an incongruity between her two taxes and the underlying hopes and realities they are based on ? That on the one hand, she has to turn every light switch in the country into a tax collection point, to cut emissions to save the Barrier Reef, if not indeed the planet ? Yet, on the other hand, she says a silent, secular, prayer that China and India go gangbusters emitting, to utterly swamp any such domestic emissions cuts; to save her budget from deficit ? And not just save her - or her successor's - budget; that the foundation of the entire Australian economy will rest increasingly on those increasing emissions ?

There is a further point of damning intersection with reference to China that has utterly eluded the Prime Minister. To say nothing of the massed brainpower of Treasury and our down under 21st century da Vinci, Ross Garnaut.

There she was at it again on Wednesday, saying that we had to move to a post-carbon economy. That "the global economy is shifting". That "Australia is at risk of falling behind the rest of the world". That "the longer we wait, the greater the cost to Australian jobs".

Somehow this message seems to escaped the Chinese. And the Indians. They are making every effort to move to a carbon economy. Indeed, that's precisely the reason for giving them a pass on their exploding emissions.

If indeed the future, and the jobs of the future, lie in a post-carbon economy, why wouldn't the very canny Chinese go straight to "that bountiful future" ? What idiots they are for trying to build the carbon economy that our down under smarties Gillard, Garnaut and ( Treasury secretary Ken ) Henry want to discard like yesterday's worn-out snakeskin.

So what is Gillard "saying" with her two taxes ? That we should feed the Chinese and Indian carbon addiction ? We should profit from the destruction of the planet ? Literally, in the case of the government's tax revenues ?

The truth is that Gillard and Co have taken policy into the realm of the surreal. She and her cabinet have moved beyond incoherence. Guided you have to say by a Treasury that has lost utterly any semblance of rational anaylsis and advice.

She makes KRudd, who had firmly established himself as a prime minister worse than Whitlam, look like the very model of prudent thoughtful judgement in comparison. His rush to lock in an Emissions Trading Scheme before the Copenhagen conference was ridiculous and mad. It would have left Australia right out there like the proverbial shag on the rock when Copenhagen collapsed without even the most basic binding commitments.

To say nothing of the whole bureaucratic imposition of the ETS. More complicated and more onerous than the GST and open to far more rorts than the building insulation fiasco. But at least before Copenhagen, some could argue the hope of some global agreement requiring an Australian commitment.

Not so now after both its failure and even more the gas-emitting farce of Cancun. Gillard doesn't even have that excuse. She embarks on this destructive absurdity knowing that the world-read: China, India and the US -are not going to follow.

If we had a Treasury that retained any of its traditional competence, it would be telling the government that an attack on carbon dioxide emissions is an attack on Australia's core and pervasive national comparative advantage.

Why are we among the biggest emitters per head of CO2 ? The biggest by far, if we include the indirect emissions from the use of our resource exports ? Because we benefit from our bountiful coal and iron ore. Gillard's attack on the so-called carbon economy is not just designed to hurt every Australian. Permanently. It is effectively a national suicide pledge. From the nation's leader. Incredible. Surreal. All-too real.

'Anti-Islamism' A Dangerous Line. Is The US Intelligence Providing Nuclear Information To Al-Qaeda ??

2011-02-23T18:00:00.000-08:00

The Liberal Party game that allows patriotic people to blow of some steam in criticizing Moslems in Australia and internationally-is a dangerous line.

Not that Moslems should be allowed to migrate to Australia. They shouldn't. Not that any Islamic radical is any friend of Australia. He isn't. Moslem culture is incompatible with Australia's European culture and identity and Islamic radicalism can threaten Australians in various ways.

However, we can now see dangerous and incredible reports coming out of Pakistan that the CIA is providing information on nuclear and biological weapons to Al-Qaeda. Aren't they the folks who are supposed to have demolished the Twin Towers in New York in 2001 ? Aren't they the ones in Afghanistan who, along with the Taliban fanatics, are being fought by our soldiers ?

Australian nationalists have long said that anti-Islamism is a game designed to rope patriotic Aussies into support for establishment politics. If the CIA is doing what Pakistan intelligence says they are-then anti-Islamism is a lethal game set up with a dark agenda.

What will the Liberal Party say about this ? Read this report from Newstrack India: http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/206839

London, Feb 20 ( ANI ): Double murder-accused US official Raymond Davis has been found in possession of top-secret CIA documents, which point to him or the feared American Task Force 373 ( TF373 ) operating in the region, providing Al-Qaeda terrorists with "nuclear fissle material" and "biological agents," according to a report.

Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service ( SVR ) is warning that the situation on the sub-continent has turned "grave" as it appears that open warfare is about to break out between Pakistan and the United States, The European Union Times reports.

The SVR warned in its report that the apprehension of 36-year-old Davis, who shot dead two Pakistani men in Lahore last month, had fuelled this crisis.

According to the report, the combat skills exhibited by Davis, along with documentation taken from him after his arrest, prove that he is a member of US' TF373 black operations unit currently operating in the Afghan War Theatre and Pakistan's tribal areas, the paper said. While the US insists that Davis is one of their diplomats, and the two men killed were robbers, Pakistan says that the duo were ISI agents sent to follow him after he was discovered that he had been making contact with Al-Qaeda, after his cell phone was tracked to the Waziristan tribal area bordering Afghanistan, the paper said.

The most ominous point in this SVR report is "Pakistan's ISI stating that top-secret CIA documents found in Davis's possession point to his, and/or TF373, providing to al Qaeda terrorists "nuclear fissle material" and "biological agents", which they claim are to be used against the United States itself in order to ignite an all-out war in order to re-establish the West's hegemony over a Global economy that is warned is just months away from collapse," the paper added. ( ANI )

The Great Water Heist...While Australians Slept !

2011-02-03T15:04:00.000-08:00

The great water debate continues to rear its head after years of dormancy, complacency, government mismanagement, and of late, proposals by the Murray Darling Catchment Authority.

The problem is not a new one, it emanates from the dismantling of strategic government policies concerning water management, the introduction of water trading, and the granting of exessive water extraction licences along our inland waterways.

Droughts and floods are nature, and we have absolutely no control over the provision of the valued resource ( water ), but we do have control over the way it is managed and harvested.

Many years ago, our forebears had the foresight and will to build one of our natural wonders, Burrinjuck Dam, along with associated irrigation areas and districts. The dam was well-planned and has provided a continued flow in the Murrumbidgee for towns and irrigators since 1912.The engineers of the day forecast the requirements to satisfy the need of irrigators in the Murrumbidgee valley and that of the growing urban population in various towns.

Burrinjuck Dam has been 'dry' several times, but a check of the records will reveal that there were very few times when credentialled irrigators did not receive entitlements to finish off growing crops. I use the word credentialled, because the dam was built for the express purpose of those irrigators farming within the duly constituted irrigation areas, not for the explosion of riverside irrigators that we have seen in the past couple of decades, nor for the benefit of those who would indulge in water trading as a commodity or share market.

So where has the system fallen off the rails ? Bureaucracy ?

Typical of this was the dismantling of provisions of the Crown Lands Act and the severing of water rights attached to land. The recent animated objections to the suggested MDB plan in the MIA are evidence enough of a plan gone haywire. But where were all these objectors when the original changes were pushed through parliament ?

The healthy maintenance of our rivers is paramount, and rightly so, but that should not be at the expense of ongoing infrastructure programs to sustain the irrigation possibilities of inland Australia to feed a growing population. What would be wrong with prioritising water allocation to irrigators who are providing the nation with food ?

I live in hope that a politician, of any standing, will have the gumption to stand up and speak the mind of the people and not some party-line rhetoric that we've all had our fill of.

Mick Foxall
Wagga.
( Daily Advertiser 4.2.11 )
Edited for length.

.............

On this vital and critical issue of water...the people of Australia need to collectively speak their own minds, as no current traitor-class politician ever will, they are guilty of prostituting all things Australian to to their pimp master friends the bankers/investors and globalists. These traitors embrace international treaties, such as the Ramsar Convention, which the Water Act 2007, and the MDBP are based on.

Let us remind ourselves the Water Act 2007, was created by Malcom Turnbull ( Minister in the Howard government and investment banker, Goldman Sachs executive etc ). I encourage people scrutinise Malcom's resume`.

Let us also consider Premier Carr's introduction of the Water Management Act 2000, cleverly crafted, before Mr. Carr took up position at Australia's largest investment bank, Macquarie bank. Interestingly farmers have already expressed concerns regarding Macquarie Agribusiness buying up water rights to secure water for its investments.

And on and on the well oiled propaganda machine goes... the hoodwinking and theft from the Australian people. The desecration of all things Australian. This agenda is much larger and not isolated to the issue of water, although without water we have nothing ! All Australians would do well to realise the seriousness of what is going on here.

Our "new" Captain of the MDBA Mr. Craig Knowles ( ex-Labor MP ) was already in the fray, as he "assisted" the Liberal party at the time of development of the Water Act 2007. Mr Knowles contributed his area of expertise, being international treaties.

On close inspection it is all rather a neat little package, a close knit 'circle of friends'. It matters not if it is the Labor/Greens, or the Lib/Nat's, the agenda is the same.

We must resist, stand up and be counted, or face the very real possibility of finding ourselves peons in a neo-colony....completley dispossessed...and to think we are allowing this to happen to ourselves !!

After all, it would be nothing for 100,000 people to turn up to a football match at the MCG, yet where are the crowds filling the streets because our water supply is under threat and our lives along with it ?

It would be foolhardy for people to think they will not be affected by the water situation, simply because they do not live in the area currently under threat.

As the world's underground aquifiers are drying up and will not replenish due to over pumping etc and other safe un-contaminated fresh water sources are diminishing, why would anyone sign away their water to international treaties and greedy bankers ?

Fellow Australians...we are at WAR...WATER WAR !!

EUREKA !!

Call For A Referendum.

2011-02-02T17:25:00.000-08:00

It is disappointing that anyone who tries to express a contrary view on immigration in this country is branded a redneck or a racist and even if those views are shared by the majority of Australians it makes no difference.

The bleeding-heart brigade, the do-gooders and our moral guardians, the media, who have the last say, win every time. So much for free speech.

A lot has been said and written about refugees coming here and our politicians keep telling us the reason for the recent upsurge is the push factor. Most claim that unless they leave their homeland they face persecution or even death.

However, I believe that it is not the push factor but the pull factor that is attracting them to our shores. It's only commonsense that anyone fearing persecution or even death would seek refuge in the first available safe haven that they come to. But not most refugees. They bypass countries where they would be most welcome but because most do not have social security they head for Australia for a better lifestyle.

They know that once they get here they are set for life with generous handouts from the government that include free housing, free dental and medical plus all the perks available through charaties and various church groups. And to top it all off there is the baby bonus. And some people wonder why they make a bee-line for Australia.

Nearly all the men who arrive and settle here are all military age and while they relax at taxpayers` expense, enjoying the life of Riley, our young service personnel are certainly facing persecution and death cleaning up the mess they have left behind.

And it would be interesting to know if Australia was ever threatened with a foreign invasion would the like of Mr. John Moi of Wagga ( "Black Attack", The Daily Advertiser, January 12, 2011 ) and his fellow compatriots be prepared to bear arms against these invaders to defend their adopted country or would they hightail it out of here to another safe haven ?

If they refuse to defend their own country and desert family members and friends then it would be highly unlikely that they would risk life and limb to defend somebody else's country.

I know it makes a lot of people feel warm and fuzzy to have an open immigration policy but I believe every refugee who enters the country is a potential welfare recipient for the rest of their days.

We all know that the big end of town doesn't contribute much in the way of taxes so it's left to the low and middle income earners to foot the bill. And to top it all off, because of overcrowding on Christmas Island, some are now being housed on the mainland enjoying five-star luxury motels with room service. And some people wonder why they are busting their guts to come on leaking boats.

And to think that there are thousands of genuine Aussies, some through no fault of their own, who are really doing it tough by having to sleep in cars, doorways and under bridges yet, despite all of this, our politicians still can't seem to get their priorities right. They apparently don't believe in the adage that charity begins at home.

If we continue to tolerate weak border protection laws, weak politicians, "no questions asked" handouts from Centerlink and the two political party system nothing is ever going to change.

And you can forget about those fruitcakes The Greens as a viable alternative. Their main concerns appear to centre around same-sex marraige and sex-change operations at the taxpayer's expense.

Our politicians won't even consider having a referendum on immigration because if we change our present immigration policies it might just upset our political master-the United Nations.

Geoff Field
Gundagai
( Daily Advertiser 3.2.11 ).

For A Patriotic United Front.

2011-01-27T23:40:00.000-08:00

The Following statement was approved by the management committee of the party on January 10 2011. It Is Now Published.

The Australia First Party recognises the dependent nature of the Australian state upon the forces of globalism. Australia is a client state, ruled by a traitor class which is intergrated into a transnational network of globalist elites and their economic and political structures. This class would govern Australia as a resources quarry cowed by thought-policing and a secret political police. Australia is further menaced by a new Chinese imperialism that competes with the American face of the New World Order for domination over Asia and the Pacific, with Australia a pawn in the game. The unfolding population / food crisis coupled with New World Order wars launches refugee hordes at Australia's borders, whilst the traitor class sponsors a mass immigration recolonization of Australia for the purposes of economic enmeshment with the 'global economy'. In the world crisis of the first quarter of the twenty-first century, Australia lacks status as an independent country. Indeed, Australia may disappear by century's end as a country-and suffer partition by other states.

To rescue our country and our people means removing Australia to a position outside of the chaos of globalism. That means the creation of an independent Australia. To win an independent Australia where political power can be exercised directly by the people, where wealth comes to all who labour and where arms and the initiation and the enforcement of the laws are in the hands of the people, a new force outside of the old parties and their worn-out ideologies and prejudices-has become necessary. This new nationalist movement must now fight and win the struggle for Australia's national independence.

It is ultimately necessary to unite all who can be united against the traitor class into a broad patriotic front to achieve Australian national independence. All those parties, groups and trade and community associations which contest the ideology, the politics, the economics and the cultural expressions of globalism, can find common ground against the foreign control and exploitation of Australia. Their uniting thread is the cause of Australian national independence.

The patriotic united front should not be a matter for tomorrow, but a matter of immediacy. United fronts operate in two ways: we predict the ultimate formation of a mass united front in times future, one that will win Australian national independence at a moment when parties and groups, economic and social and cultural associations all bond together in intense struggle. For today, we must build for that future in struggles on a daily basis around all manner of issues; we must wage community campaigns apposite to each Australian group and build unity on the ground. It is mandatory to seek this unity.

The Australia First Party is an incorporation registered as a Federal party. That does not mean that its function is only to contest elections. The party operates to the 'three tier method'. This means that the party contests elections, wages community campaigns of all sorts to build links with fellow Australians and to unite all Australians-and develops its ideas and principles into an Australianist ideology that also carries on a cultural defence of Australianity against globalisation. The three tiers operate as a unity.

In one sense, the party reaches out to groups of a patriotic nature which may operate to one or another of these three tiers as their individual method. The party seeks to build relationships with such parties and groups and to unite whenever necessary to defend common interests and win common victories. New patriotic groups form either as political, trade, or cultural groups. As Australia descends into chaos, that process is organic.

Australia First Party within the broad patriotic movement seeks to be a vanguard movement. This means that the party struggles to affirm the power of the ideals of Australian identity, independence and freedom, to carry those ideals everywhere, to defend them and preach them with zeal as a veritable Australianism and to inspire all others to tread the path towards the overweening fight for Australian national independence.

The party states clearly how it would prefer its dealings with other patriotic political organisations to be conducted and what relationships should be developed.

The Australia First Party recognises that different parties and groups exist for several reasons. These reasons can include: geographic circumstance, particular historical factors, previous organisational histories, the inter-relationships of people and sometimes-internecine struggles that are to be regretted, but which are human nature.

The Australia First Party declares that it will treat the other political organisations within a patriotic united front in this way:

1. Negotiate with any would-be candidate to avoid electerol competition.

2. Assist, when requested, other parties etc. in an electorate or council area where Australia First Party has no candidate.

3. Develop united activist campaigns on public issues or on other fronts, with any party or group-and do this in a consultative and cooperative spirit.

4. Exchange intelligence on disruptive elements, or state or other programs which undermine the integrity of the patriotic movement.

5. Avoid all unnecessary, unreasonable comment on other parties and groups; but point out fairly and reasonably, what any differences may be, whenever appropriate.

The party states clearly how it would prefer its dealings with other patriotic community organisations to be conducted and what relationships should be developed.

The Australia First Party recognises that different community associations arise for different reasons. Some defend the interests of the Australian productive classes-workers, farmers, small-business or other patriotic working people. Some advance the defence of Australian heritage and identity. Some explain new ideas that can inspire a very different Australia.

The Australia First Party declares that it will treat other organisations that represent the Australian community within a patriotic united front in this way:

1. Build links with each group and attempt to link together each group that all understand and appreciate the role of the party and each other.

2. Assist all in their struggles as requested.

3. Develop united activist campaigns on public issues with each group-and do this in a consultative and cooperative spirit.

4. Exchange intelligence on disruptive elements, or state or other programs which undermine the integrity of the patriotic movement.

5. Aviod all unnecessary, unreasonable comment on groups; but point out fairly and reasonably, what any differences may be, whenever appropriate.

The Australia First Party will always maintain its independence and iniciative in any united front arrangement and will act to secure its interests. However, it accepts that the times require a flexible and co-operative attitude.

Certainly, the goals of the Australia First Party are ( i ) to unite all nationalist and activist minded people into a single party and then seek further working arrangements with whatever political forces may thereafter exist for whatever reasons outside of the party's ambit and ( ii ) to deepen the unity of Australia's productive classes and their organisations against the traitor class and to create wider unity amongst all those resistance organisations which critique globalisation in ideas and culture.

Certainly, the party's aim is indeed to impose order where we detect diffuseness and to give focus where we note disarray.

Nonetheless, the party reasons that such general goals can not be reached by a self-proclamation of virtue. Rather, the party will fight such that its ideological position and political line progressively gain hegemony. It shall do so openly and honestly and by all fair means of discourse. No other organisation should feel anything else than a sense of relief that the position is made clear.

In the interim, and given that the fair contest of parties and other forces will continue, the Australia First Party has concluded that the only practical way whereby all may learn of each other and build the necessary bonds and links which allow for final unity, is to work confederally to construct a practical unity in struggle.

The united patriotic front is the requirement to which all should work.

Why Do We Really Need To Levy Australian Business And People For The Floods.

2011-01-25T06:37:00.000-08:00

The floods are a national disaster, yet we persist in making short term decisions which have long term impacts on our economy, our food security and our lives. Why levy businesses and our people to pay for the neglect of infrastructure by governments, and poor decisions by planning authorities over many years? Why not levy the importers who will benefit from the decimation of our food growing areas in Queensland, NSW and Victoria?

The floods have exacerbated a problem that we created, not mother-nature. Our farmers have suffered years of drought, the threat of mining taking priority over their water supplies or contaminating them, and foreign companies and countries allowed to buy our land or breeding stock to export and compete with us, or to buy our water licenses then trade them as intangible commodities.

Free Trade Agreements and the high AUD$ mean that cheap, imported foods have been competing against our farmers for years by foreign owned companies manufacturing here, or local retailers importing their private labels in direct competition with Australian suppliers.

Foreign interests have been allowed to buy the channels of distribution for our exports leaving our farmers as price takers not price makers. Seventy five percent of our dairy industry is foreign owned, as are our brewing, beef exports and abattoirs, grain exports, sugar and most of our food manufacturing. Unless we own what we have we lose control.

Decisions have been made wrongly by successive governments on the basis that we export more food than we use here. No other developed country has exposed its food supply and farmers to the same extent. When we consider that we have an enviable clean, green, growing environment and some of the most skilled and productive farmers in the world this is an indictment on how poorly we have managed a strategic resource – our food supply.

We have opportunities to rebuild lost homes and infrastructure, and priority should be given to resourcing our people and our own local companies to supply and build these. But almost half our food growing areas are decimated for the short term. These are our farmers, our skills, our factories, and our jobs under threat.

The beneficiaries of our losses will be all those countries who will gain access to our food markets while our farmers rebuild. These countries will not leave once they gain greater access. China, New Zealand, USA, Peru, Chile, UK, EU, Thailand, India are all ready to capitalise on our losses. If they are to benefit, then they should pay for access to our markets, and their imports should be on an emergency basis only until such times as our farmers can supply us again. The levies should be on them not Australians.

These countries subsidise their farmers, so it about time Australia started to subsidise our farmers especially through this “natural disaster” rebuilding period. Consumers should be better informed and allowed to choose. Our labelling laws should make it mandatory to put country of origin on all foods, and be policed to ensure consumers know exactly where the food they are eating is grown.

Our gate keepers should be better resourced to ensure we have a viable farming sector and retain the skills and quality systems that our farmers meet. AQIS should at the very least triple its resources to assess the quality and condition of produce being imported so that we are not exposed to unwanted diseases or contaminants and chemicals not allowed here.

Bio security Australia should have independent Australian scientists to assess the quality of imported foods, and not have to rely on global companies with vested interests other than Australia’s to provide research.

ACCC should be serious about the unfair competition allowed to occur when foreign interests buy our key food industry sectors for both domestic and export use. Our farmers may own the farms but they do not own the profits.

Our farmers will never recover if we do not look after them now. It is not a level playing field. These are our people, our businesses, our communities and our farmers. The Australian people have shown their true worth in how they responded to the disasters which have befallen them. Now it is time for decision makers to give Priority to Australia.

PRIORITY AUSTRALIA IN 2011

Lynne Wilkinson

Ausbuy.

Will John Moi Go Home ?

2011-01-08T02:34:00.000-08:00

That well known Wagga 'refugee advocate' John Moi has blessed us with his views on the independence referendum in Southern Sudan. Many of the African 'refugees' to Australia come from Southern Sudan Moi told the Daily Advertiser ( Wagga ) :

"Close to 9300 southerners living in Australia registered to vote. A number of us from Wagga will travel to Canberra to cast our votes. To many southerners, the plebiscite was the best thing that ever happened because this will now resolve internal contradictions; the country of Sudan was in for the last 50 years, 40 of which was spent in civil wars."

Now that Sudan will break into two states, the African south and the Arabised north, the safety of the South Sudan population can no longer be an issue. We wonder: who will return home? will the Australian government encourage these people to return home?

Mr. Moi continued:

"I would like to call on the government of Australia to support the new born country in its development".

Australia First could not agree more except we would add a rider to that: the Sudanese 'refugees' should return home! Aid should be contingent on South Sudan taking these people and assistance should be provided to get these people home.

Yet, it is our strong suspicion that having tasted the benefits of free housing, cash gifts, welfare of all sorts, few of these people would be interested in a return to South Sudan. And we suspect that Mr. Moi won't be leaving either.

For Australia First Party a return home is non-negotiable. The Future Australia will be generous, but the right of the Australian People to identity in our own land is ahead of everything.

Will Some In One Nation Cross To The Dark Side On Refugees: Why Can't It Just Be NO ??

2010-12-23T06:09:00.000-08:00

Dr. Jim Saleam and Brendan Gidley

Mr. Basil Hille, South Australian Director of the One Nation party, has written an important article on refugees. If his comments become One Nation policy, then it would mean that One Nation had fundamentally compromised its principles.

We understand that the refugee influx, the breaking open of the borders is the ultimate irrationality which faces all who say they are Australian patriots. It is something which threatens our very right to exist as a people. And it is being foisted upon us by politicians, capitalists, media, church lunatics, leftists, in front of our eyes. Our people are being dispossessed in their own land.

So, some decent people tinker with the hard question-yes or no ? Some play clever with it. Some lose sight of what the task of any Australian patriot is: to secure the Australian Nation itself !

Mr. Hille has written:

"Meanwhile, we in One Nation if we are against the arrival of boat people we must have an alternative solution, and one way I or we propose is, stop illegal immigrants in the country of their departure, that is where they board the boats on their journey to Australia eg; Indonesia or where ever, this must be done in consultation with the appropriate government authorities of that country, with any that may slip past those authorities and arrive in Australian waters then placed on planes and sent to appropriate refugee locations and processed along with other refugees who have been waiting patiently for entry into Australia the legal and safe way, other wise they are queue jumpers and are taking a place away from those who waited patiently and earned the right to enter Australia."

The Australia First Party is not concerned with whether refugees ( sic ) are illegals, or if they are legally ( sic ) processed by ten thousand United Nations officials for entry to Australia.

Australia First does not care whether they paid to come by boat ( as 'queue-jumpers' ), or whether they patiently waited their 'turn'.
Australia First says: no, no, no !

Australia First would repudiate all treaties on refugees.

Australia First would turn all boats around as the Malaysians did to Vietnamese boats in 1976-9.

Australia First would declare these unarmed intruders to be unlawful combatants in a new type of warfare which will characterise the twenty-first century: the war for resources, land, water and life itself. Those who re-entered the national territory after being turned about, after being provisioned to return home, after receiving full warning-would be sunk.

Australia First recognises that, combined with the 'legal' immigration invasion, the refugee influx adds to our woe. Essentially, Australia is being drowned in a sea of alien cultures.

Can One Nation say what needs to be said ? The members of One Nation clamour to hear the truth shouted loud and clear ! But do some leaders fear the media will frighten the voters off by saying they are a party of blood and violence ? Truly any party that allows these refugees into Australia is creating an age of blood and violence ! Who said 'voters' are the answer here ? Isn't agitation and action that mobilises the Australian people-what is really needed ?

What is being proposed to One Nation members is Liberal Party deceit-politics. Isn't that what an Abbott might say ? It is not a nationalist solution. If such a policy line was ultimately imposed upon the One Nation party-then it would be time for members to vote with their feet.
And Australia First would welcome all who are prepared to fight !

We call on One Nation members: do not go down the compromise road !

The Dispossession Agenda.

2010-12-07T15:04:00.000-08:00

Review Of Political Parties Needed
Max Goulter ( Daily Advertiser 8.12.10 ).

I ask readers to cast their minds back to 2007. Which political party was in power at the time ?

The 2007 Water Act has rightfully been attacked by irrigation farmers and dryland farmers alike. It was passed by the then Liberal/National Howard government.

Mike Taylor, the MDBA chairman, stated that "The act that set up this authority was based on the Ramsar Convention of 1971."

When the Howard government passed it they were handing the Murray/Darling producers over to a program that threatens their livelihoods, and the food security which we have always enjoyed.

How many people realise that already, Australia is a net importer of food ? There used to be close to 200,000 family farmers in Australia, now there are just 80,000.

At Echuca last week, Tony Abbott, Barnaby Joyce and Sharman Stone were confronted by Aaron Isherwood of the CEC who asked them if they had read the water act.

Sharman Stone admitted that they designed the act, but blamed the MDBA's interpretation for the problems. This whole saga smells of hypocrisy. The party which was responsible for drafting the act sends their reps to the meetings who pose like the "white knights" who are going to save our struggling farmers from the Labor Party and the MDBA.

As many have already said, the whole water act needs to be rejected and a new one written because as it stands, it doesn't matter how much consultation goes on, the necessary changes that need to be made to it will never happen.

Our rivers are flooding, and still they say that our irrigation farmers cannot have any more water. The Green/Labor coalition is just continuing this foolishness.

It has got to the point that voting in the Lib/Nat government to get rid of Green/Labor is like moving the deck chairs on the Titanic. We in the country need to take a good look at the track record of the people we have voted in over many years and assess the facts.

Australia First Supports A Boycott Of The Sineva Foundation !

2010-12-03T02:30:00.000-08:00

Foundation Needs Support; Daily Advertiser ( 3.12.10 ).

Clearly there is no end in sight to what is seemingly an entrenched parasitic culture of refugees. Is it not enough that Mr. Newah-Jarfoi has disadvantaged other Australians by way of all the tax payer assistance he and other refugees have received from the Australian people, ahead of other needy and disadvantaged groups, he now wishes to sponge the resources of struggling businesses and the community of Wagga Wagga as well !

In an article in the Daily Advertiser ( 3.12.10 ) Mr. Newah-Jarfoi states he wishes to set up a "foundation" to provide education for children in Sierra Leone. There is no doubt this is a worthy cause and has merit, BUT, as Mr. Newah-Jarfoi stated "According to the United Nations, 5 % of Sierra Leone people are illiterate. This lack of education is having a terrible and prolonged effect on the country".

I would refer Mr. Newah-Jarfoi to official Australian government NAPLAN statistics that remote areas and areas of disadvantage in Australia have much worse statistics than 5 % illiteracy, it is more like 60 %. Is Mr. Newah-Jarfoi concerned with these disadvantaged people ?

We would suggest to the people of the Riverina rather than donate yet again to international causes and agencies, they would consider donating to local and or Australian disadvantaged peoples. In the case of literacy and education, they may consider donating to the Australian Literacy and Numeracy Foundation, who are trying to raise $150,000 to support a one year community program as part of the foundations campaign to reverse the situation, where four out of five children in remote Aboriginal communities are unable to read.

Donations can be made to http://www.wallofhands.com.au/. The Herald is a media partner of the Australian Literacy and Numeracy Foundation.

Further worthy causes within Australia, that are desperate for funding and donations are child protection organisations, mental health agencies, assistance for the over 100,000 Australian homeless and rising, including homeless youth and the elderly and many many more worthy and ignored Australian causes in dire need.

We would suggest to Mr. Newah-Jarfoi, that he approach one of these other "charities" such as Red Cross, World Vision and so on, that would happily assist his cause, before that of local need as we note with the Red Cross in Lockhart and the Lockhart flood victims.

Further, as Mr. Newah-Jarfoi would be well aware, the U.N and other "international" groups are providing humanitarian and other assistance to "his country". If he is as passionate about his cause ( as he states in Daily Advertiser ), maybe he should consider returning to Sierra Leone himself to assist the need he speaks of at the coal face ?

This situation is an example of the failure of multiculti and that in reality we are opposing groups joined only by a global economy, rather than any hallucination of a homogeneous nation.

Scrap Basin Plan And Adopt Political Will And Commonsense !

2010-11-22T20:57:00.000-08:00

Jeanine McRae ( Griffith ).

Whoopsie. It's not the whole truth and nothing but the truth we're being told here. The only reason the Murray Darling Basin Plan ( MDBP ) referred to just the "environment", and excluded the social and environmental impacts, is because they simply didn't have to under legislation which invoked the act.

Yes, that's right-we are dispensable, our area is dispensable, food security is dispensable, everything is dispensable in favour of "the environment", which can be construed ( or not ) in very broad terms.

When we became party to international/UN agreements, conventions, treaties etc, then that treaty allows the federal government to override state law because the Australian federal government signed the treaties under the external affairs power [ i ] of the Australian constitution.

Thus, the federal government, supported by a High Court ruling can now legislate to enforce any international agreement by invoking the external affairs power. It is my understanding they did so in order to get the states to agree to "water reform".

Therefore, the Ramsar Convention with its wetlands environmental thrust can override our law here, and that is why the MDBA did not legally have any need to refer to any social or economic outcomes, even though the agreement on reform between the states alludes to it. And why don't they legally stick to this ? Because the international convention overrides everything else.

Regardless of any lip-service where they promise to look at it, or indeed, if they do take it into consideration initially, are we able to trust that it won't be changed in 10 or 20 years time ? Therefore, we should immediately insist that the proposed basin plan ( MDBP ) is struck from the legislation. Wiped. Zeroed. Destroyed.

Any future legislation should not refer to any international conventions that can override what we do here. If agreement can't be reached by the states, then we should have no agreement. The money we have spent already on this debacle could probably build an "environmental" dam or dams just for the frogs, birds, Adelaide, and the Lower Lakes.

This year, and last year, would have filled it/them, and for many years there would be an environmental flow that wouldn't need to impact on our already impacted community. Instead of un-dammed lies and stacked statistics, we could have dammed water to flow.

It's a myth that water is scarce in Australia. We have plenty-it just goes out to sea without us catching it. If it makes sense to catch the rainwater off our rooves, then why doesn't it make sense to fill up dams in the good years. Millions of megs of water could be captured if we had the political will to do so.

So, go build an environmental dam for Ramsar. Leave our water and food security alone. This madness is totally unnecessary and easily fixed with some commonsense and political will.

Living Under A Bridge Safer Than Living In NSW Department Of Housing !

2010-11-19T05:33:00.000-08:00

Under The Bridge: Homeless May Be Forced To Hit The Road !
SMH ( 16.11.10 ).

67 year old Lenny Walsh said " You're safer here than in the city". Mr Walsh and his friends Steve and Eddie sit in camp chairs sipping cups of tea, protected from the pouring rain by the broad belly of the M4 motorway.

They are part of a small, but ever increasing community of homeless men-and occasionally women-who have lived at the makeshift campsite in Harris Park since last Christmas.

But the men are bracing themselves for eviction today, having been told by Roads Traffic Authority that they must clear out or face charges of trespassing on government property.

"We've got everything here-stove, couches, beds, tents. What do they want us to do, rent a storage unit ?" Steve 47, says dryly.

The Roads Minister ( ex-public housing Minister ), David Borger, said last night that he had asked the RTA to review the matter and offer help. But the men have all tried, and rejected, the Department of Housing refuge and crisis accommodation facilities, saying they carry more risk than the street !

"You end up living with drug dealers and crooks," said Eddie 48. "As long as you pay the rent on time and don't have the cops around too often, Housing doesn't care what you do."

The NSW Director of Mission Australia, Leonie Green, said Sydney was facing a wave of homelessness due to the combined effects of rising interest rates, high household debt and reduced working hours.

"The most vulnerable group at the moment is the family group and those who have bought into the mortgage belt. This is predominantly Western Sydney, so that is where we're likely to see more homeless."

snip.....

The Riverina Office of Australia First has received many reports of these very problems in Regional NSW .

The majority of reports received, have been regarding the dangerous and frightening living conditions in the Department of Housing areas. The extreme violence, drug dealers and users, alcohol problems, and what goes with it. Crime is rife and anti-social behavior is the accepted norm.

In Tolland and Kooringal burnt out and vandalised houses line the streets, adding to the general ambiance of the ongoing crime scene that is Department of Housing accommodation. As tax payers we are curious as to where the millions of dollars, of taxpayers money went that was allocated to the Wagga area ( 12-18 months ago ) specifically for the purpose of cleaning up this mess and suppossedly to address the issues of anti-social behavior ? The propaganda peddled was that this was a matter of urgency for this area. Nothing has changed.

If anything the problems are getting worse, and D.O.H Wagga Office won't lift a finger. Rather they happily sit back collecting a handsome salary whilst vulnerable people, their so-called clients live in the middle of what can only be described as a war zone and a living hell !

Where is the "duty of care" ? Where is the facilitation of the Housing Act ? Who is accountable ?

Mission Australia and others have some nerve, pretending to care about the dire situation of Australians, while most of their efforts are concentrated on refugee re-settlement and services. The double talk and double standards of such groups is offensive to disenfranchised Australians.

Their actions do not reflect their talk, as they too offer only flea ridden, cockroach infested halfway houses and the like for needy Australians, while they secure the best lodgings and services for refugees ( Invaders ).

Water Shambles.

2010-11-03T18:59:00.000-07:00

Kellie Tranter ( 15.9.10 )

Did you notice recent reports that one Richard Lourey is abroad hawking Australian water ? Yes, he's a water marketeer. Yes, he's selling Australian farm water to investors in Asia, Europe and North America. Yes, he's trying to flog water rights along the Murray-Darling Basin ! Surely you remember the Murray-Darling Basin ? Yes, that's the one: the major river system for the eastern half of our continent that doesn't have enough consistently runing water to survive, let alone to satisfy the already rapacious demands of its human exploiters. Yet he's trying to get overseas speculators in on a bit of wheeling and dealing in its precious flow ? It shouldn't come as a surprise if you look at recent history.

The World Bank:

The water privatisation policy of the World Bank was articulated in a 1992 paper entitled "Improving Water Resources Management". The Bank believes that water availability at low or no cost is uneconomic and inefficient. Even the poor should pay...

In 2003 the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists discovered that despite the World Bank's contentions that it does not "force" privatisation on the poor.....Using data available from the World Bank Web site, ICIJ analysed 276 loans labelled "water supply" awarded by the bank between 1990 and 2002. In about one third of the projects, the World Bank required the country to privatise its water operations in some way before it received funds.

Here in good old New South Wales the free marketeers didn't need the helping hand of external "persuasion": water privatisation here seems to have been kicked off at the COAG meeting in February 1994 with the descision to establish an open water market as part of a national push towards a National Land & Water Resources Audit 2002-08.

This local philosophy was consistant with the World Bank's approach. An article "Tradable Property Rights to Water How to improve water use and resolve water conflicts" ( PDF 159KB ) that appeared in the World Bank's Public Policy for the Private Sector February 1995 edition took the now familiar line that.....

...Tradable water rights can help shift water to high value uses in a way that is cheaper and fairer than some of the present alternatives...Under a tradable water rights system, the public sector's role in the construction, operation and maintenance of hydraulic infrastructure can be reduced to financing selected high-return activities with strong positive externalities or public goods characteristics. The market-not the-government-will determine the allocation and pattern of water use and the prices charged for water rights...

A great idea if they're creating a true market instead of a casino, and if the players and the regulators can be "trusted" with our most precious resource of all. But they weren't and they can't.

Commoditisation Of Water In NSW:

The Carr government introduced the Water Management Act in 2000. It's most significant change was that one did not have to own or occupy land to hold a water licence. It permitted them to be held by anyone, including a passive investor, allegedly facilitated objectives such as maximising the social and economic benefits of water to the community while being consistant with the maintenance of long-term productivity of land. Unfortunately this kind of government propaganda, dubious economics and high fallutin` "public benefit" claptrap prevailed in the absence of any objective public benefit or organised community opposition.

Ongoing concerns have been raised about privatisation. The ultimate question is whether or not the punative intention of the legislation has played out ? You can bet it hasn't, and it won't. Haven't we already seen farmers express concerns about Maquarie Agribusiness buying up water rights to secure water for its investments ?

Privatisation:

Not long before Carr took up his post with Maquarie Bank his government laid the groundwork for a futures market in water rights. A NSW State Water media release from July 2005 reads:

...A water index futures market would provide reliant, or water exposed businesses with an opportunity to hedge their risks to future climatic factors, particularly water availability. An ability to hedge future risks leads to better informed investment decisions and in turn stimulates economic activity, creating jobs and more certain profits for businesses. The establishment of a futures market would enable financial service organisations to develop simple yet effective products for the rural community designed to reduce the impact of drought and flood...

Rubbish ! "Financial service organisations" exist to make profit and they will profit by selling water to "miners" or farmers, who are ultimately the only other real market in rural Australia, at prices that guarantee their profits. The press release doesn't mention environmental concerns or any limitations on the activities of overseas "investors" or local speculators.

Essentially buying water now operates, it seems like a bet on future scarcity but with a guaranteed "win" for those who have the money to play. In the driest inhabited continent on the planet and its drought conditions, the only way for the price to go is up. It won't be long before those who can afford to pay for the water will have the luxury of it. And domestic consumers are going to suffer as much as our surviving farmers.

Water Brokers:

Now with such a wonderful, well thought out scheme to benefit all and sundry one would have thought that the NSW State Government would have had an effective licensing regime in place when it introduced Water Management Act 2000. After all, everyone else seems to be regulated nowadays.

Apparently not. The National Water Commission did commission the Allen Consulting Group to investigate national and jurisdictional governance arrangements for the conduct of market intermediaries and appropriate governance options, but a "minimalist intervention" approach was recomended.

So the wheelers and dealers are free to wheel and deal, substantially regulated only by the general law: for water brokers that are corporations the ( Federal ) ACCC has released a publication called Water brokers and exchanges-your fair trading obligations, and for partnerships or sole traders the equivalent State laws administered by the ( NSW ) Dept, of Fair Trading come into play. If that arrangement is OK, why was Waterfind, one of Australia's main water brokers calling late last year for more regulation of water brokers ?

Conclusion:

Our "new" federal government needs to take responsiblity for managing Australia's limited water resources. Within the framework of addressing water and food security, the requirements for industry and agriculture have to be met in tandem with the needs of the general population. Private enterprise does not and will not distribute water equitably or in a way that promotes the national interest.

It needs to be noted that if the federal government does not voluntarily assume the role of conservator and distributor of water, acting without fear or favour to promote the national interest, sooner or later scarcity will force that role upon them. Corrupt state governments can have no part in such undertakings, and neither can cashed up private companies who grease the wheels of government for their own ends.

Australia First Supports Inverbrackie People's Struggle Against Refugee Invasion: Time For A Community Strike!

2010-10-22T00:50:00.000-07:00

Some 400 refugees will be dropped into the Adelaide Hills town of Inverbrackie. So much for the Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott election-period spin on deterring "asylum seekers". Stop the boats ? No: fly them in! Disused army facilities will be turned over to the parasites. A large protest meeting at the Woodside Town Hall on October 21 drew some 400 people.

The Australia First Party supports the people of the Adelaide Hills in their concerns and in their protests. The party will commence activities there very soon.

It is people's struggle that is the decisive thing and it is difficult for direction to be found amidst the chaos of recolonization.

The dark terror that will be waged by Moslem extremists, Tamil Tiger guerrillas, Afghan drug criminals, African animists and so on is but a matter of time. It sums to culture busting ( the process by which Australian community feeling and identity is broken down ) and is also a type of state-terrorism against the Australian population-ethnic cleansing!

Resistance must become permanent, regardless of what the government does.

Australia First Party proposes the model of a Community Strike:

No Australian should collaborate in any way with any government agency which operates the project.

No Australian should communicate with any so-called refugee.

No Australia should accept any employment arising from the intrusion.

No Australian should attend any church or community group that supports the refugee invasion.

All should shun and avoid any person who violates these rules.

The people of the area should ensure the election of fighting councillors to defend their interests at local level.

Australians should affiliate to and support their Australian heritage or community organization of choice.

The people of Inverbrackie and the Hills area generally will be vilified by the national media and other psychological terrorists for any patriotic stand they take. To end the refugee invasion, to repudiate the United Nations treaties, to punish those in political office who have allowed this are enormous questions. The people of Inverbrackie have been put in the front line of a battle for the future of Australia.

If you don't fight-you lose!

The Death Knell For Murray-Darling Food Producers.

2010-10-15T04:04:00.000-07:00

With the release of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan we realise it is the death sentence for Australian food production and up to 90 rural and regional communities along with it!

Robert Anderson of Moree NSW warns us: Beware The Consultation That Isn't !

After many delays and leaks we now have the guidelines for the Murray-Darling Basin plan, and are being told by Water Minister, Tony Burke, "not to worry, it is only a draft, and we will now have the community consultation process".

From my experiences dealing with Labor governments, now is the time to get really worried.

When SEPP46 came into being in NSW, then Premier, Bob Carr, and relevant ministers all said "do not worry, this is the interim until we have a proper community consultation process before the Act is formed and passed".

The Native Vegitation Act duly came in and was somewhat worse than SEPP46. In the so-called "consultation process" the only parties really listened to were the extreme Green groups.

Eventually a lot of time, money, and effort went into designing a "general exemption" to incorporate in the Act to make day-to-day farming operations feasible.

A workable solution was worked out with the more moderate green groups, NSW Farmers and local government. However, this did not suit the radical Greens and on the eleventh hour the general exemption was canned by Bob Carr.

At the same time the Regional Vegitation Plans that were starting to work out very sustainable solutions, and would have cost millions of dollars to formulate, were also scrapped, to appease the radical left wing Greens who wanted a centralist system they could control via a compliant government.

Both were replaced with the disastrous centralised computer program, the Property Vegitation Planner, which is negative for both farmers and the environment, but good for those inner city Green votes that are the lifeblood of Labor.

Both the Native Vegitation Act and the replacing of the general exemption and Regional Vegitation Committees were economically and environmentally retrograde steps done for pure political reasons after "community consultation", with rural NSW as the scapegoat.

When a Labor government talks of "community consultation", it is Laborspeak for "softening up" before getting hit with the real sting in the tail, which will be much worse than what has so far been put on the table.

Labor hyenas, whether State or federal, do not change their spots. They remain a gentle hue of socialist red, and love to roll on their backs and let their masters, the far left radical, so-called "Greens", tickle their tummy.

R. Anderson
The Land ( 14.10.10 ).

The real agenda here is somewhat more sinister, we are moving into the globalist fase where all agriculture excluding the big produce for export czars will be killed off and we will import for consumption.

The Murray-Darling Basin Plan is but one of the many weapons in the globalists arsenal to achieve this goal.

When injustice becomes LAW, resistance becomes DUTY!

The "Anti-Fascists" Of "Antifa Australia" Fail To Stop The Sydney Forum: It Is A Serious Political Defeat For Those Who Deny Free Speech.

2010-09-20T21:51:00.000-07:00

Dr. Jim Saleam.

The "Antifa Australia" group has failed to stop the Ninth Sydney Forum held on September 18-19. After threatening to demonstrate against the Forum's Sunday session and to generally expose and oppose "fascism" ( sic )- they simply failed to show.

Or rather, three "spies" did. One was arrested by some police for an offence ( weapon ? drugs ? ). Another slunk away with a few snapshots of a small group of police detailed to "watch" the event and the last one took a few photos at a safe distance from the Forum across the busy Princes Highway at Tempe. What startling intelligence did he get ? Simply a few pikkies of the Australia First building where the Sunday session was held!

For Antifa, it was a bad knock, a serious miscalculation, a political defeat. Not to make good on their promise to demonstrate even when sympathetic journalists at the ABC or SBS could have given them a camera opportunity, has shown even a lack of enterprise.

On Sunday, when they should have been demonstrating against the Forum to prove whatever anti free speech credentials they have, Antifa opted to hold a "rally" at the Hub Theatre In Newtown, with some forty or fifty persons in attendance. They later tried to occupy Newtown Square with banners and bongos and they threw a few insults at duty police.

There was still the opportunity to march from Newtown to Tempe, but there was no attempt to encourage others to join them, nothing at all. After adjourning from their rally, the Antifa wandered off to a few hotels and others perhaps-to some private homes to enjoy their recreational drugs.

Acting as the "fascists" they would proclaim the Forum to be, they still failed to stifle freedom of speech.

In recent months, Australia First has noted increasingly strident rhetoric from Antifa to deny freedom of speech and assembly to those who they deem to be "fascists". In the past they have damaged property and tried to assault people. They did not confront the Forum. Why ?

Last year Antifa demonstrated ( with property damage ) in inner city Chippendale, protesting against a group they called "extreme right" or "fascist". In July, they joined with others to protest a small group of persons in Newtown who objected to Islamic migration. However, Australia First and Sydney Forum have been reserved for special abuse and occasional violent rhetoric.

Antifa is a group fuelled by anarchists and inner city "lifestyle dregs" ( same sex marriage couples, perverts of various sorts, drug abusers, refugee "advocates" and what not ). They do not represent the Australian people although they might be considered "chic" in parts of inner-suburbs Sydney. They proclaim themselves arbiters of freedom. Yet, this group does not see ( if it cares at all ) that its slogans ( No borders!; No nations! Refugee rights! ) are the very slogans of the corrupt, globalist, Australian political establishment. Australia First has often decried the "rabble above and the rabble below", that funny working coalition of the rich in expensive suits and the greenhairs in dirty drag, who together share a common globalist perspective-and via the media can mobilise against patriotic Australians. At best, this curious Antifa street gang serves in practice those very elites they criticise elsewhere as the uncaring rich. The irony is absolute and the deception complete. Ultimately, it may be that the Antifa have simply recognized the fact that we cannot be deterred and that it is easier to abuse the long suffering average cop.

The Sydney Forum was a success and reports that have reached us say that the 2011 Forum will be the largest. Next year marks the tenth anniversary of the Forum's foundation and in fact-its tenth presentation. Freedom of speech and genuine democracy is not dead in Australia. Australia First Party will continue to proudly support the Sydney Forum and we look forward to reading its full report for 2010.

Foreign Buyouts.

2010-09-16T05:28:00.000-07:00

Today Tonight 16.9.10
Reporter Helen Wellings.

It's the great disappearing act. Our skills, machinery, companies, products, homes and significant parts of our land are being sold off at a rapid rate.

Most people prefer to buy Australian, but it's often impossible to tell dinky-di goods from imported ones because our government allows confusing labelling.

"Product of Australia" means the food was grown here, while "Made in Australia" means the produce can come from overseas, but just be processed or transformed here.

Lynne Wilkinson of Ausbuy, which supports Australian owned companies and products says of the top 100 food brands, only 20 are controlled by Australian interests.

"Foreign companies use koalas, Australian flags, maps even the word Australian to infer they are Australian," Lynne said.

Tracking down an Aussie product can be like finding a needle in a haystack.

"Frozen vegies, there is not much from Australia, this is from China, and these onions are from Poland. They are made in NZ and the peas are from the UK and sold for $2 a pack," Lynne said.

"You have a major brand like Dairy Farmers which represents 54 per cent of our dairy industry, it's been taken over by the Japanese. Golden Circle, that was taken over by Heinz. CSR sugar is being taken over by a Singaporean company".

90 per cent of products on supermarket shelves are imported or owned by foreign companies. Australia's now importing more than $1.5 billion worth of fruit and vegetables per year, increasing 5 per cent every year. Bonds has moved production overseas and Arnotts is now owned by the big American, Campbells.

"Uncle Tobys is owned by Nestle the Swiss company, Just Juice is the Berri company which is owned by Kirren, the Japanese. It says "Made in Australia" and its got fully imported ingredients," Lynne said.

And the latest shock? The historical Gunnedah property, Kurrumbede, Dorothea Mackellar's homestead, which inspired her to write our most famous Australian poem, My country, has just been sold to a Japanese company for $14 million. That's right, 2600 hectares of our precious heritage is about to be turned into a coalmine.

Jo Kellock, CEO of the Council of Textile & Fashion Industries of Australia says our skills and jobs are rapidly disappearing offshore.

"It is very serious, we are very concerned about what's happened to the Australian-made content in the fashion market, it is hard to find those clothes," Jo said.

"The majority of our clothes are coming from China, then Vietnam, Bangladesh and Cambodia, and in the Third World countries they are entitled to bring those goods in duty-free, and that drives the price down in the Australian market."

We're now importing one billion articles of clothing a year.

Cue, a great Australian fashion success story, was founded 42 years ago by the same family that still owns it. CEO David Kesby says they'll never be tempted to sell out.

"One of the great reasons they love Cue is because we are still predominantly Australian made. We've got suppliers that have worked with us over 30 years. By making here in Australia we get to deliver in store, much quicker than all our contemporaries, the latest international fashions trends," David said.

"Basically all our pants, dresses and jackets are made in Australia. There is a booming backlash against imports in many quarters.

Back to basics is the concept of Aussie Farmers Direct. It takes orders online and delivers fresh food, including meat, straight from the farm to your table. Chief Executive Braedon Lord says you buy local produce and cut out the middle man and save a packet.

Cr Goodlass Needs To Realise That Population Increase Means Immigration.

2010-09-15T04:10:00.000-07:00

Wagga Wagga Councillor Ray Goodlass has called on the City Council not to run headlong into population growth without knowing the limits of sustainability.

That sounds fair on the surface. We note that Goodlass brought a motion to council's infrastructure services standing committee this week that called on council to initiate talks with Charles Sturt University, water utilities, businesses and other councils to develop research projects to produce sustainable population in Wagga.

However, the Councillor, like the Greens party in general, finds it very hard to get its head around the fact that population growth in the Riverina essentially means growth arising from the bloated Australian immigration policy. It means too looking critically at the on-going refugee invasion of our country.

The Advertiser quoted Mr Goodlass: "We don't know what the sustainable growth of Wagga can be, and I think we need to find out." The paper said he claimed to be motivated to lodge the motion to council by a concern about rapid growth's demands on infrastructure, including roads, and the impact on agricultural production from new residential areas eating into prime farming land.

We find it unlikely the Greens are overly concerned about the crisis of Australian agriculture. That is a new one.

There is one sure way to save Australian agriculture, keep Australia's population levels "sustainable" and restore Australia's natural balance. That is to overturn the blind growth ideology of the globalists which demands a larger construction market and a surging labour force. That can only mean an end to immigration.

If Cr Goodlass can get to that we will praise the fellow. Yet we fear that all he will get his head around is his favourite Greens` policy-same-sex-marraige and same-sex-couple-adoption. These are much more desirable propositions than standing up for the Australian biosphere and the Australian people!

BIG BROTHERS.

2010-09-14T00:39:00.000-07:00

In the current economic climate, with increasing registration costs, dysfunctional and over regulation, intensive fines-regime, road tolls and so on, a sector of Australia's working population ( owner/drivers ) are being bled dry.

All this benefits the large corporations with their economies of scale, their links to government and their cheap contract labour.

Big Brothers....

Owner/Driver ( September 2010 ).
Brad Gardner.

Three of the industry's biggest players want government to force truck owners to install monitoring technology for speed and fatigue, but the Transport Workers Union believes transport clients should wear the cost, not owner-drivers.

Long Distance truck drivers should be forced to install monitoring technology in their rigs to crack down on speeding and fatigue offences, according to the nation's largest transport carriers.

Toll, Linfox and Asciano have joined forces to pressure governments to mandate GPS technology. The three companies claim speed and fatigue are the major causes of truck accidents and that tracking drivers will improve compliance and road safety.

Under the Road Transport ( Long Distance Operations ) Award, a long distance operation is defined as interstate work or a return journey exceeding 500km.

"We believe it should be mandatory for companies to monitor fatigue and speed using telematics technology," Toll, Linfox and Asciano write in their proposal to the National Transport Commission ( NTC ).

The NTC is currently looking at developing a national strategy for in-vehicle telematics to encourage the industry to adopt the technology. But the Transport Workers Union ( TWU ) has raised concerns over how owner-drivers will be able to afford to install the technology.

TWU National Secretary Tony Sheldon says transport clients that set the delivery schedules should be required to pay for the GPS devices. "An owner-driver should not have to pay thousands of dollars for a unit. If this cost is going to rest with anyone it must be the clients," Sheldon says.

He says it is easy to blame drivers if work hours are exceeded, but pressure must be put on those who set delivery times. "If we are going to see this rolled out in any capacity then the end result must not see drivers solely targeted-the clients schedule must come into the equation," Sheldon says. "This can't be used as another hit against drivers-this needs to go up the supply chain."

Sheldon has also questioned why short-haul operators should be left out of a monitoring scheme. "There are many accidents that happen on local work. The pressures there are the same and that needs to be acknowledged," he says.

Under the scheme proposed by Toll, Linfox and Asciano, the GPS devices will be capable of e-mailing messages to notify the vehicle owner of a breech, warn drivers when they are speeding and count driving hours to inform drivers when they are reaching a limit.

The monitoring tools will also be equipped with anti-tampering systems, traceable records, driver identification such as smart cards and measures to log accident data. However, the three companies want all information to remain under the control of a company instead of a system similar to the Intelligent Access Program ( IAP ) which transmits information to road authorities.

Companies will be subjected to external audits and accreditation such as an industry code of conduct and will provide the information in the event of a major incident or investigation. If their proposal is accepted, the transport companies want a single national standard to govern the scheme and believe the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator is the ideal candidate to develop guidelines. The Regulator will be running in 2013.

According to Toll, Linfox and Asciano, businesses should be free to use any device as long as it meets a national standard. The proposal has won the support of the Australian Logistics Council ( ALC ), which claims mandatory telematics systems will reduce the number of lives lost from heavy vehicle accidents.

But it says any compulsory scheme should be phased in over a period of time so trucking operators can gradually fit the technology. The ALC also recommends a subsidy scheme to encourage the use of telematics.

The push for mandatory monitoring contradicts the Australian Trucking Association's ( ATA ) position that the scheme must be voluntary. ATA Chairman David Simon says governments should encourage the use of monitoring tools to improve compliance and aid businesses.

"However, the ATA supports the use of supervised intervention orders specifying the use of telematics, applied by a court, for serious or persistant offenders with a proven history of non-compliance," he says. The NSW branch of the Transport Workers Union ( TWU ) has also opposed the mandatory use of GPS.

Twu Secretary Wayne Forno says governments should focus on introducing "safe rates" first to ensure drivers are paid enough to make ends meet. He claims GPS tracking will only treat the symptoms of speed and fatigue rather than stop it. "At the end of the day if the drivers out there aren't earning enough money quite frankly that still leads to those temptations to take shortcuts," Forno says.

"I certainly wouldn't endorse it ( as ) mandatory just at this stage as until such time as those other problems are fixed up such as safe rates." Toll, Linfox and Asciano also want government to amend the inconsistent fatigue management counting rules, which are catching unsuspecting drivers and companies. A queensland truck was recently accused of breaching his obligations in Victoria despite being compliant in Queensland and NSW.

Thirsty Foreigners Soak Up Scarce Water Rights.

2010-09-07T02:50:00.000-07:00

Sydney Morning Herald ( 4.9.10 )
Acknowledgment to One Nation Riverina,
and Bob Vinnicombe who sourced the story.

International investors are circling Australia's water market, looking to snap up hundreds of millions of dollars worth of our most precious national resource, with almost no government limit on how much they can buy.

Foreign investors have already bought millions of litres of water rights in our most strategic food-producing areas and are poised to buy more after the massive shake-out tipped to occur when the long-awaited Murray-Darling Basin plan is released.

The head of an Australian fund designed to cash in on our future water scarcity leaves tomorrow on a trip through Asia, North America and Europe aimed at raising $100 million from investors to buy water in the Murray Darling Basin.

"There is a chronic supply/demand imbalance for Australian water which will result in higher water prices," says the website of the Causeway Water Fund, whose managing director Richard Lourey will scour the world for investors.

Water has become a hot-button topic for the federal rural independents locked in talks over who will form government.

Overseas stakes in our $30 billion market already include:

$20 million worth of entitlements bought by the US-owned Summit Global Management through an Australian subsidiary;

An estimated $130 million worth of water bought by Olam International of Singapore in a deal involving the purchase of almond groves in northern Victoria;

More than $30 milion worth of rights in western NSW held by Tandou which has substantial overseas ownership.

Meanwhile, the chief executive of the NSW Irrigators Council, Andrew Gregson, has revealed that merchant banks have approached the organisation for advice on how European investors can pour hundreds of millions of dollars more into Australian water.

In some financial circles water is dubbed "blue gold". The online investment journal Investment U recently had the headline, "The oil of the 21st century ... how "blue gold" can make you rich.

Australia has spawned the most advanced water market in the world, with more than $3 billion worth of rights changing hands last year.

More than $2 billion of that trade took place in NSW, making this state's water market equal to the entire value of the country's wool exports.

The federal Labor government helped inflate the price by buying more than $1 billion worth of water as drought bit last year, accelerating its $3.1 billion buyback of water in the Murray-Darling-Basin.

After good rains and a change to the government's tender system, prices have dropped by as much as 40 per cent this year, hurting irrigators who need to sell their water rights, but making buying into the market more attractive to investors.

"We know that water is a scarce resource in a resource starved world," said Guy Kingwill, the chief executive of the agricultural company Tandou, which has substancial US and British investors.

"We are long-term investors in secure water entitlements and Australia is one of the few countries in the world where you can own those," he said.

Yet there is virtually no oversight from the Foreign Investment Review Board.

The federal Treasury says it never looks specifically at foreign acquisition of water licences, and takes an interest only if a foreign player is buying an agribusiness worth more than $231 million.

Mr Lourey rejects fears about "water barons", claiming his investment fund will allow "water to be used in the most productive way possible. We would argue that's in Australia's strategic best interests".

But farmers` groups are worried that big players could corner areas of the market by buying up permanent rights in whole valleys, or being able to dictate what food is grown where by controlling water.

"We don't have a problem with investment, or indeed, speculation in the water market," said Mr Gregson of the Irrigators Council. "We are concerned about market dominance. It's a recently developed, relatively fragile market."

FOREIGN OWNERSHIP

Only a tiny handful of water bureaucrats in each state has full knowledge of who owns the country's permanent water rights, as water registries cannot be openly searched. Some foreign acquisitions of water that have emerged include:

Summit Global Management, founded by John Dickerson, of San Diego, owns $20 million worth of water through its Australian subsidiary Summit Water Holdings. The company wants to buy more.

The Singapore company Olam International acquired nearly 90,000 megalitres of permanent water along the Murray when it picked up the almond operations of the failed managed investment scheme Timbercorp last year. The land and water were valued at $228 million.

The British investment fund Ecofin owns 20 per cent of Eastern Australian Irrigation, a company with extensive land and water holdings in south-eastern Queensland.

Tandou Limited owns Tandou Farm, near Menindee Lakes, in far western NSW. A fierce takeover battle this year has left the company dominated by the New Zealand corporate raider Sir Ron Brierley's Guinness Peat Group ( 28 per cent ), battling it out with Ecofin ( 19.9.per cent ) and the US company Water Asset Management ( 13 per cent ). Tandou's most valuable asset is $30 million worth of water rights.

A Japanese consortium led by Mitsubishi Corporation acquired the Australian water business of the British company United Utilities in May.

Causeway Asset Management, of Melbourne, wants to attract $100 million from foreign investors to a "diversified portfolio of permanent water entitlements" in Australia.

Greens Get The Green-Light To Brainwash School Children.

2010-08-27T19:52:00.000-07:00

The Greens seem to have official sanction to carry on their share of the liberal-globalist-brainwash in our schools.

Some Green-facts have come to the notice of Australian Identity, so let's spread the news! The story goes like this:

Students from Wagga Wagga's Mount Austin High School went to Canberra on August 7 to attend the Australian Youth Climate Coalition ( AYCC ) function on "climate change". The AYCC peddled a lot of really doomsday propaganda to the kids with the Greens marketed as the saviours. Greens Senator Christine Milne turned up to address the kids and pushed the line that if their policies weren't implemented the world was over by 2020.

And we thought political lines weren't to be pushed in schools ?! But of course, all education is usually globalist propaganda in one way or another, so why be surprised if the Greens don't add their spin on things ?

And just before the Federal Election, AYCC "cards" were circulated at Mount Austin High pushing a vote for the Greens. Perhaps the kids were supposed to prevail on their parents ?

This AYCC has connections to United Nations groups and seems also to follow the trendy line on sexuality, refugees and so forth.

The Green lobby seems to get away with a lot.

It is as if Greens are some precious species of harmless feel-good, do-good persons who have some right others don't. This is very wrong. The Greens, with their gay-marriage, open-borders for refugees fantasies, drug legalisation schemes and so forth, are at their core membership ( the ex Trotskyite communists )-maniacal. They should be kept away from school children as a class of political paedophile.

Now readers might understand a little better why it will be necessary for the new Eureka Youth League to become active in every city and town of Australia. The Eureka Youth League will surely confront the Greens in the schools and counter their false environmentalism with a real commitment to protect Australia's natural and national heritage!

Green Absurdity!

2010-08-20T22:53:00.000-07:00

Greg Bush
( Owner/Driver )

Just when you thought the trucking industry was making a strong recovery after receiving a pummelling at the hands of the recent "global financial crisis", along come the Greens, with ideas man and leader Senator Bob Brown and senate hopeful Lee Rhiannon.

Registration charges, particularly for B-doubles, have already been hard hit this year, thanks to a significant increase. But that's not enough for Brown and his band of merry men and women.

The Greens have come out with a proposal of increasing registration fees even further, up to the tidy sum of $23,000 for each B-double. The Greens figure the rego price hike will be an irresistable incentive to take freight off the smelly, dirty monsters which are billowing out toxic gases up and down our pristine highways and load it all on rail instead.

That way, the Greens reason it will go a long way to turning the road transport's carbon footprint into a fingerprint.

However, as the Australian Trucking Association ( ATA ) CEO Stuart St Clair rightly points out, "supermarkets don't have railway sidings out the back".

So, who is going to pay for these extra charges. Not the truck owner, that's for sure. If the Greens plan comes to fruition, the truck operator will simply pass his problem down the line to someone else-ultimately the consumer.

Today's trucks are the most efficent in road transport history. Technology is continually evolving, while increasing emissions regulations around the world are keeping manufacturers on their toes to build cleaner vehicles.

Rail, on the other hand, has never been identified as a mode that delivers general freight. It offers nowhere near the flexibility of road transport, and its environmental advantages are highly questionable. But Brown and his crew see it as the great white hope.

It harks back to the bad old days when rail was heavily subsidised and trucks were restricted on where and when they could take to the highways.

Unfortunately for the Greens, they, like the rest of us, will end up paying more for anything sold on shop floors across Australia.

The Greens already have the balance of power in the upper house, and are using it to force their harebrained schemes down the throat of ordinary Australians by blocking any bill they choose to. At the same time, they can fire up all their followers, who are somehow of the belief that fairies drop down from the sky and hand-deliver goods to retail outlets around the country.

The Greens will also have no problem getting the mainstream press onside. Any opportunity to stick the boot into trucking is accepted with glee.

Mind you, although Brown is at the helm, some of these absurd headline-grabbing Green policies are coming from senate candidate Rhiannon, who seems to be offering an opinion on anything she feels will attract media attention.

Housing Wait Longer, Poverty Line Stretched!

2010-08-07T01:46:00.000-07:00

Herald Sun (7.8.10 )

Victoria's poverty line is growing and the public housing waiting list has hit an eight-year high.

There are more than 41,000 Victorian families on the state's housing list-one of the highest in the country. We note this number is trumped by NSW, with a staggering 50,000 on their list.

Almost a quarter of families on the waiting list are either homeless or at risk of losing their home, have a disability or special medical needs. Maybe these Australians should apply as refugees for immediate accomodation ?

Of course anyone that raises concern regarding the plight of these Australians, risks being labelled racist, hateful or a bigot. Incredulously the first to cast these aspertions are usually media and charity organisations.

No-one is suggesting for a minute the refugees are not without their own plight, which should be addressed at the point of origin, rather than transfering their need to a secondary location. Placing the refugees at the front of the queue, for scarce social resources we are creating further problems, not that that bothers the refugees or their advocates.

The elite have promulgated ( via globalist policies ) groups of Australians that have become refugees in their own country.

The church and charity groups pretend they are doing the work of God, but of course there are other incentives regarding the refugee industry at stake here. For example the millions of dollars in government funding for groups to provide refugee services.

What we now see is vested interest groups terrified of being exposed for what they really are. Of course it is in their interests for the Australian homeless and disenfranchised to remain silent and without advocate.

Anyone that dares to speak out on behalf of these forgotten Australians, or challenge the agenda at hand, could find themselves smeared all over the front page of The Sydney Morning Herald!

Australia First Recommends "Vote One Craig Hesketh" For Riverina.

2010-07-27T05:14:00.000-07:00

Australia First Party recommends to voters in the Federal seat of Riverina that they cast a vote for Mr. Craig Hesketh of the One Nation Party on August 21.

We understand that Mr. Hesketh upholds a pro Australia stand on economic globalisation ( which has seen foreign fruit imports brought into Australia ) and he has rightly spoken out against the refugee invasion of our country.

A National Second Preference ?

Mr. Hesketh has recommended a second preference for the National Party. He has said that he seeks disgruntled farmers and other National voters to cast a protest vote for him and allow their votes to "return" to the National Party. He has seen that as the most productive course for him and his party.

Australia First Party makes no recommendation on second preferences.

If Mr. Hesketh's strategy is permissible, it is only so farmers and other regional Australians are told in the clearest way that the National Party is no real friend of country folk. Quite the contrary. The National Party is the political vehicle of powerful elites which are opposed to the family farm, to small production and small business. Such things may only exist in the collective mind of these elites if they offer no challenge to corporate farming, pastoralism and the cult of the global market.

In the 1980's, Wagga Wagga was the centre of a considerable resistance movement to the foreclosure of farms by the banks. A mighty movement against the banks and their "creation of credit at interest" power developed. Thousands were drawn in. This movement arose because the National Farmers Federation ( NFF ) worked hand in glove with Elders-IXL (John Elliot ) and Westpac bank to force farmers of their lands. No one was active at the "coal face" for the farmers. The Union of Farmers was a key patriotic movement that stood up for ordinary people. The Union of Farmers kept many small producers on their properties.

The National Party played at this time-a treacherous game. It did its best to shield the NFF/Elders-IXL connection from public exposure and often pretended that it would give a real voice for farmers in this age of declining prices and high bank interest. It often linked up with supposed "protest groups". It was all deception.

Today is no different. Despite their noises, the Nationals are so far involved in the politics of globalisation that it's a wonder anyone votes for, or supports, them at all. Why ? Because the Nationals are masters of deceit. They rely on patronage and social connections that maintain their networks.

There will be no progress for any nationalist-minded party, be it One Nation or Australia First, if the Nationals are not challenged.

The people of Riverina at least have a choice this time. Let us hope Mr. Hesketh can make an impact now and for the future.

The Gillard Palace Coup: What It Tells Us About The ( Concealed ) Nature Of Australian Politics.

2010-07-03T03:11:00.000-07:00

Dr. J. Saleam.

The appointment of Julia Gillard as Prime Minister has nothing to do with a government losing its way or bad opinion polls. It was not a cosmetic exercise, but one born in the belly of the system.

Basically, the putting aside of Krudd by the Labor party shows anyone with an enquiring mind how politics works in Australia. It is about the exercise of power and it shows that power does not reside in parliaments but with the wealthy elite and the foreign states with "shares" in the safe and efficient running of Australia Inc.

The Mining tax

The multinationals which operate in Australia pay no company tax. Fact. Via the 50 year old dual tax agreement, they pay no direct taxes. Many mining companies here are branches of the multinationals. However, KRudd set out to tax "Australian" mining giants. Call it blunder or simply a desire to balance his budget, but like the whitless Gough Whitlam who wanted to know what went on inside the American base at Pine Gap, there are some things that Australian Prime Ministers cannot do and are not permitted to think about.

One section of Australian capital considered that it was being asked to shoulder too much of the burden of upholding their own appointees in government. They rebelled. The billionaire mining oligarchs refused the super levy.

So, a government changes and Gillard "backs down" to the oligarchy.

It was almost automatic.

Chinese Imperialism Had A Hand In Government Change ?

It was well known that KRudd was-and is-an enthusiast for all things Chinese. The Chinese Vice President was in Canberra just at the time of the palace coup. His concern ? Mining contracts. Anything that delays or frustrates the supply of cheap Australian minerals to the Chinese moloch is a threat to increasing power of China in Australia. Chinese imperialism demands security for its investments as all imperialisms have done in history.

Australia is a resources pawn in a globalised market. Australia is competed over as foreigners stake out their claims and draw out the national wealth. The mining oligarchs, particularly the repulsive Clive Palmer, all kowtow to China which purchases "their" minerals, to their profit. They targeted KRudd. Gillard now looks forward to the continuance of the boom and welcomes the increasing interest of China in Australia.

It was almost automatic.

Then, It's Israel Again

It is publicly known that Julia Gillard's live in lover Tim Mathieson works in property development and that he is employed by the Ubertas Group. This company is the creature of Albert Dadon, founder of the Australian Israel Forum. It was this Forum that sponsored Gillard to Israel last year where she sang the Zionist line on Middle Eastern politics.

As for KRudd, he had recently committed another "mistake". He had criticized Israel ( an entity he really loves as the false "Christian" Zionist he is ) over the Gaza blockade and the Israeli state murder of Turkish civilians on vessels serving in a Gaza relief mission. Again, too much public criticism of Israel cannot be tolerated-even from a fair weather toady.

Mr Dadon is close to prominent pro-Israel Labor MP Michael Danby, who was influential in the palace coup that installed Julia Gillard as Prime Minister. The Zionist fraction of Australian Jewry looked to Danby to ensure the Australian state lines up with Israel in its terror against the Palestinians and for its position on Iran. How the Zionist worm turns in Australian politics!

The Gillard government will stay the killing course in Afghanistan. It will support Israel. It will not seek the nuclear disarmament of Israel, but will threaten war with Iran over a peaceful nuclear energy program.

It was almost automatic.

The Population Issue explodes

Then KRudd became a little to open in his scheme for a "big Australia"-36 millions, 50 millions, millions. It was bad to be free with the truth when the voters get nervous.

So, crash, bang, out goes KRudd and in comes concerned Julia who even appoints a "sustainable Population" minister to handle immigration.

A neat package. The public is to go back to sleep.

It was almost automatic.

When We Sum It All Up....

When we put it all together Australia has no real independence and Australian politicians are creatures of whomsoever-pays! It is a rich man's government that bens over to the foreign interest.

That there was a palace coup suggests that Australian politics will become increasingly unstable and dictatorial. We learn where power truly lies.

The Australian people's movement for national independence must address these issues. Not just the oligarchs of the mining industry, but all the czars of money must be put aside that democracy can grow in Australia!

Julia Gillard And Tony Abbott "Tough" On Immigration/Refugees ?

2010-07-03T02:14:00.000-07:00

Dr. J. Saleam.

Bullshit Me Once Shame On You; Bullshit Me Twice, Shame On Me!

A game is being played. It has been on foot since the emergence of Tony Abbott as "Opposition Leader". The Liberal Party has pretended to be a critic of the "border security" policies of the Labor government and has further argued for a "sustainable immigration program". Yeah. Yeah. At no point have the Liberals demanded an end with immigration, nor have they said a firm "No" to refugee intakes. And we would have expected nothing less from them. Under John Howard, the Liberals boomed immigration to dizzying numbers. The Liberals know that the "end" of the policy-is to affect a change in Australia's demographics. The question for the Liberals has been to stymie community fears over such a monstrous thing dispossessing the Australian People in their own country. Will we Australians become a minority in our own country within 50 years? Is the attack upon our national identity ( in education, media, politics, cultural institutions ) part of this change in our status ? When do we become "part of Asia" ?

The significant new development is that Labor has joined the Liberals in this game! In words at least, Labor has expressed concerns ( sic ) at the direction of the immigration program and its size, at the effects on urban infrastructure and so forth.

The Gillard Putsch Signals Fear Of The People.

The new Julia Gillard government has responded to mass voters` worries stated during a recent State by-election in New South Wales. Liberal and Labor activists reported the mood of the community on immigration and population policy, on border security and refugees-was poisonous to the LABER-AL machine. It could produce maverick behavior at the polls ( not just in outer suburban Sydney either ) and in the community-precisely the intention of the Australian people's party-Australia First!

The Labor government now seeks a "sustainable" population level for Australia and is not necessarily in favour of the "big Australia" that KRudd talked about. Yeah. Yeah.

So now, both sets of liars are immigration critics!

The Sydney Morning Herald editorialised on June 30:

"Julia Gillard's foray into population policy has a touch of John Howard about it. The former Prime Minister was adept at subtly using the public's fears of uncontrolled immigration-talking and acting tough about a small number of boat people while simultaneously arranging a large immigration intake. It was an effective tactic to sidestep the xenophobia among sections of his supporters, although many will demur at its cynicism. Gillard, by implying criticism of the Rudd governments supposedly arbitrary population targets of up to 40 million people, and adding the word "sustainable" to the title of Tony Burke's population portfolio, is playing a similar game ? Let us hope a game is all it amounts to."

Was this a case of honest journalism from an Establishment paper ?

We say that it is a ruthless and cynical game. But can LABER-AL pull this off ? Gillard gives her new line and Abbott says it's not hard enough and is just dreamed up policy spin. Why believe Julia ? Then vote for Tony-he said it all first. Yeah. Yeah. A double game!

The Sydney Morning Herald does tell us a couple of things. People are worried. People may react. This game is being played. The paper is worried the game might get out of hand. And it can! All the lies in the world do not necessarily mean that the voters, the people, can be absolutely fooled this time. Have people realised: bullshit me once, shame on you; bullshit me twice, shame on me ?? It's a bit late for a John Howard "children overboard" Tampa crisis. So it's cooked up in a new way, with sober pollies reacting to what voters say about the population crisis.

However, population is only part of the story. It's not just about people-but what people. Both faces of the LABER-AL machine are dedicated to the Asian Destiny for Australia, the ultimate breaking open of the borders for labour and capital to move freely. We are warned. We are in peril. That the liars in Canberra would go down their new population-sceptical road suggests they are concerned the people may not be fooled.

Let's prove that to them! Build Australia First Party, electorally and in the community as the party of the Australian People! No more bullshit!

Treasurer Or Traitor ?

2010-06-25T00:10:00.000-07:00

The Land ( 24.6.10 ).

China's Bright Food, the government-owned company interested in CSR's Sucrogen business, is looking to NSW agriculture for more investment opportunities.

It will target sugar, dairy and wine operations, and will receive assistance in identifying opportunities from State Government after signing a memorandum of understanding with Treasurer, Eric Roozendaal, on Tuesday.

The deal highlights growing foreign, and specifically Chinese, investment in Australian agricultural resources despite concerns being raised by the Foreign Investment Review Board this month.

It is hoped the deal will also help link Chinese suppliers with buyers in NSW, while also opening up the Chinese market for local companies.

These developments explain why Roozendaal left the matter of Australian food security off the agenda at the recent State Budget.

Roozendaal is clearly more interested in food security for foreigners, than for the people of NSW. We are curious as to what could be the motivating factor behind these revelations ?

In the case of the Chinese, like King Midas who was granted his wish, everything he touched turned to gold, including his food and then he starved to death.

Is Roozendaal as shortsighted as Midas, who knew the price of everything and the value of nothing ?

These traitors are intoxicated with the globalist dream. The hangover will come when they run out of oil and can no longer circumnavigate the globe with all their wares.

The only certainty with the open up the borders globalist agenda, is the imminent global chaos and social disorder.

The actions of the ruling class and their hangers on, being profit driven greed, we are now faced with the unimaginable situation, where these greedy globalists actually have a vested interest in our ever increasing suffering and hardship.

The Reason Behind The Reason.

2010-06-23T03:25:00.000-07:00

We publish an edited ( for length ) contribution to Your Say: Daily Telegraph 23.6.10

Regarding the situation in Afghanistan, one must wonder what is the real reason behind the exercise ? Whilst everyone wants to talk about this being a conflict over democracy, it is really a conflict over economics.

At the present time the big winner in this conflict-regardless of whether the Taliban or the present Afghani Government gains control-is China. But wait, you might say the Chinese are not fighting there. True, but they have an investment and don't really care who wins.

Afghanistan has one of the world's richest sources of untapped mineral resources. Earlier this year, China paid $3 billion as a down payment for the copper mining rights with a promise to provide road and rail infrastructure and electricity generation to the mining areas, regardless of who were the victors of the "war".

In the meantime, the Afghan Government is sponsoring the biggest mineral sale this decade. So what is Australia really getting out of it all ? Not very much. Maybe a little bit of prestige for being there and of course, a bill for $1 billion a year.

If our young men and women are losing their lives as part of this agenda, we should be sending all the Afghani "asylum-seekers" ariving on our shores back to Afghanistan to fight their own "war". Let's bring the Australians home and leave the place to whoever wants it, like say the Chinese!

We see a more sinister agenda at play here, cleverly orchestrated by the globalists. This is merely the tip of the iceberg and the begining of the one world government, where increasingly we see the elite few in control of the worlds resources, such as the minerals, the food supply and so on. Enter the United Nations and world dominance.

As nationalists we must remain on high alert and resist these vile traitors and fight to retain our sovereignty and regain our independence before it is to late!

Australia First Is Now A Federally Registered Party: June 21.

2010-06-20T23:53:00.000-07:00

The Australia First Party has become a Federally registered party. Mr. Tony Pettitt, who will serve as the Registered Officer, was notified today of the decision of the Australian Electoral Commission.

The registration of the party will serve to further the process which will unite all genuine Australian nationalists and other patriotic people into a united party.

Having said that, Australia First Party will work in a co-operative way with other pro Australian groups and parties. A full statement, which shall build upon our statement of last year on building this sort of co-operation, will be issued shortly.

Australia's workers, farmers, small business and other patriotic working people, now have a party that shall represent them in the fight against the globalising traitor class of big money interests and their ideological and bureaucrat supporters.

Identity, Independence, Freedom !

We seek to expand our efforts in the Riverina.

Foreign Buyers Set To Swoop.

2010-06-18T01:58:00.000-07:00

The Land ( 17.6.10 )

A rush in foreign investment interest in Australian farmland is stirring new concerns about just how much overseas ownership of local agricultural resources is too much. Unease about global food shortages in the next 20 years-and long-term agricultural market opportunities-have made Australia and areas of South America prized targets for foreign government-aided enterprises and private investor groups.

Africa has also been the focus of a significant land grab, particularly by overseas government-owned investment corporations from China and the Middle East. last week, the Foreign Investment Review Board told a Senate committee hearing in Canberra it was possible for whole rural districts to be gradually acquired by offshore owners without any Australian government scrutiny or approval.

The FIRB would only be notified of agricultural land sales if individual property land sales exceeded $231 million, or if land was being bought by a foreign government. Aquisitions by foreign entities on a farm by farm basis did not come onto the board's radar. The Australian rural property market is becoming increasingly busy with overseas clients such as the U.S, the U.K, China, India, the Middle East and others.

We might wake up at some point finding that if overseas investors wanted to they could exclude us from enjoying the value of our own land because, for sovereign reasons, their production is linked to another nation's food security.

We wonder how Australia could have ever found itself in this situation. As we are sure Ireland also believed it unimaginable, when during the potato famine the other crops they were farming on their land were exported while they starved to death, as the Irish had lost control over their land.

As nationalists we can clearly see what is going on here. Our traitorous government, along with the elite are prostituting what is left of our country to their globalist pimp master friends, for a fast buck. This is a wake up call to all Australians and the death knell to our sovereignty. We are hostages to this despicable agenda and while ever the status quo remains the ransom only gets higher.

This evil anti-Australian agenda is driven by greed and profit manifesting from an ideology of economics as if people mattered! We must resist.

Food Shortages.

2010-06-14T02:16:00.000-07:00

Global Situation:

Governments are intentionally covering up the looming food shortages, if the public realised the true extent of the crisis economies could collapse, governments would fall and anarchy would ensue. So the truth up to date has been cleverly disguised, assisted by media and other groups who happily trot out the ongoing rhetoric and deceptions on behalf of their globalist pimp masters. Australia First Party intends to rip the rug of deception out from under these vile traitors and reveal the truth.

In 2008, 30 countries had "food riots", where food was so scarce, desperation and violence followed. It could happen here. With powerful factions jockeying for control of the food supply, who can say when the hammer will fall ? We hear stories of climate change, wars, disease, and so on threatening the survival of humans, clearly we are on a fast track to starvation well before any of these so-called predictions may or may not materialise. In fact many agriculture experts predict that we will soon be experiencing a worldwide food crisis of unprecidented magnitude. Some political experts predict the catalyst for food shortages will involve more sinister political agendas.

Consider Asian countries that are now consuming record amounts of food staples, protein etc. The biofuel industry placing increasing pressure on our food crops, such as corn, sugarcane, soyabeans, etc which are used to produce ethanol and requiring more and more agricultural land to grow crops for fuel production. Of course the population explosion will place enormous pressure on our food supply. Global markets will require 50% more food over the next 10 years. The ruthless multinationals are aware of these impending events and are buying up extensive farmland in developing countries and now have their sights set on Australian farmland, to secure control of the global food supply. As demand surpasses supply.

National Situation:

We are currently seeing individuals and groups of political convenience entering centre stage concerning agricultural matters in Australia. Farmers Associations and the like are not what they used to be, they also fail miserably to justify their own existence and happily tow the globalist line. Ken Henry recently refered to Australia as a "three-speed" economy, in which mining is in the top bracket and agriculture is at the bottom. This helps to explain the anti-Australian psuedo agriculture policies we see in Australia. Australian farmers making negligable returns or quietly losing money is the order of the day.

We observe mining companies buying up productive farm land all over the country. We hear the agendas of the deluded, such as Michael Roche, CEO of QLD Resources Council, who is all for the expansion of the coal gas seam industry onto the Darling Downs ( home to our most productive food producing soils ). Mr. Roche sees no problem in sacrificing our food production land, "as we can always import food from China or India".

Enter The Wentworth Group, this "advisory" group of so-called academics and scientists, have irrigators feeling extremely nervous about future water entitlement reductions, to be foisted upon their irrigation districts. In the Murrumbidgee region cuts of up to 65% are forecast, with the Murray Darling not fairing much better. These strategically introduced advisory groups are not ignorant to the fact water and food production are linked together, nor the reality that irrigation water is used for growing food.

With free-trade agreements, seeing the impending importation of beef from BSE affected countries and apples with fire blight and so on, native vegetation ( land rights ), water buy back, mining rights, forestry lock ups, government schemes paying farmers to leave the land, cheap and nasty imports, globalists buying up our farmland and so-on, one should not be considered paranoid to feel cynical about political agendas.

The Immigration and refugee explosion has put such pressure on our food and water supply and housing stock, to the point where we are seeing our Sydney food bowl disappear, replaced by housing development, to cater for the population explosion. As we know the higher the population, the greater the chance of starvation.

The NSW State budget delivered last week ignored the crisis of food security and farmers issues again and opted to butter up the big end of town, developers and the like, to ensure continued party faithful donations. Of course anywhere west of the Blue Mountains failed to register on the NSW Treasurer's radar as usual. This in itself is an alarming situation, where Mr. Roozendaal fails to prioritise the future food security of the people of NSW above the interests of an elite few.

As we lose the expertise of our farmers, we lose their knowledge and practical skills which will not be passed on to the next generation. This in turn adds to the problem that Australia is progressively reliant on food imports from overseas where we will have no control over production methods, quality or price.

Historical Situation:

When we analyse the politics around food security in Australia, we can draw some disturbing parallels between the globalist food supply agenda and the Irish Potato Famine, where in reality the shortage of food was a myth. Yes, the potato crop failed, but all other crops thrived. At the height of the "famine" around $30 million dollars of food produced in Ireland left Ireland for export, meanwhile millions of people starved to death. Landlords seeking a better market price as the Irish were to poor to buy food they were farming themselves. Normally it was usual to export food only after the countries own population was fed. Again money was more important than human lives-nothing has changed and we would do well to remember politics and greed were behind the potato famine and guard ourselves from despot governance. We must regain our independence and resist the globalists.

Food will soon be more valuable than gold!

No Room At The Inn.

2010-06-09T21:11:00.000-07:00

A desperate working mother has told how she is enduring her worst nightmare-living with her two young children in the back seat of her car.Tonight Michelle will tuck her children Connor, 11, and Mikayla, 6, into her holden Barina parked in a vulnerable open space such as a train station or a shopping centre car park in Melbourne's south-east suburbs.

Michelle estimates she has put in up to 60 applications for rental homes in the past six weeks and says she can afford to pay up to $300 a week in rent from her part-time job at a doctor's surgery

But in a competitive market, prospective landlords keep finding more "preferable" tenants, she says. So for the past two weeks-since the tenancy in her previous home expired-Michelle and her children have been on the streets.
( Herald Sun 10.6.2010 ).

We note there is no shortage of lodgings for refugees in Melbourne's south-east suburbs and beyond. With all the Australian taxpayers money these parasites are availed via re-settlement programs and the like, they would come under the prefered tenant description. Of course refugees have other advantages not availed to Australians, such as the human rights industry and their cronies, who would not stand to see refugees living in cars. Albeit most refugees have better cars than the average Australian's standard of housing.

We must further mention homeless Australians will receive no empathy from mainstream politics. Recently Tony Abbott announced "the homeless only have themselves to blame for their situation". So much for the Christian values espoused by Abbott and so much for Rudd who only has the welfare of refugees on his mind, calling for church groups to find housing to accomodate "asylum-seekers", while in the interim Rudd has the invading-groups bedded down in a 4 star resort on the Gold Coast.

Rudd did however make mention some time ago, that "homelessness in Australia was a national atrocity", obviously not atrocious enough for Rudd to take any action. We might add the national atrocity we are seeing here is the refugee invasion. Rudd has clearly defined himself as a master of lip service. Australians need not look to the Greens or the human rights lobby for support on the issue of Australian homelessness, as they too are otherwise engaged ensuring refugee privilege and yelling and screaming about the right to bring all and sundry into the country, so much for the Greens policy on population.

Statistics from 2006, being the most recent, 7.5 thousand families are homeless and two thirds of families applying for emergency accomodation are turned away. We believe 2010 figures to be much higher. These families are only part of the over 100,000 homeless Australians. It's about time we started turning refugees away and looked after our own, after all some of these homeless Australians are employed and paying taxes that are providing accomodation for refugees. Have we gone mad ?

The elite have given birth to a new class of Australian conceived by their anti-Australian policies, The Working Homeless ! Welcome to the Third World.

Aid For Homeless !

2010-06-08T23:22:00.000-07:00

Hundreds of homeless people converged on Sydney's Town Hall to enjoy food and a range of free services yesterday. There was something for every homeless person in the city, at the launch of a new charity-Sydney Homeless Connect. As the doors of Town Hall opened, homeless flooded in for a day of entertainment, meals and showers. ( Daily Telegraph 9.6.10 ).

Had these homeless Australians arrived by boat and applied as refugees they could have flown first class to a resort on the Gold Coast, all expences paid and stayed there indefinately with access to endless free services, meals and entertainment.

We note the human rights industry and the refugee advocates are silent, when it comes to the plight of homeless Australians. Yet they scream and yell and froth at the mouth, when it comes to the refugee invasion and the so-called rights of these intrusive parasites.

We need to consider our fellow Australians and their sensibilities, first and foremost, the time has come to tear up this vile UN treaty on refugees that we were signed up to by the traitor class, if we are to survive as Australians and maintain our culture and identity. Or do we continue along watching our brother lay in the street ? along with everything else Australian, as the traitor class continue along aiding and abetting the invasion of these hostile aliens.

What we see materialising here as a result of these anti-Australian treaties is a bizarre type of vulturism, an ideology foisted upon us by the human rights industries and other vested interests groups, sent to devour us, like vultures circling prey, these so-called refugees have their eye on the prize being our future, that we are certain of.

Liberal Party Seeks Out It's "Patriotic" Three Stooges.

2010-05-25T23:18:00.000-07:00

Dr. Jim Saleam.

The Liberal Party is up to its old tricks again. With public concern heightened by the refugee invasion and with immigration soaring to unheard of levels, the Liberal Party is floating out its rhetoric of "concern".

The spin doctors have TV ads that feature maps of refugee boat streams heading towards Australia. Abbott talks of "sustainability" being out of whack in KRudd's immigration plans. Shadow Immigration Minister Morrison has talked of tough about "asylum seekers" being "illegal" and that it's time to be "tough".

It is all meant to deceive. It is schemed to win the public to believe that the Liberal Party will do something about it all. It won't and as before ( like with the Tampa "children overboard" affair in 2001 ), the public will be lulled into colluding with one of the parties of the establishment, while it gets on with the job of dispossessing the Australian people in their own land through the continuation of immigration ( and economic globalisation ).

But the worst aspect of the deception is not that the public is the victim of a con, it is rather that people who should know better-line up to suckle up to the Liberal pig.

The Delusion

John Pasquarelli has written an important article. We remember him as an advisor to Pauline Hanson in 1997 and-more recently-as an official of the short-lived Pauline's United Australia Party. His piece appeared on the website "The Australian Conservative", a Liberal-Party-connected forum and news site.

In this piece, Pasquarelli advised all patriotic people not to found other parties that compete with the Liberals-but to rally together with the Libs, even as a faction of opinion within the party such that they may have a "say" in the mainstream party. In particular, he admonished two micro ( Federally unregistered ) "parties"-the Protectionists and the Conservative United Party-to get with the program. The alternative was the hard yards of amassing funds and resources which he put in the "too hard basket".

Pasquarelli, for all his intelligence, may have missed the point. In fact, the Liberals don't mind these outside micro groups at all. If he had looked closer, he would have seen a strong current of common opinion ( as we shall describe shortly ) and most importantly, a feverent desire on their part to enter the mainstream through the Liberal prism, but in posturing competition against Liberal "softness". The Libs hold out the illusion that they are agreeable in fact and that their voting herds and financiers might see the light in the future and come to these new "hard" conservative parties. They hold out that they are soft because they are compelled to be and that the hard men can bring them back to true Liberal principles if they work hard enough. So, the micro parties work energetically at a project ( mainstreaming via the scheme to recruit the Liberal herds ) that will never eventuate. Pasquarelli should have noted that all this chatter was actually taking place on a Liberal forum! And the Libs are happy about that.

Significantly, he did not mention Australia First in all this and for that we are truly grateful; after all, we are not in the program.

Weird Facts

Consider what's happening. It looks weird at first glance.

Recently, Pauline Hanson, of all people, appeared on national television to tell us that Abbott would make a better PM than KRudd. What ? This was the very same Tony Abbott whose "Australians For Honest Politics" put her in gaol! Now she wants Abbott ? But remember what David Oldfield, her adviser, said years ago: "the aim of the One Nation was to make the Liberal Party more right wing". Was Pauline just returning to daddy ? In other words, was the original One Nation just a reflection of stress in the Liberal Party heartland which allowed to fester into a group that fundamentally-the Liberals still had a hook into ? When the beat had run its course, it could be safely reintergrated back into the fold ?

Now Hanson wants the conservatives not to rebel ( that is too dangerous now; like the original One Nation did briefly, it could get out of control ). Rather, she recommends they line up pure and simple behind the Liberal Party. What happened to her rhetoric about "Australia is being swamped by Asians ?" All gone. Now she is more concerned that her house is not sold to a "Moslem". Peddling a little "anti-Islam" is not really a challenge to the Asianizing establishment.

And Alan Jones. The man who defended Hanson whilst she was a prisoner may now front for the John Howard Institute, a policy making think tank-for guess who ? The nominal president of this group has been touted as one fellow who is big in the David Clarke faction of the New South Wales Liberals. This conservative, David Clarke, had his faction resuscitated by Abbott in 1996 as a barrier to too many Liberals sliding over to Hanson and as a fish-hook to reel them all back in when the time was ripe.

With Hanson as the big endorsement to the Liberals overall and Jones in the wings, Abbott has solid foundations to ensure that there is never a real radicalisation of the conservatives. Getting to this point isn't weird: it's diabolically clever.

So: the Three Stooges Get A Role

Of course, the conservatives in the Liberal Party, like the unionists in the ALP and certain farmers in the Nats, are all people who can, under particular circumstances, move away from their traditional alignments. Under temporary stress, some slid over to the former One Nation. They could do something similar again. But if the crisis of globalisation becomes deeper ( there are signs in the European debt crisis ), or if domestic pressures against free trade and mass immigration become stronger, some may opt out of establishment politics all together. Enter Australia First.

For the Liberals, that must never happen. So they have their three stooges waiting. They have groups on hand that may even in themselves be genuine structures, but which can be conned into singing the Abbott chorus.

I refer unashamedly to the Australian Conservative United Party, to the Protectionist Party and to One Nation ( or at least a faction of it seemingly dominant in New South Wales and strong elsewhere ).

What's the con ?

Well, there's always the anti-Islam routine. The establishment doesn't mind that-at least to a certain extent. As nationalists have said: this blows off steam while the state builds support for the faked up wars on terror ( sic ). They let people direct their rage at multiculturalism at the Moslems in Australia, careful always that it does not spill over into a generalized critique of immigration generally. But these groups can go that extra mile. They can talk up the need to follow the "war on terror", to support Israeli foreign policy, to bloc with the Zionists within the Australian Jewish community against any deals with the Palestinians and for the coming war with Iran-and so on. They can do the Liberal Party's foreign policy propaganda work for them. When one goes down the militant anti-Islam road, it means building alliances with other pro Liberal groups like Australian Christian Nation and the Christian Democratic Party. This is supposedly the mainstream option. It is-on our assessment-the road to nowhere.

The anti Islam routine usually leads to blocs being made with people who have no commitment to any real idea that the Australian People are a nationality. Rather these "allies" bleat that the Moslems should be turned into Australians by Christian conversion and civic training. Their logic as applied to Moslems is held with the same vehemence towards anyone else. As allies for supposed nationalists, they are worse than useless. In this regard, I note that the United Conservatives declaim against any European ethnic basis of Australian nationality in any case; the Protectionists are still coy, if only because they had partial origins inside the womb of nationalist politics, but as time goes on, they will turn to the easy path. One Nation is divided on the matter. But the con stands-that these allies will bring masses and people will kid themselves that they are part of a real mass movement. The civic patriot danger exists for One Nation absolutely and not just for a chunk of it.

It follows too, that by taking this civic patriot road of praising flags and constitutions alone rather than our European blood, one gets close to the conservative faction of the Liberal Party. We note that the Liberals` conservatism does not extend to defence of Australian Nationality-only to its civic forms.

The old One Nation in some states, but particularly in New South Wales, may find itself enmeshed in the Liberal Right. Some of its factional leaders have built close links with the Christian Nation group and the Christian Democrats, conduits for the Liberal Party. They are continuing to develop these links.

Three Stooges ?

Dearly would the Liberal Party like to possess these named groups as a three-stooges-act. There are dangers that they may be successful in the plan.

By ensuring groups fly false signals, the Liberal game-players understand that they also demobilise the developing nationalist people's movement.

They have not reckoned on the resolve of Australia First to do what must be done. Nationalists will maintain their independence and their initiative at all times. We refuse to be co-opted into the Liberals` game and we will always be at liberty to act in the interest of all Australians. Against the Liberal ethos of high immigration, globalist economics, free market labour rules, war for the New World Order and so forth, we offer the vision of an Australian Australia, Australian identity, independence and freedom.

The reactionary minded can follow Abbott if they wish, under any self-deception that moves them, but Australia First will reject the Liberal Party's game today, tomorrow, always.

Boy, 15, Jailed For 16 Years!

2010-05-23T20:17:00.000-07:00

Weekend Advertiser ( 22.5.10 ).

A teenaged Sudanese refugee who was refused a cigarette has been jailed for at least 16 years for the "cowardly" Sydney murder of an innocent bystander.

"This was an offence of the most disturbing and senseless kind," Justice Megan Latham said in sentencing the boy in the NSW Supreme Court yesterday.

Snip....

We are curious as to how much the defence of this criminal cost the good people of NSW ? And the cost to the State to house him in a correctional facility for the next 16 years ?

Snip....

The youth, who was 15 years old at the time of the offence and cannot be named, was found guilty of the stabbing murder of Edward Spowart, 54, in the early hours of April 21, 2008, during a brawl in the streets of Granville.

"It might be said that his exposure to violence in the Sudan and Kenya desensitised him to some extent to the use of violence in order to settle disputes," the judge said.

Snip....

It might also be said, "some Australians have experienced trauma and violence also, returned servicemen and women deployed overseas that have experienced the horror of warfare, other's that have experienced domestic violence and abuse, others living in Public Housing areas, where violence is rife and so on."

Do these people murder someone because they are refused a cigarette ? Albeit these people may also be desensitised to violence, they do not act out in this manner. We might also say murdering someone who refuses you a cigarette, is not Australian culture, nor how we "settle disputes" in Australia.

Snip....

"However, the offender is not without intelligence and according to his stepmother, was a respectful, polite young man until his entry into high school in Australia in 2006".

Snip....

So now it's all our fault ?

Snip....

The murder arose out of a confrontation between members of Mr. Spowart"s group and the teenager's.The intoxicated teenager had asked someone in the other group for a cigarette but was rebuffed and told to go home.

Snip....

Where is the concerned stepmother when the 15 year old, polite respectful young man she describes is roaming the streets intoxicated ?

Snip....

"Apparently reacting out of a wounded sense of pride, the offender threw a punch," the judge said. A brawl then broke out, with various men and youths arming themselves with sticks, bricks and street signs.

"However, Mr. Spowart played no active part in that confrontation or in the later hostilities," the judge said.

Snip....

We need to accept the reality here, it is in fact the African tribalist culture to resolve disputes with violence, always has been, always will be. We do not accept blaming others as sufficent, nor do we accept the excuse they are desensitised to violence due to their never ending wars with each other. They are without excuse!

Australia First Calls For Mayoral Candidate In Griffith.

2010-05-20T03:11:00.000-07:00

Australia First has contacted members in the Griffith City area with a view to contesting the inevitable by-election for Mayor.

Mike Neville, current Mayor of Griffith, was arrested yesterday and charged with an array of sexual offences.

In spite of his stated wish to stay in office, a resignation is all-but-inevitable.

Mike Neville has been an aggressive opponent of Australia First in the Riverina, repeatedly stating his support for contract labour, multiculturalism and immigration generally.

We cannot say whether Mr. Neville is guilty of the charges brought against him. That is for a court. Nonetheless, we would counsel him thus: if you are guilty, take responsibility and plead now-it attracts the sentence discount.

Getting It Right On The Islamic Migration Question: Don't Be Fooled!

2010-04-26T01:07:00.000-07:00

Dr. Jim Saleam and Brendon Gidley.

The Australia First Party ( AFP ) has deep reservations about certain groups, some of which even parade as nationalist and patriotic organizations, when they move to the centre of their public outreach-the Islamic question.

It is hardly that there is no problem with Islamic immigration into Australia. There was and there is. If anything, consistent experience over the last 15 years has shown the utter incompatibility of Islamic "culture" ( let alone Islamist preaching ) with Australian culture and its legal and civil norms. From brutal rape, to asocial conduct, to criminal enterprise and to terrorism, the litany of abuse against the host society is obvious. We may also rightly deprecate the hidden, but practised, principles of Sharia Law on our soil. The multiculturalist industry and nice-guy Moslem spokesmen can say whatever they like, but the problem is there.

Of course it would be completely remiss of any Australian patriot not to point this out and to politically capitalize upon it. Indeed, given it shows the futility of the multicultural experiment, we have a powerful weapon to explain this case. Yet, serious questions for a party such as ours which seeks to re-Australianize Australia, remain-and must be addressed in order to provide strategy of tactics in the immigration struggle.

The questions for the nationalists are: is Islamic migration the main problem?; how can we politically advance with this issue?; might there not be other agendas operating with those who join in the chorus against Islamic migration?

Main Problem?

Definately, Islamic migration is not the main immigration danger facing Australia and the survival of the Australian People.

The figures belie any claim of Islamization of Australia. The pattern of Australian immigration sees the nations of Asia providing the main sources of migrants. The South Pacific and Africa are now new sources. Of course, Middle Easterners and other Moslems arrive here and they are a strong component in the refugee racket. However, they are minorities. The largest non European source is China and that will remain so.

Essentially, we can see Australia rendered polyglot. We can see Australia being generally Asianized. However, there is no real threat of Islamization.

So why do some wish to say that the opposite?

Is it because it is easy? People have heard about the problems with Islamic immigration and some groups opt for political traction? That is partly sensible, even if ( as we say )it is the line of least resistance.

The problem is, that the Australian state currently permits some criticism of Islam-because it remains engaged in false wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, because it endorses the "war on terror" which the American regime still fights and it requires some sort of public support for these stupid and politically criminal adventures that kill our soldiers. Cussing the Moslems can serve that point. Permitting people to blow off steam too at a public demon, is always a clever tactic in the state's ploy to maintain multiculturalism and mass immigration overall. It keeps people away from the main danger. Of course also, making noises about Islamism also brings one into contact with likeminded religious and other groups, so one has the delusion of participation in a broad movement against Islamization.

For Australia First Party, it is a line of approach that leads one into a sideline war, a blind alley. Since Australia is not being Islamized, can the people recruited to this fight, really generalise their awareness of one problem into criticism of another? We doubt it. Indeed, as we observe, some of the groups taking up the struggle against Islamic migration are not concerned with much else.

How Can This Issue Be Developed?

We do not wish our main blow to be directed at Islamic migration. Rather, we see the rise of Chinese imperialism over Asia and the Pacific Ocean states; we are more concerned at immigration that is in fact recolonization, that which enmeshes Australia in new imperial arrangements from which we cannot escape. Australia First Party appreciates the various patterns of contract labour recruitment and investment which ensure a generalized Asianization of Australia.

In building a resistance movement to these things, we call upon our history which was engaged with these types of issues from prior to Federation and well afterwards. For Australia First Party, the matter of Islamic migration is just another vindication of a general case.

Certainly, we will warn the Australian People of all aspects of this Islamic intrusion and how it highlights the failed doctrine of multiculturalism. Yet, we won't be fooled into going up this blind alley. We will keep it in perspective so we can expose those who are working con jobs on the Australian People.

The Dark Agendas Of Others.

In the period that followed John Howard's drift to war in 2001, anti Islamism was embraced publically by a number of groups. The Christian Democratic Party, the Australian Christian Nation Association, certain Christian-Zionist church groups and the "right wing" faction of the Liberal Party, all came out about it. They whipped up concerns at Islamic extremists being active in Australia and the need to follow the USA to war.

Most corruptly, these groups posited that Australia's true friends in the Middle East was Israel and that Australian Zionists (namely those Jews who put Israel first in their thinking ) were allie's in the inter - related struggles. In fact, Israel creates Moslem unrest and the Zionists would see our soldiers killed in their service.

The propaganda of these anti Islamic groups was very energetic.

Eventually, this propaganda penetrated into One Nation Party and it also spawned a Liberal Party connected pseudo nationalist group called the Protectionists. In the case of One Nation, a rabid anti Islamist recently aquired real power there-and he has also sung the praises of Tony Abbott for supposedly being tough on immigration; funny that, since this was Abbott who put Pauline Hanson in gaol! Of course, the One Nation boss sees the anti Islamic rhetoric of Abbott and the Liberal "stance" for social cohesion etc as hard political currency and not rhetorical rubbish cooked up for voters. He does not see the truth of what the Liberals represent-enmeshment with Asia, high immigration and refugees flowing in but in an "orderly" way. This boss also collaborates very closely with the high immigration Christian Democrats just like his friends in the so-called Protectionist group. They all unite on anti Islamism and their recruits fall prey to this con.

The new line of the anti Islamists advanced a civic patriotism in which loyalty to Australia was defined as language, flag and supporting certain political institutions. At no point did this ideology commit anyone to the European ethic basis of the Australian People, or to its survival. How could it be? This anti Islamism was one big fraud.

The bottom line of it was that it led groups into the orbit of the Liberal Party and it gave them a job that served that party. The Liberals under Howard were ( till the election of the KRudd government ) the highest immigration government in Australian history. Anti-Islam? So what?

Election Year Again.

In another election year, the Australia First Party wants the immigration and population questions to be placed squarely out there on the real political agenda. There's a lot of evidence that this is occurring naturally. Australians are talking and Australians are getting angry at the loss of identity and economic security that immigration implies. Our Party will play an electoral and a community role in making this awareness intensify. However, we will not allow the anti-Islamism to creep in as a diversion from the immigration question overall and from the matter of the real threats to Australia. It will be a hard struggle to resist the con merchants. It will be this struggle that will define the political savvy of Australia First.

U.S GOV'T: We Failed To Protect Your Beef!

2010-04-15T16:27:00.000-07:00

A USDA audit finds pesticides, heavy metals, and veterinary medicines in supermarket meat. Even Mexico sent some of it back!

Rodale News, Emmaus, PA - A new report from the U.S Department of Agriculture ( USDA ) found that many dangerous substances, including pesticides, veterinary medicines, dioxin and heavy metals like arsenic, are winding up in the nations beef supply because government agencies haven't worked together to set limits.

The report makes clear that co-ordination between the USDA, the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) is lacking, making it difficult to recall beef contaminated with these harmful substances.

"They're all pointing their fingers at one another," says Tony Corbo, spokesman for the nonprofit watchdog group Food and Water Watch.

THE DETAILS: The audit report, released by USDA's Food Safety and Inspection General, found that common contaminents that can make there way into beef are not currently restricted in meat, even though contamination could harm human health. For instance, FSIS says the following medicines, feed supplements, and other contaminents could harm human health when people eat tainted beef.

1. Flunixin-a veterinary drug that can cause kidney damage, stomach and colon ulcers, and blood in the stools of humans.

2. Penicillin, a drug that can cause life-threatening reactions in people who are allergic to it.

3. Ivermectin, an animal wormer that can cause neurological damage in humans.

4. Arsenic, a known carcinogen.

5. Copper, an essential element, but harmful if too much accumulates in our bodies.

WHAT IT MEANS: When we think of food safety, we generally think about e-coli, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes contamination making people sick, but this report sheds light on the problems of drug, pesticide and heavy metal residues that can also accumulate in our bodies and make us sick. According to the report authors, "while cooking meat properly can destroy these pathogens before they are consumed, no amount of cooking will destroy residues. In some cases, heat may actually break residues down into components that are more harmful to consumers".

That's why it's more important than ever to seek out meat from sources you trust, and ideally, from farms where you can visit and perform an on-site inspection yourself, asking farmers what the animals eat, and seeing what type of conditions they live in.

Coupled with the threat of BSE contamination causing vCJD in humans,a fatal condition,with this complete absence of traceability, this is all very re-assuring. Just think Australia is set to allow this poison into our country, when the corrupt IRA is complete and the Australian government is all for it, kow towing once again to their free trade pimp masters while happily sacraficing the Australian people and Australian industries on the alter of free trade.

So long as we allow our great country to be governed by the dictatorship of the World Trade Organisation and the United Nations, we can only expect our situation to deteriorate.

Mass Unemployment On The Agenda For The Western World!

2010-04-08T14:44:00.000-07:00

What we see here is Western industries earmarked for extinction thanks to free trade!

China's Predatory Trade Practices. ( Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 6.4.10 )

On his Mon Valley stop today, Sen, Arlen Specter will accuse China of "international banditry" in its trade policies, blaming the export powerhouse for the erosion of manufacturing employment in the United States. The speech comes during a campaign in which his Democratic primary opponent Rep. Joe Sestak, has faulted the incumbent's record on economic issues, blasting him for his support of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Mr. Specter has voted for a variety of other free trade pacts, often opposed by U.S Labour groups but he has been a reliable ally of the steel industry and the

USW in his support of a succession of international Trade Organisation cases complaining about steel imports. The prepared text of the strongly worded speech targets China's management of its currency, demanding that Beijing move to a floating exchange rate. Numerous economists have observed that by undervaluing its currency, the yuan, China has seized an unfair advantage in the price of its goods over its trading partners. China has repeatedly denied the widespread charges that it manipulates its currency to promote its exports. Mr. Specter's speech calls for a "workers bill of rights" on trade. "America's continuing loss of manufacturing jobs threatens the welfare and pre-eminence of this nation."

Because of currency rates and as China's currency policy grows more intense no-one can compete with prices quoted from China. The products they bring over are cheaper than we can buy materials to make them.

Well if that's free trade today, will anyone have a job tomorrow ?

THE TRUTH ABOUT FREE TRADE..And Our Trading Partner "Friends".

2010-04-08T04:46:00.000-07:00

When we analyse how our so-called "friends" in the globalist world of free trade do business, we note their business practices appear more like a script from the Mafia movie The Godfather.

LIFT BSE BEEF BAN OR WE'LL BLOCK DANGEROUS TOYOTAS, U.S THREATENS JAPAN!
(Fairfax Stock And Land 7.3.10 )

Former United States Department of Agriculture Secretary and now Senator Mike Johanns, a Republican from Nebraska, raised the parallel of safety of U.S beef going into Japan to that of the safety of Toyotas coming from Japan into the United States.

Yet the Japanese have shut out U.S beef from their country and the market remains mostly closed to this day, over 6 years later. Johanns said "maybe it's time for us to tell the Japanese to allow our beef in or we will treat Japanese produced Toyotas in the same way. Many say the Obama administration should aggressively persue the Japanese over the beef issue.

CANADA DEMANDS SOUTH KOREA ACCEPTS ITS BEEF.
( Reuters 23.3.10 )

Canada Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz stated "South Korea has until the end of this month to re-open its borders to Canadian beef" South Korea, formerly Canada's fourth biggest export market for beef, stopped all imports following the discovery of Mad Cow disease in the west of the country.

"We left the Koreans with no illusion that the FTA is on hold until we get this beef issue worked through and resolved to Canadian producers` benefit," Ritz reportedly said in a conference call, says Reuters.

"It makes it very difficult to move forward when they want to just hive off a very signiffigant part of our exports and hold it in abeyance while we move forward with all smiles and chuckles".

With friends like these folks, who needs enemies ? This is the reality of free trade and now Australia is in their sights as the next dumping ground for their diseased beef. This is not in Australias best interests and certainly not the act of a "friend". Would a friend ask you to do something that would harm you ? To force diseased and potentially deadly beef on us- is biological warfare! It is a testement to why Australia First states: "we need to urgently rip up these foul treaties and regain Australian independence". It's time to put Australia First, this is a matter of survival! We can not rely on, nor trust the globalist Lib/Lab parties to do what is right for Australia, they are intent on prostituting what is left of Australian industries to their globalist free trade pimp masters!

A Disturbing Trend!

2010-04-04T02:07:00.000-07:00

We note a disturbing trend: one which denies our vulnerable Australian citizens the basics of life, while we continue to throw our pearls before swine.

Recently in the Daily Advertiser there were some disturbing articles.

There was Chloe the homeless Down Syndrome girl, who was making a huge effort to the best of her ability to secure housing, while contributing to society employed at the local disability employment centre ( Kurrajong Warratah ). However, she was unable to obtain housing. Of course D.O.H Wagga can offer her nothing but a dump in the most problematic area around town. She has been unable to secure private rental accommodation either. Of course, the refugees around town seem to have no difficulty in gaining housing and of course under the re-settlement scheme they have no end of assistance which snaps up the best lodgings.

There was an article reporting abuse and assaults common place upon our elderly citizens in aged care facilities.

Then, we noted the article regarding the 101st "asylum seeker" boat arrival this year and learned of how the people on board rang via mobile phone from the boat once they were metres away from shore. They announced their arrival and asked if they could be picked up forthwith and taxied to immediate shelter, food and health care and protection on our land, a privilege more than 100,000 homeless Australians could only dream off. This situation is so out of control, that one can only question the Australian government: why do we put these parasites before our own needy and vulnerable citizens, is this a cruel kind of madness.

We may add, that we also see Australian farmers and workers being sold out in favour of foreign interests and the globalist agenda of the rich! It appears we urgently need to rip up these foul treaties ( U.N treaty on refugees and free trade agreements ). We must allow our own survival to force our hand before it's to late!

END FREE TRADE IN BEEF! Keep Mad Cow Disease Beef Out Of Australia!

2010-03-31T00:32:00.000-07:00

The Australia First Party supports the rally, to be held at Parliament House Canberra on May 11, against free trade in beef-against import of Mad Cow Disease infected meat products into Australia!

Many groups and people are building this protest. Supporters include: the Australian Beef Association, a Hunter/ New England Abattoir, "the Support Aussie Farmers Say No To Imported Beef" Facebook site ( creator: Donna Morrison ), Vida Thomson, a Canberra Activist, Gabby Hughes a Wagga Wagga activist, various farmers and graziers from country Victoria, NSW and Queensland, the Australia First Party, the Australian Long Distance Owners ` and Drivers` Association and many independent people.

Messrs Brad Bellinger and John Carter from the Australian Beef Association, will be speaking at the protest, along with J.R Mc Donald from a Hunter/ New England Abattoir. There may be other speakers.

May 11 is Budget Day and a substancial media presence is expected.

This is a rally that will not be hijacked by the usual Liberal/ National Party game-players who offer a few platitudes to the crowd. It is an independent demonstration of people concerned at the free trade policies that are supported by the major parties.

Assemble: 11th May at 9am Meet at Magna Carta Place in the Parliamentary Triangle.

FREE TRADE CAN KILL YOU! SAY NO TO IMPORTED BEEF!

MAD COW MEAT: You Could Be Eating It, If You Don't Protest! We Refuse To Poison Ourselves!

2010-03-30T22:41:00.000-07:00

Don't be fooled by a government promise that it will investigate whether BSE affected meat could ever turn up in Australia. BSE is better known as Mad Cow Disease. And it kills people.

It's probably already here. And it can beat the quarantine tests that are going to be done now-and in the future.

There's only one way to be sure: don't allow beef and beef products to come into Australia from any country that has had an outbreak of Mad Cow Disease!

CLASS WAR ON THE CATTLE STATIONS: WHAT THEY SAID A FEW WEEKS AGO: FREE TRADE CUCKOO POLITICS GRIPS VERY RICH CATTLEMEN!

The biggest producers of beef in Australia want free trade so they can keep their export market. That means they don't mind if foreign beef enters our market. If foreigners can do that, then they won't keep our beef out of their countries. Crazy stuff. The Cattle Council said last week:

"The old Bse policy was not consistent with international rules. Under the previous rule banning sale of beef from countries that have had a case of BSE, if Australia were to be affected by an unlikely single case of BSE the results would be devastating for the sector and the economy. All beef could be removed from all domestic shelves at enormous expense, crippling the industry, and foreign markets could reciprocate by locking us out without scientific justification. Cattle Council found this arrangement totally unacceptable. These export markets were at serious risk if we did not change our BSE policy and we ever got a trade disruptive disease. Our markets could have shut us out and we would have no retaliation."

Why allow imported beef anyway ? The amount allowed in will grow over time. It will destroy smaller Aussie producers. But that won't worry the biggest cattlemen because they produce for export. Simple! Free trade can kill you and it will destroy thousands of Aussie graziers and farmers on the way. It will undermine regional cities and towns and destroy thousands of jobs! If regional Australia falls apart and people die from contaminated beef -that's a high price for free trade!

FREE TRADE CAN KILL YOU! SAY NO TO IMPORTED BEEF!

Join the Facebook site: SUPPORT AUSSIE FARMERS SAY NO TO IMPORTED BEEF!!! ( 20,500 members and growing )

A Dose Of Reality!

2010-03-30T01:33:00.000-07:00

Ray Goodlass's response ( Daily Advertiser 29.3.10 ), to the concerns raised by Rhonda Palmer ( Daily Advertiser 24.3.10 ) can only be described as extreme leftist cuckoo politics!

Firstly, Mr. Goodlass has continually encouraged the public to view the Green's website and policies; but it appears when people do just that and fail to agree with the stated policies, they are stridently attacked by Mr. Goodlass-and immediately labelled "right wing radicals" etc. So much for the new Greens` candidate Mr. Fletcher's assertion that the Labor Party are un-democratic in their views/policies!

Secondly, he failed to correlate the link between the Greens` approval of second trimester abortions ( murder ) and pro-euthanasia ( bumping off the infirm ) as a policy for social justice? Rather, it's a vaudiville attempt at playing God himself.

Thirdly, we note the dangers to public safety in the Greens` policy to do away with sniffer dogs, ( which provide an invaluable and necessary service regarding detecting explosives carried by would be terrorists and drugs set to poison our youth ). The sniffer dogs perform a cruical service at our ports and airports helping control the importation of drugs into the country and so on. Mr. Goodlass's concerns that the sniffer dogs are threatening when let loose in clubs and bars is absurd; next he will be asserting guide dogs are threatening when coming towards you in the street. What is of concern and threatening is if the Greens` policies were to be let loose to threaten Australia!

Fourthly, we wonder how Mr. Goodlass's recent allies on the open border for refugees policy ( Dr. Short, OAM Richter and others ) feel about the Greens` recent attempts to have prayer removed from Parliament and replaced with "reflection time" ? Who needs "right wing" media telling so-called untruths about the Greens to discredit them, when they are doing a sterling job of that themselves!?

Finally, in Mr. Goodlass's response we note a one line after thought to his epic response, as if it had almost slipped his mind that the Greens espouse humane treatment of animals. Well, don't we all.

We see nothing on environmental issues in Mr. Goodlass's statements, only a scathing attack on a concerned contributor, Ms. Palmer, who dared to view the Green's website and policies as encouraged by Mr. Goodlass himself!

One Nation Vote In South Australia Cuts In Half : Another Proof Of The Failure Of Mainstreaming.

2010-03-25T03:28:00.000-07:00

The South Australian election has, in some ways sadly of course, validated the stand taken by Australia First Party against any idea of "mainstreaming" the patriotic movement.

Our friends in the One Nation party saw their State-wide upper house vote cut in half from the last poll in 2006. In 2006, the One Nation party polled 7,559 votes ( 0.8 % ). This time around it was 3,759 votes ( 0.51 % ). At one half of one per cent, the result could only be considered poor.

It is true that there are policy and political differences between Australia First and One Nation; however, at the level of presentation, One Nation set itself on the road of "mainstreaming" many years ago. Australia First has said a lot about that in the past and we make comment on parts of the mainstreaming formula:

Mainstreaming means reaching for the very people still enthralled by Establishment ideas and values-and parties. What mainstreamers usually don't get is that political change, real change, is not a product of mass electioneering with competing party "imageries" put before the public. Change cannot occur while the great mass of Australians is prepared to support the regime itself, the system itself. Grumblings about this or that government, or party boss, or erroneous state policy, do not mean a rejection of the liberal globalist society and its politics. Clearly, some 70 % of Australians most certainly support the regime because they refuse to change it and of the rest, there are varying degrees and qualities of radicalisation and ideological persuasion. The liberal globalist regime has weaknesses, but it rests on still-secure economic, social and legal ( and yes, we must also say, physical force ) props. No mainstreamer ( and yes, at this time, no nationalist! ), is going to change this at least not now.

The mainstreamer is overwhelmed by cosmetic appearance. Any person, any action, any symbol, any issue etc, who/which can be held ( by media and our political opposition ) to be non mainstream, sends him into a frenzy of denial and repudiation. Hence mainstreamers will abandon friends, maintain public facades that they may or may not believe in, confuse their associates who can no longer decide what they do actually believe, create fluffy programmes and adopt non threatening ( sic ) imagery. Our problem with this, is that it is not a clever game ( sic ) to get big support, big votes and acceptance, but a process that finally leads to the transformation of the mainstream would-be-nationalist into his exact opposite. He becomes a version of what he says he is supposedly fighting, just a nice-guy in a party with feel-good policy.

We say that mainstreaming is a recipe for political death! We have principles and we intend to convert people to them.

We know that right now the mainstream follows what is wrong with Australia. We say that we stand for Real Australia, those who have in one way or another stepped outside of the mainstream to stand up for themselves, their communities and livelihoods, with new associations and new parties. We aim to become the voice of Real Australia. Real Australia may also be divided about which way to go and who to follow, but at least-thinks for itself.

In our view, One Nation may find itself wiped out after the next Federal poll-and we do not mean that in terms of votes received. In the last Federal poll, One Nation's average was 1.82 %. Even though the climate is very favourable to a nationalist type message, it is likely that One Nation will continue its course, saying what it thinks "reasonable" people want to hear about problems for which the solution is hard and unbending.

Of course, there are nationalists inside One Nation who wish to take the path of an activist politics. Good luck to them, but we cannot escape our own logic; there is no future for them inside a mainstreamer group because there may not be time to reform it.

The mainstreaming path was repudiated by Australia First in 2007 after a small cabal of persons tried to take over the original Australia First Party ( inc ) and "mainstream" it, causing the old party real damage. However, the nationalists reconstituted the party and moved forwards. We welcome all genuine nationalists who would serve Real Australia-into the ranks of Australia First!

PROTEST AT PARLIAMENT HOUSE CANBERRA :11th MAY 9am MEET AT MAGNA CARTA PLACE CANBERRA! NO BEEF IMPORTS PROTEST

2010-03-24T01:42:00.000-07:00

Rural Australia Needs A Thousand Ned Kelly's: Dr. J Saleam / K Sharp

2010-03-22T21:11:00.000-07:00

Ned Kelly embodied the spirit of the downtrodden and those oppressed at the hands of the Establishment.

Today we can draw parellels, between the past and the present. Can we not realise the ongoing signifigance of the Kelly Spirit in the patriotic struggle and defence of our nation and identity?

We see today the globalists` indifference at the plight of the ordinary Australian. Did not the patriots of the past speak of the oppression at the hands of the elite?

The rural issues of the past echo in the rural struggles of today. There is the matter of survival of Australian farmers and indeed the Australian identity which our farming class so well expresses.

As the patriots of the past struggled for survival, we today struggle for our future. We fight the 2 faces of the same elite ( Lib/Lab ) and their lackeys the Greens, all with their globalist friends and their collusion that would turn Australia into one big quarry for the world ( the fate predicted for us by the World Bank ).

We note our farmers, timber mills, abattoirs, manufacturing industries and our identity are all earmarked for extinction. What was theatened in the past may certainly occur in our future.

The globalists attempt to sanitise our minds with an indoctrination by media that tells us that their deceptions are good policies. Ned Kelly's last stand was a defeat that our great union leaders and other fighters of the day turned into many victories for social justice. Today, our rural communities face their own "last stand" - but this time around, it is either win or lose. Nothing follows in the event of defeat.

Animated globalist rats have us sandwiched between the two faces of the same government-system. Indeed we see and feel the pain of our great land just as did our patriotic brothers of the past. We see clearly the perpetually moving anti Australian agendas of the day. We intend to win and fight. We recall the lines about Ned Kelly.

No man single-handed,
Can hope to break the bars.
It's a thousand like Ned Kelly,
Who'll hoist the Flag of Stars.

Australian Resources And Industries Are The Property Of The Australian People: Special Editorial.

2010-03-19T03:21:00.000-07:00

What we are seing in Australia regarding takeover of our resources and industries, defies democracy and all reason. We cannot continue to tolerate it!

In fact, both major parties have no problem prostituting whatever may be left of Australia's resources and industries to their globalist parasitic pimp masters! We need to remind them that Australia actually belongs to the Australian people, that they are merely caretakers of our great land. But what care have they taken?

These traitors have lined their pockets and that of their cronies; meanwhile we see a different reality materialising for the Australian people!

Is it not offensive that an unacceptable situation faces Australians in our hospitals and with health care, that Third World standards are the order of the day? The traitors have no qualms about that. In all their arrogance are we somehow supposed to be grateful for this disaster that should be proclaimed a state of emergency?

Farmers and Australian workers are being brought to their knees by convenient free trade, contract labour and mining agendas.

The education stimulus rort and insulation fiasco defy belief. The astronomical electricity price hikes about to befall us are warnings.

We may end up with in excess of the already 100,000 homeless Australians ( something well beyond our already conservative statistics ).

We could say that due to the price of electricity alone, we will find ourselves dancing in the dark. Yet, ironically KRudd has kept us in the dark regarding many issues of national importance, whilst hatching plans and hidden agendas.

The list of atrocities against the people is endless and billions of dollars have been wasted!

Let's not forget the "asylum seeker" scandal. Just take note one of the hundreds of boat arrivals under the KRudd regime-and the terrorist style arrival that it was. We refer to the SIEV36 exploding boat case. Of course, the Minister for Immigration helped facilitate and rewarded their terrorism in Australian waters by wecoming the terrorists and murderers into our great land with visas.

So much for law and order and any policy on terrorism or border control! If we were to be democratic about the SIEV36 issue, we should just open the gates and pull down the walls for everyone incarcerated in our nation's jails-and set them free as well. Maybe even reward them with a Gold Mastercard to boot!

At the recent coronial inquest on the SIEV36, Coroner Greg Cavanagh found the boat explosion to have been a deliberate act by the Afghans at issue.

Council assisting the Coroner, Mr. Walsh QC, said "the asylum seekers did not tell the truth" at the inquest into the deaths/murder of five people on board the SIEV36. They were in fact all involved in a conspiracy to blow up the boat. This was obviously a deliberate act of terrorism which endangered Australian Defence Force Personnel, who were put at risk in an attempt to help these criminals!

What does the KRudd government do in the face of this blatant act of terrorism? Why, grant the murderers a permanent protection visa. What fine Australians these folk will make! Before they have even set foot on our sacred soil, they have already murdered five of their own countrymen-and who knows how many others back in Afghanistan?

This is madness! Minister Evans and Kommandant KRudd announced they had no option but to grant them a permanent visa under the Immigration laws and refugee treaty. We say this is all a lie. They were not lawfully bound to issue these terrorists with permanent visas at all.

Our old friend, Ian Rintoul from Refugee Action Coalition says they should be allowed to stay even after the coronial inquiry found them to be liars and guilty of intentionally blowing up the boat. This says a lot for the credibility of Rintoul and refugee advocates in general. They would be better imprisoned along with the criminals they advocate for. Had any other ordinary Australian citizen been involved in such crimes, or "advocated" for such criminals, he would in fact be in jail.

This whole refugee/asylum seeker business is out of control and the state KRudd and his globalist mates have reduced Australia into a state of anarchy. This is not democracy!

The Evil That Lurks Within David Fletcher Revealed!

2010-03-16T05:19:00.000-07:00

RIVERINA GREENS CANDIDATE WILL BE PUTTY FOR NATIONALISTS.

A recent exchange of words took place between David Fletcher of the Greens ( and candidate in the next Federal poll ) and Mr. Craig Hesketh of One Nation, who has been a patriotic candidate in this region in the past. Fletcher has recently put himself forward as an opponent of Australia First, accusing us of distributing "hate" leaflets which targeted African refugees ( we deny any knowledge of them ), which oh-so conveniently turned up in his letterbox.

Fletcher supports the refugee invasion. In his statement here, he shows his loathing of any nationalist position. Mr. Hesketh holds the pro Australian position. In any election, the mad "open up the borders" rants of Mr. Fletcher would make him putty for nationalists.

New Greens ( C. Hesketh )
The Greens have launched their new candidate for the upcoming 2010 election: Mr. Fletcher. This is the David Fletcher from Forrest Hill who attacked me personally in the Daily Advertiser for asking for calm on the immigration debate that was happening between members of Australia First and supporters of immigration.

I must say after reading his emotional tirade and derogatory opinion of nationalist Australians who want to retain their culture and countries character, we are in for some fun times.

It is a sad fact that our local media likes to give people of this political persuasion and ideology a lot of attention. It seems that the more fuss is made about what the Greens are doing or what their opinions are on all matters then the sitting member Kay Hull. It is obvious that diverse left political views are also supported by editorial staff at the Daily Advertiser. This can be confirmed by reading their pro Labor party view in most editorials.

As leader of One Nation in the Riverina, I am never asked my opinion on an event or policy. Even at election time I do more chasing than answering questions on our position. I must say that I am luckier than most members of One Nation who do not even get their letters published. Don't ever believe the media will publish an accurate impartial view on any subject. They like Labor, their cronies and allies the Greens and Liberal have many vested interests to protect.

Dear One Nation Riverina: ( D. Fletcher ).

Firstly, I live in Forest Hill, not "Forrest Hill".

Secondly, perhaps Greens get a voice in the media because they are a party that is fast growing; or maybe because there are five ( soon to be seven )

Greens Senators in Federal Parliment, four ( six by March 2011 ) in the NSW Upper House and over 70 ( the sky is the limit ) in local government areas across the state. How many elected officials does One Nation ( or any other so-called nationalist group ) have?

Furthermore, perhaps One Nation should devote more time to convincing the electorate that Pauline Hanson and her politics of personal profit and racial hatred have left the party. Here's a free tip: running around claiming conspiracy does not help your cause; it makes you look like fringe lunatics ( proper spelling and grammar also helps ).

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Australians can smell a political rat, and One Nation has odour de rodent emanating from every orifice.

Regards
David Fletcher
Forest Hill.

Well it seems that Mr. Fletcher is not only smug, he is condesending. A simple mistake to put an extra 'r' in Forest Hill. Yes the Greens have bluffed voters, especially the young and naive, conning them to believe that they have something to offer in Politics. If you get past the environmental propaganda you have some very strange ideas. I am looking forward to the fight Mr. Fletcher. ( C. Hesketh ).

The Ombudsman For Everything !

2010-03-16T01:23:00.000-07:00

Australia First ran foul of Wagga Wagga busybody, Erwin Richter. Now, it seems it is the community that has tired of him.

We note an unsavoury common denominator regarding Mr. Richter's contributions to-and recent publicity in -the Daily Advertiser. Mr. Richter appears to want to remove the splinter from his brother's eye, before taking the log out his own. And people have seen this contradiction!

Not long ago, Mr. Richter was yelling around and nominated himself as "fuel watchdog" for the Riverina; of course, such a role is redundant.

He has brought nothing but dissension into the group which manages the Tarcutta Truckies Memorial. His meddling is something he should be ashamed of, as our truckers are Australian heroes. The site is a sacred site of Australian labour! Without our truckies, Australia would grind to a halt and so many have paid the ultimate price for their service to Australia. Mr. Richter's futher involvement and his position as Secretary of the Memorial, are now seen as liabilities by most of the Memorial Committee and truckies who know him. We think his position as Memorial Secretary should be terminated.

Mr. Richter, recently announced to Wagga that it is right to accept all and sundry into our community and boasted of his contribution to the process. He did not ask the community its wishes regarding refugees swamping the area. He rammed the agenda down our collective throat.

We should make mention that Mr. Richter has shown no interest on issues facing farmers or Australian workers; he just bangs on about refugees! His OAM should be rescinded, but in the currently politically correct climate, he will survive that demand.

Finally, the city's affair with this theatre of the absurd moved into its final phase. Mr. Richter wanted to monitor the goings-on of Council and scrutinise their every move. The Councillors are elected by the community, not puppets of the watchdog for everything and grand master puppeteer, Erwin Ritcher. If the community are not satisfied with the decisions of Council, they will have the democratic opportunity to vote them out at the next election. This last performance has publicly shown the man to be a first class second class fool. Even the local media saw through this.

In the meantime we remind Mr. Richter there is a God, but it's not you our readers or our editor-let alone, Mr. Richter. He is starting to resemble the personality of a Hitler type character, dictating to the community. Some citizens say that someone should start a watchdog group to monitor the actions of Mr. Richter and his cronies.

Contaminated Beef: Time For Action.

2010-03-08T03:17:00.000-08:00

The notion that contaminated overseas beef products could have entered Australia would have riled previous generations of Australian politicians. Not now. Free trade allows everything.

A people's movement is building against this madness.

The key to winning this fight is people's action. Despite the interest Aussie farmers and workers of all types have a vibrant local beef industry, there are movers and shakers behind the National Farmers` Federation and similar federations-who are for free trade. These folks arn't allies of the people.

So as individuals or in small groups: get letters going in to all papers, including trades and other papers; ring radio talk-back and go to town on the facts; put together local pickets of your Federal MP's offices particularly if he's a National and likes to pretend he has the rural interests at heart; call on the Meatworkers Union to strike ( and on this one they may have the companies in support ); call on TWU and the Maritime Union to "black" the imported products ( this will pit some organizers and the rank and file squarely against those who toe the ALP line on Free Trade ); The Australian Long Distance Owners And Drivers Association may also blacklist imported products; similar political groups are keen allies in any fight with the big parties; and don't forget the old supermarket protest-load your trolleys with imported products and leave it at the checkouts.

In other words, what people do is the important thing and one can do in tandem with just a few friends.

Australia First Party will support any local action taken by anyone-and do so in a co-operative manner. For any comments on any of the above-we're happy to oblige , to contact us e-mail ausfirst@alphalink.com.au

THE HEADSPINNING SPIN!

2010-03-08T02:16:00.000-08:00

MONEY FOR WASTE POLICY : WHAT ABOUT MONEY FOR HEALTH REFORM?

We note KRudd and his spin doctors all but spun out, with a sudden urgency for a plan to implement "health reform".

Well, maybe with a 2014 type urgency! Are we so gullible as to embrace KRudds sudden and long awaited concern for the needs of Australians? Australians are understandably quite sceptical of KRudds grandiose announcements by now. What about the broken promises of the Kevin 07 Manifesto? All we see is a health system in the final stage of decomposition.

KRudd can't dig the mineral resources of Australia out the ground quick enough and ship them over to China and to hell with future consequences! Everything in the name of "free trade"! We note the denials of the KRudd government regarding the building construction going on at Christmas Island Detention Centre ( come on KRudd it's a bit hard not to notice earthmoving equipment ). KRudd anticipates Christmas Island will need to accommodate 5,000 "asylum seekers" within the next 4 years, as 1,000 have arrived here already. And what parasites they all are.

KRudds calculations could be considered conservative. Predictions for this year were only 200 arrivals but that has already been surpassed by 800! This is a fine example of KRudds roll over and die attempt to deal with organised criminals, the "people smugglers" he once described "as the scum of the earth". By the time we get to the end of the year, the budget for running this operation will have blown out to $300 million dollars. That's money that could have helped Australia's health reform.

When we analyse the reality here, we see Australia's homeless and jobless continuing to be ignored. We note that thousands of Australian Defence Force Personnel have gone to Afghanistan to make that country safer, but thousands of Afghani young males have come to Australia seeking "asylum". What message is that sending to our Defence Forces heading in the other direction? Why doesn't KRudd just use the $300 million dollars and put them all on a P&O cruise ship back from whence they came!?

Mr. Rintoul from the Refugee Action Coalition should be the first detained for the crime of assisting mass invasion of Australia. These refugees / asylum seekers are no more than parasites on the misery of struggling Australian people and are willing participants in organised crime. As far as KRudd's spin doctors are concerned, the old wives tale will ring true: "what doesn't come out in the wash will come out in the spin dry!" Happy campaigning, KRudd.

HOMELESSNESS

2010-03-08T01:31:00.000-08:00

We publish a piece contributed by a lady in the Riverina ( edited for length ). It is for the rights of the ordinary people- that Australia First will fight.

When we scratch away the facts behind what we call homelessness, we can see an institution and an unsavoury reflection of our contemporary society.

It is wrong to blame people for their circumstances. Some look down their nose of their privilege won by serving the elite; they have their position of power and control. It is not sufficent to wear blinkers and perceive homelessness with a childlike out-of-sight-out-of-mind and do-nothing convenience.

What we see is a certain group of Australians on the scrap heap of society. Out of this fact we have seen an industry emerge that ironically keeps some people in a living. Yes, it's ironic that the emptiness of others, fulfils yet another group. We see the so-called social housing providers, DOH and the like, providing anything but a safety net. Rather they provide yet more social injustice; they play the slumlord overseeing the institution that their housing ghettos have become.

The bureaucrats facilitating this so-called housing for the disadvantaged relish the power and control with sick pleasure. They play with the lives of the downtrodden, and receive a delicious salary to do so. We see the run down boarding houses / unscrupulous private landlords in our communities, fleecing the otherwise-homeless of their meagre pensions.

We see DOCS providing so called care and protection for our youth in dire circumstances. In reality, they further the abuse and neglect. They just warehouse youth until they come of age and they are no longer required to be seen to be providing any care and protection.

Some youth have accepted it is in fact safer on the streets, where they form their own street communities and family, and maybe finally find some empathy and understanding. That would be an indictment of the system itself.

What of the homeless? We see complete lack of empowerment ever increasing in our society. So much for a mans 's home is his castle-if you don't have a castle! This is part of the breakdown of our real social fabric and our identity as Australians.

Years ago programs were run that were actually successful, with low cost homes and loans available to circumvent perpetual homelessness. There was even pride in our social housing communities. Of course all these things are long gone. These were the days when an Australian culture was dominant and these issues and people mattered. What matters now is not the human cost, but the capitalist machine and the globalist agenda.

This agenda further erodes our culture. We step over our brother in the street, rather than consider the institution of homelessness and what goes with it. Do we consider the government agendas that make this reality? Do we wonder how it is possible to re-settle and find housing and services for refugees and invaders, as we deny our own?

If the Australian governments of today can plan for stupid wars, why cannot they plan to bring Australians out of poverty?

Refugee Invasion Is The Reality Of Things!

2010-02-28T23:18:00.000-08:00

KRudd has abdicated all responsibility to stop the refugee invasion. So much for the election promise to discourage the boats!

Religious groups, refugee advocates and human rights groups work in tandem with our do-nothing governments; therefore, they become the "prime mover" towards anarchy.

Some recent revelations tell us that the so called small scale Third World type people smuggling operations, are actually a much more sophisticated and organised multi million dollar, large scale travel-agent-style people smuggling operation, involving corrupt government officals worldwide, religious groups, refugee and human rights advocates.

We have seen a Canadian church based group and others launching a "proud to aid and abet refugees" campaign in 2007, on the back of a US "humanitarian" worker being arrested in Canada for people smuggling. They will break the law to further their rabid bust-the-borders agenda.

Recently we had two Australians and a Canadian arrested in Indonesia regarding inappropriate involvement with the Tamils in the Merak fiasco. They were deported from Indonesia. Ironically, the Sri Lankin Tamils on the Merak have little credibility as the Sri Lankin government confirmed the Merak spokesman known as "Alex" was in fact a people smuggler himself-and that he was deported from Canada in 2003 for involvement with violent street gangs.

The statement also says "Alex" had been involved in people smuggling for a long time and had an office based in India. His brother, who is now in Canada is being sought by Canadian Police since he is also involved in people smuggling. "Alex" did not deny the allegations.

One lady from the Gold Coast Queensland commented on an internet site on the Merak boat affair: "These so-called refugees have so far threatened to blow up their boat, won't reveal their real names, hide behind children, blackmail via hunger strikes and then offer to grass their illegal co-offenders. Great future citizens of Australia! Imagine what would happen if a disgruntled Australian approached their local MP with all those threats if they couldn't get their own way" ?

We remember KRudd announcing the Merak issue in Indonesia was not Australia's problem and he flatly refused to have anything to do with it all. Yet less than a month later, as predicted by Australia First, KRudd has accepted into Australia the Tamils off the Merak.

Last week, the Australian Immigration Minister announced he was aware of a sophisticated people smuggling operation in Australia, with so-called refugees paying substancial amounts of money to get here. He was aware of a curiosity: that refugee advocates and family members had prior knowledge of "asylum seeker" travel plans and arrangements before their boats are intercepted in Australian waters.

The Minister vowed to prosecute anyone involved. He threatened mandatory sentencing for people smuggling-with 20 years imprisonment the maximum penalty and/or 220,000 Australian dollar fine. These supposed "new" developments have prompted KRudd to extend the powers of ASIO to border protection, with the power to tap phone conversations of suspected people smugglers. Still nothing concrete is ever done.

The Australian refugee advocacy group Chilout has confirmed the practice of sending out to media and politicians misleading material about refugee treatment in Australia in an attempt to "fire" people up. This pseudo moralist claptrap produces the angry mobs of recent times in Australia, wild protests, threats and intimidation outside Immigration Ministers` residences etc. These feral dross have no logical argument in favour of simply opening our borders; the only ammunition the refugee advocates have is to scream racist at anyone who even insists on the most remote notion of border control.

The goal is mad. It is to inalterably change and eradicate our culture and society. These groups think only of their self righteous mission without regard for the rest of us. The Refugee Action Coalition is the most obvious example of this. It is a gang of Trotskyite communists, churchies, druggies, lecturing on the need to allow all and sundry access to Australia. They engage with people smugglers and in conspiracies with others to commit illegal acts. They operate outside of the law. Yet they seem to operate with impunity.

The question we need to ask is: what happens when Australia descends into complete social disorder and anarchy?

And this will come in a decade perhaps. So much diversity that we will choke on it.

We say that groups like the Refugee Action Coalition are offensive to the human rights of disadvantaged Australians. They have no problem shoving their agenda down our collective throat. They don't care about our poor or sensibilities.

By their example does that mean that it is ok for the rest of us to disobey the laws as we choose? Religious groups and refugee advocates who chose to defy our immigration laws are criminals! It matters not what "higher law" they think they are obeying. They operate out of "sympathy" for the invading army of "asylum seekers" and refugees, by traitorously facilitating the invasion of our country. Might the day come when we Australians may be forced to break all "law" to defend ourselves from the chaos they have caused?

So-called asylum seekers are not refugees or heroes. They are parasitic scum. Why should our taxpayers` dollars be spent supporting these people who broke the law to get here and who just imposed themselves upon the Australian national family? Free housing. Medical Care. Legal help. Pensions. What lunacy is this ?

Why should we give effective amnesty to the people who aid and abet them? The refugee advocates are the vilest criminals Australia has. These people prey upon everyone to bleed every Australian of the fruits of his labour-for the benefit of utter aliens.

We have a situation here with a health system in collapse, a housing crisis, a myriad of neglected infrastructure problems and decling services for Australians. It is time we thought of ourselves. We don't see KRudd lifting a finger about it all and we never will. To do so would mean that he too-will be called a racist.

Wake up Australia! Being Australian can no longer be a matter of lip service. Fight back and yell it loud. If you don't know how to shout, just emulate the refugees; they're very good at it!

JAPANESE MULTINATIONALS THREATEN AUSTRALIAN WORKERS: Who Comes First-Australia Or The Foreign Bosses?

2010-02-28T19:44:00.000-08:00

JAPANESE BUSINESS LEADERS HAVE ISSUED A THREAT TO AUSTRALIAN WORKERS, STATING IN THEIR JAUNDICED LANGUAGE THAT "A FRESH WAVE OF UNION MILITANCY THREATENS THE SUPPLY OF CRUCIAL RESOURCES AND BILLION-DOLLAR INVESTMENTS."

Australian nationalists know that some unions have raised workplace issues, compelled as they occasionally must be by the rank and file, which put the immediate interests of the worker at loggerheads with the profit-driven Japanese multinationals.

Australian nationalists know that attacks upon the union movement are seldom calculated to curtail a crook union leadership or to overcome some fault of industrial behavior. Rather, they are usually designed to make ordinary Australian workers subservient to the foreign bosses-particularly right now when the globalised economy totters on a knife edge.

Nippon Steel's Australian boss, Yoshifumi Nakata, said his company wanted assurances Australia would not return to the "industrial days of the 1970's" when Japan was "forced" to look to Brazil for key supplies.

The steel giant was "afraid and very concerned" that an esculation in industrial action would disrupt export markets, Mr. Nakata said.

"We are seriously concerned with the stable supply of raw materials, particularly iron ore and coking coal," he added.

This is all rhetorical muck that was used 30 years ago by the Frazer and then Hawke governments to attack, not a few corrupt unions and silly work-rules, but the tried and true structures of Australian workplace culture. We now live with the results of that foul attack: work contracts, visa labour, fewer union rights, intrusive courts and commissions and so on.

It can be rightly said that the Japanese multinationals are more concerned about what they can rip out of Australia vast wealth, with lowering the price of Australian labour and weakening proper conditions, than with any issue of industrial lawlessness.

Nippon Steel, one of Japan's largest steel producers, is among several foreign firms to express "concern" over growing industrial militancy in Western Australia. Indeed, some unions have called snap strikes and disrupted production work there in past months. And why not ? At the moment the unions demand fairness. The day will come when the Australian People will demand an end to the fire-sale of our national wealth!

The fear of the foreigner for any form of union activity comes as workplace relations, emerge as an issue in the next election. The two faces of the regime ( Liberal, Labor ) will vie with each other to promise the Japanese multinationals that they will curtail the unions and they will spin the Australian suburban voter wild tales about trade union thuggery stopping projects that will make us all rich-as their justification for stripping us of the right to freely associate in unions and fight industrial struggles.

Resources giant Woodside Petroleum last month announced it was suing the Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union ( CFMEU ) after the union called an eight-day strike. The action halted development of Woodside's $12 billion liquefied natural gas processing plant on the North West Shelf. This project feeds Chinese imperialism and not just the Japanese. The union should be praised, not criticised!

With annual exports of $50 billion, Japan is Australia's biggest market. Iron ore and coal account for exports worth about $30 billion while LNG exports are valued at $8 billion. There is nothing wrong with trade with Japan, but there is everything wrong when the Japanese multinationals can demand openly that restrictions be placed on Australian workers and their industrial organizations.

The Japanese concerns were raised during all-day Australian-Japanese talks behind closed doors in Canberra last week. Japanese delegates directly raised the matter of Australia's industrial past. In their view, they want subservient unions like in Japan. They wanted assurances government would act against unions and workers.

Western Australia Treasurer Troy Buswell said: "Investors are growing very nervous." And such a worthy group of parasites these investors are! As if, we must run when investors crack the whip.

The answer of our traitor class is always to rule for the foreign master. The idea of establishing an economy for Australia is not on their agenda. Nonetheless, threats to the Australian workers may spread the idea of Australian Independence, the vision splendid where the ordinary people control their own wealth and their own country.

WARNING! To Australian Beef Industry.

2010-02-26T19:28:00.000-08:00

Australia First warns Australian beef producers and processors attending the forum in Armidale NSW ( Feb.27 ), not to be conned by deceptive mouthings by Liberal/National representatives in attendance.

A pattern has formed regarding the Lib/Nat hijacking of farmers` issues.

We note a similar ambush by Lib/Nat's of the Peter Spencer "Farmers Land Rights Rally" at Parliment House last month.

Most curious, how it is not until after the deceptions/abuses of farmers by government, that these Lib/Nat's decide to champion the farmers cause. Up till then, they appear quite happy to go along with KRudd and his globalist pimps.

Farmers should remember the National Party deceptions of farmers is legendary and be vigilant, as the Lib/Nat's are also bed partners of the globalist "free trade" agenda.

Australia First warns all Australian industries not to fall for the 2 faces of government ( Lib/Lab ) "free card trick".

KRudd Prostitutes Australian Industries To His Globalist Free Trade Pimps !

2010-02-25T19:46:00.000-08:00

MAD COW DISEASE ALLEGATIONS OVER LIFTING OF BSE BEEF IMPORT BANS!

Free Trade can kill you. Many Australians may die over the next decade as a result of it.

A Senator claims the Federal Government was pressured by the United States and Canada to allow beef imports from countries affected by Mad Cow disease-effective from March 2010.

Senator Bill Heffernan says an in-confidence answer to the committee revealed there were 37 communications from the Canadian and US governments since November 2007, demanding Australia allow their beef into the country.

Senator Heffernan accused departments of lying about why the policy was changed. "This is the greatest ambush of Australia's farmers of all time by a Government," he said.

"The evidence given at the last meeting was dead set lies."

"And for a proposition that this change in government policy is led by industry is a dead set lie."

An important risk assessment will not be carried out before the import ban is dropped on March 1.

Labor MP Simon Crean stated the move to lift the ban was "driven" by Australia's cattle industry. That was untrue.

Grazier Gary Radford who owns a number of properties is concerned about traceability. education and the speed of change. He says the risk that something could go wrong is still to high.

"And of course with no traceability, definately no genuine traceability, Australia really has a problem".

The Cumberland Livestock Health and Pest Authority says it's not just BSE that people need to worry about, claiming chronic wasting disease, which is also found in much of North America, is also a threat.

Senior livestock veterinarian for the Cumberland LHPA, Keith Hart, says government protocols will not protect Australia from being infected.

"There is no way you could put a protocol in place that would minimise the risk until the science is known. It might be 10 years or more."

With the Australian dollar at 90 cents against the US dollar, it would be unlikely to be a commercial proposition to import beef, said Chief Executive of the Australian Meat Industry Council Kevin Cottrell.

The chief US beef lobby group says Australia must defy the critics and push on with plans to allow beef imports from mad cow affected countries.

As critics become more vocal, president of America's National Cattlemen's Beef Association, Steve Foglesong, is calling for calm.

Senator Nick Xenophon is calling for an urgent senate inquiry to get to the bottom of this very quickly.

Bob Katter claims it will cost lives and industry.

Australia relies on Nations filling out a questionaire honestly where importers have to tick the right boxes.

Veterinarian Chris Beck says he's concerned how little say Australia has in the assessment process.

Interestingly, the 2002 guidelines from the US Food and Drug Administration laws state as there is no way to detect BSE in blood of people who have lived in areas affected; from 1980 to the present, they are not allowed to donate blood in the US. Yet Australian blood bank is telling Australians there is no risk to the blood supply from donations ?

Assertions this mad cow meat is welcomed by farmers, is testament to the increasing deception of the Australian Government and vested interest cronies.

Government failed to give the beef industry a say on import standards.

We see angry farmers protesting around the country, with farmers protesting last week in Lismore outside the Lismore Workers Club, where Deputy Prime Minister Gillard attended for a fundraising dinner. Farmers stated: "maybe we should start importing politicians, as Australian elected politicians have no care for the Australian people or farmers."

Independent MP Bob Katter states that Health Minister Nicola Roxon is ultimately responsible for this fiasco as bio-security matters rest with the Trade Department. The quarantine service is also part of this department as well ( not a very reassuring situation ). Katter stated "But they're quite happy that human beings be sacrificed on the sacrificial alter of free trade."

Let's feel reassured as KRudd guarantees us the meat is 100 per cent safe. Is that the ranking of safety he gave the insulation program ? Maybe he can give Peter Garret the Mad Cow portfolio ?

Consumer Affairs Minister Craig Emerson said that allowing the imported meat will help restrain the cost of living increases. But hang on: isn't the Aussie dollar comparable to the US dollar etc ?

There appears to be no end of hardship, injustice and lies KRudd visits upon the Australian people.

With an incubation period of 2-8 years for Mad Cow disease, will KRudd be around to accept responsibility for yet another of his deadly failed-policies ?

The Australian beef export industry is worth 7 billion dollars annually and now in jeopardy-along with 300,000 Australian jobs.

The human varient CJD resultant from human exposure to BSE infected meat is a fatal disease predicated on real suffering.

Independant expert John Mathews, said there are: "increasing concerns that a second wave of BSE infections in the UK may be on the horizon. ( a comforting thought? )

In BSE infected countries the tests performed at slaughter are not sensitive enough. Therefore they are not 100% accurate-which means the risk is real that the disease will find its way into Australia.

Meat pies made in Australia with the imported meat will not have to label as such. If the pie is made here it will say on the packaging: Made in Australia. No-one will know if they have eaten mad cow meat until it is to late.

Free Trade might be "free", it just isn't fair!

Our Position

2010-02-23T19:53:00.000-08:00

We publish here the full version of a letter published recently in the Wagga Wagga Daily Advertiser. We felt that the full version should be read by our friends ( Ed. )

I am saddened that the materials published by Australia First do not come up to the high standards imposed by your correspondent, Mr. Fletcher ( DA Feb 17 ). Having read his paean of hate, I wonder why he should bother to criticise us ?

He happily reports that our websites are "blocked" by "service providers" ( read; certain libraries and public access internet ). So much for the former conduct of those he decried - in Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union etc. The multiculturalist advocates are obviously the ones in fear.

Indeed, we are in the stage of our party growth not a frameworked structure, but our cause springs from eternal Australian political traditions. Our economic and social policy is in the tradition of the former labour movement and the names of Jack Lang, Frank Anstey and Ben Chifley travel with us.

Mr. Fletcher said that the old One Nation was no victim of conspiracy, but of internal fundraising methods. Really ? Perhaps a Commission of Inquiry was needed to get to the shadowy world of "Australians For Honest Politics" which was behind the Hanson Trial and which the Opposition Leader is still very silent about. Yet, I can assure Mr. Fletcher, we are not One Nation, but a hardier beast.

I say that Mr. Fletcher's letter reveals much about a refugee advocate: attempts to confuse certain migrant arrivals with others, an assertion there are powerful groups we would not dare to antagonise and hence the claim we pick on the unfortunate; allusions to personal superiority and victimhood.

Mr Fletcher might remember the words of Arthur Calwell who said that people living under injustice should not consider migrating to Australia, but struggle to right the wrongs of their own lands. And since then, the "refugee" population has just exploded. I would say that to end poverty, injustice and war, it is right for some to take up the gun themselves.

Dr. Jim Saleam
Chairman
Australia First party ( NSW branch )

It's Truck Week ! To All Our Australian Truckies/National Heroes. You Are Greatly Appreciated. Have A Happy And Safe Truck Week. From Australia First.

2010-02-22T21:14:00.000-08:00

PUT AUSTRALIA AND AUSTRALIANS FIRST!

2010-02-22T00:58:00.000-08:00

WE PLEDGE TO IMPLEMENT THESE POLICIES.

This is a draft election policy for Australia First party in the 2010 Federal poll and for subsequent polls. The final version is yet to be approved. Our general programme is set out in the "Eight Core Policies" of the party; these policies are in accordance with these statements of position. What appears below is an electoral and community programme for action. It may be used as local circumstances permit in tandem with any purely local issue of community significance. Such policies may be added to if they are in accordance with the Eight Core Policies that guarantee the unity of the party around the idea of "Australia First".

ELEVEN POINTS FOR ACTION

Australia First Party stands in this election with a programme for action and change for our country. Any Australia First representative elected is pledged to advocate these policies. The party is pledged to motivate the community generally to support these key demands to secure Australia's identity, independence and freedom..

1. We demand that YOU the people should be represented in the parliments and not be victims of cynical, corrupt, and foreign-loyal party machines.

2. We demand the Implementation of citizens` Initiated Referendum and Voters` Recall of parlimentarians, so that you the people can propose the laws and get rid of unresponsive parlimentarians.

3. We demand accountability for all politicians: for all those who have failed and corrupted Australia, sold the country to foreign states and agencies, or devoted themselves to globalisation; we pledge to nationalize their personal property and deny them parlimentary pensions and benefits.

4. We demand the promotion and rebuilding of Australian manufacturing and other enterprise and thence guarantee - Australian jobs for Australian workers.

5. We demand the re-instatement of the Commonwealth Bank as originally intended to limit interest rates to a minimum charge and to eliminate the private control of the nation's credit.

6. We demand the control of currency exchange rates to end speculation in the national currency and resources.

7. We demand the reform of taxation, its simplification to end the exemptions for the speculators, the multinationals and the super-rich.

8. We demand an end to foreign ownership and control of Australian real estate and Australian resources.

9. We demand: the end of all immigration for a long period on environmental, cultural, ethnic and security grounds; the repudiation of all treaties on refugees; the end of contract labour; the end of residency for foreign students; the end of multiculturalism.

10. We demand that the Australian transport industry be freed of bureaucratic control with the end of world-parity-pricing for fuel, the creation of an Australian fuel industry with a domestic fuel price and with public ownership of all roads and abolition of tolls.

11. We demand protection for Australian farmers by the provision of a guaranteed national market and pricing system, such that all food necessary to sustain the Australian People may be grown in Australia and regional Australia and its lifestyle be maintained.

Published "Without Fear Nor Favour".

2010-02-20T17:00:00.001-08:00

THE EGALITARIAN SOCIETY (R. Johnson)

( We publish an article received by e-mail to our office today , it was contributed by a Riverina resident who has worked in social situations ).

Recent contributions to the Wagga Wagga Daily Advertiser from the pro-refugee lobby have been long on emotion; they have also vented their spleen that Australians should not come first in their own country.

Many of these people purport to be Christians and others are from political parties ( Greens, Labor ) and they say they are striving for social justice.

I would ask these Christians and social justice advocates to take time out to consider other disenfranchised groups within our society ie. those who have fallen down the list of moral worth in the mind of the do-good group. I will refer to one particular disadvantaged group.

Now I have worked in the Northern Territory and other outback places. I recall the Howard Government screaming from the rooftpos about the national crisis regarding the forgotten Aborigines. Up to then, welfare was thrown at them and all was supposed to cure itself.

We still see a shameful situation today even after the so called Government intervention in Aboriginal affairs in the Territory. And I note these problems are just as bad in some areas that have had no attention at all. We note that exploitation of children by pedophiles is still common place; we note drug and alcohol abuse; we note petrol, solvent and glue sniffing, resulting in a mental health crisis; yet inadequate mental health intervention; we see families in a perpetual state of abuse and violence.

Do the refugee advocates really care for the Aborigines? I suspect not.

As it stands these Australians are in no mans land, without hope. There is no place for them in a country of open borders. Whatever is left of their culture will be swept away.

I challenge these so called Christians and others to accept if they have any faith in Jesus, they should also accept the needs and concerns of these forgotten communities, is just as valuable as their pet cause of letting aliens into this stressed land.

To go one step further, maybe one academic do-gooder who joined the Daily Advertiser debate, Dr. Strong ( a social scientist in the world of academia ), can furnish us with some real statistics regarding the plight of these forgotten Australians.

As I certainly wouldn't like to be labelled as someone with racist leanings, I must bring to the debate the reality of injustice within our society. I would challenge those do-gooders in their ivory towers to accompany me on my next tour of duty to remote locations in need; then, come down a few back lanes in our great cities where we shall comfort the unwanted, un-needed and forgotten groups of Australian people.

Some people need to come down from the clouds and wake up and smell the coffee. It may be a long way down to the back lanes of our cities and the riverbeds of the outback from their ivory towers, where they judge all others; but you never know, they just might learn something, or understand what Jesus really meant and how Jesus felt forsaken on the cross.

We note the pontifications of the so called do-gooder groups who tell us they are driven by their love of God and they are merely doing the work of God etc. I find all this a little hard to believe. Yet they strike out at anyone else who comes along with concern for fellow Australians, quite bizarre! The truth of the matter is these refugees and others have far more assistance, services and advocacy lobbies than these forgotten Australians ever had-or ever will have. We need to get things in perspective.

I note finally, Rudd's "closing the gap" agenda, regarding Indigenous affairs. A Productivity Commission report into Indigenous disadvantage revealed there had been no improvement in 80 per cent of the economic and social catagories examined-when it came to child abuse and imprisonment, the situation was actually getting worse rather than better.

Disadvantaged "indigenous" European-Australians are in a dire situation also. What are the refugee and so called social justice advocates doing regarding the plight of these people ? Do these people fall within their Christian outreach ? Are these people not also our "neighbours" who we are commanded to love as ourselves ?

FOOTNOTE:
I do hope the assertions of Weekend Advertiser ( Opinion 20.2.10 ) that "The Media Should Publish Without Fear Or Favour", is a genuine reflection of its commitment to the public. If not, then the natural course of history and democracy are hijacked by prejudice and exclusive vested interset groups.

It is with this concern I forward for publication to Australia First my article "The Egalitarian Society" ( R. Johnson, Wagga Wagga ).

Contract Labour Is Cheap Labour And It Can Now "Legally" Flood Australia!

2010-02-14T00:33:00.000-08:00

AUSTRALIAN WORKERS: It Is Time To Fight !

It is now official. Contract labour can be employed ahead of Australian labour, at a cheaper price and there is nothing the Federal Government will do about it. Not only that, the Federal Government says that allowing this to happen is part of the free trade deals that Australia has signed.

Contract labour enters Australia as temporary visa holders. Some aquire that right as part of the overseas student rort; others are part of a mobile pool of labour hired by foreign body-hire companies for employment in Australia. Strong evidence exists that many of these companies are fraught with criminal overtones. Others ( like the Chinese or Vietnamese ones ) are state agencies.

Australian workers cannot look, either to Tony Abbott's Liberal Party ( which started the whole Section 456 and 457 Visa scam ), or to the Greens ( who favour the "rights" of these parasites )-for any sympathy. They must now look to themselves for strength and to a new party like Australia First for political action.

The contract labourers who now number over 70,000 persons are joined by up to 60,000 illegal workers. Numbers have been rising steadily.

The truth revealed.

The truth has been revealed by a report issued by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union ( CFMEU ) and to be launched within days. The report, which analyses recent government statements on the visa scheme, finds that Australia is not requiring employers to prefer Australian over foreign workers in hiring-or in retention in case of redundancies. Nor can Australia freely change the list of occupations for which the visas can be granted, nor cap the numbers of visa holders in a particular year. The number on the scheme is set to explode. The CFMEU has approached the Immigration Minister, Chris Evans, in letters and in meetings. Union leader John Sutton said: "What they are saying is that their hands are tied by international obligations under the World Trade Organisation and the Doha round of trade talks. This report has found that that is not the case. We are not bound, but the Rudd Government is totally mesmerised by being seen to support a free-trade agenda internationally.Indeed, all Australian governments are hitched to the globalisers` dream of a borderless world-borderless for goods, capital and workers.

Senator Evans has replied to the CFMEU: "We cannot create legal obstacles for overseas workers or introduce preferential treatment for Australian workers without compromising our international trading position and legal obligations."

Essentially, the globalist dream comes first.

The minimum salary or wage for a visa worker is sometimes 60% of that of an Australian worker.

If employers are no longer even compelled to demonstrate the "need" conclusively, they could sack current workforces on certain pretexts-and rehire aliens.

It is strongly rumoured this may occur at the Burrangong Meat Works in Young.

Cheap labour scourge built the Old Labour Movement.

Obviously, unions like the CFMEU may be compelled to fight the government.

But contract labour involves many unions and occupational representative groups. Mr. "Bunny" Brown of the Australian Long Distance Drivers Association said today:

"Contract labour, hired by the big transport companies, has been common. It denies many ordinary Australian drivers a job and it increases the profitability of the large companies against owner drivers. We have noticed large numbers of contract drivers from Sudan and South East Asia. Some come on trainee schemes and we have been told the government subsidises the scheme. These drivers are not as hounded by the authorities to comply with regulations as are we."

Originally, cheap labour, drawn from the South Pacific and from China, was a factor in fuelling the original Australian trade union movement over 100 years ago. It was a cardinal rule of policy that cheap labour would be refused access to Australia.

All this changed with the globalising "vision" which grew to dominance by 1990. The availability of foreign contract labour-and now even domestic contract labour which enters under the guise of "refugee" and overseas student programs-is too much of a temptation to the dominant class.

Similar problems build similar movements. It is obvious enough that the Labor Party and it's unions are no longer any sort of representative of the working population. However, for Australia First, it is the original model of a united people's movement, which the former Labor Party grew out of-to which we must turn.

People's Action.

The threat of cheap labour may drive tens of thousands of Australian workers into unemployment and continue to deny employment to those who lost jobs in the current economic downturn.

The cheap labour curse is a recipe for unlawful conduct. Australia First could not legally condone those who might break the law in wildcat strikes or actions against such unconscionable scabs, but we could understand the frustration and the anger of people denied a job to support their families.

Whatever occurs, it is time for Australian workers to fight back howsoever they can-through any union or association which is prepared to go the distance industrially and through Australia First, the only political party prepared to say what needs to be said on the political front.

In unity, we will have the Australian people's movement that can ensure Australian Jobs For Australian Workers !

Australian History.

2010-02-13T16:41:00.000-08:00

The Editor visited Jerilderie last weekend, to join with other Australians celebrating some of our great Australian history- the Ned Kelly letter event.

It was reported to be an outstanding weekend. The Jerilderie Council published the following:

THE NED KELLY RAID TRAIL:

When Ned came to town in 1879 he was already infamous for the Stringy Bark Creek incident, he was an outlaw with a bounty on his head and orders to "be shot on sight".

Yet he visited Jerilderie in spite of a vow by the NSW Police that he would never cross the border; daringly relieved the bank of NSW of over 2000 pounds, chopped down the telegraph poles, locked the local police in their own cells, booked up the cost of shodding his horses to the NSW Police whilst parading in police uniform, held over 30 hostages and shouted the bar in just 3 short days.

What many readers may be unaware of is that the real purpose for his visit was to publish what is now known as "The Jerilderie Letter" at the Office of the Jerilderie & Urana Gazette. This was his manifesto - an account of his actions, his side of the story, highlighting his plight and the corruption of the law.

Unfortunately for Ned the printer was not home and Living, the Bank of NSW's Teller, promised to hold the letter in safe custody to be passed onto the printer upon his return. However this copy of the letter never surfaced and was not to be printed until over a century later, when it was donated to the State Library as a National Treasure by Bronwyn Binns, wife of Ned Kelly historian Ian Jones.

One of the most appealing facets of this Letter is that it contains a type of humour that sits well with most Australians, however its real worth is that it gives us an insight into the real Ned Kelly - beyond the myth.

The Ned Kelly Raid Trail allows you to walk in the footsteps of the Ned Kelly gang over that fateful weekend. Six of the sites are still extant giving us a small glimpse of the town as it once stood. You can explore the Jerilderie Letter whilst you walk along the
Raid Trail and perhaps you can make the decision -

Ned Kelly hero or outlaw ?

Of course, modern Australian nationalists have no trouble answering the question. We record the resistance of a Patriot, one who noted the oppression of the poor and the corruption of the authorities of the time.

Nothing substantial has changed regarding the abuses of power over the years.

We must resist the traitor class of today, as the patriots throughout our great Australian history have done!

As this great weekend of Australian history at Jerilderie ( Feb 6,7,and 8th 2010 ), gave witness, not a refugee or multiculti advocate in sight. They have no interest in our great Australian history, as it is Australias future they aim to steal. Perhaps next time, they'll be bussed in.

It just confirms there is no such thing as a multiculti society. There is merely a mass of opposing groups connected only by a globalist economy. The real cost here arises from the European-Australian de-culturisation agenda.

A Big Welcome To Australia First ACT

2010-02-13T02:11:00.000-08:00

Yet another blog for the ever increasing network of Australia First.

YOUNG ABATTOIR : Letter From A Worker

2010-02-07T01:35:00.000-08:00

We publish a letter from a worker at Burrangong Meat Works.

The workers were informed last week they do not have jobs and were terminated without notice- over 300 of them. In addition, the meat works claim they do not have any money to pay us.

It is no doubt big news in your region. Your suspicion of it re- opening with contract labour is a possibility. The jobs are unlikely to go to our people- obviously.

The meat works in Wagga, Cargill ( a multi- national company ), use contract labour; we note a lot of Chinese contract labour, and Sudanese labour. They have a heap of Sudanese out there, most who can't speak a word of English. This brings me to work- cover industrial law.

In some of the duties that contract labourers are engaged in at Cargill ( and I'm sure it's the same at other abattoirs around the country ),Workcover requires certain safety regulations to be followed by law. Certain required tickets, including OH&S, forklift licences etc, have to be completed and passed in English only. A friend who works at a local training facility for these required tickets, commented: "Cargill had sent a Sudanese man to get a forklift license but he couldn't speak a word of English. I had to send him away; what do Cargill think it is sending these people here ?; they know Workcover requires these tests to be completed and passed in English only- that is the law."

Maybe this is another angle you can attack some of these contract labour lovers on. The companies should be audited by Workcover, to reveal any breeches of the industrial law. It is a litigation minefield.

These industrial laws apply to our industries. The construction industry, the transport industry etc. All places of work have a duty of care and a chain of responsibility regarding Workplace safety. The companies are liable in the absence of these requirements.

I know the transport industry is highly scrutinised, audited and these laws are regularly enforced to the letter of the law.

Now, what about the illegal immigrants who have been turning up all over the Riverina and beyond ? How can illegal aliens have any of these required tickets ? How could they have OH&S which is a mandatory requirement to even set foot on most of these industries sites ?What about the Sydney construction company, that was caught last month by the immigration department with the illegal immigrant gyprockers ? They rounded them all up. How could those people have had required white or blue cards issued by Workcover ?

You should demand a public enquiry into these practices, and demand companies in breech of Workcover industrial law be prosecuted.

What we have noticed is a rapid increase in contract labour and refugee labour, in all industry. It is getting out of hand in country NSW and I'm sure other places around Australia.

We are also concerned what will happen to safety in the workplace and quality control, not to mention our prospects of getting a job and a decent wage.

I see that Australia First says it's an ethnic cleansing agenda, targeting European- Australian workers. This would be a good time for your people to stir it up in Young. I suspect many of the jobs on some farms in Young are tied up in contract labour. While people's emotions are raw over this situation at Burrangong Meats, we need some comment from Australia First to explain to these people what might have happened to their jobs.

The receivers of Burrangong Meatworks, think they can pull the wool over the workers` eyes. Like we wouldn't have enough intelligence to realise what is going on! They have appointed some spin doctor to address our concerns tomorrow ( or tell us more lies ), but that attitude is just making us more determined. We have to pay our bills and feed our children.

I would appreciate if you could contact me to discuss what you think is going on, or what we should do.

( Name, address, and phone number supplied but withheld by request ).

Dr. Short's 'Christian Advocacy" For Refugees And Contract Labour Is Still Propaganda By Another Name: We Reply.

2010-02-05T03:00:00.000-08:00

Dr. J. Saleam / N. Favorito

Dr. Mark Short of St Paul's Anglican Church has criticised Australia First Party in the Daily Advertiser ( Wagga Wagga ) ( February 4 ). He has said that we have scapegoated outsiders and have behaved in a way that divides and so forth. He maintains he has upheld his Christian ethics as showing the true way to integrate refugees into this society and to address the problems of contract labour.

Dr. Short said:

"It seems our church is also of interest to the party as we received some comment in one of the first entries on their blog. Apparently it was considered noteworthy that we welcome people of all backgrounds, including African, into our common life. This surprises me. We are just a normal Christian church who believes that when Jesus gave us a command to "love your neighbour as yourself" he didn't add a footnote restricting its application to people of certain races, ages or backgrounds."

When a church interferes in politics - and the refugee program is politics and not some exercise in secular social concern - then criticism follows. The Christianity Dr Short puts up here is different in form from the one our forefathers, having embraced as it has, the new social agendas of the Australian liberal elites. We do not agree that Jesus preached unconditional acquiescence in injustice nor that love of one's neighbour implied extirpating one's own identity to win a brownie point in heaven. Our forefathers were Christians when they enacted the famous White Australia Policy and we doubt they are in hell.

In our view, there are Christians and Christians. Dr. Short's interpretation of scripture is simply - not ours. Nor is it that of a wide sector of Australians.

Dr. Short has raised an important point:

"My personal concern with the extreme right is that they offer inadequate solutions to real issues. Take contract labour, for example. If there is exploitation taking place in the system surely we need to address it directly, rather than scapegoat the very group ( immigrants and refugees ) who on Dr Saleam's own account are the victims rather than the causes of such exploitation."

Dr. Short is dead right. These contract labourers are, in one way, victims too. They do jobs underpriced, and are ripped off by their own and by unscrupulous employers, suffer long periods away from their loved ones and live in poor conditions. Our Australian "capitalist" system lets that happen.

We could ask, if we may be so bold, why such fine folks ever allowed themselves to be in a situation where they would disadvantage us ? Now, they might be desperate in their own way, but they still chose to come and effectively cheat us.

They are no saints either.

But we will not allow Dr. Short to suggest that we are blaming them alone. We are not. The great sin of contract labour is commited by those who profit by it and the Australian State which allows it to be.

Dr. Short said:

"Surely we need to ensure they have the language and other skills to be aware of their rights and obligations. Surely we need to support their emerging leaders so they can contribute to Australia through a wide range of community groups and professions."

Yes, but despite the lies of the union bureaucrats, they are cheap labour ultimately. They are easy labour and they undermine our system of labour - which was the very aim of the capitalists behind it. It matters not what skills they have with our language. Further, we are not interested in their emerging leaders. What ? We thought they were supposed to go home ? Contribute to what? To breaking what little is left of our trade union workforce and the achievements of our great labour movement of a centuary ago?

Dr. Short said:

"This is what we are doing and many others are seeking to do, and if Dr. Saleam wants to partner with us he's welcome to come down to Wagga and join me for a cuppa and chat. I'm sure he knows where to find me. Treating a person or group as outsiders and scapegoating them offers a tantalising but temporary relief for a community experiencing conflict or stress. Temporary, because in the end the real issues have not been addressed and they simply re - emerge."

No, no Dr. Short. We want the contract labourers gone - gone home. We want their jobs filled by a re - unionised Australian workforce. We want Centerlink unemployment rules restructured and we want university and TAFE rules recrafted such that Australian students can earn an income in regional Australia on a part time basis.

The real issue is globalisation and the loss of Australian economic independence. We know that. We want the protection of all Australian industry and the provision of a secure domestic market for the produce of Australian industry and labour.

No scapegoating here!

What we see in Dr. Short's criticism of Australia first - and in our reply - is that the battle lines are being drawn between those who think Australian and those who do not.

They may put it any way they like, but when they argue against us, these anti Australians create their own propaganda.

Dr. Short's church is engaged in justifying the unjustifiable and the culture busting of the Australian community in the Riverina. He seeks to impose not just contract labour, but "refugees" upon the area.

Let us conclude on this: we believe the treaties on refugees must be repudiated and refugees assisted to return home - with the intervention of the Australian military and other services in their homelands to facilitate their re - integration into their own countries.

We will go further. Certain Christians wish to "share" the bounties of Australia. Okay. We might pledge to establish a fund for the re-settling of refugees - from the assets of their former advocates in Australia! The expropriation of the liberal do - good group is not "legal" as matters stand today; but Australia may decend to real political and social disorder long before the political victory of the nationalists. Indeed, that is fairly certain. At that future time all might be possible. We have no problem with such a radical solution because we understand that the liberal group in Australia, having fought us tooth and nail for decades, would continue to do so after our political victory. Not all are motivated as is Dr. Short by the love of Jesus. Perhaps someone might write that we intend to scapegoat the liberal clergy too? Like the sometimes unquoted Jesus; we bring not peace - but a sword!

WHEN I RETURN FROM YOUNG!

2010-02-04T14:55:00.000-08:00

I am currently following closely the story in Young and the "sudden" closure of the abattoirs there.

The supposed sale of the abattoirs, that "fell" through, ( last minute ).

The "alleged" theft of 5 computer hard drives, from the office at Burrangong Meats , 3 days before the closure ?

No money to pay the Australian workers ?

A host of other curiosities, surrounding the abattoir.

Potential "new" buyers, on the horizon ?

We smell a rat !

Australia First will be keeping a close eye on developments, my editor is doing that job first hand.

Australia First wonders: will a "new" buyer, employ the redundant Australian workers ? Or is this another contract labour scam and was that the agenda all along ?

Let's hope the sacked workers get paid ? Good luck to the workers and we wish them well in attaining future employment, with proper wages and conditions. But in light of the ever - growing plague of the contract labour game, this could prove difficult.

All this on top of the recent closure of the Mudgee , Forbes, and Harden abattoirs. It is starting to form a curious pattern. Is it the begining of the end of Australian abattoir workers and Australian jobs, in country Australia.

Australia First outed Burrangong Meats about 7 years ago when they took to employing contract labour with all sorts of delicious subsidies provided because they were "refugees". This attack upon Young workers was even made subject of a telemovie which aired on SBS. The movie even took time to libel an Australia First leader for our opposition to the program.

Australia First warns the Young community to be very vigilant and to contact us with any news as to the fate of the abattoir.

Government "Blows Off - Shore Processing Budget"

2010-02-04T04:50:00.000-08:00

A FLOOD OF ASYLUM SEEKERS HAS BLOWN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S IMMIGRATION DETENTION BUDGET,

Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison said the Government had been forced to more than double the money it allocated in the budget for offshore immigration "processing".

"In the May budget the Rudd Government had allocated $125 million for offshore processing", he said in a statement on Thursday.

"However additional estimates figures reveal the Government is now asking for another $132 million for this work, an increase of more than 100 per cent".

The claim comes on top of the arrival of another boatload of "asylum seekers" in Australia's northern waters on Thursday, and fears the detention centre at Christmas Island will be unable to cope with further arrivals.

Initial indications suggest 89 passangers and four crew were on board.

It is the 10th "asylum seeker" boat to be intercepted this year! ( with 602 people on board ). Bringing the total number of "asylum seekers" on Christmas Island to over 1800 people.

"Barely a day after 89 "asylum seekers" were flown to the mainland in a futile effort to reduce overcrowding on Christmas Island, another 89 "asylum seekers" plus three crew are on their way to take their place! ",Mr. Morrison said.

Christmas Island sure is a "factory producing mental illness". If you are the Australian tax payer footing the bill, you would be feeling quite mentally ill by now.

All that Australian money could be doing a lot for Australias run down hospital system, Australian jobs, Housing etc. No wonder KRudd can't afford to pay for the care of our elderly Australian folk.

Mr. Morrison's comments
via: news. ninemsn
4.2.10

UPDATE:
Australia First predicts: The Merak, with more than 240 Tamils on board, refusing to disembark at a Javanese port, where it has remained for over 4 months, will be headed for Australia by the end of the month.As the Indonesians have lost patience with the issue ( as previously predicted by Australia First ).

Roll up roll up, everyones a winner, except the Australian tax payer and Australian identity.

5.2.10

ONE NATION LEADER SIGNALS SELL - OUT TO THE LIBERALS ON IMMIGRATION, POPULATION AND NATIONAL IDENTITY ?

2010-01-31T21:24:00.000-08:00

A prominent executive member of the One Nation party, Mr Bob Vinnicombe, has signalled in recent public material, that he would sell out to the Liberal Party.

If Mr. Vinnicombe is accepting as "spot on" Tony Abbott's recent deceptive mouthings on Australia's immigration and population requirements and our national identity, then he is encouraging a blurring of the One Nation's policy integrity with a pure propaganda line from the establishment party.

What do we mean ?

In an Australia Day speech, Tony Abbott said a lot about the failure of infrastructure to accommodate immigration, about the need for a population debate, about community concerns with bad immigrants who criticise our ways - and so on. But he also said that he was in favour of a larger population, high immigration and refugee intakes.

His quibbles seem to be precise numbers overall. Big bloody deal ! Where's the real difference with KRudd ?

However, we see from the One Nation representative, an attempt to separate the Abbott commentary into little pieces and "unite" with him on some of it. Once any "unity" is arrived at with an establishment party, the sucker party is turned into a satellite.

Mr. Vinnecombe has said on One Nation's behalf:

When he said, "the inescapable minimum that we insist upon is obedience to the law and it would help to bolster public support for immigration and acceptance of social diversity if more minority leaders were as ready to show mainstream Australian values the respect they demand for their own` most Australians, and the party that represents them, One Nation, will say spot on."

Really ? All this means that we continue to accept those who should not be allowed admission into Australia on the ultimate survivalist ground ( they differ from Australia's European population by ethnic and cultural factors! ) and on the other grounds that immigration has had its day on an ecological basis, that "diversity" is something to choke on to the point of cultural and social confusion - but we are supposed to insist the new colonisers "respect" our values ? what foolishnish is this ?

Mr. Vinnicombe has said on One Nation's behalf:

"When he said existing and planned infrastructure can hardly cope with the present population let alone the additional 14 million ( almost entirely due to immigration ) that the Prime Minister expects by 2050` and the rise of ethnic gangs and perceptions of ethnic street crime threaten the community understanding that migration should overwhelmingly a net benefit`, they'll say spot on again"

But Abbott's Liberals intend to keep high immigration and refugee intakes. They did not say, they never will say, that they will opt for anything else. They simply want to plan it better and select immigrants more carefully to avoid taking in the gangster elements. Big bloody deal ! Abbott is addressing how to hoodwink the community with "better" immigrants. He is not addressing whether the entire psycotic desire to boost Australia's population - should be abandoned. Why should anyone support him ?

Mr. Vinnicombe has said on One Nation's behalf:

"If this signals a possible about turn on policy by the Liberal Party, following their about turn on ETS, one Nation welcomes it and hopes it is followed by an about turn on policies like free trade on which the Liberals are at present equally misguided."

No, there is no "about turn on policy" by the Liberal Party on anything. There never will be.

The Liberal Party is just one face of a two - party - faced regime. The Liberal Party functions to deceive that it is an "opposition" to the "other" party. But both parties agree on all matters, because they are created and sustained by the same economic - political class. Yet, both play to their electoral and activist clients to convince them they matter and that they listen. It is part of a game which we call mistake as - democracy. For anyone in One Nation not to know this, would mean that he has abandoned reason.

From his press release published on One Nation website through to a letter to Griffith Area News ( Griffith where Australia First has recently been in the news over the contract labour scandal now engulfing that city ), Mr. Vinnicombe is clearly trying to impose a "me too" style on One Nation, which would make it a cheerleader to Abbott's deceitful policy ( it is a policy that tells the people what they might like to hear in loud tones, while it pushes the establishment agenda ). Playing "me too" or "we said it first", seldom gets anyone anywhere. It is desperate politics which leads to being used by someone else.

One Nation exists as a Federally regisered party, but is it now divided internally, between those who wish to follow in the Liberals` wake and those who would pursue independant policy ?

It is a cold fact that a faction directed by Mr. Vinnicombe has operated for a long time with very particular politic on things Islamic ( ie. to the point of very narrow focus ). It has overstated the Islamic problem in Australia as the main immigration problem. This has led to building alliances with Fred Nile's Christian Democratic Party, the Australian Christian Nation Association and the actual "conservative wing" of the Liberal Party itself in New South Wales. The focus on Islam by these groups hides their passion for increasing "Christian" immigration drawn from anywhere (particularly Middle Eastern countries ). Indeed, Fred Nile supports high immigration drawn from everywhere. These straight - jacket alliances centre on criticising Islam generally, whilst being truly "colour - blind" on immigration overall. They also involve themselves in a lot of false religion about Israel being an ally in a work struggle against Islam ( Israel is as much a problem as it seems to incite Moslem discord ), which supposedly obligates Christians to support it, even saying that is a fulfillment of Bible prophecy.

It is easy to go down that road. Meetings. Friends. Good Press. Talk to others about a great future. This is fantasy politics.

Many people in One Nation reject this. A larger amorphous group inside the party has struggled towards nationalist politics. Many One Nation members have pondered all this Islam / Israel stuff and observe that it's hatched by people who tie back to the Liberal Party.

So, are the latest comments on Abbott part of the process by which faction ties One Nation to the Liberal Party ?

What is the future ? It is not for Australia First Party to lecture One Nation. But we ask: what if Abbott continues with his rhetoric ? Just as Howard did at the time of the Tampa Affair in 2001 - and even much earlier in 1988 when he invented the "One Australia" idea to run counter to multiculturalism ? Remember: Howard flew in the Tampa "refugees" after the tough talk of the 2001 election and his criticism of multiculturalism never, ever, involved a critique of developing Australia as a multi - ethnic society. Will there be those who urge an alliance with the Liberal Party, an entirely delusional thing in fact, but who merge together with the Liberal Party on the ground ?

Australia First Party says openly that if these alien elements seize control of One Nation, or aquire a debilitating influence, the nationalist minded within its ranks are always welcome to join us. Our party rejects compromise. The Australia First Party will fight unreservedly for the Australian people in the struggle for possession of its own state !

PETER SPENCER WILL SPEAK: PARLIAMENT HOUSE CANBERRA, Feb. 2 : Australia First Urges Support For This Rally, But Warns Against National Party Speakers.

2010-01-31T18:00:00.000-08:00

Peter Spencer electrified Australia with his solitary pole protest in December and January. He endured a fifty two day hunger strike in defence of his private property against a State grab disguised as a law to protect native vegetation.

Peter Spencer is now recovering with family. His doctor and medical team are continuing to monitor his recovery.

As he builds - up strength, he remains resolute in his determination to persue the issues of farmers and all Australian's loss of property rights. Peter and his many supporters will continue to raise awareness and pressure all levels of Government, starting with a series of rallies and public meetings throughout the whole of Australia. Spencer's first objective remains - the Federal Governments must:

Establish a Royal Commission to inquire into how the 3 tiers of Government, Local, State and Federal removed the land rights of Australian farming families so as to enable the Australian Government to meet the entire 'Kyoto Commitment' on greenhouse gasses and by so doing breached the Constitution, and pay those effected farmers on just terms for the "TAKINGS" .

In an Australia Day address to supporters, Spencer said "democracy is not set in concrete, and evolutionary change does not guarantee that our freedoms come up with the sun", also quoting Thomas Jefferson "our liberties are only guaranteed by our own eternal vigilance".

Preperations are being made for the PETER SPENCER TOWER OF HOPE RALLY FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS IN CANBERRA on the 2nd February . Peter Spencer is monitoring preparations for the rally and is grateful for the support provided by NSW farmers Association who have undertacken a supporting publicity campaign and are providing free bus transport from around NSW to Canberra .

That is excellent . But beware of National Party goons bearing gifts .

Other speakers to the rally will include Barnaby Joyce, Shadow Finance Minister, Kevin Humphries, State Nationals Member for Barwon, Shadow Minister for Healthy Lifestyles, Shadow Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Shadow Minister for Western NSW, Peter Dimbrowsky, Mayor of the Hills Shire, Peter King, Charles Armstrong, President NSW Farmer's Association .

Australia First Party has absolutely zero confidence that any of the National Party parlimentarians or supporters who may attend or even speak, have real support for Peter Spencer's cause at all . After all, wimpering remarks aside that are meant to lull farmers back to sleep, the National Party has presided over every aspect of the rural side of the globalisation program. The aim of these National Party toads is to get up and mouth off about farmers` concerns, get their votes and their donations and derail anything wothwhile.

The National Party betrayals of our farmers are legendary. But still idiots line up to get fleeced, so be on guard !

Details of the PETER SPENCER TOWER OF HOPE PROPERTY RIGHTS RALLY are:

WHEN: - - Tuesday 2nd Febuary, 2010

TIME: - - From 10.00 am

WHERE: - -Meeting point will be Magna Carta Place,
Queen Victoria Terrace, Canberra

Peter Spencer's 52 day long hunger strike has brought unprecedented attention to the demise of the Australian people's secure property rights. However the fight has only just begun - your attendance and participation in this historical rally on this day will help send a clear message to every Australian politician - this is an issue which will not go away - you need to act.

The "Indonesian Solution" Is "No Solution".

2010-01-28T01:39:00.000-08:00

The KRudd Government is sitting on a time bomb and the clock is ticking.

Why ? There is no Indonesian Solution for "asylum seeker" immigration. The disturbing events playing out in a Javanese port, where the vessel Merak has been in dock and held up for months ( well before the Oceanic Viking fiasco ), with Tamil "asylum seekers" on board who refuse to disembark in Indonesia and who demand to be brought to Australia.

The Indonesian Goverment is losing paitence with this issue and wants the Merak out of their port. The Indonesian Government has requested the Australian Government resolve the standoff immediately as they did with the Tamils on board the Oceanic Viking.

Of course, that is not in the true Australian national interest either. These people should be returned to Sri Lanka.

The KRudd Government has told the Indonesians that it is not Australia's problem, but Indonesia's problem and Australia will not be dealing with the situation.

Yesterday, the Indonesians have arrested 2 Australian refugee activists and a Canadian, confiscated their passports and held them for 12 hours at a police station. Indeed, these agitators may have been behind a lot of refugee immigration to Australia.

Has KRudd forgotten that Indonesia is a large Muslim country sitting on Australia's doorstep ? The KRudd Government will at its own peril- and our peril- continue a fruitless provocation of a close neighbour, which has tried to assist the KRudd Government previously in dealing with the illegal immigration problem.

Let us play "scenarios" What if KRudd ultimately jeopardised the security of Australia, such that the next boats to arrive in Australian waters were loaded with the Indonesian military.

What will KRudd do ? Send out the one submarine it has in its fleet, the only one that is actually operational ? Will that stave off hostile Indonesians heading for Australian shores ?The Indonesian Solution is no solution. The situation is out of control.

Note: It has been revealed, Australia doesn't have the capacity to protect its borders- and not just from refugees !

With a large number of our experienced military personnel deployed overseas, there is a shortage of experienced service people left here in Australia. It was reported last week that Australia has deployed a contingent of the Army Reserve to Afghanastan. This is the first time this has happened since the Vietnam war. And once again- it is not our war !

Organised Crime Targets Universities :

2010-01-28T01:06:00.000-08:00

IF ORGANISED CRIME HAS INFILTRATED THE OVERSEAS STUDENT INDUSTRY, THEN AUSTRALIA FIRST WONDERS ABOUT CONTRACT LABOUR IN THE RIVERINA ?

Organised Crime is believed to have infiltrated foreign student education.
.Fraud involving student visas
.People smuggling operations
.Bogus students being placed

Australia's $16 billion foreign education sector has been infiltrated by organised crime.

A confidential Immigration Department report reveals nearly 40 per cent of detected fraud involving student visas last year was aimed at universities.

Previously the problem was thought to be confined mainly to the private colleges and language schools being the prefered target of people smuggling operations.

But the report to Immigration by consultants Ernst & Young, obtained under the Freedom Of Information laws by The Australian, shows universities and vocational colleges are increasingly being exploited to place bogus students.

The Ernst & Young report showed that in June 10 months to April last year, higher education accounted for 39 per cent of student visas refused where fraud was involved. But it was higher in the 12 months to June, where higher education accounted for more than half, 53 per cent of such cases.

"The majority of fraud risks stem from higher education and vocational education and training," the report found.

It is said Australian Immigration and Education officers in diplomatic posts were having to work with foreign Governments` law enforcement agencies regarding "increased levels of organised fraud".

This amounts to an admission that organised crime is targeting the student visa to shoehorn illegal migrants into the country as fee- paying students.

The revelations will concern university leaders, who have blamed most student migration fraud on less rigoursly regulated private colleges and institutes.

The Department of Immigration and Citizenship declined to say whether it knew organised crime was using education and migration agents for migration fraud.

"The Department is concerned with any type of visa fraud, whether it involves overseas organised crime elements or not," a DIAC spokesman said.

Taken from The Australian Newspaper Jan 2010.

Australians Housing Hell !

2010-01-24T00:43:00.000-08:00

In the Melbourne Herald Sun ( Jan 23 ), there is a report confirming the existence of a disturbing trend in house prices. The paper said they were rising on average $766 dollars a day.

An Australian woman explained her experiences trying to get into the housing market, about the hundreds of thousands of dollars sought by vendors for uninhabitable dumps, dishonest /sleazy real estate agents, crooked wheeling and dealing.

One real estate agent announced that in one area of Melbourne 80 % of houses purchased were by Chinese buyers.

There were parents stating their children are not moving out of the family home as they cannot afford housing. One parent said: "I look across the dinner table at my children and I'm looking at adults and I realise they are never going to move out".

Also noted was the population increasing in Melbourne by 1700 people per week- more than double the increase in population than 4 years ago. There is a problem in the shortage of supply in existing housing stock and a lack of new dwellings coming onto the market.

So are Abbott and KRudd still in favour of "come one come all" immigration and does Abbotts policy on the enviroment and climate change include mowing down more trees to accommodate all these settlers ? Of course anyone who raises these questions will quickly be labelled racist !

Where to from here ?

WAKE UP AUSTRALIA

2010-01-21T21:09:00.000-08:00

We noted a piece by Monash University academic, Dr Bob Birrell, in The Australian, July 22 2009.

Dr Birrell, who is an influential critic of the overseas student industry market has told us that some 40,000 former overseas students, with little chance of winning permanent residency, have been allowed to overstay on temporary or bridging visas, but with full work rights.

These ex -students are ripe for exploitation ( sound familiar? ) on the cheap labour market. They also compete for housing with Australian youth and also with the refugee/ low skilled migrant groups, fuelling tensions also amongst the intrusive groups. But as ever, working class Australians are heading to the bottom of the pile.

DAILY TELEGRAPH REPORTS HOME PRICES SURGE!

The Daily Telegraph reported, that John Edwards of Property Monitor Residex, said recently: "increased skilled migration is pushing up house prices".

Sydney is already getting too expensive for "ordinary" families and the problem is set to get worse. Clearly, these skilled migrants can out bid most people, consequently inflating prices. Between cashed- up skilled migrants and overseas investors, the Aussie dream is evapourating fast.

This is just the begining! Some argue that the median house price is set to hit one million dollars by 2020.

Some may relish the notion that by 2020 they may be "millionaires". Yet this sort of wealth is an illusion- like during the Hitler era when ordinary workers had to push wheelbarrows full of money down the street- just to buy a loaf of bread.

Who said immigration is good for Australia ?

Refugee Reps Make Poor Case Against Australia First.

2010-01-21T20:32:00.000-08:00

Sudanese "representative", John Moi, has attacked Australia First via the Wagga Wagga Daily Advertiser. We are more than a little disappointed with his attitude. Maybe if he is the concerned, "well respected" elder of the Sudanese community in Wagga ( as he claims ), then perhaps he could do something positive to reign in the increasing violence from youth and others from within his group ( ie Afro-American style gang culture which we observe around town ).

Surely refugee advocate Erwin Richter and Councillor Ray Goodlass would be only to willing to help him show some iniciative, rather than them all singing the same old "the white racists have done me wrong" song.

This is starting to become like a broken record.

It seems to Australia First that these people all need to look outside their loop and see what is happening in contemporary Australia.

LONG LIVE THE SOUTHERN CROSS ! Australia First Replies To Culture - Buster Warwick Thornton

2010-01-21T20:03:00.000-08:00

Warwick Thornton, a filmmaker, who has been chosen as the Northern Territory's nomination for Australian of the Year, has launched a vicious attack upon the emblem of the Southern Cross.

He said: "I'm starting to see that star system symbol being used as a very racist nationalistic emblem - and that is seriously worrying me." We don't want to turn the Southern Cross into a swastika - that's bloody important."

It is a fact that young Australians carry the National Flag and the Eureka Flag at parties, sports` events and public occassions; many have tattooed themselves with the star - constellation, or the cross design. The symbol has truly become a tribal expression of Australian Identity. No wonder it has been assailed by this traitor class representative - just as Australia Day approaches.

What the globalising, cultureless, masters of the geographic space they call Australia, fear above all else, is the emergence of a movement that openly proclaims a native identity for the European population here. This population has that identity, which stretches back to the first articulation of "Australianness" at the Eureka Stockade and then through to the radical nationalist upsurges at Lambing Flat ( 1861 ), the Barcaldine Revolt ( 1891 ) and further on into the great achievements of ANZAC and Kokoda. In the lost deserts of multiculturalism, the Australian People are re - finding themselves. Against those trying to bust our culture in the suburbs, all social institutions and in rural Australia, a spirit of resistance is building. The Southern Cross is the symbol of resistance.

A political movement must be built. No wonder Warwick Thornton prattles on about the swastika. He is trying to build a Great Wall between the mass of awakening "tribal" Australian people ( especially the youth ) and any movement which builds the nationalist resistance. Smearing the Southern Cross is an act of desecration.

On Australia Day, the Australia First Party will be active. Other patriotic groups will also come out publicaly to proclaim their Australianity.

The National Flag and the Eureka Flag will be held high.

"FLAG OF THE SOUTHERN CROSS" ( Henry Lawson 1887 )

2010-01-21T03:45:00.000-08:00

Sons of Australia, be loyal and true to her-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!
Sing a loud song to be joyous and new to her-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!
Stain'd with blood of the diggers who died by it,
Fling out the flag to the front, and abide by it-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!

See how the toadies of Austral throw dust o'er her-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!
We who are holding her honour in trust for her-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!
See how the yellow-men next to her lust for her,
Sooner or later to battle we must for her-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross.

Beg not of England the right to preserve ourselves,
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross,
We are the servants best able to serve ourselves,
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross.
What are our hearts for, and what are our hands for?
What are we nourished in these southern lands for?
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross.

Shall we in fear of the Dragon or Bruin now
Keep back the flag of the Southern Cross?
Better to die on a field of red ruin now,
Under the flag of the Southern Cross.
Let us stand out like the gallant Eureka men-
Give not our country the sorrow to seek her men-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!

See how the loyal are storing up shame for us
Under the light of the Southern Cross.
Never! Oh! never be coward a name for us-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!
England's red flag will bring hatred and worse to it,
Murder and rapine hath brought a black curse to it;
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!

Have we not breasts for the bullets of thunderers?
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!
Have we not steel for the bosoms of plunderers?
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!
Prove ourselves worthy the land we inherit now,
Feed till the blazes the National spirit now!
fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!

Let us be bold, be it daylight or night for us-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!
Let us be firm - with our God and our right for us,
Under the flag of the Southern Cross!
Austral is fair, and the idlers in strife for her
Plunder her, sneer at her, suck the young life from her!
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!

Fling out the flag to the front, and abide by it-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!
Stand by the blood of the diggers who died by it-
Fling out the flag of the Southern Cross!Fling out the flag to the front, and be brave for it.
Liberty! Light! or a battle - field grave for it!
Bonny bright flag of the Southern Cross!

WE CRITICISE OUR CRITICS: Refugee Advocates Are Wrong

2010-01-20T18:23:00.000-08:00

Our critics say that we are not telling the truth about refugee privilege in Wagga Wagga.

Erwin Richter, a so-called resettlement "volunteer", claims that refugees do not get any more assistance than-let's say, homeless Australians.

Obviously the "Asylum Seekers Assistance Scheme" administered by the Red Cross, under contract to the Department, slipped his mind. The scheme assisted 1867 "clients" at a cost of $4.79 million dollars to the Australian taxpayer, in the period between 2007-08.

We can't forget-of course-the Settlement Grants Program; nor should we forget the 1.2 billion dollar asylum seeker Australian Goverment budget blowout which has contributed to maintaining them until they get here.

There is also a myriad of multiculti resourse centres, such as Bridge For Asylum Seekers Foundation, providing "living" assistance for individuals and families to survive.

Then, there is the Australian Refugee Association ( ARA ), which is one of a number of agencies that receive money to help support people financially. They help pay utility bills ( refugees are also eligiable to receive utility vouchers from other welfare agencies such as St Vincent De Paul and Salvation Army which are donated by the power companies and the community.

There are too many of these agencies to list. These multiculti centres exist in regional locations and suburbs across Australia.

Refugees are an exclusive group. In 2007-8, refugees from Africa received $113 million from the Foreign Aid budget, applied to them locally-here. That explains part of the "refugee wealth" which has been commented on by many disadvantaged Australians.

Refugees are immediately entitled to welfare services, although the general community is not entitled to access refugee-exclusive services and benefits. Refugees also receive benefits to access services for "trauma". Hard call, but we doubt many will ever recover from "trauma" and many will take out their rages upon each other and the general community.

We do not post this with vexation. We merely ask that when the likes of Richter, Wagga Greens Councillor Goodlass and all the rest of them, start grandstanding publicly and pretend to take moral high-ground by screaming RACIST about other Australians, they would show a bit of honesty regarding these facts.

How about a little concern for Australians living on the streets, those who do not have access to this level of support. What of our Aborigines? Aborigines topped a United Nations list of some 90 countries for the worst life expectancy. Once upon a time, the very same people (yes, the very same people! )who now go on about refugees, used to make public claims about Aboriginal social problems. It is one of the greatest curiosities how and why they now forget them. Is it a type of peculiar racism? African refugees culture-bust our European-Australian communities, a multiculti process of special importance to the multicultural industry- whereas Aboriginies are part of the Australian reality which Europeans must address.

Let's get things in perspective. Yelling "racist right wing fanatic" gets us nowhere.

Councillor Goodlass says that Australia First ignores "certain community members whose needs and concerns are not considered valuable! "Such hypocrisy! He ignores our own people.

Lastly, readers should note that Messrs. Richter and Goodlass have the same concern for the exploited contract labourers as they do homeless Australians-none. They will allow contract labour to exist because to oppose it means that they might appear as "racists".

These folks are not serving the Australian people. They serve their own delusions. Nothing will come out of African refugee settlement program other than social disaster for Australia. And still the program runs on.

PROTECT AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRY ( Peter Schuback )

2010-01-20T17:49:00.000-08:00

We publish a piece by Peter Schuback, a Queensland member of The Australian Long Distance Owners and Drivers Association and The Australia First Party.

I needed to buy a couple of new cars for the company and thinking I was doing the right thing, I decided to buy Australian made. Thinking back, I remembered that the only Australian made cars were Holden. They had a factory in Acacia Ridge in Queensland, another in Pagewood in Sydney and a couple more around Australia. So I brought a Holden Captiva, a Holden Rodeo Ute and a Holden Vivia. I imagined I was buying Australian and helping to create work for my fellow Aussie.

Blow me down, but not one of them is made in Australia! So Mr Rudd, if you spent 42 billion dollars of Australian taxpayers money on stimulating the ecomony, why was that money not used to create real long term employment-like in the vehicle industry? Why does Australia import cars, trucks, farm equipment, earth moving equipment? Why are our steel works shut down? Why was our ship building industries in Newcastle shut down? And don't tell me because it's cheaper to import these goods because that just isn't true. the South Koreans are now building the ships we were once building.

It is time for all Australians to stand up and demand we once again become a leader in the secondary industry, a leader in the manufacturing of every item that we need in our daily lives.

Have a nice Australia Day and ask yourself are Australians deficient that we cannot manufacture all of the goods and products that we now import? Or have we been sold out by the Australian State itself? And we really pay through the nose for these imports. And ask why a brand new Ford Mustang car in the USA is only $29,000 and in Australia you pay somewhere around $60,000 for it. Why can you buy trucks in the USA for around a third of the price you pay in Australia. Why is our cost of living going through the roof and why are our jobs being sent of shore to the detriment of the Australian people and Australian economy? The answer lies in greed and the power of the overseas owned companies. Buy Australian if you can find anything actually made here!

The ' Contrary ' Reaction In Wagga Wagga Will Assist Australia First.

2010-01-17T05:14:00.000-08:00

The Wagga Wagga Daily Advertiser ( Jan. 16 ) has published comments from Greens Councillor, Ray Goodlass, condemning the arrival of the party in the city and the articles published here on the Australia First ( Riverina ) blogsite. Mr. Goodlass was responding to "Far Right Fanatics Coming To Town" ( Jan. 14 ), a piece that set the tone for the hysteria which has greeted the party's effort in the Riverina.

We highlight the duplicity of Mr. Goodlass. It was stated "he was infuriated by comments of Dr Saleam and the blogger and would not wish to see any members of AFP included on council". Mr. Goodlass feels: "the needs and concerns of some community members would not be considered valuable". Clearly, he understands that the party wants to win seats on Wagga Council and that we are critical of the city's roll-over-and-die attitude towards the refugee invasion.

How ironic. Mr. Goodlass has made statements which demonstrate his own attempts to exclude some community members needs and concerns.

The Greens intervene for the minority and against the majority. They support the establishment of the African group with its privileges. They do little for the poor of this city.

Griffith Underbelly Runs With Mayor Nevilles Acceptance Of The Unacceptable

2010-01-17T03:13:00.000-08:00

Griffith Mayor, Mike Neville, responded to Australia First criticising his acceptance of the contract labour scandal in his city, with the juvenile comment in the Griffith Area News: "Australia First wouldn't have enough supporters to fill a phone booth". Really?

Well, that remains to be seen at the ballot box, not the phone box. We would also question that if Mayor Neville and others have nothing to be concerned about, then why whip up hysteria regarding Australia First? Is this an attempt to instil fear? Or are they only concerned for their own interests and really have little concern for the future of Australia?

The fact is Mayor Neville is sitting on the proverbial tinderbox. The Griffith Underbelly is getting out of hand.

Insiders in the "contract labour" game are complaining of "greedy farmers", "ruthless" contractors ( middle men ), "violent" standover men and widespread worker exploitation.

This is hardly the compassion and understanding for refugees and certain 457 visa migrants spoken of by the likes of Ray Goodlass and co.

The way the contract labour game is set up perpetuates a cycle of exploitation and unfair competition against Australian workers. The contract labour game is an organised criminal's dream ripe for exploitation.

We reject the idea about "greedy farmers" as a characterisation of our Riverina producers. Overall, they are being exploited by the "greedy" globalists, receiving little return in comparison to what the globalists receive on world markets. A few ( sadly ) have taken the short cut out and have opted for contract labour. In the old days, our unions would have "blacked" the farmer and anyone who carried the produce. Not any more. Our unions are toadies to KRudd type Labor politicians-and tow the line.

But we are in the open and condemn those few absolutely. We also note the globalists will relinquish any responsibility for the practices of contract labour and distance themselves from what is going on in Griffith.

Of course, it is far more convenient for some local profiteers to explain away public concern at contract labour as "racism"; this is just a smoke screen, which can also result in innocent Australians bearing the brunt of racist revenge attacks.

Thanks Mike Neville for welcoming the mayhem of contract labour to our region. We shall reap as we have sewn! Why not just give the farmers a fair price for their produce and pay Australians ( local youth and others ) a fair wage for their labour? The alternative, Mr Neville, is unacceptable.

Special Postscript:

It's ironic that the thought of some supposedly poor-persecuted-suffering-Third Worlders drowning at sea in their attempt to gain "asylum" in Australia, drives the liberally minded to a frenzy. So we can't get them to Christmas Island for process and then over to the Mainland and signed up with Centerlnk quick enough. But at the same time, the same traitors are desperate to hire in some of their fellows as slave labour. Curious.

Funny too how the big, bad, White Australia Policy of 1901-actually stamped out that sort of slavery in Australia. Alas, that was a century ago.

Let's try and assist the refugees and visa workers in resettling back in their own lands before our country becomes part of the Third World. Or was that the agenda all along?

We think that KRudd and the rest of the traitor class went back to the 1960's/early 1970's happy-hippy days of universal love and brotherhood for their policy-inspiration. Perhaps they have had a bad batch of LSD if they actually think Australians will continue to put up with dispossession in our own country.

SUDANESE REFUGEES; WAGGA WAGGA GETS A DOSE OF MULTICULTURE! THE ESTABLISHING OF A NEW PRIVILEGED GROUP IN OUR MIDST .

2010-01-16T02:56:00.000-08:00

We publish this article from a lady previously involved in community welfare.

There appears to be plenty of money in Wagga to accomodate the Sudanese, their needs and ever increasing ambitions. Between all their Government handouts, the multiculti centre and the church groups and the Sudanese have veritable slush funds to sustain this intrusive community. The Sudanese are driving around in new cars and building new houses in the newest housing estates in Wagga ( I believe that's money from the Foreign Aid budget ).

The Department Of Housing is also to willing to accommodate Sudanese before others on the waiting list. In some instances Sudanese families are allocated 2 houses in close proximity; public housing in Wagga is very limited regarding 4 bedroom houses, so they give the Sudanese 2 x 3 bedroom homes for their larger families. I note that the poor Australians live in the old fibro dumps the Department has on offer in Wagga in the little ghettos - but only after years when their turn to be housed actually comes up.

St Pauls Anglican church in Turvey Park, Wagga, runs its own Dinka service, with its own Sudanese minister, John Moi. Maybe this is where some of the slush fund comes from?

Sudanese youth are forming gangs. They dress in Negro American style clothes, intimidating people all over town. There are instances of people being violently attacked. The women are just as aggressive. It was reported to me recently that some local young girls waiting in the line in the post office in the market place shopping centre were pushed out the way as two Sudanese women walked straight in and up to the counter and forced there way into the front of the queue knocking the young European women out the way. I learned that a Sudanese woman attempting to get on the bus at the market place Wagga demanded to be carried for free saying to the driver: "no pay free".

In my support role, I have been to court with people in Wagga and noticed that Sudanese are always over represented on the court lists, usually for violent offences. They are always represented by the best lawyers in town, one being Mr Selwyn Houseman who is not a legal aid lawyer but in fact a private lawyer; and in Wagga some private lawyers will do legal aid work for them.

I have been concerned for homeless and poor people in Wagga. But I note that anything the Sudanese want is provided. One family needed a fridge and a church group got them one. Another family dipped into clothing collections inside a certain church. The Salvation Army are inundated with Sudanese taking more than their fair share of food and other handouts leaving not much of anything for the rest of the poor Australians around town.

Meanwhile back in European reality the ever increasing homeless people are being turned away from homeless shelters in Wagga. They are full and can't place these homeless folk anywhere. They are quite obviously increasing in numbers and you can see them all down at the river and sitting in the streets of Wagga with all their worldly belongings in a bag or shopping trolley, filthy, dirty and with a forlorn look in their eyes. Abandoned by their own society as the Sudanese speed by in their new cars!

How can all this be justified? It can't but those in power just don't care! The majority of Sudanese children who attend schools go to the expensive private schools like Christian College. These schools are expensive and out of reach of the wider community. An old lady commented on how over weight most of the Sudanese women are, I would say a lot are in fact obese, the old lady was inquisitive as to what famine camps these people had come from? caustic, but not unreasonable.

The Sudanese do not get on well with the Aboriginal people. There is much hostility between the groups. A female Aboriginal elder made a comment to me on the violence, particularly of Sudanese men towards women, stating: "they are in our country now I don't care that they say it is their culture that women are property. They must follow Australian law regardless." aboriginies are now bottom of the welfare list. Clashes with Aboriginal young people have been reported to me.

The Wagga Police loathe dealing with the Sudanese as the Sudanese are violent towards our Police. I don't envy them in their job. Yet, if they talk about it, the fear is that the Sydney Human Rights industry will jump on them for "racism". That's all Wagga Wagga today. It's a refugee dumping ground that politicians say is some great success story. Imagine what it will be like in twenty years.

The Sudanese belong in Sudan - with aid, assistance and security. That's all possible. That should be the real goal.

Editors Note: Recently, Ray Goodlass, Greens Party candidate, has countered letters in The Advertiser paper on the refugee question. He's all in support of immigration and refugees. I thought the greens were environmentalists? Hate to tell `em, but numbers in Australia are a problem, regardless of what ethnic background they may have. As immigrants consume at our level, they add to Australia's woes. Funny how the Greens went on about "carbon pollution", but want to add numbers to Australia.

Transport Industry Under Attack: Truckies - If We Don't Fight We Lose!

2010-01-12T21:45:00.000-08:00

We publish comments here from a truck owner/driver in the Riverina

The Australian transport industry in crisis with major companies the only ones being long-term sustainable. The owner driver and small family companies, could be wiped out due to the costs of fuel, maintenance, insurance,RTA and EPA compliance for the carting of livestock, hazardous goods etc. That's before the owner driver has even paid wages to drivers.

The major companies get huge concessions regarding these costs due to the sheer volume of business they do. Most major companies have their own mechanics at their own depots, their own discounted fuel also at their own depots and so on. Office staff handle the thousand and one paperwork issues and so on.

The RTA has over regulated the industry making it additionally difficult for the owner driver. With the introduction of new log books and a host of other new laws; the owner driver has had to-by law- pay for fatigue management courses and so on. Astronomical fines by the RTA for sometimes accidental minor infringements etc, punishes good people. The only option for some owner drivers seems to be sub contracting for these major companies - yet he still has to absorb his own higher fuel, maintenance costs etc.

It is hard for many not to consider selling his vehicle and driving for the major companies. The rate of pay at best for a semi driver is around 20 to 25 dollars an hour or around 300 dollars per trip from Wagga to Sydney and back. It's miserable and with all the headaches of being in business, it's easier to consider just being on wages. Some truckies say they'd prefer to be refugees and get more from the welfare system.

We are currently in a situation where the average age of truck drivers is between 55 to 60 years of age. Many experienced drivers are due to retire over the next 10 years, leaving us with mainly younger less experienced drivers or overseas imports to fill the gap, further jeopardising road safety and lives.

To add insult to injury, the recent spate of accidents on our roads will not be resolved by blaming the trucking industry. It is not the truck driver's fault the state of our Nation's roads is one of disrepair. Where does all that fuel tax money go?

Interestingly the New South Wales government is in favour of putting more b-doubles on the road to move more freight with less trucks, but now due to the recent spate of shocking tragedies on our roads, it wants trucks off the roads and freight onto rail. How ironic-as our rail infrastructure is as delapidated as our road system. Trains can't pull up at every point of delivery required. I've never seen a train pull into my local service station to unload, nor a train pull into the local supermarket to unload!

Australian truck drivers are unrecognised Australian heroes for the work they do and the crap they have to put up with and it's high time the government made the transport industry a priority. We would demand:

1. An end to all toll roads.

2. An end to the fines regime that serves the big companies and destroys small business.

3. Heavy Vehicle operators should become recognised as the professional tradespeople they are and as a regulated and licensed trade be paid accordingly to maintain the professional standard of the industry.

4. End the world-parity-pricing for fuel.

5. Develop an Australian fuel industry.

6. An end to over regulation.

To get these things we should support activist owner-driver groups like the Australian Long Distance Owners And Drivers Association and a party like Australia First.

Australias Third World Farmers

2010-01-12T20:20:00.000-08:00

Farmers On The Road To Destruction

Charles Armstrong the NSW Farmers Association President, has recently stated: "due to the Government restrictions regarding farmers lands, under the carbon trading scheme, the farmers will loose $600,000,000 in productivity, exports etc, ;of course the Government has not compensated farmers and farmers must absorb this loss". Mr Armstrong also said: "this will result in Third World standards for the Australian agriculture industry".

This is an abhorrent way to treat our food producers. Bearing in mind agriculture is the backbone of Australia and has contributed to much of Australian wealth and culture, one would expect a different attitude.

The great paradox these days is that any fleabag from the Third World who floats into Australian waters and cries "asylum" is treated with such compassion and understanding and given a free stake in Australia's wealth.

No wonder there is such a high rate of suicide amongst our farmers! We could say the main drought Australian farmers are experiencing is a drought of any concern for them by their own Governments. Surely, this is another one for KRudds ever growing shame file.

We wonder whether the Farmers Federation will finally grasp the fact that the Australian farmer is slated for destruction by the globalist parties? Will the Farmers Federation break with that other globalist cane-toad party -the Nationals?

SECURITY ALERT

2010-01-11T14:07:00.000-08:00

Four Tamils from the Oceanic Viking fiasco have been officially declared a "security' threat" to Australia. The Australian Government is "unsure" as what to do with them since other countries will be reluctant to take them.

Here's a simplistic solution - send 'em back from whence they came! So much for the band of bleeding hearts, who would have us believe these people are innocent, suffering, disenfranchised "victims". Let's be real: it's Australians who end up being the victims in this charade.

The sooner we disband the bleeding - hearts - brigade and deal with this issue more pragmatically, the safer we will be. KRudd continually "kowtowing" to these criminals is to the detriment of Australian safety.

The Tamils are simply unarmed combatants who have invaded Australian territory. It's time for a truly hard policy of physical repatriation.

The Face Of The New Age Refugee

2010-01-08T23:10:00.000-08:00

The Australian tax payer is already in the red this year with a 1.2 billion dollar blowout in the budget regarding asylum seekers and that's before they've even cashed their first welfare cheque !

The Australian Government is playing Russian roulette regarding the Indonesian solution for bogus asylum seekers . As we all know the Indonesians couldn't care less about the problem the Australian Government has created for Australia by its come one come all policies .

Indonesia will continue to accept Australian tax payers money being thrown at them untill the issue becomes a pain in the neck to them . Indonesia being a third world country with much corruption going on at all levels will continue to accept money from anyone including people smugglers , bogus asylum seekers , and the Australian Government , a sort of double handed pan handling and that is just the reality of of the third world situation .

After all the third world lawless scroungers don't want to go to Indonesia , there's no Centerlink or bleeding heart mentality there .

The Indonesians are known for their intolerance of foreigners and that's their prerogative ; our problems have only just started regarding the Indonesians , thanks to KRudds handling of the issue . The Oceanic Viking is a good example that the Indonesians will not continue to tolerate this problem and why should they ?Therefore the Indonesian solution is no solution and consequently a waste of Australian tax payers money and further straining relations with Indonesia .

KRudd needs to take some leadership on the issue and rip the welcome mat out from under these asylum (welfare ) seekers himself and lose the notion the Indonesians are obliged to mop up his mess .
Anyone that can afford a flight into South East Asia and /or a 30 ,000 dollar boat trip out to Australia is in no way a genuine asylum seeker as described under the United Nations High Commission On Refugees and must be classified - Refugees to be legitimate asylum seekers .

Therefore they must be classified - criminals , as the rest of us know criminals are housed in Gaols , not put on top of the list for the best housing or public housing in front of homeless and needy innocent citizens , nor put to the front of the queue for every other social service and certainly not given Government payouts . In fact , criminals are required to pay their victims compensation .

Something is terribly wrong with our present system of Government in Australia . With almost 70 % of these bogus asylum seekers remaining on long term welfare and turning our cities , suburbs and now country towns into violent third world ghettos and welfare colonies ,what is the point in working , with such a large amount of our taxes going to feed such a corrupt system ?

Might as well join the asylum seekers and third world immigrants and become welfare junkies too ! Our taxes should be redirected to our ailing infrastructure and preserving our National Australian Identity ! Let's put Australians First . Deport bogus asylum seekers now !

As we speak the Tamills are engaging in protests at the Christmas Island Resort again , apparently they are angered that they are not being let loose into the Australian community quick enough , asserting having to wait to be " processed " between 4 to 6 months is unacceptable to them . Obviously these criminals see Australian's waiting 15 years on the public housing list in Sydney to obtain housing as irrelevant to their agenda and could not care less for the plight of those needy Australians .

All this dissention on the back of an all out riot at the facility on Christmas Island less than a month ago, between Tamills and Afghans over whose turn it was to use the pool table . With injuries including broken bones ; as a result of fighting with tree branches , pool cues , and broomsticks , involving 150 men , of course no charges have been layed on anyone involved . Had that sort of violence erupted in the community involving Australians , we could expect the full force of the law to be visited upon us .

Of course these bogus asylum seekers have had a hard life , selling all that heroin to get the funds to get here , so let's just cut them some slack and call it compassion and understanding to be " politically correct " .

2010-01-08T23:03:00.000-08:00

Australia First Will Be Built In The Riverina !